30 Comments

I believe the enquiry is already framed and just an exercise to exonerate all those in power who harmed us. Its sole purpose will be to hear the voices of the cult of covid and ignore any others. It will support all restrictions etc and say they were beneficial. In fact, I feel it will go further and make ridiculous conclusions like we should locked down sooner and harder.

They will NOT look at the data, let's face it the plethora of evidence of deaths and harms have been ignored by ALL expert systems and Government all along. It is truly beyond belief how they are still happily poisoning people. I have zero positive expectations of this enquiry and no faith in it whatsoever. Once completed I am dreading the righteous headlines and media glee that will focus only on the manipulated false narrative. It makes my head hurt!

Expand full comment

Yes, the willing blindness of western countries to "best practice" or even considering the data coming out of other countries has been shocking, e.g. when Japan had zero cases for a good while, there was zero interest in determining why, or what we could learn from it. A case in point was the deliberations about another lockdown before christmas in the UK - a refusal to consider real world data from South Africa which had already gone before, yet consideration given to the data from disproven toy mathematical models!

Expand full comment

The enquiry won't be worth the paper it's written on - they have basically already ruled out looking at whether the decisions were the right ones. The data which the govt departments themselves churn out will be ignored. As you say, they will ask "experts" what they think so the whole thing will be based on the views of people who agreed with the lockdowns, masks, silly rules and dangerous jabs.

The public will nod along as they pop in for their boosters whilst keeping a mask in the glove compartment "just in case" and discussing how sad it is that so many died from the Biblical Plague which *some* people just didn't take seriously enough and how the current economic woes are all the fault of that nasty Mr Putin. World of Fools.

Expand full comment

Woah. But also, obviously. The 2 CBAs done in AU so far show :

31 x more life years lost than saved (measured in QUALYs)

https://rebekahbarnett.substack.com/p/australias-covid-response-cost-9348

And, from memory, the other one says 61 or 62 x more cost than benefit. That one’s not officially published yet and is measured in Well-being Years.

It’s so obscene!

Expand full comment

I believe this was a ‘Plandemic’ by the evil elite NWO Cabal who have placed their WEF, WHO & UN Communists/Marxists in high places in all our countries.

Big Pharma KNEW that early treatment by proven drugs like Ivermectin & Hydroxychloriquine worked well & could have saved many lives from the Bioweapon Covid virus that Fauci & US was funding in Wuhan China.

Instead the elite cabal wants depopulation so they denied medication that could save lives & made BILLIONS on their depopulation vaccines & boosters that has/is killing more people than the Covid Virus.

Many of Hitlers evil doctors went to prison with death sentences for doing less in the holocaust.

The Satanic NWO Cabal owns most of our “Injustice Systems” in the world.

#CrimesAgainstHumanity

Expand full comment
Oct 11, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Hear hear. I am so fed up of their total rollicking. I now just want to see heads on blocks and faces in hospitals. When dud people lise their vack bones as well as their minds? Masks going in bin again at wigan infirmary this morning and I don't care who sees

Expand full comment
Oct 11, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

“the focus will be on asking certain groups of people what they thought about it”

In other words, it’s political. Like all of “Covid”, it was always about politics (power and control) and never about anyone’s “health”.

Expand full comment
Oct 11, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

(UK Public Enquiry on Covid Response) - "... instead of actually looking at the data, the focus will be on asking certain groups of people what they thought about it".

Yes, you're right. It's far too early for any meaningful enquiry into this anyway. The UK enquiry is simply there to delay the evil moment when the majority wake up to what's happened to them.

The truth is emerging independently anyway and the reality of national bankruptcy and IMF loans will focus minds infinitely better than another government whitewash.

We have certainly had the governments we deserved.

Expand full comment
Oct 11, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Speaking of subjective data…..the Zoe app comes to mind.

Expand full comment

You are absolutely right--the opinions of people are as nothing when set against the evidence/data---I noticed this as I made presentation after presentation to one of my councils---I showed the data/evidence around eg masks,PCR tests, child fatality rates---only to be greeted (when at all) with...well,I think.....

Expand full comment

I agree that both lockdowns/vaccines... and metabolic syndrome could account for most of the differences. However, has anyone considered that lutefisk consumption may protect against Covid?

Expand full comment

On the 2nd spike of excess death, the one attributed to vaccine uptake, what is the number of excess death of just that spike, and out of curiousity how many vaccinations occurred by the end of that spike? what were covid cases doing at the time as well?

Expand full comment

Joel,

Have you looked at the UK's ONS data comparing vaxxed and unvaxxed mortality over time for all age groups? Does the Expose article's analysis of this look solid?

It looks like Simpson's Paradox is excluded, so that's something.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment