Same must be happening across Canada, no doubt. And UK says it treats vaxxed as unvaxxed only for 14 days after the 1st jab. But their stats prove that that is also the case for 14 days after any jab.
My main concern has always been for the potential for harm.
That is always the top concern in public health: Safety, safety, safety.
Because so many were to be exposed to novel technology & new specific complex molecules, and long term safety data was missing (& is still missing), even a very low frequency of serious adverse event can easily outweigh much or all of the good that’s hoped for.
The decision to treat as unvaccinated people who’ve received these injections as if they hadn’t had it, for two weeks, seems to hide any toxicity.
There are many, if not all, abnormal things about these "vaccines". For example, trying to guess lot toxicities. Why aren't lot distribution numbers, locations, and quantities made public by Pfizer, Moderna, J&J? Can these be requested from them? Can't see why not, if all is above board. And if can't, then start a criminal investigation immediately, as they admit to be hiding things. Brandon, where are you?
I've written 12 draft articles and discarded them in the last 12 days. Each one is discarded because just when I think I couldn't see something more flagrant happen in the meantime, it does happen. I've been surprised by the level of scientific and moral depravity these people are willing to practice without so much as a hint of doubt or self-awareness.
It's now a race between how blatantly they can do this and how much faster the impact of their actions puts us on an irreversible course. We are weeks away from mass deployment of a Omicron specific vaccine and we haven't even worked out yet if Omicron reinfections happen faster in the newly vaccinated. No doubt, the crooked data fudgers at UKHSA must be thinking "how can we cook the books" when Qatar has already revealed the obvious. Instead, they cheat again and release a fake SIREN study censoring the same data points in the same window where they spread the virus.
I've decided that I will stop reading everything for a few days and put out whatever I have challenge them (UKHSA) to reveal the data by vaccination date fast while I will go on a hunger strike. Not kidding, looking at the Public Health Scotland numbers, the age standardized mortality is growing fast in 2 doses (actually 3 doses shifted back). This is totally out of control, I can't let it slip.
Unfortunately, I've fallen into the same trap that these number fiddlers with PhDs are trapped in- Thinking too much about the strategic communication aspect over the blunt force truth of the matter. I've written to UK's ONS about missing data again and they replied "which publication are you talking about?". On the same day they released bogus re-infection numbers. These people are beyond saving, but I still gave them more time. I've replied to them and linked the papers showing how hiding immortal time and exposure misclassification will be deadly in march since billions are infected. They haven't replied yet. I doubt they will. But I can't be blamed for the incineration that I plan to bring to these empty suits. I gave them a chance.
Thanks to you and others for keeping up the good fight with data. That's the only way to beat these people.
FYI, I have a copy of the scraped data set in csv format from the day before they removed it if you need it for anything. Been writing about and tracking Alberta for so long lol
Indeed, it's the same absolutely every. It's almost like they are all being controlled by the same strings or something? But the minions just publish what they're told to. They don't put any thought into it and have no interest in the actual truth just getting paid for doing their job.
Please always be sure to take screen shots as I found links to pages get changed to hide or eliminate any information that is deemed problematic . What is good about Alberta sars is they still include recent age cohort info . Where Ontario simply stopped as the data no longer supported the narrative
Screen shot is good, but it's easier to save the whole site with all info (Settings, Print, to pdf.) Ontario is still posting the data - I save it everyday - https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data
Because apparently refusing to a treatment is suppose to be suddenly wrong . Even if it were only all unvaccinated in hospital that is a right to accommodate . Just as justified as those with any other illness . Don’t let anyone define the terms as vaxx or unvaxxed when it’s actually irrelevant
IMPORTANT - looks like the BC CDC updated the 14 days to be 21 days sometime in the past week or 2 as the Data Notes section now shows the Unvaccinated definition to be < 21 days and is no longer < 14 days. This means more time for issues to show under the unvaccinated status after the shot.
See below - it was < 14 days not too long ago.... But it is NOW 21 DAYS. Note the 2nd sentence below - they are also somehow able to say those not protected represents < 5% of the unvaccinated cases since Oct 1st, 2021. We have no info to show that is true and it would be variable greatly so that is hard to believe.
Unvaccinated - Unvaccinated or vaccinated population with one dose of any vaccine but not considered protected (surveillance episode date is < 21 days since dose 1).
Cases who have received 1 dose, but were not considered protected as per the definition above represented < 5% of the total unvaccinated cases since October 1st, 2021.
Thank you for all you are doing - it is incredible work!
Thanks so much for that link. Making sure i screenshot it and more then to start putting it out on all my platforms. I thought 14 days was bad enough, but 21 days until you considered vaccinated in BC.... b.. sss....
Yes, my neighbour-but one was a 61 year old recluse... sailed through 2020. March 2021, just as the 50-75 age groups were getting vaxxed he died. Everyone on my road said Covid got him and the next month when my age group 40+ was eligible I was called a "selfish c***" for not getting one. (actually I was actually eligible in first batch as a 'extremely vulnerable' transplant patient). No level of cognitive dissonance affects these people's forebrains.
Moreover my uncle runs a 60-person 'care' home in the West Country. 2020 not a single death, he was really proud.
2021 different story.
Christmas 2021 my family was allowed to the family Christmas party for refusing to test ourselves. Again the care home was cited and I'm "so selfish" and I've "let Covid come between me and the family"
I am an Alberta resident, PhD chemist and retired trial lawyer. I am not going to let this one slip past. I have sent a FOIP request, and sent letters to my MLA, the Minister of Health and a leading local journalist. Along the way I learned how to use web archive! I'll keep you posted.
Thanks for your efforts, Phil (& Joel). I am also in Alberta. I am replying here on Jan 29th, and the Freedom Convoy 22 has arrived in Ottawa. I really hope some star power shows up there to help out the truckers, even though they have some well spoken leaders, they need more than $ to get this thing done. If you need anyone to duplicate your efforts let me know.
I have also made a complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta concerning the failure of Dr. Hinshaw to advise the public of the risks.
This is exactly what is happening in Sweden as well. Each week they produce a weekly report with a bunch of graphs showing hospitalization and death in each category; vaccinated and unvaccinated. As a comment to the statistics in the beginning of the document you can read the following:
"The dividing of the population into unvaccinated and vaccinated is updated weekly based on vaccination status in the national vaccination register (NVR). Unvaccinated refers to persons who do not have a dose registered in NVR, only have one dose registered or two doses and it has been less than 14 days since the second registered dose. Vaccinated refers to people with two doses registered in NVR, where the date of the second dose is at least 14 days ago at the time of the positive test. People with a third registered dose are included in the group vaccinated"
With the graph showing ICU hospitalization for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated they write this as a footnote:
"The weeks when the number of vaccinated patients in each age group is less than three, the vaccinated are not included in the calculation of the number per 100,000 shown in the graph. This is due to the risk of disclosure of information about an individual. The reported number for the last two weeks is expected to rise slightly due to delayed reporting, especially with regard to the current reporting week."
how do you define "so many"? so many more than 50 days after the first dose of the vaccine? assuming the person likely followed up with a second. Wow ya, that's a ton isn't it.
Joel hits it out of the park, again.
This time in Alberta, not Altrincham.
Same must be happening across Canada, no doubt. And UK says it treats vaxxed as unvaxxed only for 14 days after the 1st jab. But their stats prove that that is also the case for 14 days after any jab.
My main concern has always been for the potential for harm.
That is always the top concern in public health: Safety, safety, safety.
Because so many were to be exposed to novel technology & new specific complex molecules, and long term safety data was missing (& is still missing), even a very low frequency of serious adverse event can easily outweigh much or all of the good that’s hoped for.
The decision to treat as unvaccinated people who’ve received these injections as if they hadn’t had it, for two weeks, seems to hide any toxicity.
Completely abnormal decision.
There are many, if not all, abnormal things about these "vaccines". For example, trying to guess lot toxicities. Why aren't lot distribution numbers, locations, and quantities made public by Pfizer, Moderna, J&J? Can these be requested from them? Can't see why not, if all is above board. And if can't, then start a criminal investigation immediately, as they admit to be hiding things. Brandon, where are you?
We have formally requested a definite list of vaccine lots. No dice.
BTW, BMJ just wrote this (same thrust, not far enough): https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o102
Thank you, shared.
Great! Do it with a lawyer next time, then 1 prosecutor, 2 lawyers+33 politicians. Or with 1 with a sledgehammer + 2 with a stretcher :-)
You need to get some lawyers involved.
No, WE need to get some lawyers involved.
After two years, I badly need others to pull on the rope, a fresh pair of legs etc
I’m more than happy to be the or an expert witness but I’m not about to try to organise a legal campaign.
Which politicians are working with you? Any?
https://howbad.info/ Amazing!
I've written 12 draft articles and discarded them in the last 12 days. Each one is discarded because just when I think I couldn't see something more flagrant happen in the meantime, it does happen. I've been surprised by the level of scientific and moral depravity these people are willing to practice without so much as a hint of doubt or self-awareness.
It's now a race between how blatantly they can do this and how much faster the impact of their actions puts us on an irreversible course. We are weeks away from mass deployment of a Omicron specific vaccine and we haven't even worked out yet if Omicron reinfections happen faster in the newly vaccinated. No doubt, the crooked data fudgers at UKHSA must be thinking "how can we cook the books" when Qatar has already revealed the obvious. Instead, they cheat again and release a fake SIREN study censoring the same data points in the same window where they spread the virus.
I've decided that I will stop reading everything for a few days and put out whatever I have challenge them (UKHSA) to reveal the data by vaccination date fast while I will go on a hunger strike. Not kidding, looking at the Public Health Scotland numbers, the age standardized mortality is growing fast in 2 doses (actually 3 doses shifted back). This is totally out of control, I can't let it slip.
And here I am waiting for your next post ;)
Unfortunately, I've fallen into the same trap that these number fiddlers with PhDs are trapped in- Thinking too much about the strategic communication aspect over the blunt force truth of the matter. I've written to UK's ONS about missing data again and they replied "which publication are you talking about?". On the same day they released bogus re-infection numbers. These people are beyond saving, but I still gave them more time. I've replied to them and linked the papers showing how hiding immortal time and exposure misclassification will be deadly in march since billions are infected. They haven't replied yet. I doubt they will. But I can't be blamed for the incineration that I plan to bring to these empty suits. I gave them a chance.
Thanks to you and others for keeping up the good fight with data. That's the only way to beat these people.
Well, now you've built up the anticipation. Can't wait to see the carnage.
But you have to get the correct data somehow to the people- and how to get around MSM?
FYI, I have a copy of the scraped data set in csv format from the day before they removed it if you need it for anything. Been writing about and tracking Alberta for so long lol
I have it too in Excel. You could have saved me an hour of scraping if I'd known sooner!
😂
Put it up where people can grab it, please. Thank you.
Can you post it on your Substack?
Posted in article.
Thanks!
A perfect illustration of El Gato's basic examples yesterday: https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/bayesian-datacrime-defining-vaccine?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0ODg1MjIzMSwicG9zdF9pZCI6NDY4NjM2NTYsIl8iOiJsK3lydCIsImlhdCI6MTY0MjA4NTE5OCwiZXhwIjoxNjQyMDg4Nzk4LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMzIzOTE0Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.X-OqrB2eijRdyO6Q_pPgNAtpsWPh4AhchNjGr1hsA7Q
This will have a massive effect on the VE's. Wonder how/why they actually published this!
Indeed, it's the same absolutely every. It's almost like they are all being controlled by the same strings or something? But the minions just publish what they're told to. They don't put any thought into it and have no interest in the actual truth just getting paid for doing their job.
Please always be sure to take screen shots as I found links to pages get changed to hide or eliminate any information that is deemed problematic . What is good about Alberta sars is they still include recent age cohort info . Where Ontario simply stopped as the data no longer supported the narrative
Screen shot is good, but it's easier to save the whole site with all info (Settings, Print, to pdf.) Ontario is still posting the data - I save it everyday - https://covid-19.ontario.ca/data
60-79 is still oct 24 latest . I’m fact only the 80 + is updated to recent
Yes, it's incredibly sloppy in that aspect. But the hospitalization, ICU and cases should be current.
And as suspected , the older aged that are dying are not vaccinated , just like the influenza data
or use a web archiver like archive.today. this saves the site but also serves as some proof that it existed
They already scrubbed the chart! I hope you took those screenshots. Please send to Joel to post in article if you don't mind.
I have a pdf of the webpage (28 pages - most graphs and data) for Alberta dated Jan 13. Not sure how I could send it.
Edit: Thanks, I got it!
Can use Evernote to save page.
[Edit: archive.org has some screenshots but they do not play well and aren't usable it seems]
Is Evernote saved to the cloud? Would rather have it on my own harddrive.
Cloud, yes. They might also have a hard drive sync option. I don't know.
Believe it or not, things disappear right out of your account on some cloud accounts.
Thanks for graphing it out to . How it’s listed on the site is harder on my phone to appreciate
Excellent analysis! Completely gives me a sound/correct rebuttal to nagging family 😎
Because apparently refusing to a treatment is suppose to be suddenly wrong . Even if it were only all unvaccinated in hospital that is a right to accommodate . Just as justified as those with any other illness . Don’t let anyone define the terms as vaxx or unvaxxed when it’s actually irrelevant
IMPORTANT - looks like the BC CDC updated the 14 days to be 21 days sometime in the past week or 2 as the Data Notes section now shows the Unvaccinated definition to be < 21 days and is no longer < 14 days. This means more time for issues to show under the unvaccinated status after the shot.
Found here: http://www.bccdc.ca/health-professionals/data-reports/covid-19-surveillance-dashboard
See below - it was < 14 days not too long ago.... But it is NOW 21 DAYS. Note the 2nd sentence below - they are also somehow able to say those not protected represents < 5% of the unvaccinated cases since Oct 1st, 2021. We have no info to show that is true and it would be variable greatly so that is hard to believe.
Unvaccinated - Unvaccinated or vaccinated population with one dose of any vaccine but not considered protected (surveillance episode date is < 21 days since dose 1).
Cases who have received 1 dose, but were not considered protected as per the definition above represented < 5% of the total unvaccinated cases since October 1st, 2021.
Thank you for all you are doing - it is incredible work!
Thanks so much for that link. Making sure i screenshot it and more then to start putting it out on all my platforms. I thought 14 days was bad enough, but 21 days until you considered vaccinated in BC.... b.. sss....
Yes, my neighbour-but one was a 61 year old recluse... sailed through 2020. March 2021, just as the 50-75 age groups were getting vaxxed he died. Everyone on my road said Covid got him and the next month when my age group 40+ was eligible I was called a "selfish c***" for not getting one. (actually I was actually eligible in first batch as a 'extremely vulnerable' transplant patient). No level of cognitive dissonance affects these people's forebrains.
Moreover my uncle runs a 60-person 'care' home in the West Country. 2020 not a single death, he was really proud.
2021 different story.
Christmas 2021 my family was allowed to the family Christmas party for refusing to test ourselves. Again the care home was cited and I'm "so selfish" and I've "let Covid come between me and the family"
I have potential access to some private GP data that corroborates what you say. I will publish next week with a bit of luck.
I am an Alberta resident, PhD chemist and retired trial lawyer. I am not going to let this one slip past. I have sent a FOIP request, and sent letters to my MLA, the Minister of Health and a leading local journalist. Along the way I learned how to use web archive! I'll keep you posted.
Thanks for your efforts, Phil (& Joel). I am also in Alberta. I am replying here on Jan 29th, and the Freedom Convoy 22 has arrived in Ottawa. I really hope some star power shows up there to help out the truckers, even though they have some well spoken leaders, they need more than $ to get this thing done. If you need anyone to duplicate your efforts let me know.
I have also made a complaint to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta concerning the failure of Dr. Hinshaw to advise the public of the risks.
Hoping to heck everyone is sharing this far and wide in their networks to help awaken those under the mass formation spell....🙏🏻
Will do for sure!
https://live2fightanotherday.substack.com/p/pkb-covid-19-vaccine-fraud-falsehoods - prominently featured! Will add to other topics too.
This is exactly what is happening in Sweden as well. Each week they produce a weekly report with a bunch of graphs showing hospitalization and death in each category; vaccinated and unvaccinated. As a comment to the statistics in the beginning of the document you can read the following:
"The dividing of the population into unvaccinated and vaccinated is updated weekly based on vaccination status in the national vaccination register (NVR). Unvaccinated refers to persons who do not have a dose registered in NVR, only have one dose registered or two doses and it has been less than 14 days since the second registered dose. Vaccinated refers to people with two doses registered in NVR, where the date of the second dose is at least 14 days ago at the time of the positive test. People with a third registered dose are included in the group vaccinated"
With the graph showing ICU hospitalization for vaccinated vs. unvaccinated they write this as a footnote:
"The weeks when the number of vaccinated patients in each age group is less than three, the vaccinated are not included in the calculation of the number per 100,000 shown in the graph. This is due to the risk of disclosure of information about an individual. The reported number for the last two weeks is expected to rise slightly due to delayed reporting, especially with regard to the current reporting week."
At least they are hones hey? ;)
Here is the latest report (in Swedish): https://www.folkhalsomyndigheten.se/globalassets/statistik-uppfoljning/smittsamma-sjukdomar/veckorapporter-covid-19/2021/covid-19-veckorapport-2021-vecka-52-final.pdf
It's happening everywhere. Just not reported.
Trust Big Government?
No way.
Trust Corporate Media?
No way.
Trust the Medical Community?
No way.
Thanks y’all for destroying your credibility over a nasty - but non lethal (for virtually everyone) - virus.
These are deliberate crimes against humanity.
Or simply what woke and community-caring ppl with fascist inclinations do. Out of goodness of their hearts.
Excellent data and analysis!
nobody finds it odd there are so many people going to the hospital shortly after being jabbed?
and the data on the x-axis is number of days before diagnoses after 1st dose for those that already were, or did end up in the hospital.
how do you define "so many"? so many more than 50 days after the first dose of the vaccine? assuming the person likely followed up with a second. Wow ya, that's a ton isn't it.
This is gold dust. Thanks Joel for your incisive detective work.
happens in every province, its just that alberta got caught.