In the UK you require an "Age verification" (digital ID precursor) to view this Substack, unless you have a VPN. And therein lies the point. A point so basic that Nick missed it. Sovereignty of the individual or the right to self ownership/self governance. Another term for this is Voluntarism. Everything Nick listed that are big negatives or tyrannical & totalitarian in some way are literally all the same thing: forms of governance.
All forms of governance are illegitimate, immoral, involuntary, totalitarian & authoritarian. It is very simple, you own yourself or you do not.
Taxation is theft/extortion. All "laws" are diktats created by a ruling class to control behaviour under threat of violence and to generate revenue. Every "Nation State" is a geographical, political jurisdiction as created by a ruling class.
I see next to nobody other than James Corbett, Larken Rose speak about Voluntary association, the non aggression principle (the golden rule). A good 70+% of the complaints/problems Nick listed end as soon as enough people reject the concept of "rule" aka governance aka subservience aka slavery.
Tyranny of any scale is only possible via the compliance of collaborators and useful idiots.
I'm in the UK. I've never been asked for my age to view this Substack - not that I'm aware of. Do you get asked every time you get a notification of a new article? I certainly don't have a VPN. I'm viewing on a PC - does that make a difference?
Ann, I have had the same "Age-restricted content" block for this article on a PC and on a degoogled phone using a privacy focused browser. I can't see it without a VPN.
i’m in Canada and am beginning to be blocked from viewing SOME links on instagram and/or facebook (i don’t have accounts with either) but have not yet encountered this phenomenon on substack.
I agree, but good luck persuading 98% of humanity to even entertain the idea let alone implement it. I wish my glass was half full but it's actually nearly empty....
the biggest war is playing out right now. It is thousands of years old. It is the war between commerce and the people living on the land. It is brutal. Ruthless. Commerce seeks synthetic solutions, people submit to God and Nature only.
"God" (especially the abrahamic version) is a human projection for those who require a psychological/existential comfy blanky. A comforting lie. Submission, a form of slavery, to anything is not good.
Thank you Joel and Nick. The situation is indeed dire but I am not sure there is "an opaque common control structure." I am sure that there are plenty of malevolent forces. I'm not sure they are - or need to be - particularly well organised,
What a coincidence! Earlier today, before reading this post, I got involved in a comment thread on a climate change blog. It turned out a bit disjoined/cross-purposes after I replied to:
“ … The prosperity-decadence-collapse cycle happens because the prosperous don’t speak up when decadence takes hold …”
“Luxury beliefs, complacency, apathy, … you may be right, but I’m not convinced. It seems to me the deep state could be behind it all, for some unfathomable geopolitical purpose. Once they have the media, the politicians and the institutions in their pockets, as they have now ex-USA, they can lie with impunity and most of the general public has no idea what is really going on.
Remember the original Club of Rome dictum that “The main enemy then is humanity itself”. We saw on Covid that the main objective seemed to be to get the entire populace digitally shackled via covid passports, with some depopulation and sterilisation thrown in for good measure. They are now trying the same control freakery again with Digital Ids on absurd pretexts.”
Did my fumbling comment stumble into Nick Hudson’s mainstream dogma postulation?!
I think you missed the point of the story, hmm... TDS I presume. Cognitive dissonance perhaps, or just plain hatred for the orange man. Or maybe you watch the VIEW?
First of all, Henry, physically is only one portion of our being. Mathematics is a pure science, and it proves itself to be a simple fact. 2+2=4, you can have philosophies and argue the fact.
However, it remains a fact. Your mind can be "trained" to believe it is wrong, and you can go through life believing that you're correct and the world is wrong.
Much of what we see and hear is our perspective, e.g., I'm color blind, if you tell me it's brown, okay, it's brown to me, why, because I choose to believe you, understand in the middle is a lie, and one lie changed the world. My belief in you could be seen as my having faith in what you said. We all have faith, although it's often misdirected.
Schools are the number one mind benders, and have been for over a century. To keep this short, you can look up JD Rockefeller and Frederick Gates. The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America's youth.
To simplify this reply, Jesus/Yeshua fulfilled 351 biblical prophecies; you can do the math, or use statistical probabilities. But just ‘8’ is on the edge of impossibility. If you need more facts, I haven’t even started. God bless, thanks, looking forward to a rebuttal or reply.
Physical proof or empirical logic or common sense or natural philosophy are all names for pattern recognition, which is the basis of sentience. Humans are both blessed and cursed with the ability of language; blessed because language allows the common knowledge to be shared, leading to the knowledge growing by sharing and discussing evidence. Mathematics is the easiest language to demonstrate and understand and physically prove.
You can add 2+2 or count to 2 two times etc.
The main reason to educate your young is for mutual social support and survival in a harsh environment. Narratives both organize knowledge and help provide a framework for learning similar to the mathematical lattice (Ramachandra). When we use archetypes like Santa Claus or the Boogie man to enforce standards of behaviour we may save effort by confusing those we try to educate. Over generations, these shortcuts become part of the language but not of the pattern we need to recognize.
Faith in the unknown and unknowable is a personal benefit but is violence when forced upon another human. Rationality seeks to establish a common standard of reality as opposed to truth which requires divine guidance. All religions are equally true which is why no wise person argues for his preference except on moral grounds.
It's not yet, but it soon will be, at such a time as you think not, the son of man cometh. We have a trifecta going on. The Biblical prophecies, current events aligning, and the celestial events all coming together, and God's timeline is at the END.
''Their ultimate removal can only be averted by a massive awakening to the realities of the trap being set.''
Thing is this one post below confirms the mainstream and alternative are NOT as different as they purport to be. This real evidence could do more to wake people up to all that was done in the name of 'COVID' than anything else yet it is clearly being suppressed.
"With respect to trans rights, trans people have degenerate cognition, not legitimate knowledge of what it is like to be the other gender." Bull shit.
The act & process of human reproduction, is binary, but then after we're born our genotypes / phenotypes, are not always binary because we all lie on a non-binary spectrum of possibilities, sometimes called Disorders / Differences of Sex Development (DSDs) a non-binary phenomena, i.e. not all resultant babies can always be neatly and irreversibly assigned into a “male / man” or a “female / woman”. Meanwhile, it's uncontroversial among doctors, biologists, and geneticists, that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to find a line in nature that cleanly divides people into males and females. For example, after typing into an internet search engine the question: “What does "biological sex" in humans mean?” practically all the links to internet articles listed, are ones overwhelmingly telling us that the agreed understanding between scientists, is that the genotype / phenotype of a particular individual's “sex” falls on a non-binary spectrum as robustly confirmed by our National Health Service too.
Signed by 2617 scientists on 2018/10/26: “As scientists, we are compelled to write to you, our elected representatives, about the current [US] administration’s proposal to legally define gender as a binary condition determined at birth, based on genitalia, and with plans to clarify disputes using “genetic testing”. This proposal is fundamentally inconsistent not only with science, but also with ethical practices, human rights, and basic dignity. The proposal is in no way “grounded in science” as the administration claims. The relationship between sex chromosomes, genitalia, and gender identity is complex, and not fully understood. There are no genetic tests that can unambiguously determine gender, or even sex. Furthermore, even if such tests existed, it would be unconscionable to use the pretext of science to enact policies that overrule the lived experience of people’s own gender identities.”
Claire Ainsworth writing in the science journal Nature in 2015: “Doctors have long known that some people straddle this boundary – their sex chromosomes say one thing, but their gonads (ovaries or testes) or sexual anatomy say another … What’s more, new technologies in DNA sequencing and cell biology are revealing that almost everyone is, to varying degrees, a patchwork of genetically distinct cells, some with a sex that might not match that of the rest of their body.”
Steven Novella 2022: “Biological sex is not binary. The notion that sex is not strictly binary is not even scientifically controversial. Among experts it is a given, an unavoidable conclusion derived from actually understanding the biology of sex. Its more accurate to describe biological sex in humans as bimodal, but not strictly binary.”
Translucent Team 2025 citing a Nature Editorial 2018: “[In the USA] as many as one in 100 people [in England & Wales circa 262,000 = 0.43% of UK population] have differences or disorders of sex development, such as hormonal conditions, genetic changes or anatomical ambiguities, some of which mean that their genitalia cannot clearly be classified as male or female. The idea that science can make definitive conclusions about a person’s sex or gender is fundamentally flawed.”
Further, many other cultures, both historic and contemporary have acknowledged and celebrated the biological, scientific, and psychological reality that sex and gender in humans falls on a non-binary spectrum without imploding. And a third gender has been legalised in 14 countries: Argentina, Australia, Malta, New Zealand, Germany, India, Pakistan, Nepal, Chile, Bangladesh, South Africa, Ireland, Spain, and Thailand.
And of course, India, Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh, all have a long history of recognising a third gender called Hijras. And Native American two-spirt are usually considered a good omen, and children are encouraged to chose their own gender roles.
And in Indonesia Warias are men who live their lives as women, who are believed to have feminine souls even though they have male sex organs, and the Bugis people recognize five genders. And in Oaxaca Mexico Muxes are celebrated. And in Oman the Xaniths use makeup, oil their hair, and engage in other activities traditionally categorized as feminine. And in Samoa a third gender called Fa’afafine are respected and recognized. And Madagascans recognize the existence of a third gender called Sekrata born as boys but raised as girls and grow up to become women. And in the Dominican Republic Guevedoce who don't have a visible penis at birth are recognized by some tribes as a third gender. And Old Judaism recognized six genders.
Claas Flint et al publishing in Nature, Neuropsychopharmacology 2020: “Biological sex classification with structural MRI data shows increased misclassification in transgender women. […] Conclusions. In this study, we present a highly accurate biological sex classifier in cis gender individuals that shows a significantly decreased accuracy in transgender individuals after cross-sex hormone treatment. Our results underline that the brain structure of transgender individuals is similar to both the brain structure of their perceived gender and biological sex. This implies that brain structure of transgender women differs from both cis gender men and women. Based on our brain-structural data, we suggest a dimensional rather than binary gender construct which will contribute to the destigmatization of transgender individuals.”
Marianne J. Legato, MD, PhD (hon.c.), FACP publishing in Sage Journals 2018: “Untangling the Gordian Knot of Human Sexuality: What Is the Biologic Basis of Variations in Sexual Phenotype? Abstract. There is increasing interest in and tolerance of the lay public for variations in human sexuality. In contrast, the molecular biology that underlies gender identity, the development of gonadal and genital anatomy, and the factors that define sexual behavior is proving unexpectedly complex and is still incompletely understood. It is now evident that humans cannot be characterized as member of 1 of 2 clearly defined units: male or female. In fact, individuals exist on a continuum: those who do not conform unequivocally to the dyadic view of human sex in terms of anatomy, gender identity, and/or sexual behavior should be characterized as having variations in rather than disorders of sexual development. Such individuals can no longer be regarded as anomalies to be rejected, condemned, and, if possible, “corrected” either psychologically or anatomically.”
Agustín Fuentes, Busting Myths About Sex and Gender 2022: According to published research by biologists and psychologists when we take all humans into account, "gender identity" is embedded in a 'non binary' spectrum of "biological sex".
Monica Vilhauer Ph.D. 2024: “Key points. Defining biological sex by sex organs or chromosomes is unscientific due to numerous exceptions. Biological sex is traditionally defined by gametes (sperm and egg), essential for direct reproduction. This definition is incomplete, as intersex conditions can be adaptive through kin selection. A complete definition of biological sex should include male, female, and intersex.”
What is rather interesting, after listening to a multitude of 9/11 related interviews done by Jerm Warfare, a close friend of Hudson, he now knows the truth of what happened on 9/11...
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
I was uncommitted on 9/11 for over 20 years. I've always been a sceptic and didn't trust either side, so I put it aside. But in my later years, I had more time, and began to research the subject, hundreds of hours later, and I'm now 99% convinced that it was an inside job. What it came down to was "follow the money." I wish I had started there, but it was a circuitous route that eventually got me there... But it was an education along the way. Now I know where to begin: always start by following the money, or by identifying who benefits from the crime or disaster.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialize in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
It doesn't take 98% because 80% are oblivious, too busy trying to make a living, watching their sports, movies, and playing their video games, and God forbid watching the mainstream news. Of the remaining 20%, 5% are on the extremes of left and right, too far gone into their own realities to be much good in the scheme of things. That leaves just 10%; these are the people who can make a difference. The elites make up a small percentage of that 10%.
In other words, you only have to persuade a tiny fraction of people to make an impact. A few examples might help to improve my point: Charlie Kirk comes to mind, a college dropout who escaped the insidious college indoctrination. His martyrdom will live on, as his work has been making astounding progress in turning our youth down the right path. His life was surely a TURNING POINT in America and now around the Globe!
On the other end of the spectrum, we have Madalyn Murray O'Hair, who founded the American Atheists and waged an open war on God and mankind. Her actions destroyed the fabric of our society in America and further negatively impacted the entire world. She was a prime example of the personification of evil in the world, and the precursor of the anti-Christ that is in the world today.
An excellent post that needs to be Restacked! Don't just be a reader, be a doer. This is not a time to read, sit back, and do nothing. Really, how much time does it take to restack a post?
At this point, 81 likes and only 18 Restacks, wake up people, it's much later than you think. If you liked it, SHARE the bleeping posts. Stop living on "some day I'll." God never promised tomorrow.
In the UK you require an "Age verification" (digital ID precursor) to view this Substack, unless you have a VPN. And therein lies the point. A point so basic that Nick missed it. Sovereignty of the individual or the right to self ownership/self governance. Another term for this is Voluntarism. Everything Nick listed that are big negatives or tyrannical & totalitarian in some way are literally all the same thing: forms of governance.
All forms of governance are illegitimate, immoral, involuntary, totalitarian & authoritarian. It is very simple, you own yourself or you do not.
Taxation is theft/extortion. All "laws" are diktats created by a ruling class to control behaviour under threat of violence and to generate revenue. Every "Nation State" is a geographical, political jurisdiction as created by a ruling class.
I see next to nobody other than James Corbett, Larken Rose speak about Voluntary association, the non aggression principle (the golden rule). A good 70+% of the complaints/problems Nick listed end as soon as enough people reject the concept of "rule" aka governance aka subservience aka slavery.
Tyranny of any scale is only possible via the compliance of collaborators and useful idiots.
Exactly. ‘I have seen the enemy, and he is us’.
I'm in the UK. I've never been asked for my age to view this Substack - not that I'm aware of. Do you get asked every time you get a notification of a new article? I certainly don't have a VPN. I'm viewing on a PC - does that make a difference?
Ann, I have had the same "Age-restricted content" block for this article on a PC and on a degoogled phone using a privacy focused browser. I can't see it without a VPN.
My experience is the same as Ann's.
I can also view RT if I want to. I've sometimes seen comments from people who say they can't.
i’m in Canada and am beginning to be blocked from viewing SOME links on instagram and/or facebook (i don’t have accounts with either) but have not yet encountered this phenomenon on substack.
You may now be aware but it is only certain articles. I am in UK too. This is a great evil.
I'm in the UK using the app on a phone. Not restricted.
I agree, but good luck persuading 98% of humanity to even entertain the idea let alone implement it. I wish my glass was half full but it's actually nearly empty....
Never ever ever give up. Not ever.
Exit and build. Numerous grouplets are being seeded around the globe.
Indigenise or die. Know your terroir. Not what you "own", but where you are planted and grow.
You can't beat the master with the master's tools. You can use them; know that they are corrupting poison.
We've been here before. We've got this.
I’m in the UK and don’t have any problem accessing this or any other substack with a basic laptop or smartphone.
Thank you for sharing this. Appreciate it.
Yes. Me too!!
Nick Hudson was a guiding light during the dark Covid injection abuse. Thank you.
the biggest war is playing out right now. It is thousands of years old. It is the war between commerce and the people living on the land. It is brutal. Ruthless. Commerce seeks synthetic solutions, people submit to God and Nature only.
"God" (especially the abrahamic version) is a human projection for those who require a psychological/existential comfy blanky. A comforting lie. Submission, a form of slavery, to anything is not good.
By God I mean Nature and whoever breaks Nature’s laws is dead.
Fair enough
Absolutely Correct 👍
I once believed as you do. Thankfully no longer.
That is truly a sad world you are living in. Facts state other wise.
Delusions aren't "facts". It is amusing because trannies share similar delusions, which they are free to possess but I'm not compelled to accept them.
Thank you Joel and Nick. The situation is indeed dire but I am not sure there is "an opaque common control structure." I am sure that there are plenty of malevolent forces. I'm not sure they are - or need to be - particularly well organised,
see https://www.hughwillbourn.com/post/23-cock-up-conspiracy-or-murmuration
& expanding on the issue of distorted cognition,
https://www.hughwillbourn.com/book
Just as silver hit $60 and I was feeling upbeat along you come and smash me back into reality!
Pretty sure you already knew all this, Kev?! Hence your silver position?!
Started 20 years ago!
Much more than 20 .
You continue to keep very good company.
What a coincidence! Earlier today, before reading this post, I got involved in a comment thread on a climate change blog. It turned out a bit disjoined/cross-purposes after I replied to:
“ … The prosperity-decadence-collapse cycle happens because the prosperous don’t speak up when decadence takes hold …”
with https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2025/12/10/ford-boss-ev-mandates-threaten-entire-european-car-industry/#comment-325105 :
“Luxury beliefs, complacency, apathy, … you may be right, but I’m not convinced. It seems to me the deep state could be behind it all, for some unfathomable geopolitical purpose. Once they have the media, the politicians and the institutions in their pockets, as they have now ex-USA, they can lie with impunity and most of the general public has no idea what is really going on.
Remember the original Club of Rome dictum that “The main enemy then is humanity itself”. We saw on Covid that the main objective seemed to be to get the entire populace digitally shackled via covid passports, with some depopulation and sterilisation thrown in for good measure. They are now trying the same control freakery again with Digital Ids on absurd pretexts.”
Did my fumbling comment stumble into Nick Hudson’s mainstream dogma postulation?!
I do hope he’s wrong about Donald Trump.
Come on he told us he was a snake.
I think you missed the point of the story, hmm... TDS I presume. Cognitive dissonance perhaps, or just plain hatred for the orange man. Or maybe you watch the VIEW?
It is either a physical or a metaphysical world
Physical evidence suggests strongly that the universe is physical
There is no evidence in support of religious or metaphysical beliefs
Prove your hypothesis that CO2 can do miracles or STFU
100% wrong! Words can be changed and manipulated, but mathematics prove a creator.
Please physically prove that statement 🙏
First of all, Henry, physically is only one portion of our being. Mathematics is a pure science, and it proves itself to be a simple fact. 2+2=4, you can have philosophies and argue the fact.
However, it remains a fact. Your mind can be "trained" to believe it is wrong, and you can go through life believing that you're correct and the world is wrong.
Much of what we see and hear is our perspective, e.g., I'm color blind, if you tell me it's brown, okay, it's brown to me, why, because I choose to believe you, understand in the middle is a lie, and one lie changed the world. My belief in you could be seen as my having faith in what you said. We all have faith, although it's often misdirected.
Schools are the number one mind benders, and have been for over a century. To keep this short, you can look up JD Rockefeller and Frederick Gates. The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America's youth.
To simplify this reply, Jesus/Yeshua fulfilled 351 biblical prophecies; you can do the math, or use statistical probabilities. But just ‘8’ is on the edge of impossibility. If you need more facts, I haven’t even started. God bless, thanks, looking forward to a rebuttal or reply.
Physical proof or empirical logic or common sense or natural philosophy are all names for pattern recognition, which is the basis of sentience. Humans are both blessed and cursed with the ability of language; blessed because language allows the common knowledge to be shared, leading to the knowledge growing by sharing and discussing evidence. Mathematics is the easiest language to demonstrate and understand and physically prove.
You can add 2+2 or count to 2 two times etc.
The main reason to educate your young is for mutual social support and survival in a harsh environment. Narratives both organize knowledge and help provide a framework for learning similar to the mathematical lattice (Ramachandra). When we use archetypes like Santa Claus or the Boogie man to enforce standards of behaviour we may save effort by confusing those we try to educate. Over generations, these shortcuts become part of the language but not of the pattern we need to recognize.
Faith in the unknown and unknowable is a personal benefit but is violence when forced upon another human. Rationality seeks to establish a common standard of reality as opposed to truth which requires divine guidance. All religions are equally true which is why no wise person argues for his preference except on moral grounds.
Thanks for your patience
It's so bleak, so unbearably true.
ObummerCare is the Insurance Company Hill DemonCrats want to die on. While making Insurance Company Assassin Mangione a super hero.
Python Pressure.
God is the God of Life, not death please Bless and Protect America from the Cult of Death, 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
The worlds' culture is a cult.
It's not yet, but it soon will be, at such a time as you think not, the son of man cometh. We have a trifecta going on. The Biblical prophecies, current events aligning, and the celestial events all coming together, and God's timeline is at the END.
Does that mean the World is your Blue Oyster Cult?
What is a Blue Oyster Cult?
The correct question is “who are…”.
What/Who is/are “the world’s culture” Cult? Since the World is your Oyster.
"The world is your oyster" is a quote from Shakespeare's The Merry Wives of Windsor:
Falstaff: I will not lend thee a penny.
Pistol: Why then the world's mine oyster, Which I with sword will open.
Falstaff: Not a penny.
The original implication of the phrase is that Pistol is going to use violent means (sword) to steal his fortune (the pearl one finds in an oyster).
Prayers for USA tonight.
''Their ultimate removal can only be averted by a massive awakening to the realities of the trap being set.''
Thing is this one post below confirms the mainstream and alternative are NOT as different as they purport to be. This real evidence could do more to wake people up to all that was done in the name of 'COVID' than anything else yet it is clearly being suppressed.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
Respect to PANDA for stepping up at the time but like everyone else interest waned soon after.
https://pandauncut.substack.com/p/hardship-and-heartache-told-at-the
"With respect to trans rights, trans people have degenerate cognition, not legitimate knowledge of what it is like to be the other gender." Bull shit.
The act & process of human reproduction, is binary, but then after we're born our genotypes / phenotypes, are not always binary because we all lie on a non-binary spectrum of possibilities, sometimes called Disorders / Differences of Sex Development (DSDs) a non-binary phenomena, i.e. not all resultant babies can always be neatly and irreversibly assigned into a “male / man” or a “female / woman”. Meanwhile, it's uncontroversial among doctors, biologists, and geneticists, that it would be difficult, if not impossible, to find a line in nature that cleanly divides people into males and females. For example, after typing into an internet search engine the question: “What does "biological sex" in humans mean?” practically all the links to internet articles listed, are ones overwhelmingly telling us that the agreed understanding between scientists, is that the genotype / phenotype of a particular individual's “sex” falls on a non-binary spectrum as robustly confirmed by our National Health Service too.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=what+does+%22biological+sex%22+in+humans+mean%3F&ia=web
https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/differences-in-sex-development/
Signed by 2617 scientists on 2018/10/26: “As scientists, we are compelled to write to you, our elected representatives, about the current [US] administration’s proposal to legally define gender as a binary condition determined at birth, based on genitalia, and with plans to clarify disputes using “genetic testing”. This proposal is fundamentally inconsistent not only with science, but also with ethical practices, human rights, and basic dignity. The proposal is in no way “grounded in science” as the administration claims. The relationship between sex chromosomes, genitalia, and gender identity is complex, and not fully understood. There are no genetic tests that can unambiguously determine gender, or even sex. Furthermore, even if such tests existed, it would be unconscionable to use the pretext of science to enact policies that overrule the lived experience of people’s own gender identities.”
• https://not-binary.org/statement/
Claire Ainsworth writing in the science journal Nature in 2015: “Doctors have long known that some people straddle this boundary – their sex chromosomes say one thing, but their gonads (ovaries or testes) or sexual anatomy say another … What’s more, new technologies in DNA sequencing and cell biology are revealing that almost everyone is, to varying degrees, a patchwork of genetically distinct cells, some with a sex that might not match that of the rest of their body.”
https://aeon.co/essays/nonbinary-identity-is-a-radical-stance-against-gender-segregation
Steven Novella 2022: “Biological sex is not binary. The notion that sex is not strictly binary is not even scientifically controversial. Among experts it is a given, an unavoidable conclusion derived from actually understanding the biology of sex. Its more accurate to describe biological sex in humans as bimodal, but not strictly binary.”
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-science-of-biological-sex/
Translucent Team 2025 citing a Nature Editorial 2018: “[In the USA] as many as one in 100 people [in England & Wales circa 262,000 = 0.43% of UK population] have differences or disorders of sex development, such as hormonal conditions, genetic changes or anatomical ambiguities, some of which mean that their genitalia cannot clearly be classified as male or female. The idea that science can make definitive conclusions about a person’s sex or gender is fundamentally flawed.”
https://translucent.org.uk/transgender-people-crime-and-prisons/
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-07238-8
Further, many other cultures, both historic and contemporary have acknowledged and celebrated the biological, scientific, and psychological reality that sex and gender in humans falls on a non-binary spectrum without imploding. And a third gender has been legalised in 14 countries: Argentina, Australia, Malta, New Zealand, Germany, India, Pakistan, Nepal, Chile, Bangladesh, South Africa, Ireland, Spain, and Thailand.
And of course, India, Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh, all have a long history of recognising a third gender called Hijras. And Native American two-spirt are usually considered a good omen, and children are encouraged to chose their own gender roles.
And in Indonesia Warias are men who live their lives as women, who are believed to have feminine souls even though they have male sex organs, and the Bugis people recognize five genders. And in Oaxaca Mexico Muxes are celebrated. And in Oman the Xaniths use makeup, oil their hair, and engage in other activities traditionally categorized as feminine. And in Samoa a third gender called Fa’afafine are respected and recognized. And Madagascans recognize the existence of a third gender called Sekrata born as boys but raised as girls and grow up to become women. And in the Dominican Republic Guevedoce who don't have a visible penis at birth are recognized by some tribes as a third gender. And Old Judaism recognized six genders.
https://listverse.com/2018/10/03/10-societies-that-recognize-more-than-two-genders/
https://sites.uab.edu/humanrights/2018/10/29/indias-relationship-with-the-third-gender/
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ftsa&q=third+gender+history+country+list&ia=web
Claas Flint et al publishing in Nature, Neuropsychopharmacology 2020: “Biological sex classification with structural MRI data shows increased misclassification in transgender women. […] Conclusions. In this study, we present a highly accurate biological sex classifier in cis gender individuals that shows a significantly decreased accuracy in transgender individuals after cross-sex hormone treatment. Our results underline that the brain structure of transgender individuals is similar to both the brain structure of their perceived gender and biological sex. This implies that brain structure of transgender women differs from both cis gender men and women. Based on our brain-structural data, we suggest a dimensional rather than binary gender construct which will contribute to the destigmatization of transgender individuals.”
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41386-020-0666-3#Sec19
Marianne J. Legato, MD, PhD (hon.c.), FACP publishing in Sage Journals 2018: “Untangling the Gordian Knot of Human Sexuality: What Is the Biologic Basis of Variations in Sexual Phenotype? Abstract. There is increasing interest in and tolerance of the lay public for variations in human sexuality. In contrast, the molecular biology that underlies gender identity, the development of gonadal and genital anatomy, and the factors that define sexual behavior is proving unexpectedly complex and is still incompletely understood. It is now evident that humans cannot be characterized as member of 1 of 2 clearly defined units: male or female. In fact, individuals exist on a continuum: those who do not conform unequivocally to the dyadic view of human sex in terms of anatomy, gender identity, and/or sexual behavior should be characterized as having variations in rather than disorders of sexual development. Such individuals can no longer be regarded as anomalies to be rejected, condemned, and, if possible, “corrected” either psychologically or anatomically.”
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2470289718803639
Agustín Fuentes, Busting Myths About Sex and Gender 2022: According to published research by biologists and psychologists when we take all humans into account, "gender identity" is embedded in a 'non binary' spectrum of "biological sex".
https://www.sapiens.org/biology/busting-myths-about-sex-and-gender/
Monica Vilhauer Ph.D. 2024: “Key points. Defining biological sex by sex organs or chromosomes is unscientific due to numerous exceptions. Biological sex is traditionally defined by gametes (sperm and egg), essential for direct reproduction. This definition is incomplete, as intersex conditions can be adaptive through kin selection. A complete definition of biological sex should include male, female, and intersex.”
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/lies-and-deception/202412/what-is-biological-sex
So, Nick Hudson where's YOUR evidence that sex in hmans is ALWAYS binary?
What is rather interesting, after listening to a multitude of 9/11 related interviews done by Jerm Warfare, a close friend of Hudson, he now knows the truth of what happened on 9/11...
Jerm's interviews: https://www.jermwarfare.com/tag/9-11/
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
Were the towers destroyed by a gravity collapse? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by explosives? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by thermite? The evidence says no.
Were the towers destroyed by nukes? The evidence says no.
The answers to these questions can easily be found by studying the evidence.
The problem is NOT a shortage of evidence.
The problem is nobody wants to LOOK at the evidence and think for themselves.
Instead, everyone wants to be TOLD WHAT TO THINK by "experts" in the MSM, alternative media, the scientific community, the government, and the "truth" movement, but these "experts" spend the whole time covering up and muddling up the evidence.
Here is a 20-minute video that most can follow: https://rumble.com/v5jnndx-understanding-the-911-evidence.html
9/11 FACTS that hurt people's feelings
43 FACTS that cannot be explained due to jet fuel, bombs, thermite or nukes
Article: https://911revision.substack.com/p/911-facts-that-hurt-peoples-feelings
A whole industry has been created - A whole "truth" movement, to have people NOT look at the evidence presented TO COURT in 2007, all whilst they are gaslighting good intentioned truth seekers with stories of remote-controlled planes or drones, CGI TV video fakery, bombs, and thermite for a controlled demolition or even buried or mini nukes.
Making sure people NEVER look at the anomalies with the 9/11 orphans, buildings 3, 4, 5, 6 and the Bankers Trust building, because if people do, they will immediately see the problems with the 9/11 truther narratives that are being SOLD to them.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
I was uncommitted on 9/11 for over 20 years. I've always been a sceptic and didn't trust either side, so I put it aside. But in my later years, I had more time, and began to research the subject, hundreds of hours later, and I'm now 99% convinced that it was an inside job. What it came down to was "follow the money." I wish I had started there, but it was a circuitous route that eventually got me there... But it was an education along the way. Now I know where to begin: always start by following the money, or by identifying who benefits from the crime or disaster.
Sept 11 is a crime that should be solved by a forensic study of the evidence. Before it can be determined who did it, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done.
The order of crime solving is to determine
1) WHAT happened, then
2) HOW it happened (e.g., what weapon), then
3) WHO did it. And only then can we address
4) WHY they did it (i.e. motive).
Let us remember what is required to (legally) convict someone of a crime.
You cannot convict someone of a crime based on belief.
You cannot convict someone of a crime if you don’t even know what crime to charge them with.
If you accuse someone of murder using a gun, you’d better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it. And yet before noon on 9/11/01, we were told who did it, how they did it, and why they did it (they hate us for our freedoms); before any investigation had been conducted to determine what had even been done.
Many people have speculated as to who committed the crimes of 9/11 and/or how they did so. But without addressing what happened, speculation of this kind is nothing more than conspiracy theory, a phrase that also describes the 19 bad guys with box cutters story we were given before noon on 9/11/01.
Dr Wood’s research is not speculation and she’s been the closest to getting to the bottom of the who dunnit.
Dr Wood did a forensics investigation of what happened to the WTC complex on 9/11/01.
She does not address who did it, nor am I concerned with that question right now.
Before issues of that kind can be addressed, we must first determine what happened.
By definition, research that is purely empirical cannot be about and has nothing to do with conspiracy theory of any kind.
The fact that others (in the mainstream media, the alternative media, and the so-called 9/11 truth movement) promote various theories about 9/11 is irrelevant to Dr Wood’s research. On the other hand, to determine what happened, we must address all of the available evidence.
Anyone declaring who did what or how they did it before they have determined what was done is merely promoting either speculation or propaganda.
The popular chant, “9/11 was an inside job,” is, scientifically speaking, no different from the chant that “19 bad guys with box cutters did it.” Neither one is the result of a scientific investigation supported by evidence that would be admissible in court.
Neither identifies what crime was committed or how it was committed.
There are a lot of coincidences with regards to the build-up, on the day and the days after 9/11. There are suspects as to who might have had some sort of involvement in the events of 9/11, but for now it’s all they are. Suspects.
Dr Wood sued 23 NIST subcontractors who were tasked with security and clean up at ground zero. These companies also helped write reports that made up the scientifically flawed, 10 000 NIST report.
Two of the main defendants in the case were ARA and SAIC, who specialize in psychological warfare, weather manipulation and directed energy weapons, DEW.
If Dr Wood’s 2009 US Supreme Court Case wasn’t railroaded by the judge, she would have been able to depose these 23 companies and in so doing, would have been closer to determining exactly HOW and then we’d get a lot closer to WHO and WHY.
But we can have our suspects for now, but we need hard evidence to convict.
Read Dr Wood’s book: Where did the towers go?
https://www.wheredidthetowersgo.com/
Dr Wood 9/11 presentation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWNzq9OWGmY
Condemnation, without investigation, is the height of ignorance - Albert Einstein.
Good intentioned truth seekers are FUNDING the greater cover-up of the truth of what happened on 9/11. Have a listen and read their court filings.
Dr Reynolds' case was for the fraudulent plane impact reports: https://nomoregames.net/2011/06/12/request-for-correction-by-nist-for-its-invalid-wtc-jetliner-animations-and-analyses/
Dr Wood's case was for the destruction at the WTC complex: https://www.doctorjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html
There are 3 issues most people have when faced with the truth regarding the events of 9/11;
1. Problem solving skills
2. Group Think
3. They just can't handle the implications
It doesn't take 98% because 80% are oblivious, too busy trying to make a living, watching their sports, movies, and playing their video games, and God forbid watching the mainstream news. Of the remaining 20%, 5% are on the extremes of left and right, too far gone into their own realities to be much good in the scheme of things. That leaves just 10%; these are the people who can make a difference. The elites make up a small percentage of that 10%.
In other words, you only have to persuade a tiny fraction of people to make an impact. A few examples might help to improve my point: Charlie Kirk comes to mind, a college dropout who escaped the insidious college indoctrination. His martyrdom will live on, as his work has been making astounding progress in turning our youth down the right path. His life was surely a TURNING POINT in America and now around the Globe!
On the other end of the spectrum, we have Madalyn Murray O'Hair, who founded the American Atheists and waged an open war on God and mankind. Her actions destroyed the fabric of our society in America and further negatively impacted the entire world. She was a prime example of the personification of evil in the world, and the precursor of the anti-Christ that is in the world today.
P.S. not a prophet.
An excellent post that needs to be Restacked! Don't just be a reader, be a doer. This is not a time to read, sit back, and do nothing. Really, how much time does it take to restack a post?
At this point, 81 likes and only 18 Restacks, wake up people, it's much later than you think. If you liked it, SHARE the bleeping posts. Stop living on "some day I'll." God never promised tomorrow.