Denmark Pandemic of the Vaccinated
Amazing work by Kristoffer Torbjørn Bæk reveals the vaccinated in Denmark account for more cases, hospitalisations and deaths than the unvaccinated and have done all year.
Now that vaccination statuses are stable enough that the tomfoolery of misclassification no longer meddles with the analysis, we can see a clear picture of the ineffectiveness of the COVID vaccine.
Hat tip to Kristoffer Torbjørn Bæk (Twitter) for some incredible work collating and displaying the Danish data and reader Jens Happel for alerting me.
In the last reported week (14, 2022), triple-vaccinated (green below) are more infected on a pro-rata basis than double-vaccinated (blue), who in turn are more infected than unvaccinated (orange), across all age groups.
In fact, it has been this way for the whole of 2022 for the over 20s.
It turns out the data is distorted by the testing rates. Who knew?! When that is taken into account, the positivity rates per vaccination status are pretty much identical across all ages over 20.
It appears like the vaccine is having a positive benefit on hospitalisation in terms of pro-rata data. However, it isn’t clear whether COVID is the reason for the hospitalisation or incidental. Nevertheless, it is evidently the vaccinated that are clogging up the hospitals looking at the absolute numbers. I wonder if Jeremy Vine has an opinion on this?
It’s the same picture for deaths as it was for hospitalisations. The burning question, of course - would it have been worse if it weren’t for the vaccine??
I don’t think so. COVID deaths (orange below) have gotten progressively worse each season since the vaccine was rolled out and yet still have little additional impact over a regular flu. Worse still, it is apparent that all-cause mortality (light blue) is substantially higher (and in excess) since mass vaccination with much of that death not being attributed to COVID itself.
It’s almost like a pattern we’ve seen literally everywhere else in the world… The vaccine has no impact whatsoever on transmission, severe disease or death but all-cause mortality is substantially worse in the post-vax era.
Yet "public health" officials see no red flags.. criminal insanity of the highest order.
That was a really fast response! Thanks a lot!
I want to point out a few things. In the past there was a big discussion if such data is biased, since vaccinated had also more "freedom" than unvaccinated. And could so easier get an infection. That argument never made much sense to me, because was that not the intention of the vaccination? Nvertheless it is no longer an Argument. All restrictions (NPI) had been lifted a while ago. So that can not explain the big difference.
Also the mass testing of the unvaccianted has stopped. That for sure gave a bias to a better vaccine efficacy. But it is gone and the increase we see, might also be due to that.
Another problem in the past was that the group size was changing quite dynamic. Some months ago the number of boostered grew at a high rate and the group size of the double vaxed shrinked. That made it very hard to calculate the figures and gave room for errors. Especially because boostered people that got infected in the first seven days after the booster had been counted as infected double vaxxed. If these group sizes changes quickly this gives a positive bias for the booster.
All this is now over. The different group sizes of unvax, double vax and boostered are more or less constant.
The only explanation left that makes sense to me is, that the whole vaccination program is one big fail.
Trying to achieve herd immunity with these vaccines is like trying to put out fires with petrol.