Cooking the books, ONS style (Part IV)
They are well and truly burnt
In Part III, we looked at COVID mortality and witnessed how the data presented by the ONS appeared flawed because it seemed more reasonable to use the vaccinated population at the time of expected infection with COVID rather than week of death when working out the age-standarised mortality rates (ASMRs) for each cohort.
In this fourth and final part, we’re going to put it altogether and try to draw some conclusions.
To put it together we can simply add the ASMRs for COVID and non-COVID for the vaccinated and unvaccinated respectively.
And there you have it, clear as day, vaccinated 70 to 79 year olds in England died at a substantially higher rate than the unvaccinated during the period when COVID was rife and first doses were being administered.
What was it again that Nobel Prize winning French virologist1 and former GAVI and B&M Gates Foundation vaccine expert2 said about vaccinating in the middle of a pandemic??
Oh yeah, STUPID idea, people will get hurt.
I’ve put the expected ASMR for one last sanity check. Looks reasonable too. In the “off-season”, mortality is lower. In the absence of the vaccine, 2021 would probably have been a very benign year for deaths. Not surprising given the historical progression and the excess suffered in 2020.
But has the toxic jab saved any lives at all? Afraid not. It’s close but except a brief period at the end of Feb when the vaccinated fared marginally better, the unvaccinated have fared better than the vaccinated throughout. In fact, it would appear that you are up to 4 times more likely to die if you are vaccinated than not.
It should go without saying that this conclusion is heavily caveated. Without knowing exactly what changes were made to the underlying data, we cannot be certain that my forensic analysis is correct.
Nevertheless, I have written to both the Office for National Statistics and the UK Statistics Authority to try and get some clarity on the issues raised and better still, to get a copy of the unadulterated data to work with.
*Addendum 1 - Spoiler alert. This is how they do it in Australia…
**Addendum 2 - This is how they do it in Scotland too…
***Addendum 3 - Same fraud being committed in Northern Ireland.
In the meantime, dangerous idiots like Jeremy Vine, Piers Morgan and Andrew Pierce will continue to peddle the misinformation promulgated by the ONS to encourage the discrimination against those who believe bodily autonomy and the Nuremberg Code are serious matters that ought to be upheld.
I hope you find this information useful in the interests of selfish self-preservation even if you are not concerned about the broader implications of the coerced or mandated medical interventions with experimental therapies.
Luc Montagnier to save you the time looking him up - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luc_Montagnier
Geert Vanden Bossche (DVM, PhD), https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/
Why was it done? profit or control? or both? ----- I, Grampa
Really can't thank you enough for doing these analyses.