An Important Mortality Analysis Comparing Singapore and England
An Important Mortality Analysis Comparing Singapore and England
And more disinformation from the authorities emanating from definition fraud.
Foreword
I was referred to the brilliant article below from my ‘alma mater’, HART. It compares cardiovascular deaths and clearly examines the possible excuses explanations given by the public health authorities for their inexorable rise in both countries over the course of 2021 and 2022.
However, the thing that most caught my attention was the conspicuous (and alas, inevitable) absence of COVID “vaccination” as a possible contributory factor, let alone cause. Furthermore, there was the ubiquitous trick on the part of Singapore to create the illusion of “vaccine” efficacy simply through misrepresentation of definitions.
Like many other countries, they compare outcomes of “fully vaccinated” (whatever that may mean since they didn’t actually define it, but normally, it is 14 to 21 days after dose 2, 3, 4, etc… so it can even be dynamic) to “unvaccinated”, which by implication is anyone not in the “fully vaccinated” group.
Even if the “unvaccinated” are strictly those who have never been “vaccinated”, obviously the results will still be illegitimately skewed towards vaccine effectiveness since so many of the COVID and non-COVID “events” in the “ever vaccinated” are simply ignored.
As one of my brilliant scientific colleagues noted in private:
This casts on the shrinking group of the un-jabbed a steady/growing number of negative health events, which do not belong to them.
So, I have decided to adopt a clear and consistent definition of my own, which I stress is important if you truly want to know the truth about the COVID mRNA injections.
We should only concern ourselves with “never injected” and “ever injected”. These terms avoid the pejorative association with the term “jabbed” but, more importantly, they also avoid the false impression given by using the term “vaccine”, which is something they certainly are not.
For those who still want to believe the Safe and Effective™ narrative, by all means, add a third group for “fully injected” if you so wish but never ignore the “ever injected” if you are going to make any representation of safety.
I may have discussed my Singapore related investigations here before so if you've read something similar, apologies in advance.
After discovering an article on The Federalist that later became tricky to share on social media, I found that Singapore was registering covid deaths ONLY if they came with an attendant diagnosis of pneumonia, unlike in the UK where at that time, ANY death for ANY reason within 28 days of a positive test was registered as a covid death. Singapore's approach makes sense because the R in SARS stands for Respiratory & not for Run-Over-By-Bus.
https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/04/cdc-data-suggest-lockdowns-could-kill-as-many-people-as-covid/
"Singapore, for example, only counts deaths as COVID deaths if they are accompanied by pneumonia."
At this time, prior to it's vaccine rollout mid-2021, Singapore was reporting just over 60 000 covid cases but only 30 dead, producing a CFR (Case Fatality Rate) or as I called it at the time, Deaths-to-Cases rate, of 0.05%. The UK however was reporting 3.8 million cases+ & almost 127 000 deaths, which produces a CFR or Deaths-to-Cases rate of 2.9%. All stats came from Worldometer.
2.9% is almost SIXTY times higher than 0.05%. So I'd wager that the UK's deliberately flawed methodology was raising the initial pandemic fatality figures to around sixty times higher than they should have been. I'd also wager that Midazolam Matts "pandemic measures" were further driving excess deaths that were to be pinned on covid rather than the accelerated end-of-life pathways that were truly to blame.
What is especially interesting is how quickly Singapore's CFR or Deaths-to-Cases rate changed once their rollout picked up around May/June of 2021. Using Worldometer, I checked regularly, & posted & kept many screenshots. I was able to watch, almost live & in real time, as the data & statistics from Singapore changed. Referring to one of these screenshots that I made in Nov 2021, I can see that within about six months of Singapore's rollout, they were now reporting almost 249 000 cases (up from 60 000 in March 2021) & 641 deaths, raising their initial, pre-rollout CFR or Deaths-to-Cases rate from 0.05% in March 2021 to 0.257% in November 2021, an almost six-fold increase. In the six months following their rollout, Singapore's deaths from covid has risen almost six-fold compared to before any vaccines appeared there.
I had already been concerned at the speed of the rollout & the rush to get completely novel vaccines made using completely novel techniques into the arms of almost every single person on earth despite a complete lack of safety & efficacy data that was not being presented by those pushing the hard sell. In other words, only those who had made these vaccines & only those who were pushing the vaccines were in a position to present data as to their efficacy & safety & I prefer to get a slightly more independent analysis before rolling up my sleeves to be experimented upon. Tiffany Pontes Dover had already dropped on live TV in late 2020, & once I realised she was never going to be seen again, my concerns that the vaccines were dangerously unsafe put me off them, permanently. The data out of Singapore simply confirmed my suspicions. 1) They don't work & 2) they ARE dangerous.
Even though they aren't vaccines, the one reason I like everyone still calling them vaccines is that it taints all other vaccines with the stain of the mRNA vaccines. Other "real" vaccines aren't "safe and effective" either.
Plus, it's the reverse of what these criminals tried to do. They tried to legitimize these mRNA injections by calling them vaccines. It's one part of the reason so many were seduced into taking them. Now let the mRNA injections delegitimize all other vaccines.