23 Comments

Governments all round the world acted in lockstep early in the “plandemic” to ban hydroxychloroquine (and ivermectin). In the UK, hydroxychloroquine was banned just two days after the first lockdown, see https://www.gov.uk/government/news/chloroquine-and-hydroxychloroquine-not-licensed-for-coronavirus-covid-19-treatment.

The lockdown “three weeks to flatten the sombrero” was a sham as they had already decided that the only exit from the pandemic would be to get the entire population vaccinated. We know this from the open letter to Boris Johnson which explains the seemingly-illogical move made by the government just before the first lockdown, namely to downgrade Covid-19 from its then-prevailing status of High Consequence Infectious Disease, see https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/we-both-know-this-has-never-been-about-saving-lives-boris/.

South African GP Dr Shankara Chetty testified in the Fuellmich Covid-19 Crimes Against Humanity model trial as to the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine in treating Covid-19. He treated 10,000 patients without needing to put any of them into hospital or onto oxygen and without having single patient death, see https://expose-news.com/2022/02/22/covid-illness-is-due-to-an-allergic-reaction/.

Expand full comment

I know 2 women who were hospitalised in UK with pneumonia in December 2019, both seriously ill but treated with whatever meds doctors wanted to use and both recovered. This is not about HCQ per se but I have wondered if the time frame different, then tested and labelled as a "covid" illness, with new protocols, restrictions on drug use, would they be here today? Regardless of any label, symptoms are symptoms and doctors, not politicians, make their choices. The fact the majority just went along with the politics is frightening and does not bode well for the future.

Expand full comment

And, yet, most people still have no clue what really happened. Many have the memory of a goldfish.

Expand full comment

It’s not that simple. Most people living busy lives and relying on the MSM for their news don’t realise that they are being horribly abused. Either that or they have been conditioned to mentally blocking out the idea.

I’ve sent out many emails on the Covid "plandemic" which got posted online by Joel Smalley and others but I never get any response from the addressees (To or Friends and Family Bcc), some of whom still go out to get the latest Covid boosters despite knowing of the “coincidences” of multiple severe post-jab afflictions within our extended circle - strokes, autoimmune difficulties, heart irregularities and even one suspicious 50-year-old death.

Sadly, the power of establishment psyops brainwashing coupled with politician and MSM lying propaganda and censorship of the truth is very difficult to overcome. My latest effort is here, mostly about Net Zero but linking to the Covid “plandemic”: https://principia-scientific.com/what-rishi-sunaks-recent-net-zero-back-pedalling-really-means/.

Expand full comment

Well said, Douglas. I totally agree. Excellent article. Thank you for helping inform the public about all the mass deception.

Expand full comment

I am retired and have time to research. Whilst initially believing the hype, I sewed masks for family and friends, battalions of women sewed scrubs too because the media told us there were huge shortages! I then discovered how the PCR test was quickly concocted in the absence of an isolated virus and the SOP, standard operation procedures, were set at a much higher level than "normal" which would ensure positive results. I relayed this info, plus outcomes from previous mRNA attempts in animal subjects to people and I was either rebuked, or ignored/unfriended by family as well as friends. I was trusting initially and of course had no pressure from employment. However, I can't understand those who I informed who still took them just to travel. I will look at link you posted now.

Expand full comment

Any medicine denigrated by 'them' has/had to be worth consideration and trials. The population kept masked during the low virus circulating summer months so that amoral cancer of a PM could spout about the "galloping hooves of the cavalry" bringing the 'vaccine' to enable society to get back to normal. His preposterous language was a big red flag ( after all the others), and he never promoted any other medications.

For all those, as Whitty explained without equivocation in the spring of 2020, who would only experience C-19 as a mild illness, paracetamol, bed for a day or so, would be more than enough!

They did all the damage back then and set in motion even more, experienced across all age ranges, and they swan around confident that the Hallett Inq will shield their very gross misconduct.

Ones boiling blood will withstand the winter chill to come.

Looks like it will be parky compared with last few years....leaves late to fall, squirrels frantically hoovering up acorns, spiders spinning very large webs...apparently nature's signage!

Expand full comment

And unfortunately I’m unable to take HCQ as it will or can exasperate my psoriasis. Ivermectin is my win. I still haven’t gotten Covid, but I do have HCQ before I knew it could flare my psoriasis, ivermectin and antibiotics in case I get sick. These studies are so important. It’s a shame that ppl didn’t listen to us who just knew better than getting that poison injected.

Expand full comment

You've done amazing work Joel. You, unlike so many, can hold your head high when children now, are grown and say, "what did you do when the iatrogenocide happened?"

If this "contamination" issue gains momentum and there is still crickets from anyone in power, I think you and anyone else that has fought tooth and nail for humanity, will have the answer to the final "conspiracy theory" of intentional depopulation.😐🤔😤🤐

Expand full comment

Well; Lets hope you don't get "De platformed"!

However, you must expect this. If you insist upon speaking the truth and upon debunking the 'Narrative', there is no other outcome possible.

In a Woke World, "Democracy(?)" cannot allow dissent!

If we cannot break free of this intellectual apathy, the clock might be rolled back a few hundred years to where dissent had really disastrous results?

Expand full comment

Hi Joel, I am coposting this on Igor as well, a bit more of relevant history.

I am a good friend with a director, whose company was delivering HCQ to the States from Europe. The ambassador was VERY active on this, calling frequently, and finally there was a delivery, with prospects of more. While the Trump administration idea was to deliver these to pharmacies, 29 M units first phase, in order to keep americans out of hospitals.

However, dr rick bright had a second opinion, pointed out by this interview and featuring an angry late Dr. Zelenko. The early treatment policy was gamed to late hospital treatment, which is too little to late. I guess it was abandoned when remdesivir was made "standard of care", read standard of kill. Of course, there was no need for further deliveries.

The video link https://www.bitchute.com/video/WHIktyjGEPcF/

Dr. Eades had something to say about this: "The little medical piece I read said that a medical journalist surveyed a large number of Italian rheumatologists (the docs who care for patients with these disorders (lupus , other autoimmune) and discovered that none of their patients who were on long-term hydroxychloroquine had contracted Covid."

He also used some nasty words of this bright Dick Head. Not this one, though.

JR

Expand full comment

Yikes. That video is a horror movie; not sure I can make it past Bright saying "And that is the moment I decided I had to break protocol..."

Expand full comment

Hi Joel,

Not sure this news reached you in wherever you are but it was kind of 'big' news in Belgian/Holland MSM. I found an English report here: https://www.conservativenewsdaily.net/breaking-news/hydroxychloroquine-reduces-covid-19-mortality-study-finds/

However, the MSM were also quick to announce that "the Medical journal The Lancet distances itself from controversial study on hydroxychloroquine" (google translation beneath):

The prestigious medical journal The Lancet distances itself from the study on hydroxychloroquine that appeared in the journal about ten days ago and was criticized. In a formal warning, The Lancet acknowledged that "important questions" have been raised about the data in the study.

HAA 03-06-20, 13:54 Source: AFP

With this "expression of concern", the journal would like to inform readers that "serious scientific questions have been reported to us". The editors point out in the short statement that the authors have now requested an audit of the study themselves. The results are expected soon.

The "expression of concern" is not as serious an exaggeration as a retraction of an article, but in any case it also raises doubts about the scientific work.

Also read

WHO: “Clarity in June about the use of hydroxychloroquine against corona”

Antimalarial drug

The research in question has led to clinical trials of the drug hydroxychloroquine being stopped all over the world. The study concludes that the drug - which is best known as a means of treating malaria and autoimmune diseases - is not beneficial for people hospitalized with Covid-19, and that it can even be fatal.

The article is based on data from 96,000 patients admitted to 671 hospitals between December and April. The study compares the condition of patients who received hydroxychloroquine and those who did not.

Methodology

Immediately after the publication, several scientists expressed their doubts, including scientists who had long questioned the usefulness of treatment with hydroxychloroquine. In an open letter published on May 28, dozens of scientists from around the world say scrutiny raises "concerns about both the methodology and the integrity of the data."

Would you like to receive the Lunch News newsletter from HLN every day by email?

There was also intense criticism from the camp that is in favor of the controversial medicine, including from the well-known French scientist Didier Raoult. According to him, the investigation was done by "lambags", he said in a video posted online on Tuesday.

Expand full comment

The prestigious medical journal The Lancet ....

Not any more it isn't, plenty of other adjectives starting with 'p', but certainly not 'prestigious'.

Expand full comment

It may not help those in hospital, but it could be effective in keeping them out of the hospital in the first place.

Expand full comment

With regards to deplatforming and censorship, I very recently saw a chart that summarized what the 5 eyes countries (UK, Canada, USA, NZ, Aus) are implementing very soon: basically fines and possibly imprisonment for companies that go against whatever rules these gov's put in place.

We must be prepared because I think companies like Rumble, Substack, even X (twitter), free speech platforms, will be targeted. I doubt even VPN's will be useful as a work around.

I watched a video last night where Russell Brand interviewed John Campbell and he made a comment with respect to Rumble that confirmed my fears.

Might be time to invest in some carrier pidgeons.

Expand full comment

Thanks for cataloguing this, Joel. What troubles me the most, although maybe it should not at this point, is members of "Team Reality" who are quick to say, with assurance, "HCQ and IVM do not work." I mean, seems like the data would confirm what they say. Then, some of them say, again, with confidence, "no trials have shown otherwise." Then I see all manner of data, from you and others, some of it even available to a duffer like me, that contradicts their statements. So hard to understand the level of B.S. afoot right now! Anyway, I have long been convinced on IVM, from data I gathered and personal experience. That HCQ is similarly effective comes as no surprise.

Expand full comment

Joel, amazing post and thank you for mentioning me!!!

Expand full comment

Here in Chicago for a few weeks. Sadly it appears the covid jabs are as popular as ever. Every TV and radio advert for Pfizer explain how important it is to get the “covid jab”. It is depressing to hear the ongoing brainwashing.

Expand full comment

I always recommend https://c19early.org as a good compilation of studies on dozens of proposed Covid prophylaxes/therapies.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Oct 10, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Hi John,

Perrot, Sanders... yes, perhaps, but Kennedy?

If so, would he be a pacifier knowingly or not knowingly?

I understand that the last couple of years (decades?) everything looks doubtful, we can't be sure of anything anymore. But what about Kennedy's life work? Many many years of hard work fighting for a righteous cause (i presume).

How can one dismiss that? All of a sudden he changes direction?

Just asking aloud.

For those who like to think, these are confusing times, for those who are asleep, it's just another (groundhog) day.

Expand full comment

Kurt;

This 'Looking for Saviours', is a fatal human flaw.

There are no "Perfect" humans. We all have weaknesses and delusions. Not one of us is suited to Power! This is specially true of those who aspire to power. Most people instinctively know that we are unsuited, and most withdraw into apathy. But, there is a 'Third Way' in which we can develop our individualism and support others in developing their own. If human individuality was taught, we would have no need for Laws, Government, or even Police. Right and wrong are hardwired into Humanity.

Expand full comment

His unconditional support for Israel and his stance on the 2nd Amendment concern me a good deal.

Expand full comment