Thak you so much for this well reasoned article. I am now censord fron discussing preventive and early treatment using IVM with my Cornwall National Health Service (I live in Cornwall, UK); with my doctor's surgery (I never see the same GP twice, so to sayI have a GP allotted to me is no longer true); my local newspapers; my friends; fellow members of U3A (University of the 3rd Age - I am retired) and my neighbours. It has been very hard emotionally (& physically with the lockdowns) over these last 2+ years, especially as I am a widow. I would encourage people to find a local group onine at "Stand in the Park" (STIP). I have found a group and plan on "standing in the park" to be with other hopefully like minded people. Does the majority of the population truly have a death wish?
It’s so frustrating that even the judiciary cannot be relied on to serve justice these days. Reiner Fuellmich has the same problem of being unable to find a court that will take his Covid crimes against humanity case. Anyway, I hope my slip has prodded a few more people into realising how serious the situation is.
Okay, you've learned some of the failings of, amongst other things, your own thinking. The danger here for you now is that your own subconscious mind is likely seeking some New Mindsets to latch its World View onto.
While I'm no accepted expert in the field of social psychology, I have read a lot of it with the view of searching for clues as to why this all is, including why we look to POLITICIANS as repositories for our faith in humanity, not regular people.
That's a huge clue right there. As someone who never conflated complete strangers in positions OF authority with beings I should Blindly Assume had my best interests at heart, I know what a tough sell this is to people who did.
We shift how we feel towards our parents at no later than age five onto the concept of 'Government' in adulthood: we see "politicians" as extensions of 'Government.'
So we subconsciously WANT politicians to be larger than life Perfect Protectors just as we want to feel that Our Daddy can beat up Anyone Else's Daddy when we're children. And because of this, we REACT as children do - with utter disbelief that "Daddy" didn't live up to our expectations of him.
This may be a lot to digest, but more important than having a parental figure to look up to is ending the harms of their decision-making. So, if I haven't utterly offended you with any of this (the subconscious is 100% emotional, logic need not apply) & you WANT to discuss ending the harmful agendas, please reply.
I have some ideas. No support though.
The majority of people are still waiting for "Daddy" to come rescue them. I'm suggesting he never will.
Michael, I have no idea why you seem to think I look up to politicians. I have already described them as WEF puppet useful idiots, I've said they lie all the time and I've said there is no point in hoping for any establishment politician to turn things around.
The only hope is for the general public to wake up as to how they are being abused. This is starting to happen with the farmer protests. The problem is the Covid brainwashing, peer pressure and cognitive dissonance which leaves many unable or unwilling to accept the harsh reality that they have been duped and have submitted to possibly permanent damage of their own health for no useful purpose.
The passage of a "crimes against humanity" trial in a proper court of law would be a major eye-opener, if an honest judiciary can be found anywhere in the world.
1) "I have no idea why you seem to think I look up to politicians." Well then go back & reread everything. If you start off by putting words into my mouth & take off from there, I can't tell if you're doing so because you're in the mood to, or anything else.
2) "The only hope is for the general public to wake up as to how they are being abused." Really? That's The Only Hop?
When the prisoners in the camps realized they were being abused, they were freed? Or do you think that the people here who you said yourself are different? How deal realizing one is abused lead to ending abuse? When has a bully stopped beating up a kid who knew their name?
3) "The passage of a "crimes against humanity" trial in a proper court of law would be a major eye-opener, if an honest judiciary can be found anywhere in the world."
So, wait... now you think that the judiciary ARE people looking out for the public? Then why do you seem insulted about what you think I said in 1)?
I pointed out that GENERALLY, people shift their blind faith in their parents onto 'Government' in adulthood. I started by saying how you specifically have now seen that this isn't the case. I have no idea how you then misconstrued that into me accusing you of looking up to politicians. Did you skip Entire Sections of what I wrote?
Alas, I do not expect Barclay to show backbone. Nor do I see a single candidate who thinks anything other than "the fantastic vaccine roll out was a huge success, we must do more!" It looks as though it is going to be a long, long, painful, exhausting process of side effects and deaths from the jabs, economic collapse and revolution in the poorest countries before people begin to see the facts.
The defenestration of Boris is purely down to the fact that Tory MPs fear for their seats, due to Gove and Dom's engineered Partygate, enabling ministers around him crazed by ambition to rush for the chance to be at the top of the greasy pole. What this Government has done, almost no one in Parliament realises. Maybe Brady understands. Almost no one.
They need a functioning stock market, a functioning gold market, housing market, etc.
They need functioning industry to make the stuff they use - yachts, planes, phones, medicines, food.
They need people who know how to run all this.
Randomly killing people through dodgy jabs, starvation, net zero runs the huge risk of killing the useful.
Sterilisation through the jabs won't make enough of a difference in the WEF elite's lifetime. I really doubt Klaus Schwab gives a toss about his grandkid's future.
I know we have reached the end of the post-war consensus and even, sadly, the Enlightenment period of history. I know we are seeing the rise of a new world order. I hoped that wouldn't happen for decades but here it is. Just not sure it's a dastardly plan from Davos. More like a chaotic mess with really weak, venal people in charge because we are at that period of weak men being in charge. End of Times.
Well said.I agree. Perhaps at some level it is more comforting to have a bogeyman( WEF,etal) than to face that we have allowed rampant venality and incompetence to “lead” for so long.
We in the West ignored politics after the war. Life got so much better that politics seemed irrelevant - whoever you voted for wasn't going to take away your fridge or your cheap chicken so it didn't matter. We also ignored Big Business - they just made stuff cheaper so what was the problem? I think this meant that we didn't notice/didn't care that weak inappropriate people were becoming political leaders strutting on the world stage. We also didn't notice people like Bill Gates becoming too powerful or companies like Amazon destroying competition. We were all too rich and comfortable. Now the illusion of liberal democracy is faltering, whether we chose to see it or not. I think it's more likely that the WEF crowd are opportunists seizing their moment but I don't think the politicians or the philanthropists will want to work together to destroy us so it will just be an unholy mess.
The Rothschilds and their ilk don't really think in terms of 'the grandkids' as individuals. Power and control over the money supply (fiat/gold) is their paramount concern. They have held this power for centuries, through world wars, depressions and genocides. This is really nothing new for them.
Jo, it’s all so unhinged re solar & wind, isn’t it? I’d never seen a wind farm up close & personal until a recent trip through Texas, where some are literally on the side of the highway. Those things are massive & from what I understand, have a pretty short “shelf life” (not to mention all of the “fossil fuels to manufacture & maintain them); where do those huge poles & blades go when they wear out? Same for solar panels?? And the dissonance it takes to pretend that blanketing the countryside w/ either or both, disrupting ecosystems & killing wildlife, while providing a minuscule amount of “energy” (if any on windless &/or cloudy days) is “saving the planet”….
Excellent summation! I was watching a Patrick Wood video yesterday about what we are up against & the main takeaway for me was that suppressing & criminalizing free speech (which is being attempted everywhere right now) is when the killing really starts. Chilling to see the accelerated dash to accomplish all of it. There is some new affront against us every damn day
I love what you are doing. Like you, I have learned that my many efforts - in my case to get more people to see the truth about Islam - were using energy that disregarded the core of what was going on. Now I am seeing how best - listening to my core impulses - to use my energy. I am delighted at what you are doing, and how successful you are in reaching people. It is freeing for me. I applaud your work, and am doing mine.
Don't you think that, given the near absolute control these people now have over governments, media, and nearly all of the resources that we depend on to survive (water, food, energy) that "they" now have near-total control over everything that matters? What can we deplorables do to stop them, other than "refusing to go along with their program?" If that's all we can do, we're pretty much doomed.
What does Dr Steele in Aus, think about immune escape. If they keep shooting people up with this thing, the virus will mutate and evade the limited incomplete protection and we could have a mass causality event
Great piece, but I have one quibble: the Abe meme you link to is nonsense.
1) Abe quit as MP in August 2020, before the jabs were rolled out.
2) Japan doesn’t mandate jabs because it constitutionally can’t. The government loves the jabs though.
3) IVM isn’t suppressed in Japan, but the govt doesn’t recognise it as a Covid treatment, and it isn’t widely used. You can’t get it over the counter for example. The head of the Tokyo Medical Association said a few nice things about IVM once, but he’s nobody important.
I’m still not found a totally convincing explanation for Abe’s killing. But I do think he was made to resign as PM because he wanted to soften Japan’s Covid policy and treat it more like the flu.
Do Not Comply. The government is not your friend. Frequent only the small businesses that accept cash or check, boycott those who require a credit card or some form of smartphone payment. Even if you are only able to do this 25% of the time, in a country of tens of millions if we all make the attempt our would-be uber-masters are sure to take notice. Slowly but surely, institutions are coming around. One bank I use only for cash withdrawals. Another bank will accept a check for my monthly credit card balance - a balance that keeps diminishing all the time.
Small efforts by the many will defuse their march toward totalitarianism. Do Not Comply, at least part of the time. Do your part: Don't make it easy for them.
In the US, I read that no new refineries have been built since the 70s. Think how much more efficient the technology would be today to refine w/ new refineries. Can’t have that though. Maybe if we started calling it “organic fuels” instead of “fossil” the greenie terrorists would jump on board?
This post like other similar posts, are very good pieces of investigative journalism.
I have tremendous respect for the work they have put in to this.
They do a great job of showing the facts.
But they do tend to make an unbacked leap.
From "horrible things are happening" to "this is a planned depopulation campaign".
They tend to show people who support the vaccines and all, who are connected with eugenics societies, who are very rich, but they never show how these people excactly implemented this plan.
How did Bill Gates put poison in these vials of injectable *stuff*?
How did Klaus Scwhab turn up the price of oil and make food so damn expensive?
How did both of them convince goverments to implement vaccine-passports?
These pieces, which are great, show correlation, but not causation.
I'm well aware that it's a massive task to find this correlation, but without it these claims of planned deopulation-campaing falls to the ground.
Without causation they can be explained away by malfeasence .
Actually I read somewhere recently that fossil fuels are not running out at all. This is bad for the producers because it means prices can fall. They maintain a narrative that they are scarce to keep the price high to act as another deterrent to use.
We will never run out of oil — it is the 2nd most plentiful liquid on the planet and is self renewing. “Fossils” have nothing to do with oil — the term was added by JD Rockefeller, one of the most evil men to ever walk the earth (imho), to inject an element of scarcity that would ensure a healthy profit margin. Fletcher Prouty was there —
Anecdotally, my family has been receiving royalties on oil / natural gas from the same small patch of land since the late 60s, and there’s no indication that these will stop, certainly not in my lifetime. The US can be energy independent again and can maintain this status easily for the next 100 years, which will enable us to develop true alternative energy sources, unlike the failed solar and wind technologies, both of which cost more energy to produce and maintain than they will ever produce, to say nothing of the outrageous abuse and pollution that goes into their manufacture and disposal. All for something like a 3% (if memory serves) contribution to our total energy consumption.
I believe that Petroleum, misnamed "dead dinosaur fuel" is constantly produced by the operation of the molten core of the earth. Mama Earth is cookin stuff up for us.
Read my post below, Joel. It's true. However, price is a factor in supply. It costs to recover and refine energy of any sort. Add in inflation to account for current prices. Compared to other products, oil prices have remained fairly low over the long term. Even now they are barely double what they were 20 years ago, while most other products have tripled or quadrupled.
Here in Canada, federal, provincial and carbon taxes make up about 30-40% of the price of gasoline and diesel at the pump.
Another question one might ask is, where will governments find the hundreds of billions of $ in gasoline and diesel taxes they collect each year, when they finally succeed in ending fossil fuel use??
I have read, too, about the theory of “peak oil” but also that there is plenty of energy product. I tend to believe the latter, or at least that innovation would create an alternative, as humans have always adapted. But honestly, IDK what to believe about ANYTHING anymore.
It also makes sense if what Peter Zeihan is saying is correct. The populations of many developed countries are already below replacement levels and are heading for catastrophe as their ageing, skilled, boomer workforce retires. My thoughts are this is one reason why our borders have been destroyed and the elites talk about replacement migration and to hell with your heritage/society/communities. https://www.youtube.com/c/ZeihanonGeopolitics/videos
I am right now literally sitting on 165 billion barrels of proven recoverable oil in Alberta, Canada. This is enough to supply current global consumption for 1650 years. Furthermore, overall emissions in Alberta have dropped 30% since 2000, while production has doubled.
Meanwhile, just to the East of me in Saskatchewan, Canada, are huge proven reserves of Uranium, which is the primary fuel for conventional nuclear reactors. There are proven, economical global reserves (much of it in Saskatchewan) of Uranium enough to power current conventional reactors for about 90 years. Any Uranium price increase would certainly lead to discoveries of more supply.
So, no. Do not buy into the energy shortage narrative. There is plenty to last centuries until more powerful and efficient technologies are devised - and wind and solar are not the answer, as has so many times over been proven.
And I've said in another post here, the barriers are now all political, not physical. Governments won't approve pipelines or refineries, while piling on carbon taxes and threatening the very industry that powers our lives. And as Doug Brodie and Joel are pointing out here, this is all part of their long term plan, the Net Zero climate lies and/or depopulation agenda.
In the long term, which is what we are talking about here, and not spot market prices or monthly drawdowns, the oil sands contains all the recoverable oil needed in the world for many centuries. The cost of production in the oil sands varies between $25 per barrel for current SAGD and $40 per barrel for Greenfield, which is comparable to all other marginal barrels, such as US shale. At these prices oil remains the cheapest, densest and most reliable energy available on the planet. Canada already produces and exports 2.5 million barrels per day more than it consumes. And this does not even figure in natural gas.
Don't confuse the current artificial/political manipulation of oil prices with physical reality. The current price of oil above $100 is due to political machinations. Oil companies, in Canada at least, are profitable at $50 USD per barrel. $100 oil is a result of political interference in Canada and the US, and the war in the Ukraine. The industry does not need $100 oil to thrive. However, politicians and their minions can profit from up and down movement in commodity prices such as oil, which enriches them and transfers wealth to the least ethical members of society. Market manipulation is a thing. Regular up and down market movement is needed for the rich to get richer and further consolidate their power.
With Uranium, the reserves mentioned are recoverable within current market dynamics. It is again government intransigence, and unwarranted public fear of nuclear power that limits its use. Nuclear power is regulated by the feds here in Canada, so there won't be any progress with the WEF pandering Liberals in power. I believe the same is true in a Democrat America. But again, if there was the political will, Uranium is available enough to supply a large portion of our energy needs for at least many decades and likely much longer, as most of the world has not even been properly surveilled. Currently Saskatchewan, Canada supplies the vast majority of high-grade Uranium ore to the world. France, for example, generates 70% of its power from Uranium-fueled nuclear plants, and most of this fuel comes from Canada. Many of the rich ore fields in Canada have not been developed due to lack of demand. But as I have noted, this is a political issue, not a physical one.
Listen, I don't argue with hardcore ideologues. You have your distorted views, and I'll leave you to them. I work in geology in the oil industry, and I've worked in the atomic energy field as well, so I know what reserves are currently exploitable and the timelines involved. You apparently do not. We are nowhere near the physical limits or carrying capacity available from these energy resources. Good luck with your peak energy arguments elsewhere.
Thak you so much for this well reasoned article. I am now censord fron discussing preventive and early treatment using IVM with my Cornwall National Health Service (I live in Cornwall, UK); with my doctor's surgery (I never see the same GP twice, so to sayI have a GP allotted to me is no longer true); my local newspapers; my friends; fellow members of U3A (University of the 3rd Age - I am retired) and my neighbours. It has been very hard emotionally (& physically with the lockdowns) over these last 2+ years, especially as I am a widow. I would encourage people to find a local group onine at "Stand in the Park" (STIP). I have found a group and plan on "standing in the park" to be with other hopefully like minded people. Does the majority of the population truly have a death wish?
Brilliant. Thank you.
But there is no charge in the ICC. The complaint has been filed and avknowledged but the court HAS NOT CHARGED ANYONE.
Please keep to the facts as not doing so detracts from credibility.
Critical friend not enemy
Thanks
You are right, that was a bit of a slip. I have previously described it correctly as a complaint, e.g. in this article also hosted by Joel: https://metatron.substack.com/p/how-the-government-abuses-the-general?s=r.
It’s so frustrating that even the judiciary cannot be relied on to serve justice these days. Reiner Fuellmich has the same problem of being unable to find a court that will take his Covid crimes against humanity case. Anyway, I hope my slip has prodded a few more people into realising how serious the situation is.
Okay, you've learned some of the failings of, amongst other things, your own thinking. The danger here for you now is that your own subconscious mind is likely seeking some New Mindsets to latch its World View onto.
While I'm no accepted expert in the field of social psychology, I have read a lot of it with the view of searching for clues as to why this all is, including why we look to POLITICIANS as repositories for our faith in humanity, not regular people.
That's a huge clue right there. As someone who never conflated complete strangers in positions OF authority with beings I should Blindly Assume had my best interests at heart, I know what a tough sell this is to people who did.
We shift how we feel towards our parents at no later than age five onto the concept of 'Government' in adulthood: we see "politicians" as extensions of 'Government.'
So we subconsciously WANT politicians to be larger than life Perfect Protectors just as we want to feel that Our Daddy can beat up Anyone Else's Daddy when we're children. And because of this, we REACT as children do - with utter disbelief that "Daddy" didn't live up to our expectations of him.
This may be a lot to digest, but more important than having a parental figure to look up to is ending the harms of their decision-making. So, if I haven't utterly offended you with any of this (the subconscious is 100% emotional, logic need not apply) & you WANT to discuss ending the harmful agendas, please reply.
I have some ideas. No support though.
The majority of people are still waiting for "Daddy" to come rescue them. I'm suggesting he never will.
Not much support coming my way.
Michael, I have no idea why you seem to think I look up to politicians. I have already described them as WEF puppet useful idiots, I've said they lie all the time and I've said there is no point in hoping for any establishment politician to turn things around.
The only hope is for the general public to wake up as to how they are being abused. This is starting to happen with the farmer protests. The problem is the Covid brainwashing, peer pressure and cognitive dissonance which leaves many unable or unwilling to accept the harsh reality that they have been duped and have submitted to possibly permanent damage of their own health for no useful purpose.
The passage of a "crimes against humanity" trial in a proper court of law would be a major eye-opener, if an honest judiciary can be found anywhere in the world.
1) "I have no idea why you seem to think I look up to politicians." Well then go back & reread everything. If you start off by putting words into my mouth & take off from there, I can't tell if you're doing so because you're in the mood to, or anything else.
2) "The only hope is for the general public to wake up as to how they are being abused." Really? That's The Only Hop?
When the prisoners in the camps realized they were being abused, they were freed? Or do you think that the people here who you said yourself are different? How deal realizing one is abused lead to ending abuse? When has a bully stopped beating up a kid who knew their name?
3) "The passage of a "crimes against humanity" trial in a proper court of law would be a major eye-opener, if an honest judiciary can be found anywhere in the world."
So, wait... now you think that the judiciary ARE people looking out for the public? Then why do you seem insulted about what you think I said in 1)?
I pointed out that GENERALLY, people shift their blind faith in their parents onto 'Government' in adulthood. I started by saying how you specifically have now seen that this isn't the case. I have no idea how you then misconstrued that into me accusing you of looking up to politicians. Did you skip Entire Sections of what I wrote?
Sorry, I’m too busy doing other things to spend time trying to decipher what you are trying to say.
Alas, I do not expect Barclay to show backbone. Nor do I see a single candidate who thinks anything other than "the fantastic vaccine roll out was a huge success, we must do more!" It looks as though it is going to be a long, long, painful, exhausting process of side effects and deaths from the jabs, economic collapse and revolution in the poorest countries before people begin to see the facts.
The defenestration of Boris is purely down to the fact that Tory MPs fear for their seats, due to Gove and Dom's engineered Partygate, enabling ministers around him crazed by ambition to rush for the chance to be at the top of the greasy pole. What this Government has done, almost no one in Parliament realises. Maybe Brady understands. Almost no one.
God, that's depressing and frightening.
I do wonder about the WEF theory though. Surely, if they destroy everything they actually destroy themselves too?
Build Back Better!
That's a really risky proposition though!
They need a functioning stock market, a functioning gold market, housing market, etc.
They need functioning industry to make the stuff they use - yachts, planes, phones, medicines, food.
They need people who know how to run all this.
Randomly killing people through dodgy jabs, starvation, net zero runs the huge risk of killing the useful.
Sterilisation through the jabs won't make enough of a difference in the WEF elite's lifetime. I really doubt Klaus Schwab gives a toss about his grandkid's future.
I know we have reached the end of the post-war consensus and even, sadly, the Enlightenment period of history. I know we are seeing the rise of a new world order. I hoped that wouldn't happen for decades but here it is. Just not sure it's a dastardly plan from Davos. More like a chaotic mess with really weak, venal people in charge because we are at that period of weak men being in charge. End of Times.
Well said.I agree. Perhaps at some level it is more comforting to have a bogeyman( WEF,etal) than to face that we have allowed rampant venality and incompetence to “lead” for so long.
We in the West ignored politics after the war. Life got so much better that politics seemed irrelevant - whoever you voted for wasn't going to take away your fridge or your cheap chicken so it didn't matter. We also ignored Big Business - they just made stuff cheaper so what was the problem? I think this meant that we didn't notice/didn't care that weak inappropriate people were becoming political leaders strutting on the world stage. We also didn't notice people like Bill Gates becoming too powerful or companies like Amazon destroying competition. We were all too rich and comfortable. Now the illusion of liberal democracy is faltering, whether we chose to see it or not. I think it's more likely that the WEF crowd are opportunists seizing their moment but I don't think the politicians or the philanthropists will want to work together to destroy us so it will just be an unholy mess.
The Rothschilds and their ilk don't really think in terms of 'the grandkids' as individuals. Power and control over the money supply (fiat/gold) is their paramount concern. They have held this power for centuries, through world wars, depressions and genocides. This is really nothing new for them.
Jo, it’s all so unhinged re solar & wind, isn’t it? I’d never seen a wind farm up close & personal until a recent trip through Texas, where some are literally on the side of the highway. Those things are massive & from what I understand, have a pretty short “shelf life” (not to mention all of the “fossil fuels to manufacture & maintain them); where do those huge poles & blades go when they wear out? Same for solar panels?? And the dissonance it takes to pretend that blanketing the countryside w/ either or both, disrupting ecosystems & killing wildlife, while providing a minuscule amount of “energy” (if any on windless &/or cloudy days) is “saving the planet”….
Excellent summation! I was watching a Patrick Wood video yesterday about what we are up against & the main takeaway for me was that suppressing & criminalizing free speech (which is being attempted everywhere right now) is when the killing really starts. Chilling to see the accelerated dash to accomplish all of it. There is some new affront against us every damn day
I love what you are doing. Like you, I have learned that my many efforts - in my case to get more people to see the truth about Islam - were using energy that disregarded the core of what was going on. Now I am seeing how best - listening to my core impulses - to use my energy. I am delighted at what you are doing, and how successful you are in reaching people. It is freeing for me. I applaud your work, and am doing mine.
Don't you think that, given the near absolute control these people now have over governments, media, and nearly all of the resources that we depend on to survive (water, food, energy) that "they" now have near-total control over everything that matters? What can we deplorables do to stop them, other than "refusing to go along with their program?" If that's all we can do, we're pretty much doomed.
what does dr steele think about immune escape . IF the mass vax program continues we could have a mass casualty event
What does Dr Steele in Aus, think about immune escape. If they keep shooting people up with this thing, the virus will mutate and evade the limited incomplete protection and we could have a mass causality event
Great piece, but I have one quibble: the Abe meme you link to is nonsense.
1) Abe quit as MP in August 2020, before the jabs were rolled out.
2) Japan doesn’t mandate jabs because it constitutionally can’t. The government loves the jabs though.
3) IVM isn’t suppressed in Japan, but the govt doesn’t recognise it as a Covid treatment, and it isn’t widely used. You can’t get it over the counter for example. The head of the Tokyo Medical Association said a few nice things about IVM once, but he’s nobody important.
I’m still not found a totally convincing explanation for Abe’s killing. But I do think he was made to resign as PM because he wanted to soften Japan’s Covid policy and treat it more like the flu.
https://guygin.substack.com/p/abe-on-covid-successful-arsonist
Do Not Comply. The government is not your friend. Frequent only the small businesses that accept cash or check, boycott those who require a credit card or some form of smartphone payment. Even if you are only able to do this 25% of the time, in a country of tens of millions if we all make the attempt our would-be uber-masters are sure to take notice. Slowly but surely, institutions are coming around. One bank I use only for cash withdrawals. Another bank will accept a check for my monthly credit card balance - a balance that keeps diminishing all the time.
Small efforts by the many will defuse their march toward totalitarianism. Do Not Comply, at least part of the time. Do your part: Don't make it easy for them.
Let Freedom Reign!
In the US, I read that no new refineries have been built since the 70s. Think how much more efficient the technology would be today to refine w/ new refineries. Can’t have that though. Maybe if we started calling it “organic fuels” instead of “fossil” the greenie terrorists would jump on board?
This post like other similar posts, are very good pieces of investigative journalism.
I have tremendous respect for the work they have put in to this.
They do a great job of showing the facts.
But they do tend to make an unbacked leap.
From "horrible things are happening" to "this is a planned depopulation campaign".
They tend to show people who support the vaccines and all, who are connected with eugenics societies, who are very rich, but they never show how these people excactly implemented this plan.
How did Bill Gates put poison in these vials of injectable *stuff*?
How did Klaus Scwhab turn up the price of oil and make food so damn expensive?
How did both of them convince goverments to implement vaccine-passports?
These pieces, which are great, show correlation, but not causation.
I'm well aware that it's a massive task to find this correlation, but without it these claims of planned deopulation-campaing falls to the ground.
Without causation they can be explained away by malfeasence .
How did "they" do this?
And who are they?
Actually I read somewhere recently that fossil fuels are not running out at all. This is bad for the producers because it means prices can fall. They maintain a narrative that they are scarce to keep the price high to act as another deterrent to use.
We will never run out of oil — it is the 2nd most plentiful liquid on the planet and is self renewing. “Fossils” have nothing to do with oil — the term was added by JD Rockefeller, one of the most evil men to ever walk the earth (imho), to inject an element of scarcity that would ensure a healthy profit margin. Fletcher Prouty was there —
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSff0pwc1Xc
Anecdotally, my family has been receiving royalties on oil / natural gas from the same small patch of land since the late 60s, and there’s no indication that these will stop, certainly not in my lifetime. The US can be energy independent again and can maintain this status easily for the next 100 years, which will enable us to develop true alternative energy sources, unlike the failed solar and wind technologies, both of which cost more energy to produce and maintain than they will ever produce, to say nothing of the outrageous abuse and pollution that goes into their manufacture and disposal. All for something like a 3% (if memory serves) contribution to our total energy consumption.
I believe that Petroleum, misnamed "dead dinosaur fuel" is constantly produced by the operation of the molten core of the earth. Mama Earth is cookin stuff up for us.
Good stuff! Beat me to the punch.
Read my post below, Joel. It's true. However, price is a factor in supply. It costs to recover and refine energy of any sort. Add in inflation to account for current prices. Compared to other products, oil prices have remained fairly low over the long term. Even now they are barely double what they were 20 years ago, while most other products have tripled or quadrupled.
Here in Canada, federal, provincial and carbon taxes make up about 30-40% of the price of gasoline and diesel at the pump.
Another question one might ask is, where will governments find the hundreds of billions of $ in gasoline and diesel taxes they collect each year, when they finally succeed in ending fossil fuel use??
I have read, too, about the theory of “peak oil” but also that there is plenty of energy product. I tend to believe the latter, or at least that innovation would create an alternative, as humans have always adapted. But honestly, IDK what to believe about ANYTHING anymore.
It also makes sense if what Peter Zeihan is saying is correct. The populations of many developed countries are already below replacement levels and are heading for catastrophe as their ageing, skilled, boomer workforce retires. My thoughts are this is one reason why our borders have been destroyed and the elites talk about replacement migration and to hell with your heritage/society/communities. https://www.youtube.com/c/ZeihanonGeopolitics/videos
I am right now literally sitting on 165 billion barrels of proven recoverable oil in Alberta, Canada. This is enough to supply current global consumption for 1650 years. Furthermore, overall emissions in Alberta have dropped 30% since 2000, while production has doubled.
Meanwhile, just to the East of me in Saskatchewan, Canada, are huge proven reserves of Uranium, which is the primary fuel for conventional nuclear reactors. There are proven, economical global reserves (much of it in Saskatchewan) of Uranium enough to power current conventional reactors for about 90 years. Any Uranium price increase would certainly lead to discoveries of more supply.
So, no. Do not buy into the energy shortage narrative. There is plenty to last centuries until more powerful and efficient technologies are devised - and wind and solar are not the answer, as has so many times over been proven.
And I've said in another post here, the barriers are now all political, not physical. Governments won't approve pipelines or refineries, while piling on carbon taxes and threatening the very industry that powers our lives. And as Doug Brodie and Joel are pointing out here, this is all part of their long term plan, the Net Zero climate lies and/or depopulation agenda.
In the long term, which is what we are talking about here, and not spot market prices or monthly drawdowns, the oil sands contains all the recoverable oil needed in the world for many centuries. The cost of production in the oil sands varies between $25 per barrel for current SAGD and $40 per barrel for Greenfield, which is comparable to all other marginal barrels, such as US shale. At these prices oil remains the cheapest, densest and most reliable energy available on the planet. Canada already produces and exports 2.5 million barrels per day more than it consumes. And this does not even figure in natural gas.
Don't confuse the current artificial/political manipulation of oil prices with physical reality. The current price of oil above $100 is due to political machinations. Oil companies, in Canada at least, are profitable at $50 USD per barrel. $100 oil is a result of political interference in Canada and the US, and the war in the Ukraine. The industry does not need $100 oil to thrive. However, politicians and their minions can profit from up and down movement in commodity prices such as oil, which enriches them and transfers wealth to the least ethical members of society. Market manipulation is a thing. Regular up and down market movement is needed for the rich to get richer and further consolidate their power.
With Uranium, the reserves mentioned are recoverable within current market dynamics. It is again government intransigence, and unwarranted public fear of nuclear power that limits its use. Nuclear power is regulated by the feds here in Canada, so there won't be any progress with the WEF pandering Liberals in power. I believe the same is true in a Democrat America. But again, if there was the political will, Uranium is available enough to supply a large portion of our energy needs for at least many decades and likely much longer, as most of the world has not even been properly surveilled. Currently Saskatchewan, Canada supplies the vast majority of high-grade Uranium ore to the world. France, for example, generates 70% of its power from Uranium-fueled nuclear plants, and most of this fuel comes from Canada. Many of the rich ore fields in Canada have not been developed due to lack of demand. But as I have noted, this is a political issue, not a physical one.
Listen, I don't argue with hardcore ideologues. You have your distorted views, and I'll leave you to them. I work in geology in the oil industry, and I've worked in the atomic energy field as well, so I know what reserves are currently exploitable and the timelines involved. You apparently do not. We are nowhere near the physical limits or carrying capacity available from these energy resources. Good luck with your peak energy arguments elsewhere.