Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Dr Mike Yeadon's avatar

It took me way too long to make anything of the published literature showing flu vaccination does not reduce deaths in the elderly. Why might that be?

The elderly are vulnerable to respiratory illnesses we call colds & flu because their immune systems are poorly responsive to new challenges.

So why would anyone expect the elderly to respond to c19 vaccines?

In addition you cannot acquire long term safety data in a period shorter than the duration of any alleged pandemic. You can’t speed everything up by applying extra resource. You cannot make a baby in one month with nine women.

Vaccination using a novel vaccine could NEVER have been a safe & effective intervention.

The basic design of the “vaccines” was the most dangerous option that could have been chosen: causing recipients to manufacture known to be directly toxic spike protein.

All four lead pharma chose this basic design.

Collusion & malfeasance.

The clinical trials were fraud (see Brook Jackson, Peter Doshi)

The non clinical dossiers are fraud & consequently the regulatory authorisation were fraud (see Sasha Latypova)

The manufacturing QA/QC was fraud (see Hedley Rees).

The batch to batch consistency was all over the place (see www.howbad.info)

It’s not possible to survey this mess, in light of the facts that in many countries there was no excess deaths (eg Germany), knowing that none of the “measures” did anything useful & they knew that in 2019, and that eariy treatments were available from spring 2020, as anything other than a deliberate PsyOp designed to smash everything & inject billions.

No pandemic, no elevated health emergency. Some think there wasn’t even a new virus circulating at all. It’s doesn’t matter now. The above is sufficient for anyone to know this is already the greatest crime in history. And it’s hardly begun.

I’ve not even mentioned PCR, which is where I started on this. I knew it was fraud the moment I saw it. Again, all irrelevant now.

Did you know that the bulk of excess deaths in UK were planned medical murder with midazolam & morphine? (see Stuart Wilkie by Maajid Nawaz). In the US, their planned medical murder was mechanical ventilators & remdesivir. Theee was no classical signature of what we considered respiratory virus illness deaths (see Denis Rancourt by Jerm Warfare).

Given lockdowns were known not to slow transmission (assuming anything to transmit) closing the world must have been authorised by the uber wealthy. Why would they so authorise?

It can’t only be money. These people stand astride the very money creating processes in Central & private banks. No. It’s about totalitarian control. UN2030 sustainable development goals. Personally I believe the perpetrators intend depopulation on a grand scale. I think they see this Act as their destiny. Once you start looking under the rug, I’m afraid all the evidence points this way, 50 years of scene setting & lies. For pandemic planning, see YouTube & Paul Schreyer’s Pandemic Simulations). Climate change uses exactly the sane actors, methods & themes. That’s fraud, too, starting perhaps with Ehrlich’s Population Bomb, Club of Rome, the Iron & Steel Confederation / EU, the international panel on climate change etc.

This is merely Phase I of a long planned demolition of everything that makes modern life tolerable or better. They’re continuing to chop away at electrical generation, gas supply, inflation of everything, destruction of all sovereign currencies, the health, education, police & courts systems, supply chains globally, fertiliser production, food production etc etc etc.

Phase II is beginning. It’s not my crime, but it looks like stripping most of us of our assets is under way.

At some point, it will become expediently necessary to require mandatory digital ID to obtain meagre needs for food, fuel, money & warmth. At that point, freedom & democracy is permanently over, and from then on, if the perpetrators choose to require regular injections to keep your digital pass valid, you’ll do it or you’ll starve. Cash will be withdrawn completely under some pretence.

That’s why I’m of the view that we’ve a short time at most to halt it at least deviate from this trajectory.

I ask again for people to weigh up what others call Yeadon’s Wager.

A. If I’m right and you ignore me, the downsides could be (I’m sure of it) as I’ve outlined. Irreversible. It doesn’t matter if I’m wrong about depopulation. That’s a detail, because permanent loss of freedom makes this a world I don’t plan to live in.

B. If those standing back, hoping I’m wrong, are right, we all get a good laugh at my expense.

Which wager should you take, A or B?

As to what to do, that’s irrelevant until you’re convinced you must act. Virtually no one is there, yet, but it’s why my wife & I dropped everything & tried to get to a place where I hoped they’d fight back. I don’t care where a solid resistance occurs. It’s not about me.

Expand full comment
Ray's avatar

mike is spot on as always, but i cant even convince my own mother, she just shuts down and refuses to discuss anything. this is a problem i cant see past, how do we wake them?

Expand full comment
302 more comments...

No posts