Agree. It's getting beyond ridiculous. If they really want to play this game, then they should at least start telling people to go into strict quarantine between shots number one and two, and then again as soon as dose two wears off, until two weeks after shot three. What they are really saying with these games is that the vaccine is never neutral. It is either demonstrating positive efficacy or negative efficacy. They are trying to hide the negative efficacy.
Jan 26, 2022·edited Jan 26, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
A coworker of mine told me the nurse that administered his booster actually did advise something along those lines, which was beyond interesting to me. Likely she was misinformed about the actual guidance, but it's interesting to consider a reality where she has empirically observed the phenomenon noted here.
Receipt of my FOIP request has been acknowledged by Alberta Health Services. In looking for their analysis of these observations and of post -vaccination immune suppression, and for communications regarding the decision to remove the embarrassing graph. Will keep you posted.
They reveal a lot of useful information. Pfizer own documents contain enough truth to arrest them all for Premeditated Genocide, but the mass murder continues as planned.
The Truth About Safety of mRNA Vaccines Found in The European Medicines Agency's Document Titled "Comirnaty (COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine) Risk Management Plan" Welcome to the Medical Inquisition
mRNA "Vaccines" Are Gene Therapy. May cause Undesirable Side Effects That Could Delay Or Prevent Their Regulatory Approval According To BioNTech SEC Filing The Truth About "Safe and Effective" mRNA "Vaccines" Hidden In Plain Sight
From the States is this certainly true. They stated openly that they were. Not in those words but they did say that they were counting in ways they had never used in the past.
I deliberately did not address those. Very strangely, these numbers went the opposite way when they dumped the case data, i.e. when cases went down in one cohort, population actually went up! Bottom line, as many have pointed out, the data is unreliable, and as I conclude, it would be better at this point for them to simply come clean with it before more people get hurt.
Not better for them. They will never come clean for to do so would admit either malice or gross incompetence causing death on a scale never before seen. They will never own up to what they have done.
To anyone who does this kind of thing for a living, someone who needs to set up data collection and logging systems so as to be able to actually establish and demonstrate the truth, it's perfectly obvious they are intentionally obfuscating and preventing the truth emerging. The raw data should be available as just "date of dose N" or something equivalent, allowing different models and interpretations to be tested. Then what the first 14 days means or does not mean could be deduced from the raw data. Baking this number of days and what it means into the data collection cake - calling the person unvaccinated when they literally were just vaccinated, making a mockery of the very words - is so transparently ridiculous as to qualify as active fraud.
Agree. It's getting beyond ridiculous. If they really want to play this game, then they should at least start telling people to go into strict quarantine between shots number one and two, and then again as soon as dose two wears off, until two weeks after shot three. What they are really saying with these games is that the vaccine is never neutral. It is either demonstrating positive efficacy or negative efficacy. They are trying to hide the negative efficacy.
A coworker of mine told me the nurse that administered his booster actually did advise something along those lines, which was beyond interesting to me. Likely she was misinformed about the actual guidance, but it's interesting to consider a reality where she has empirically observed the phenomenon noted here.
Receipt of my FOIP request has been acknowledged by Alberta Health Services. In looking for their analysis of these observations and of post -vaccination immune suppression, and for communications regarding the decision to remove the embarrassing graph. Will keep you posted.
Hiding and manipulating data=fraud. Politics, not science.
Great work again Joel. That 3rd does number (286%) really stand out!!
Gotta get meself crackin' on that causation thing!
Yup, if the first 2 shots didn't kill you, the Booster will...
Well done Joel. I noticed this about dose 3 as well
Booster Shots causing more cases of Lymphadenopathy
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/booster-shots-causing-more-cases
brilliant confirmation
Excellent work here. Thanks for exposing the corruption
They reveal a lot of useful information. Pfizer own documents contain enough truth to arrest them all for Premeditated Genocide, but the mass murder continues as planned.
Dr. Michael Yeadon: THIS MUST STOP! Pfizer Documents Show FDA Knew of Death Risk https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-michael-yeadon-this-must-stop
The Truth About Safety of mRNA Vaccines Found in The European Medicines Agency's Document Titled "Comirnaty (COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine) Risk Management Plan" Welcome to the Medical Inquisition
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-truth-about-safety-of-mrna-vaccines
mRNA "Vaccines" Are Gene Therapy. May cause Undesirable Side Effects That Could Delay Or Prevent Their Regulatory Approval According To BioNTech SEC Filing The Truth About "Safe and Effective" mRNA "Vaccines" Hidden In Plain Sight
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-are-gene-therapy-may
It is safer to assume all data are diddled - mens rea and otherwise.
From the States is this certainly true. They stated openly that they were. Not in those words but they did say that they were counting in ways they had never used in the past.
In any "case", counting is racist and bigoted!
Lol.
What a great detective you are, thank you.
Also, what are numbers of total population they use for each group?
I deliberately did not address those. Very strangely, these numbers went the opposite way when they dumped the case data, i.e. when cases went down in one cohort, population actually went up! Bottom line, as many have pointed out, the data is unreliable, and as I conclude, it would be better at this point for them to simply come clean with it before more people get hurt.
Not better for them. They will never come clean for to do so would admit either malice or gross incompetence causing death on a scale never before seen. They will never own up to what they have done.
To anyone who does this kind of thing for a living, someone who needs to set up data collection and logging systems so as to be able to actually establish and demonstrate the truth, it's perfectly obvious they are intentionally obfuscating and preventing the truth emerging. The raw data should be available as just "date of dose N" or something equivalent, allowing different models and interpretations to be tested. Then what the first 14 days means or does not mean could be deduced from the raw data. Baking this number of days and what it means into the data collection cake - calling the person unvaccinated when they literally were just vaccinated, making a mockery of the very words - is so transparently ridiculous as to qualify as active fraud.
Great work!
Would love to have your response to my comment on "Alberta just inadvertently admitted..." pointing out some glaring flaws in your analysis.