Dead Man Talking

Share this post
ONS manipulating the numbers AGAIN??
metatron.substack.com

ONS manipulating the numbers AGAIN??

Is there no end to this data fraud?

Joel Smalley
May 7, 2022
137
46
Share this post
ONS manipulating the numbers AGAIN??
metatron.substack.com

The ONS recently published this report - Risk of death following SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination in young people in England: a self-controlled case series study.

They concluded:

Compared to the baseline period, there was no evidence of a change in the incidence of cardiac death in the six weeks after vaccination, whether for each of weeks 1 to 6 or the whole six-week period.

There was a decrease in the risk of all-cause death in the first week after vaccination and no change in each of weeks 2 to 6 after vaccination or whole six-week period after vaccination.

There is no evidence of an association between COVID-19 vaccination and an increased risk of death in young people.

They reached this conclusion by comparing the death rates 1 to 6 weeks after vaccination to rates 7-12 weeks after vaccination. Here is a picture of those deaths:

Is there the same death before and after the dotted lines? Or do my eyes deceive me?

Alberta, anyone?

Dead Man Talking
Alberta just inadvertently confessed to fiddling the COVID vaccination stats.
Those who have done the slightest bit of research (really not a dirty word), will know that there is no claim of protection after the first dose of the COVID vaccine. So imagine how you can conflate the vaccine effectiveness stats if you dump all the COVID events (cases, hospitalizations and deaths) that occur subsequent to infection within 14 days of th…
Read more
a year ago · 364 likes · 226 comments · Joel Smalley

Of the 585 deaths which occurred within 12 weeks of receiving a COVID-19 vaccination, 105 were due to a cardiac event.

That’s 18%. Are almost 1 in 5 of all deaths of 12 to 29 year olds really due to cardiac events? If I had the data, I could check but what I keep hearing is that young people don’t often die from cardiac events. *See pinned comment for some further, very rough sanity checks on this number.

I’m sorry but this does not pass the initial smell test for me and deserves more thorough investigation. Fortunately, I know of a university professor who specialises in designing analytical models for complex systems who is doing just that.


One other useful nugget came out of this paper:

The NIMS data includes most COVID-19 vaccinations administered in England since 8 December 2020. However, in some rare cases, the vaccination records of people who died shortly after vaccination may not be recorded in NIMS. This would happen if the death was recorded on the Personal Demographics Service (PDS) before the vaccination records were sent to NIMS. Therefore, we supplemented the vaccination records from NIMS using a special extract of 2,044 people who died after vaccination but whose records for the last vaccination received were not sent to NIMS, 2 of whom were aged 12-29 and had a linked death record.

Over 2,000 people dying so soon after injection that their death record was made before their vaccination record is “rare”??! Come on! This isn’t an inoculation, it’s euthanasia!

I wrote in great detail about my suspicion that thousands of vaccinated deaths were not recorded properly.

Dead Man Talking
Cooking the books, ONS style (Part II)
In Part I, I showed some obvious discrepancies in the vaccination-status populations used by the ONS in their analysis of COVID “vaccine effectiveness”. In Part II, I continue my forensic analysis and reveal that these discrepancies are also apparent in the death numbers…
Read more
a year ago · 11 likes · 9 comments · Joel Smalley

A hypothesis that I put forward several times was the possibility that some people died so soon after vaccination that their vaccination record wasn’t updated before their death record. And now we have confirmation of that. Another conspiracy theory becomes fact.

So, that’s 2,000 of the missing 6,000 found. I’m sure we’ll find the others in due course.

46
Share this post
ONS manipulating the numbers AGAIN??
metatron.substack.com
46 Comments
Dr Andrew Bamji
May 7, 2022Pinned

I am not convinced. There was an article in the "New Statesman" in November 2018 headlined "Every week 12 young people die from sudden cardiac death. Is it time to start screening runners?". This, of course, is pre-Covid. See https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2018/11/every-week-12-young-people-die-sudden-cardiac-death-it-time-start-screening

Multiply 18 and 12. My calculator says 216. Which is more than twice 105. So the baseline death rate from cardiac events in young people is, perhaps, higher than one might have thought. It's certainly a common enough event to have featured as a case story in the Royal College of Physicians (UK) Membership exam

Expand full comment
ReplyCollapse
16 replies by Joel Smalley and others
John Dee
Writes John Dee's Almanac
May 7, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Yum yum - no surprises there! By coincidence an hour ago I published some work that is strongly suggestive of the ONS missing a fat wedge of all cause deaths for the younger age bracket. Here's the link to part 1 of what will be a 4 part series. At some point I'll flip to modelling mode and start to estimate how many young bodies they are hiding in the closet.

https://jdee.substack.com/p/age-and-gender-factored-mortality

Expand full comment
ReplyGift a subscriptionCollapse
44 more comments…
TopNewCommunity

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Metatron
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing