Jeff Childers a lawyer who writes a daily coffee and covid substack each day. May have contact with Gov DeSantis or his surgeon general Dr Joe Ladapo. I will send your request to him today.
fwiw, both Geert Vanden Bossche and Mike Yeadon think the shot should be stopped immediately and prophylaxis given freely. Both made recent remarks to that effect.
Mary Ann, if you do not get a response I will send it as well. Don't want to pile on, so will not overwhelm him with more messages unless he ignores you.
Will also send to DeSantis' COS. But they are currently fully fired up on re-election so getting focus now that the legislative session has ended will be an adventure.
HERE IS MY CORE THOUGHT: I don’t believe deSantis should end the shots. He is giving people choice. I am for choice. For example, we allow people to drink themselves to death. Choice. We allow people to smoke though it tremendously increases the risk of lung cancer. Choice.
True choice means, of course, that the statistics you present are made widely known, rather than that the mainstream media dominates with untruths.
So what I would ask for is that the stats, like the stats on lung cancer, are made as widely known as possible.
A final point. I don’t believe most Floridians would stand with DiSantis if he ended the shots.
A question to you: do you know the stats on what percent of Floridians are for a statewide ending of the shots?
Also, if people have taken the shots and booster, and now have a damaged immune system, is ending the shots beneficial to them? I definitely see most of these people as utterly against what you propose.
Note: Smoking has not been prohibited. Neither has drinking.
I look forward to hearing your response, whatever it is. One step leads to another.
Excellent points, Elsa. Informed choice has to be the way forward AS ALWAYS.
In terms of who might support the governor in ending the shots, let me put it this way - 10.9 million under 65s got the first shot, 9.2 million got the second, only 2.3 million got the third. In other words, over 70% (7.6 million) of those who got the first shot did not get the third. What does that indicate? For the over 65s, the number is only 46% (2.2 million). However, in total, that's 62% of the electorate who didn't take the booster.
'Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me three times, shame on both of us.'
Jun 1, 2022·edited Jun 1, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
Meanwhile, in Australia, the defective ‘leaky vaccines’ were MANDATED for millions of people, to keep their jobs, to participate in civil society, e.g. No Jab, No Job; No Jab, No Restaurant; No Jab, No Sport; No Jab, No Travel etc.
‘Informed consent’ has been trashed. I’m reeling in horror at what has been done in the supposed ‘liberal democracy’ of Australia, where people’s right to bodily autonomy and bodily integrity has been stolen from them.
Politicians and others also fostered division and segregation, turning family members and friends against each other based on jab status, and encouraging bullying to make people submit to the jabs.
Some mandates have been wound back, but the damage has been done.
Millions of children have been jabbed too - what lies ahead for them, and how many future doses, against a disease that was of little or no threat to them?
We have no idea how all this is going to pan out in future. It’s a very dark time in Australia’s history.
Reeling in horror with you Elizabeth. Here in NSW there are still mandates for teachers and carers, and not a single logical argument to explain why that is so.
those who pointed out early on that prior attempts to create a corona vax resulted in the death of all the animals, have not changed their assessment of the lethality of this vax campaign.
DeSantis has prohibited coercive vax policies by local, county and state Florida governments and by companies, and tried to do so for cruises. He's the most informed consent governor out there. His surgeon general has been outstanding defending children on this issue as well.
Thank you for the figures, Joel. Then, one needs to ask: what % of the 62% would be for ending the shots, vs just being strongly for INFORMED CONSENT - which means, lots of info that is as accurate as possible, which we all know has not happened.
There's only one way to find out. Not being a politician myself, personally I would just do what I thought was right, not what I thought was popular. I'm appealing to this side of Ron.
We know the risks of smoking and drinking. We don't know all the risks of the vax. The FDA and public health departments around the nation are doing all they can to hide the risks and pressure people into taking the genocide vax. Your final point is particularly cynical: don't we have enough politicians doing the wrong thing to save themselves politically?
People aren't coerced into drinking or smoking. People aren't convinced by the public health experts - in whom they place enormous trust - that drinking and smoking are not only safe but beneficial to their health. Smoking and drinking are things that people choose to do because they derive some enjoyment from doing so. The 'vaccines' are a medical procedure with no purpose other than the stated health benefits - benefits which are, at best, extremely limited on a personal level, and which almost certainly are a net negative at the societal level.
The FDA's purpose is to PULL dangerous products off the market. They did it regularly, up till 2020. That should have happened for all these jabs in Jan / Feb 2021 -- the safety signals were already clear -- people were dead directly post-jab, a friend of mine included. (The jabs should never have been authorized to begin with, but that's another conspiracy trail.) The powers-that-be delayed and fought public awareness of smoking's dangerousness for 20+ years though they completely knew these dangers ... enough time to brainwash people into accepting cigs and thinking they were "cool" and sign of a "rebel". The globalists intend to follow the same evil playbook this time. Why should we put up with any of it? The shots help absolutely no one. If DeSantis comes clean about ALL the dark dealings that brought these jabs into being, the entire county would be behind him and he'd be the next president, if the globalists don't get to him first. Therein is the problem: the threats they hold.
Certainly NOT making it illegal.....but a recommendation of NOT getting it, with the backing of all reasonable science would be the proper role of government.
Agreed! All about choice. With that being said , what are your thoughts on children under the age of consent getting the shot but their legal guardians consent?
I consider it criminal - meaning against the law, usurping the place of the parents - to give shots to children without the 100% informed consent of the parents. And with adequate information, I do not see any parents consenting.
Brilliant idea to reach out to Governor DeSantis about stopping the injection pogrom. If he is brave enough to take that step, other states may summon the courage to follow in his trailblazing footsteps.
I sent him my own letter about vetoing HB 7021 to end incentivized hospicide a few months ago:
He didn’t veto the bill (which would have removed liability protection for hospitals implementing CDC protocols), but he did introduce Buck the CDC after that with alternative state protocols emphasizing early treatment, so that was a big step in the right direction. I would still like to see him take more concrete actions to prevent hospicide, but stopping the injections would obviously be the #1 way to stop injuries and fatalities.
Is there any country that has had a true (not partial) pause of mRNA vaccines? Ideally both of them? If so, we could do a natural experiment to see what happened to that country's mortality. At most, I think some countries paused just Moderna in a young age group if I recall.
Poland maybe (they were on Pfizer). And Australia & NZ (both Pfizer although Australia started with AstraZeneca) have more or less paused at this stage.
But not for the moment, mandatory. Advertising seems to have taken over the role of coercing people to booster up. I'm a little worried about Albanese though.
The shots are still mandatory for many people - e.g. in healthcare, aged care. Many of the population would support jabbing of healthcare workers, because they’re brainwashed by propaganda. What isn’t understood is that healthcare and aged care workers also have the right to informed consent, and to natural immunity. Coercive Covid jabbing is a disaster in Australia…but many people don’t understand this yet…
I was in Australia recently for about 3 weeks or so. Friends there are willing to look at the possibility that the jabs are bad. One of them I think has already decided that they are.
Also, alot of businesses here have changed their internal policies, to make the shots required as conditions of employment (illegally by the way). BUNNINGS as 1 of those. Current employees who refuse are ok, but any new employees are required.
So I definitely dont think that the shots have paused here in Australia.
Yep but when not mandated by a government's extremist policies the % jabbed will go back to very low percentages as they did in the 19th C in the UK. Not surprised re Bunnings but what someone might like to do is compare absenteeism rates between them and another employer who doesn't demand the jab of death.
It didn't matter if they weren't keen in the Ukrainian country, as soon as any fled the country, outside Ukraine, they were forced to get the shots or denied entry.
Right, I've since checked in with the Ukrainian refugee strictures and yes the countries that were forcing vaccines on them have since stopped. But that's terrible what "Treadonus" Trudeau is doing to the Canadian people. 😭
I think the letter should go to both DeSantis and Ladapo via Jeff Childers. I would also suggest adding a risk/benefit analysis similar to that done by Steve Kirsch (see url below). Because of media propaganda and CDC/government pushback, I don't think the shots can be stopped. But as part of "informed consent', if you were handed a card that showed, for example, that fifteen people in your age group would die to save one life, it might make some people think.
- weeeell he might be worried of losing one thing, e.g. traction, when walking on one of Florida's beautiful beaches, at night, towards the end of a boat landing stage, with exceptionally heavy shoes on and a compelling argument pressed against his back.
You may know something about data but you clearly don't know anything about politicians so you lost me with the first sentence.
"In my opinion, you are the only trustworthy politician in the world."
DeSantis? Really? Because of his political grandstanding about Covid? He wants to be President. All his decisions about Covid are based on firming up his image with the base for the election. He's not for or against anything from a personal conviction standpoint. He's a politician. They don't have souls, or convictions. He's not using Covid data to inform his decisions about Covid policy, not your Covid data nor the Covid data from anyone else. He's using POLLING data to make these decisions. How is that ethical? You think he cares at all about your conclusions with data? Your conclusions are completely uninteresting and pointless to him. Show him how to improve his polling numbers with your data and you'll get a call back in a hot minute but otherwise save your breath.
Final observation. I've read a lot of your stories and almost all of the posts. None are ever negative nor object to any conclusions, it's just a bunch of sycophantic fawning over the work. Have I wandered into some mile deep conspiracy theory echo chamber or are posts you dislike being deleted? I guess time will tell. I'll check back tomorrow. :)
My comments usually get auto-deleted on most sites when I try to mention this but let's see what happens here. DeSantis isn't what he seems. If you look back at the bill he signed that caused much ruckus in the mainstream media for being. "too weak" or whatever on covid safetyism policies, you'll find that the bill actually contains a line about allowing officials to force vaccinate individuals deemed a public safety threat.
A politician who is a wolf in sheep clothes. What else is new?
Actually, he wouldn‘t be the first senior politician to end the jabs. Poland and Romania have stopped the vaccine program, and Denmark has paused it pending a review who to vaccinate with which products.
So, again, let's review your position: you believe that most of the politicians are dishonest. But you also believe that we need to leave all decision-making power in their hands.
Well, why theirs? If the goal is to leave all decision-making in the hands of dishonest people so you can worship them, why not The Hell's Angels, Mafia, or members of the neo-Nazi party? Why exclude such Worthy Candidates?
All U.S. law was written to assure us that no individual NOR GROUP had the power you are now imagining politicians to have. The articles against Trump reminded us that all taking of ANY private $ while in public office was still illegal.
It is also 100% illegal for any POLITICIAN to mandate ANY untested product, let alone ones proven harmful. We have the evidence for all THREE of these things.
Only the courage of you & everyone else was lacking to proceed with this. You all begged the politicians to stop themselves or else you would beg continually,. THAT gave them the power to continue to coerce, write into policy & mandate the deadly jabs. You could have used this same forum to rally the public on board with a movement to end this all legally, non-violently. Instead, you just begged for those who already clearly made the decision to Personally Profit from this to arrest themselves instead of acquire more wealth, a guaranteed to fail demand.
Congratulations. If making sure they stayed in Unquestionable Authority over you despite The Law, you've succeeded.
Sounds impossible, too many confounding factors. Don't you think?
We have a control group everywhere (the dirty unvaxxed), but we are living amongst people that are more likely to get the virus (and therefore spread) than we are. So we have:
- Amish counties.
- Countries with low vax rate.
Other option is Pearson the data from every country. It has been done already. Horizontal lines for hospitalization = no correlation.
Jeff Childers a lawyer who writes a daily coffee and covid substack each day. May have contact with Gov DeSantis or his surgeon general Dr Joe Ladapo. I will send your request to him today.
I was going to suggest that—thank you for reaching out to Jeff!
fwiw, both Geert Vanden Bossche and Mike Yeadon think the shot should be stopped immediately and prophylaxis given freely. Both made recent remarks to that effect.
Mary Ann, if you do not get a response I will send it as well. Don't want to pile on, so will not overwhelm him with more messages unless he ignores you.
Will also send to DeSantis' COS. But they are currently fully fired up on re-election so getting focus now that the legislative session has ended will be an adventure.
I have just sent Joel Smalley’s info for Gov DeSantis to Jeff Childers.
HERE IS MY CORE THOUGHT: I don’t believe deSantis should end the shots. He is giving people choice. I am for choice. For example, we allow people to drink themselves to death. Choice. We allow people to smoke though it tremendously increases the risk of lung cancer. Choice.
True choice means, of course, that the statistics you present are made widely known, rather than that the mainstream media dominates with untruths.
So what I would ask for is that the stats, like the stats on lung cancer, are made as widely known as possible.
A final point. I don’t believe most Floridians would stand with DiSantis if he ended the shots.
A question to you: do you know the stats on what percent of Floridians are for a statewide ending of the shots?
Also, if people have taken the shots and booster, and now have a damaged immune system, is ending the shots beneficial to them? I definitely see most of these people as utterly against what you propose.
Note: Smoking has not been prohibited. Neither has drinking.
I look forward to hearing your response, whatever it is. One step leads to another.
Excellent points, Elsa. Informed choice has to be the way forward AS ALWAYS.
In terms of who might support the governor in ending the shots, let me put it this way - 10.9 million under 65s got the first shot, 9.2 million got the second, only 2.3 million got the third. In other words, over 70% (7.6 million) of those who got the first shot did not get the third. What does that indicate? For the over 65s, the number is only 46% (2.2 million). However, in total, that's 62% of the electorate who didn't take the booster.
'Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. Fool me three times, shame on both of us.'
Meanwhile, in Australia, the defective ‘leaky vaccines’ were MANDATED for millions of people, to keep their jobs, to participate in civil society, e.g. No Jab, No Job; No Jab, No Restaurant; No Jab, No Sport; No Jab, No Travel etc.
‘Informed consent’ has been trashed. I’m reeling in horror at what has been done in the supposed ‘liberal democracy’ of Australia, where people’s right to bodily autonomy and bodily integrity has been stolen from them.
Politicians and others also fostered division and segregation, turning family members and friends against each other based on jab status, and encouraging bullying to make people submit to the jabs.
Some mandates have been wound back, but the damage has been done.
Millions of children have been jabbed too - what lies ahead for them, and how many future doses, against a disease that was of little or no threat to them?
We have no idea how all this is going to pan out in future. It’s a very dark time in Australia’s history.
Reeling in horror with you Elizabeth. Here in NSW there are still mandates for teachers and carers, and not a single logical argument to explain why that is so.
those who pointed out early on that prior attempts to create a corona vax resulted in the death of all the animals, have not changed their assessment of the lethality of this vax campaign.
DeSantis has prohibited coercive vax policies by local, county and state Florida governments and by companies, and tried to do so for cruises. He's the most informed consent governor out there. His surgeon general has been outstanding defending children on this issue as well.
Yes, but someone needs to officially recognise that the shots are deadly. Then watch the house of cards fall.
Agreed.
Consider the duplicity in the Australian situation…
The federal government Department of Health website states:
“Vaccination for COVID-19 is voluntary – as are all vaccinations in Australia – and people maintain the option to choose.“
https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/covid-19-vaccines/is-it-true/is-it-true-are-covid-19-vaccines-mandatory-in-australia
It’s the state governments that set the jab mandates, because I think technically the federal government wasn’t able to do it legally.
See my email to South Australian premier Peter Malinauskas: Peter Malinauskas bullying South Australians to submit to Covid-19 'leaky vaccines', 6 April 2022: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/04/peter-malinauskas-bullying-south-australians-to-submit-to-covid-19-leaky-vaccines.pdf
See also my email to former prime minister Scott Morrison, who really wanted the Covid jabs to be mandatory…and voila they were mandated by the states: Scott Morrison "a hypocrite and a liar" - informed consent and the Covid-19 jab rollout, 10 February, 2022: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2022/02/scott-morrison-_a-hypocrite-and-a-liar_-informed-consent-and-the-covid-19-jab-rollout.pdf
if they make the wrong choice, off to the camps they go
Thank you for the figures, Joel. Then, one needs to ask: what % of the 62% would be for ending the shots, vs just being strongly for INFORMED CONSENT - which means, lots of info that is as accurate as possible, which we all know has not happened.
There's only one way to find out. Not being a politician myself, personally I would just do what I thought was right, not what I thought was popular. I'm appealing to this side of Ron.
There are such politicians! One such (to a major extent, anyway, is Ron.
We know the risks of smoking and drinking. We don't know all the risks of the vax. The FDA and public health departments around the nation are doing all they can to hide the risks and pressure people into taking the genocide vax. Your final point is particularly cynical: don't we have enough politicians doing the wrong thing to save themselves politically?
No cynicism.
Choice is informed consent to an experiment.
Coercion viruganda is not choice.
Big Harmaceuticals hacksxxxxine is coerced, nothing freely chosen about it.
Where you been for 2 years
?
I can't get a job without the jab.
I'm not working. Not by choice.
Can you please hire me in s f killafornia please. please.
People aren't coerced into drinking or smoking. People aren't convinced by the public health experts - in whom they place enormous trust - that drinking and smoking are not only safe but beneficial to their health. Smoking and drinking are things that people choose to do because they derive some enjoyment from doing so. The 'vaccines' are a medical procedure with no purpose other than the stated health benefits - benefits which are, at best, extremely limited on a personal level, and which almost certainly are a net negative at the societal level.
The FDA's purpose is to PULL dangerous products off the market. They did it regularly, up till 2020. That should have happened for all these jabs in Jan / Feb 2021 -- the safety signals were already clear -- people were dead directly post-jab, a friend of mine included. (The jabs should never have been authorized to begin with, but that's another conspiracy trail.) The powers-that-be delayed and fought public awareness of smoking's dangerousness for 20+ years though they completely knew these dangers ... enough time to brainwash people into accepting cigs and thinking they were "cool" and sign of a "rebel". The globalists intend to follow the same evil playbook this time. Why should we put up with any of it? The shots help absolutely no one. If DeSantis comes clean about ALL the dark dealings that brought these jabs into being, the entire county would be behind him and he'd be the next president, if the globalists don't get to him first. Therein is the problem: the threats they hold.
Certainly NOT making it illegal.....but a recommendation of NOT getting it, with the backing of all reasonable science would be the proper role of government.
I agree, Apeon.
The hacksxxxine should be illegal and must be eliminated
Agreed! All about choice. With that being said , what are your thoughts on children under the age of consent getting the shot but their legal guardians consent?
I consider it criminal - meaning against the law, usurping the place of the parents - to give shots to children without the 100% informed consent of the parents. And with adequate information, I do not see any parents consenting.
He should have balls like church bells, and I think he has. Try with Ladapo as well.
Brilliant idea to reach out to Governor DeSantis about stopping the injection pogrom. If he is brave enough to take that step, other states may summon the courage to follow in his trailblazing footsteps.
I sent him my own letter about vetoing HB 7021 to end incentivized hospicide a few months ago:
• “Letter to Governor Ron DeSantis” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-governor-ron-desantis)
He didn’t veto the bill (which would have removed liability protection for hospitals implementing CDC protocols), but he did introduce Buck the CDC after that with alternative state protocols emphasizing early treatment, so that was a big step in the right direction. I would still like to see him take more concrete actions to prevent hospicide, but stopping the injections would obviously be the #1 way to stop injuries and fatalities.
I like the use of pogrom there. Very true.
Is there any country that has had a true (not partial) pause of mRNA vaccines? Ideally both of them? If so, we could do a natural experiment to see what happened to that country's mortality. At most, I think some countries paused just Moderna in a young age group if I recall.
Amish counties
And the data is in there.
Indeed. https://metatron.substack.com/p/let-it-rip?autoPlay=true
I knew that I'd seen it somewhere recently. Good work again.
Poland maybe (they were on Pfizer). And Australia & NZ (both Pfizer although Australia started with AstraZeneca) have more or less paused at this stage.
Paused in Australia? I don’t think so…
Reportedly over 95% are ‘double vaxxed’…for whatever that’s worth.
The third shot/‘booster’ is being pressed aggressively due to the obvious double jab failure, certainly in South Australia where I live, see: https://www.sahealth.sa.gov.au/wps/wcm/connect/public+content/sa+health+internet/conditions/infectious+diseases/covid-19/vaccine/boosters/boosters
Australia hasn't paused. Shots and boosters are still going strong here.
But not for the moment, mandatory. Advertising seems to have taken over the role of coercing people to booster up. I'm a little worried about Albanese though.
The shots are still mandatory for many people - e.g. in healthcare, aged care. Many of the population would support jabbing of healthcare workers, because they’re brainwashed by propaganda. What isn’t understood is that healthcare and aged care workers also have the right to informed consent, and to natural immunity. Coercive Covid jabbing is a disaster in Australia…but many people don’t understand this yet…
I was in Australia recently for about 3 weeks or so. Friends there are willing to look at the possibility that the jabs are bad. One of them I think has already decided that they are.
Also, alot of businesses here have changed their internal policies, to make the shots required as conditions of employment (illegally by the way). BUNNINGS as 1 of those. Current employees who refuse are ok, but any new employees are required.
So I definitely dont think that the shots have paused here in Australia.
Yep but when not mandated by a government's extremist policies the % jabbed will go back to very low percentages as they did in the 19th C in the UK. Not surprised re Bunnings but what someone might like to do is compare absenteeism rates between them and another employer who doesn't demand the jab of death.
I've also heard that the Ukrainians, especially out of the cities, were never too keen on it.
It didn't matter if they weren't keen in the Ukrainian country, as soon as any fled the country, outside Ukraine, they were forced to get the shots or denied entry.
Not in Canada: the Ukrainians are welcomed non-jabbed while Canadians can't work, travel or leave the country in many cases if non-jabbed.
Right, I've since checked in with the Ukrainian refugee strictures and yes the countries that were forcing vaccines on them have since stopped. But that's terrible what "Treadonus" Trudeau is doing to the Canadian people. 😭
Great work, great that you're trying to get it to DeSantis.
Somebody calling The Florida State Guard!
https://ragnarforseti.substack.com/p/ron-desantis-posts-openings-for-florida?r=hjhbr&s=w&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I like the guy but he bans too many things... Too many laws... Authoritarian.
Hopefully he doesn't run for President and just decides to keep Florida based.
I think the letter should go to both DeSantis and Ladapo via Jeff Childers. I would also suggest adding a risk/benefit analysis similar to that done by Steve Kirsch (see url below). Because of media propaganda and CDC/government pushback, I don't think the shots can be stopped. But as part of "informed consent', if you were handed a card that showed, for example, that fifteen people in your age group would die to save one life, it might make some people think.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/uk-government-data-shows-nobody-should?s=r
He HAS come out strong against giving them to children though.
"nothing to lose"
- weeeell he might be worried of losing one thing, e.g. traction, when walking on one of Florida's beautiful beaches, at night, towards the end of a boat landing stage, with exceptionally heavy shoes on and a compelling argument pressed against his back.
You may know something about data but you clearly don't know anything about politicians so you lost me with the first sentence.
"In my opinion, you are the only trustworthy politician in the world."
DeSantis? Really? Because of his political grandstanding about Covid? He wants to be President. All his decisions about Covid are based on firming up his image with the base for the election. He's not for or against anything from a personal conviction standpoint. He's a politician. They don't have souls, or convictions. He's not using Covid data to inform his decisions about Covid policy, not your Covid data nor the Covid data from anyone else. He's using POLLING data to make these decisions. How is that ethical? You think he cares at all about your conclusions with data? Your conclusions are completely uninteresting and pointless to him. Show him how to improve his polling numbers with your data and you'll get a call back in a hot minute but otherwise save your breath.
Final observation. I've read a lot of your stories and almost all of the posts. None are ever negative nor object to any conclusions, it's just a bunch of sycophantic fawning over the work. Have I wandered into some mile deep conspiracy theory echo chamber or are posts you dislike being deleted? I guess time will tell. I'll check back tomorrow. :)
My comments usually get auto-deleted on most sites when I try to mention this but let's see what happens here. DeSantis isn't what he seems. If you look back at the bill he signed that caused much ruckus in the mainstream media for being. "too weak" or whatever on covid safetyism policies, you'll find that the bill actually contains a line about allowing officials to force vaccinate individuals deemed a public safety threat.
A politician who is a wolf in sheep clothes. What else is new?
Actually, he wouldn‘t be the first senior politician to end the jabs. Poland and Romania have stopped the vaccine program, and Denmark has paused it pending a review who to vaccinate with which products.
So, again, let's review your position: you believe that most of the politicians are dishonest. But you also believe that we need to leave all decision-making power in their hands.
Well, why theirs? If the goal is to leave all decision-making in the hands of dishonest people so you can worship them, why not The Hell's Angels, Mafia, or members of the neo-Nazi party? Why exclude such Worthy Candidates?
All U.S. law was written to assure us that no individual NOR GROUP had the power you are now imagining politicians to have. The articles against Trump reminded us that all taking of ANY private $ while in public office was still illegal.
It is also 100% illegal for any POLITICIAN to mandate ANY untested product, let alone ones proven harmful. We have the evidence for all THREE of these things.
Only the courage of you & everyone else was lacking to proceed with this. You all begged the politicians to stop themselves or else you would beg continually,. THAT gave them the power to continue to coerce, write into policy & mandate the deadly jabs. You could have used this same forum to rally the public on board with a movement to end this all legally, non-violently. Instead, you just begged for those who already clearly made the decision to Personally Profit from this to arrest themselves instead of acquire more wealth, a guaranteed to fail demand.
Congratulations. If making sure they stayed in Unquestionable Authority over you despite The Law, you've succeeded.
woo-effing-hoo.
If only we had a control group we could compare these graphs with ...
The few countries with very low vacc rates, like Burundi (0.11%), probably dont collect the data.
All we can hope for is for someone courageous enough to stop the experiment so we can compare the before and after results.
Sounds impossible, too many confounding factors. Don't you think?
We have a control group everywhere (the dirty unvaxxed), but we are living amongst people that are more likely to get the virus (and therefore spread) than we are. So we have:
- Amish counties.
- Countries with low vax rate.
Other option is Pearson the data from every country. It has been done already. Horizontal lines for hospitalization = no correlation.
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/a-single-brave-district-attorney?s=r
We have a red-pilled Attorney General!!
https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/now-we-are-cooking-with-gas-i-have?s=r