Hospital admissions double – and it’s got to be down to the vaccines
By Guy Hatchard - March 24, 2023, The Conservative Woman
DATA from the New Zealand Ministry of Health has revealed a massive 103 per cent increase in hospitalisations among 12 disease categories measured in 2021 following the mRNA rollout. This calls into serious question the safety of medical interventions such as mRNA vaccines which penetrate the cell wall and re-program activity in the cell cytoplasm.
With relatively little COVID in 2020, it’s a bit difficult to pin this on “long COVID”…
Last week in the UK, MP Andrew Bridgen again attempted to capture the attention of the House of Commons about severe injury and death following Covid vaccination, but almost all MPs walked out before he had even started his speech. Undeterred, he gave a brilliant, succinct summary of the dangers and huge costs of Covid vaccination as revealed by the UK Government’s own statistics. In essence he explained how Covid vaccines make roughly a thousand people ill enough to send them to hospital in order to prevent one hospitalisation from Covid. In passing he revealed that the members of the committee approving vaccines in the UK own a billion pounds’ worth of vaccine company shares between them.
Neah. It's not the injections, it's due to opening up and people getting infected. Especially those pesky anti vaxxers... This is what drove the numbers up in 2021...
Look, regardless of how much data and arguments you bring to the table, some people have made up their minds and won't see the truth unless people start to literally drop down like flies. Maybe not even then. At this stage no one in the "I forgot that lockdowns were supposed to work and injections were supposed to prevent transmission and getting infected" camp is looking at any data or arguments that contradict their view. They made up their mind. They are educated. The smart ones. They have good jobs and the system has worked their entire life in their favour. Unless they witness the effects of the injections directly on themselves, relatives or close friends, they won't give a second thought to any "conspiratiorial" view. I gave up trying to persuade others with data. They don't even look. If they are so stupid to fall for the next scam regardless of what it would be: new plandemic, CBDCs, cyberatracks, china war, alien invasion etc I know I tried my best. Fuck them and their utter stupidity. I didn't even hear a thank you from those few I persuaded not to continue on the clot shot rollercoaster. Even from.those that admit something wasn't and isn't right I only hear, it's not quite as bad as I am predicting it to be. Some people never learn.
Too few people are aware that those with “rational drug design” knowledge can predict qualitatively the biological profile of many chemicals and biological molecules, just by inspecting the choices made about what’s in them.
I’m in that category. Leading R&D in allergy and respiratory diseases for decades (Pfizer U.K.) and later the same in dermatology (Ziarco Pharma Ltd), my training & practise involved so called rational drug design. I also have a formal training in toxicology, at a time when it wasn’t really regarded as a discipline. I was fortunate to have as lecturers two professors who played important roles in formalising understanding of “mechanisms of toxicity” for drugs and chemicals. For most, we simply don’t know. We can characterise unwanted activities but not explain them. For other compounds, we have as good an understanding of toxicity as we usually do about how a drug works to bring about benefits (if any).
When I looked at these so called vaccines, I saw several unquestionably toxic motifs. Here are some of them. Do note we cannot predict the magnitude of adverse events because no one has previously calibrated dose (or concentration) vs adverse effects. Time (duration of exposure) is another variable. There will be other variables we’re not smart enough to discern. So what we can say with confidence is that “we can see rational expectation of harms A, B, C & D, because...”. Whether that will not occur or occur in almost everyone awaits clinical dosing.
A. The mRNA technology is inherently very dangerous and this cannot be circumvented. It prompts your body to synthesise whatever protein is encoded in the mRNA sequence. When that happens, your body having made NON-SELF proteins, your immune system will recognise it’s foreign and so it’s level best to destroy the affected cells. Depending on where the injected material goes and how well it’s taken up and translated into protein and for how long, we’ll see autoimmune mediated injury, which could include deaths.
B. They’ve chosen to have the product encode virus spike protein. This protein is known to be directly toxic, for example, it indirectly causes blood coagulation. This is in addition to autoimmune issues as in A above.
C. They’ve wrapped the mRNA in a complex lipid mixture. Some of those lipids are known to be toxic. Additionally, the lipid nanoparticles are known to accumulate in various tissues, including ovaries. The manufacturers knew fhis. The regulators knew this. It is in the peer reviewed scientific literature from at least a decade ago.
D. Spike is very strange and contains sequences which are just similar enough to some of our own gene sequences to make me concerned for autoimmune reactions interfering with processes which depend on things just similar to spike. One of these is syncytin, an essential protein of pregnancy. Immune responses to syncytin after vaccination have been reported.
The “vaccines” could never have worked as advertised. They’re injected & mostly result in blood antibody responses. But blood antibodies are too large to exit the blood vessels and get into the air side of the lungs.
I conclude that these injections have been designed with the deliberate intention of causing injury, maiming some & killing others.
Best wishes
Dr Mike Yeadon