Baffled
I’m baffled.
But, not as baffled as the “health experts” around the world about why there are so many young, healthy people literally dropping down dead unexpectedly.
I mean, that’s obvious, isn’t it?
It’s obvious to Mercure Wang and Dr. Yuhong Dong, writing for the Epoch Times:
2022 Excess Deaths All Around the World Raise an Alarm
It’s obvious to their readers.
I imagine it’s obvious to you if you subscribe to my Substack.
It’s obvious if you read anyone’s Substack.
It’s obvious if you read other alt media sources like Lifesite News, The Conservative Woman and The Daily Sceptic.
It’s obvious if you watch The Highwire.
I mean it’s even obvious if you’re on Twitter because even the most voracious censorship in the world cannot possibly hide this truth, it is so obvious.
So, how on earth are medical professionals and “health experts” baffled? Are they really that bad at their jobs??
So, that’s what I’m baffled by.
It’s like there’s an elephant in every room of your house. It’s in your car and at your office. It’s at the shops and your kids’ school. It’s in your bed every night.
And yet, you don’t see any elephants?
Thank you. Here is what I wrote in July 2020 in my Letter to Establishment Intellectuals:
https://tessa.substack.com/p/grow-some-balls-a-sour-letter-to
"This letter is a word of warning for my people—the city intellectuals—who haven’t somehow noticed that Reason at their altar has been long replaced by an effigy made from scraps of establishment garbage. What’s passing for reason is a mix of appearance-only #science and deranged corporatchik mumbo jumbo. Have you got no eyes?'"
Synchronously, I was just writing about my concept of "Anti-Knowledge" - I think it applies in buckets here, and may have explanatory power of what you are describing, so copying my fb post: "ANTI-KNOWLEDGE
This is when scientists come up with conclusions which are not just in error, but also are 100% diametrically opposite to the truth, yet the dogma and indoctrination is so enshrined, that it is impossible to provide any amount of evidence which will change minds of those captured by anti-knowledge. This is why, indeed, science advances one funeral at a time.
I first encountered this concept while an academic scientist myself, first in my own field, then I started to see it everywhere. One could take just about any field and start questing the assumptions, and the whole thing would unravel. I then saw it in the real world in a major industry which was operating on total anti-knowledge, thus demonstrably highly inefficient, and unsafe (costing lives), but no-one would listen, and I think not being herd about this was part of my descent into disease. Like Semmelweiz went mad, trying to convince doctors of the time that washing their hands would save lives.
We have seen it again in overdrive over the past couple of years.
Perhaps the simplest way to describe anti-knowledge is: when a theory doesn't match, explain or predict the real world observations, the real life world is taken as being wrong, and the theory is upheld!!!
Here is another example, Allan Savory's real world results demonstrate the very thing the powers that be seem to blaming a lot of climate change on - livestock - is actually the very thing we need for health of the planet, properly managed. Shutting down the farms and putting limits on livestock has the potential for catastrophy! Well worth a watch, for this specific case, and as an illustrative example of anti-knowledge. https://www.ted.com/talks/allan_savory_how_to_fight_desertification_and_reverse_climate_change
Also worth checking out Steve Patterson's "Our Present Dark Age" article."