COVID-19 vaccines employed in England during 2021 and 2022 led to unintended selective all-cause mortality harm
COVID-19 vaccines employed in England during 2021 and 2022 led to unintended selective all-cause mortality harm
Effect of Age, Sex, and COVID-19 Vaccination History on All-Cause Mortality: Unexpected Outcomes in a Complex Biological and Social System by Rodney P Jones and Andrey Ponomarenko.
A new preprint from a few days ago by more independent analysts draws the same conclusions as every other honest data analyst - the COVID mRNA injections are net detrimental in terms of all-cause mortality. In other words, they kill people.
Effect of Age, Sex, and COVID-19 Vaccination History on All-Cause Mortality: Unexpected Outcomes in a Complex Biological and Social System
Rodney P Jones Healthcare Analysis & Forecasting, Wantage, UK OX12 0NE and Andrey Ponomarenko, Department of Biophysics, Informatics and Medical Instrumentation, Odessa National Medical University, Valikhovsky Lane 2, 65082 Odessa, Ukraine
Some highlights (my emphasis):
[For flu vaccines] using a data set of nearly 100 countries over a 4-decade period no long-term net effect against all-cause winter mortality could be demonstrated. […] The degree of benefit/disbenefit varied each winter (as does the composition of the vaccine) and between countries. Obesity may be associated with net disbenefit.
Our overall conclusion is that the COVID-19 vaccines employed in England during 2021 and 2022 led to unintended selective all-cause mortality harm under specific combinations of age, sex, vaccine history, COVID-19 variant, and time (season, outbreak or non-outbreak months). The question is which of the three vaccines employed during 2021 and the two employed in 2022 led to the most all-cause mortality harm.
Our main conclusion is that COVID-19 vaccines seem to perform better for the elderly. Their sluggish immune and miRNA regulatory processes allow them to enjoy the benefits of the vaccines but to avoid the nonspecific disbenefits. Alas the young suffer increasing nonspecific disbenefits which worsen as the COVID-19 variants progressively mutate.
It is our observation that researchers questioning aspects of COVID-19 vaccination are not ‘anti-vaxxers’ but are seeking genuine answers to seeming ‘anomalies’ in the data.
It would also appear that the process for reporting/detecting adverse events following vaccination is not achieving its intended purpose since subtle changes in all-cause mortality are going undetected in both influenza and COVID-19 vaccination.
We also recommend that long term surveillance and re-analysis of all-cause disease outcomes following COVID–19 vaccination is actively pursued. Vaccination of the young must be reconsidered based on the comprehensive evaluation of the all-cause mortality vaccination outcomes.
It is strongly recommended that international studies are conducted to determine the exact contribution of the different types of COVID-19 vaccines against all-cause mortality. The expressed opinions that mRNA vaccines may have long-term adverse effects cannot be ignored.
Just in case The Science™ continues to play whack-a-mole and “retract” this paper on behalf of the authors because it does not support the dogmatic narrative, here it is for download.
The vax mortality was completely intentional
I've got a mate who is dying from a vax injury (but has not the slightest clue that the jabs put him in this position) -- who is warning me about reading Substacks... because 'you can't trust independent writers'..... the only trustworthy media is the liberal media.
You really cannot make this up. Twilight zone stuff