It wasn’t really an experiment, it was a pre-planned, globally coordinated “plandemic”. Reiner Fuellmich and his colleagues presented copious evidence of this in his 2022 Covid-19 Crimes Against Humanity model trial, see my two-part post kindly hosted by Joel: https://metatron.substack.com/p/reiner-fuellmichs-grand-jury-court.
Over a year ago I effectively accused my MP of being complicit in these crimes by asking him to deny twenty simple questions which explain the sequence of how the “plandemic” was perpetrated. He didn’t reply, see https://metatron.substack.com/p/an-open-letter-to-my-mp-culpable?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email. It’s nice that my first question to my MP relates to the Boris Johnson’s skulduggery highlighted by Joel above.
Joel’s last image relates to yesterday’s House of Commons “debate” on excess deaths secured by Andrew Bridgen MP. It only lasted 30 minutes. Dr John Campbell has posted the video, accompanied with his own commentary. The good news is the cheering that Mr Bridgen got from the public gallery through the screen of security glass and the abusive shouting down of the Minister, something I have never heard before. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97qRUqYLNu0&t=366s.
Neil Oliver is one of the very few public commentators who understands and exposes how the general public are being horribly abused on multiple fronts by our treasonous puppet politicians acting on behalf of their psychopathic globalist overlords and paymasters. In his latest monologue Neil rails against these abuses just sufficiently obliquely as to (hopefully) avoid being taken out by Big Brother Ofcom.
He opens with “For the past few years we have been marched from bad to worse by people who are bad, and getting worse every day … Anyone here in the UK who looks on at Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer [must] shudder at the thought and ask, how in the name of all that’s holy did we find ourselves asked to choose between two men who, by their every action, have failed the people of this country in every measurable way”.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
There's no polite or moderate way to describe these Parliamentarians. To continue to deliberately ignore excess deaths and to refuse to explore the possible reasons for those deaths on behalf of the victims and the electorate in general is evil. The politicians supposedly democratically elected to represent us are content to watch us die whilst they turn a blind eye to the likely causes of those deaths because in all probability they will be revealed as being complicit in the deaths because they voted for deadly lockdowns and wholeheartedly supported - and in many cases promoted - the mass, aggressively coerced (and even mandated) rollout of 'safe and effective vaccines', which have demonstrably proved to be neither. Parliament needs a thorough de-lousing, Cromwell style.
Funding Both Sides: How Jewish Money Controls British Politics . . .
“During the previous Labour government, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown were ardent Zionists because they accepted the justice of Israel’s cause, not because Labour’s chief fund-raisers were first the Jew Michael Levy and then the Jew Jonathan Mendelsohn (both are now members of the House of Lords). And during the current Conservative government, David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson have been ardent Zionists because they too accept the justice of Israel’s cause, not because the Conservatives’ chief fund-raisers have been first the Jew Sir Mick Davis and then the Jew Sir Ehud Sheleg.”
What has been also overlooked is earlier in the day there was a debate for a second reading put forward by the only other Upstanding MP’s in the house, Christopher Chope, Ester McVey and Philip Davies on a bill to increase the vaccine damage payment scheme amount. In the discussion it was made clear they have had to extensively increase the dept dealing with these claims and one of the stats revealed was over the course of the scheme which was started in the seventies only around 270 claims have been made for all vaccines in all that time. Yet in the last two years nearly 7000 have been made for covid alone!! BBC didn’t report on that at all!!
“This is the big lie of big lies, wherein we are supposed to believe that in this process of the World Government’s depopulation of humans, we are also saving the earth, which will save humanity. No rationalization could be more absurd”
Correct...I use “300” to refer to the globalist satanic cabal that has been pulling the strings behind our “democratic” governments giving us only the illusion of freedom and democracy when really it is nothing more than a criminal satanic pedophilic cartel spanning likely millennia.
It’s hard to imagine what else would encourage them to open their sleepy eyes. I guess it’s a propaganda induced stupor. Most people are very much conditioned to only think and talk about tv series, sport or survival. Maybe as survival becomes much more difficult that might have an effect... but i won’t hold my breath 😂
I’ve always thought that the only way those fast asleep will ONLY wake up if it affects their own lives and/or family. And still many refuse to see. Many don’t question why their loved one is DEAD now... one Doctor put it this way. It’s called AGITATED DENIAL. Their soul KNOWS something is wrong but they choose to NOT SEE IT, NOT HEAR IT, and NOT TALK ABOUT IT because it’s too painful and will shift their PARADIGM instantly and it’s too much to bear. Sad times indeed.
Absolutely I’ve got fiends who’s friends and relatives have died suddenly from “undiagnosed conditions” or got vaccine injured and they are like what? Even if it was the vaccine what can I do about it. The end. So yeah apparently death isn’t enough to raise the curtain of denial.
So incredibly true. Bogged down in there own self absorption; NFL. Taylor Swift /Kelce, Draft Kings. Facebook, Twitter ad infinitum. Won't know what ran over them when it happens. All done through the clever intentions of the elites over many years to dumb them down so as to make then vulnerable to what we are witnessing.
Yes i see that there has been a long push for people to disengage in any conversations that involve politics, philosophy, religion or understanding the reason for why the world is like it is, when I was growing up I remember these topics were labelled boring and if I ever tried to engage friends in meaty conversations i was quickly told this is boring you’re boring. They planned this for what more than a century? They have certainly achieved their aim however maybe once the bread runs out the circuses won’t be enough?
What a disgusting and despicable showing in the house with the exception of one courageous man who figures he’s already old and has not much to lose so stands for what he knows is the truth and just.
Oct 21, 2023·edited Oct 21, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley
It’s over. If you want justice you’re going to have to go get it yourself. All institutions are corrupted and those in power aren’t even pretending they have your interests in mind. The democratic experiment is over.
This is not "Socialism"! It is a modified Fascism, masquerading as Socialism.
A wolf in sheep's clothing.
The Welfare State can be taken away with the stroke of a pen, and the Sheep can't even reach the "Wolves", so they will turn on each other and complete the slaughter?????
We need to stop blaming "the voters." The elections are RIGGED.
In 2021, we ran the largest exit poll ever conducted in California (all counties, over 30K responses) after the "Recall Newsom" election. 98% reported that they voted "yes" to oust Newsom. Based upon the large sample size (% of the number who voted) the statistical analysis and margin of error showed that no less than 96% who voted in that election, voted to oust Newsom.
California is the state that sent Reagan to the White House. In 2020, SF was having "gays for Trump" and "Trannies for Trump" parades! Not that the MSM would cover any of THAT.
Until we get our elections back, none of this changes. People who say the "voters" in California deserve Newsom, should ALSO be saying that the whole country deserves Biden, "cuz that's who they voted for."
If we all deserve this tyranny, it is because we've let the DEMONS take over our elections systems, not because we're all "voting wrong."
Yes. And it's a sticky widget locating a "civil" remedy, as all of those in office (via the rigged elections) immediately go to work creating barriers to correcting the problem by passing new elections codes that will block almost all attempts to correct the situation. The codes THEMSELVES are now the reason the elections are ABLE to be so fully rigged.
Lawyers and litigants generally go into court trying to locate a code that was "violated." And they miss the entire point by not challenging the ENFORCABILITY of the codes which are CAUSING this level of election fraud to continue. Laws passed by the legislature which only CAUSE/ALLOW rampant election fraud are subject to direct challenge.
We are in serious trouble now because we've not paid the price in ADVANCE of the problem.
The price of freedom is constant vigilance. There are ALWAYS evil people fighting behind the scenes for more power, and they ALWAYS claim it's for our "own good" which is why "public health/welfare" is normally their sales-pitch. That, and "saving children" or "saving the planet."
Correct Mark but most people have a slave mentality, via Matrix programming. This is why they believe they NEED to be governed aka ruled. Vast majority of folks in this comment section are not voluntaryists but statists and have that mindset. They believe there NEEDS to be a ruling class and that “authority” is to be obeyed. Joel Smalley doesn't appear to have worked things out yet but to be fair dropping the belief in statism is a gradual process. Good luck to him and anyone else on that journey.
Folks like Joy Lucette Garner are absolutely oblivious. Fast asleep. They have no grasp whatsoever.
I give ZERO legitimacy to the CURRENT government nightmare we are suffering. I confronted SCOTUS myself to learn that they are ALL fully onboard with the agenda to EXTERMINATE the American people. I am most assuredly NOT "asleep." I SEE. I KNOW.
"No grasp whatsoever???" Insults are not an argument for a "better world" which you've YET to explain the creation of. You act as if I cannot see that we currently live under complete despotism and tyranny, and that they're planning for MUCH WORSE tomorrow.
The only "solution" you've offered is "no form of government." And that would be great IF those who've highjacked it AGREED with you about this. They do not. And it's a well-oiled machine headed for us all right now. We (the people who prefer freedom) might want to consider getting together and AGREEING to be organized enough to stop them. Hiding in the woods is probably not going to save anyone from what's coming after they finish dividing us up, (to make it easier to finish us off).
As I fervently exhausted my last possible CIVIL remedy to prevent the extermination of the American people at the hands of the U.S. government, my brief was concluded with these words:
"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long
established should not be changed for light and transient
causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that
mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are
sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the
forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long
train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the
same Object evinces a design to reduce them under
absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to
throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards
for their future security.
Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776).
When SCOTUS (U.S. Supreme Court) formally "declares" the extermination of the American people to be a "Constitutionally authorize" action of government, the gig is obviously up. I was so hoping for a CIVIL remedy. And I tried very hard for this. I had previously once fought a group of Rockefeller trustfund babies in Federal Court and WON. (It was over some Intellectual property rights.) But now I see that on the ultimate issue of this wholesale extermination of the American people, SCOTUS will not bend, not ONE INCH in the direction of saving the people of this Nation. On this issue, they are entirely bent toward the collapse of the one Nation who's people might still have stood in the way their "One World Order."
Not voting will not stop them. I wish it could help stop them. But it won't. We shall see how well humanity can fend off their next couple of assaults WITHOUT organizing to marshal our own forces, and instead, immediately descending into a Mad Max world as the only "solution" anyone has the IQ to come up with after dozens of the older "soft-kill" jabs. I would prefer an organized approach, as I believe it gives us a better shot at survival. But then, that would violate your "rule" because it might look like a structure, which you would call a "government."
The fact "we the people" have ALLOWED criminals to overtake our government (while we were watching football, movies, etc.)) and violate literally everything which the Constitution specifically PROHIBITS the government from doing to us, does NOT mean there's no way to self-govern. But then, you'd READ the Constitution to understand this. Most of the people arguing against any form of organized agreement between humans (i.e., civilization) cannot manage to make up their own bed in the morning, let alone get it together enough to get off of their parent's tits. But they are very busy insulting other people.
"The fact "we the people" have ALLOWED criminals to overtake our government (while we were watching football, movies, etc.)) and violate literally everything which the Constitution specifically PROHIBITS the government from doing to us, does NOT mean there's no way to self-govern. But then, you'd READ the Constitution to understand this."
Thank you for proving my point. I'm not insulting you, I am just stating facts. You are subservient to institutions of authority, such as "the constitution", which is literally a document from the ruling class that introduced the federal state, taxation and criminalised challenge of it. You still believe that governance is legitimate and are blindly regurgitating Matrix programming. A Constitutional Republic is just a form of governance. All governance is tyrannical. You are absolutely oblivious. Demonstrably so.
The Constitution is NOT an "authority" over people. It is a proclamation of the LIMITATIONS of any entity purporting to serve the people as a "government" may DO to people. It proclaims that ANY form of government which violates the principal that individual God-given rights may NOT be trampled by the the collective government, nor any mob, majority, "network" or otherwise. It affirms that it is not only our right, but our DUTY to deny the legitimacy of ANY structure which performs tyranny upon us.
If you'd ever bothered to READ it, you'd understand this. But you haven't. Someone told you it was written by "white males" and that it was the cause of slavery. An you've no idea that it was this document which ultimately led to abolishing slavery, (at least the overt version;-)
You see, this entire "Matrix" of slavery, with it's illusion of "choice" is under the FRAUD that our captors are somehow still entitled to their positions of power, EVEN THOUGH they've broken the contract. Rather than wipe my arse with the contract, light it on fire, and then piss on it's ashes, I go to enforce it against the swine who used it to obtain their pretense of legitimacy.
At worst, the Constitution is very good PREMISE to start from, i.e., no "network" no "structure" no "organization" and no GOVERNMENT has ANY legitimacy so long as it violates our God-given rights, INSTEAD OF protecting them.
But then, you'd have to READ the document to understand it's value. My guess is, you couldn't recite the 1st ten Amendments to save your life. You see a document that has as it's sole purpose the delineation of strict LIMITS on the functions of ANY "network" purporting to govern ANYTHING (let alone people) as a source of a problem, when the document itself contains extremely valuable strategies for avoiding tyranny, if indeed anyone was vigilant enough to enforce it BEFORE their "network" has been overtaken by despots.
"The Constitution is NOT an "authority" over people. It is a proclamation of the LIMITATIONS of any entity purporting to serve the people as a "government" may DO to people. It proclaims that..."
Things with zero authority can proclaim anything... You are contradicting yourself as you are clueless. Simply repeating what you've been told to believe without thinking about it. I suggest you go do some research about the document written by the ruling class that you revere. I suggest you read the anti Federalist papers.
Oh, I am still waiting for an answer: WHAT will keep the managers of your "network" (sounds so much better than "guvment") from breaking literally EVERY agreement made therein? What will keep it's members from doing so?
What will protect a farm/family/production from random marauders who wish to pillage? Your own guns? What if they have more firepower? Back to the Mad Max utopia without any pretense of a civilization. You see it as heaven. I view it as hell.
Okay Neo. You'll free humanity from the Matrix by going online to insult random people you don't approve of. The only thing you're truly interested in, is seeing yourself as smarter and better than others, and also seeing how much MORE bad frequencies you can create by being abusive and insulting to others. And if there's anything I am quite certain of about this fraudulent system we now inhabit, it's that those who wish to destroy us within it, use the frequencies YOU want to create MORE of as FOOD, both metaphorically and literally, i.e., adrenochrome.
So you have all of the answers for escaping the Matrix? Good. It must've worked out very well for you so far. But where are you right now? Living off of others? Can you even even manage to make your own bed in the morning? No wonder the very thought of ANY form of "SELF-governance" is so fully abhorrent to you. Trolling around the internet looking for opportunities to level person insults at others is hardly going to "wake up the masses" Neo - even if you manage to find another character to support your attacks on us "asleep" people, and confirm for you that it's a correct method of 'helping humanity get out of the Matrix".
Maybe spend a little more time outside of the Matrix before you come back. Your energy here is abusive, egotistical, dismissive, nasty, and dark;-) With your approach, nobody would suspect you are in any way "enlightened" to anything of value.
"Voting" is a sin. Okay. I have YET to hear your version of "civilization" that works WITHOUT any pretense of self-governance, and is able to maintain even a pretense of any freedom. I guess in your world, there are no "rights" upon which any person can, or should, stand to defend. Or, if such defense were to take place, it's "every man for himself?" If someone else has bigger guns, THEY RULE without dispute, take what they please, etc.? Oh, but that would mean that these rulers would have to get together and make AGREEMENTS with one another, to do these awful things to others who are weaker. THEY will have agreements with one another, an THEY will "vote" on how to divide the booty once they've conquered.
Or we just trash the idea of any sort of civilization? But what EXACTLY would stop evil people from getting together and AGREEING to kill you and your family? You are opposed even to the idea of making any agreements with the people in your own community - that you will protect each other's rights if marauders come to end a human in your group? No agreements whatsoever? No plans to get together and defend ANYTHING, let alone anyone's rights within the community?
Yeah, just insult me and write me off as a blithering idiot, a brainwashed zombie. Nice. Keep the insults coming because you are UNABLE to say what sort of world WOULD work for humanity. All you can think of is what you don't want. But the universe doesn't work that way. You have to be able to identify what you DO want, and HOW it would work.
Dreaming that evil will just fall away and nobody will have any need for other humans in order to live with any measure of freedom - let alone any pretense of prosperity that cannot EASILY be taken by evil ones who DO get make agreements with other humans for the purpose of robbing and injuring others - is NOT a practical solution to the evil that exists.
In the world you've so far (in very limited terms) attempted to describe, there is only a nightmare of "might makes right" possible. And the ones who have no others with whom they've made enforceable agreements will ALWAYS be the weaker ones. Such a world could ONLY work if there were NO EVIL in the world. Not being evil yourself does not prevent others from visiting evil upon you. But you can dream.
I did not make an argument against voting. I made an argument that the elections are all fully RIGGED. Therefore, those in so-called "authority" at this moment in time, have ZERO legitimacy in their positions. NOBODY actually agreed to any of this.
Before the internet, they were fully ABLE to "rig" HOW we voted, (most people did not yet understand what the MSM actually was) so there was no need to rig the voting system itself, since they could still get the majority to vote how they wished. Now they just straight up rig the voting systems (beyond all comprehension) because far too many people now understand what's happening and will not vote the way they wish us to. So then they moved to banning free speech, particularly that which dares imply the elections are fully rigged. This is their death rattle. It's their last attempt to claim their "authority" was granted to them "by the people."
Tossing out the entire idea of ANY form of "self-governance" in response to learning that rigging elections is HOW despots gain control, is not necessarily the best "solution."
The technology to correct this issue is CHEAP, SIMPLE, and EASY to deploy. Within ANY "network" or system, (even if it's confined only to "trading") there will NEED to be a set of LIMITS placed upon those purporting to be "serving" us in managing that network for us.
At least READ the Declaration of Independence for IDEAS. If actually enforced, (rather than ignored because we're all too busy watching football, circus and bread) it's a healthy way to view the intrinsic value of humanity, i.e., that we are ALL entitled to basic human rights, i.e., rights that NO PERSON, collective, "network" or other organization or structure of civilization is EVER entitled to violate.
The cabal is moving fast on it's "final solution" at this time. I do not see merely avoiding the "sin" of voting as an effective means by which we may prevent our own extermination and enslavement. Who knows though? Maybe you're right and humanity is not entitled to make agreements with one another to either have, or protect ANY fundamental rights. Maybe we're all just worthless flotsam, not worthy of such things. Mad Max here we come;-)
The act of voting is an agreement to be "self governing." When adults don't bother with any of their own business, which may include the benefits we agree to accept and enjoy in a civilized world for a pre-agreed price, we become "abandoned" property.
The fantasy that we will be "left alone" if we refuse to participate in our own self governance is just that, a FANTASY. When the people with whom we've made an "agreement" for self governance BREAK the agreement by rigging the elections, we either CORRECT the situation, or we build new societies WHEREIN we make new AGREEMENTS for self-governance. Civilization requires these agreements, and it requires that the agreements are NOT broken.
The alternatives to self-governance are (1) hiding in the hills (or caves) alone UNTIL the nearest "government" finds you and tells you someone else owns the land, or else joining a "vote-less" cult, i.e., a dictatorship. See how that worked out for the Jonestown victims.
Just because it's a SERIOUS battle to get ourselves to a state of self governance (and it requires VIGILANCE to maintain it) does not mean that self-governance is a bad idea. There are many advantages to living within a civilized world with laws that people agree to live by, and which are enforced.
The premise of the founding of this Nation was that government's only real LEGITIMATE function was to protect our rights, and only to the extent that it did so was it legitimate. Perverting and disregarding our founding documents is the problem. The problem was not created by the act of "voting."
Even in a small community, there must always be a starting premise that there are certain individual rights (God-given) that cannot EVER be "voted" away by the mob. And the community issues that can be resolved by vote, cannot ever by subject to, or vulnerable to, election fraud. But that part takes vigilance.
Refusing to participate in any form of self-governance, on ANY level, is not the answer. And people who refuse to vote are in no position to complain that the elections are rigged. They certainly have no standing to seek any civil remedy. And they make it harder to prove the rigging occurred.
If what you're really hoping for is a fall of this Republic, don't be so certain something MUCH WORSE won't arrive to take control.
Yes, you're right, government itself is fraud, ditto elections. The American writer, Gary D Barnett, writes excellently on that fact (and re. the many aspects of this evil global coup d'etat) in his regular articles.
I'm an Englishwoman, 64, and came across his writings early on in this heinous global takeover. I've been 'awake' (re. many, many big subjects in life) for 40-45 years.
I don't understand why the masses feel that they should obey so-called 'authority'. What a tragedy that most people do. I've had my own mind from a very early age.
Voting that is rigged is the problem. It is a fraudulent "contract." The ONLY agreement I personally made with this FARCE of a government we're faced with right now, was premised upon their OWN adherence to the U.S. Constitution which prohibits almost EVERYTHING they're up to right now. Our current government has ZERO legitimacy at this time, because it was ONLY legitimate IF it served the function of protecting my inherent GOD-GIVEN rights. It was the ONLY premise under-which I ever agreed to ANYTHING.
I'm not "asleep" merely because I don't agree that the ONLY solution is to "not vote."
Nor do I agree that not voting will STOP this machine that's determined to exterminate MOST of humanity.
Your Mad Max world, wherein we make no agreements with others, is folly. The problem is not that people form groups which voluntarily enter into agreements. It is that the power-hungry people DO enter into agreements with EACH OTHER to destroy the rest of us. And they don't just disappear one day because you decided not to vote. They are NOT going to stop in their tracks and say, "Oh my, voter turn-out is dismal. I guess we need to stop slaughtering people now and let them have their freedom."
We need a better "plan" than THAT. Pretending this is not happening is the zenith of "asleep."
Voting is the act by which we make agreements with other humans in a civil-ized manner. Again, certain rights are NOT EVER to be violated, and nobody can vote these away. At least this was the INTENTION of our founding documents. But most of us refused to be responsible for GUARDING and PROTECTING those rights. WE got soft, and we let it all slip away.
Civilization and the most effective strategies for protecting individual rights within a civilization are NOT the problem. The problem is that we ALL lost touch with our RESPONSIBILITY to self-govern via vigilance. Your "solution" is to simply dream of a world were there is nothing left that is civilized at all, no agreements whatsoever, and no structures within which to hope we might have help in defending ourselves from a neighbor who has 6 hefty sons, more weapons than us, and who wants to take EVERYTHING we have because he CAN, (because we have no agreements with a local group of armed men who might rescue us and our daughters;-)
Keeping our agreements "secret" is the mechanism by which the FRAUD occurs in this process. But the secrecy is "for our own good" right? And we go along with this because nobody wants to be ACCOUNTABLE/responsible for what they voted for? This day and age the technology to shield one's identity while ALSO allow each and every voter to verify that THEIR particular vote was counted AS IT WAS CAST is very available, simple, cheap, expedient, EASY.
Without ANY agreements that there are a number of individual rights which CANNOT EVER be trampled upon, (either by vote, the government, OR your neighbors) all you end up with is the law of the jungle, where the stronger and better armed simply take what they want, whenever they want.
Are you CERTAIN you can beat Bubba and his sons when they come to take whatever you have worked for? Or might you want to make some AGREEMENTS with other HUMANS who will help you protect your rights, and those of your loved ones? Just because we've lost our way, and ENTIRELY FAILED to enforce our rights as enshrined in our founding documents, does not mean that it was a "bad idea" to begin with. WE failed. WE got lazy. Now we're going to pay for it. Have you ever ONCE in your life attempted to audit an election? I had not attempted this until I was in my 40's. And by then it was all screwed up, way far gone.
Go find your utopian hole in the ground, or wherever. But sooner or later, if you ever do create something worth taking, someone bigger and stronger than you will come and take what they wish, including your life if they want that too. It might be "Bubba and his sons" or it might be a debauched government run amuck.
But hey, until then, you'll live without ANY responsibilities, not to family or community, until a T-Rex visits you.
So what EXACTLY would you call your civilization capable of protecting ANY individual rights? A "collective" with NO VOTE when it comes to solving community issues or improving the collective conditions?
Call it whatever you want to, to live together in any sort of cooperative civilization, we MUST make agreements, and not ONLY with those in our immediate vicinity. By what means do you suggest ANY rights can be protected within a civilization without AGREEMENTS?
Because we were ALL negligent, we LOST the ability to ENFORCE our rights. The best solution might not be to ENTIRELY ABANDON the premise that we DO have certain rights that CANNOT EVER be violated, whether Bubba shows up with his guns or not.
IF you want protection from "T-Rex" (and yes, VILE monsters DO exist) you get together with others who wish to defeat the monster, and in order to prevail, one must make AGREEMENTS with other humans.
You've yet to answer a SINGLE question I have posed. Instead you've offered insults, suggesting that I am "in the Matrix" and faltering around as one of the brain-dead zombies does.
Bad form. You claim to have all of the answers. So ANSWER at least ONE of my questions. Without making agreements with others as to how we will protect our rights (to not have Bubba come and take our stuff, and even our lives whenever he wants to - just because he's bigger) how EXACTLY will you defend yourself?
"often essential" is how they word it. That reads into unlawful requirement or mandate in practice. That's the only good thing to come out of this charade. They are shown naked by 98% of those unwilling now to take another injection. Even in the face of this outright rejection, they carry on unencumbered are the media mafia. The message is the money.
Yes, the government is a deadly virus. I have been saying that for years. For those who would like to explore this idea in more detail please visit me at https://TheNAP.org.
Via another of my favourite "stackers" https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/tragedy-and-hope-101 I'm reading the book referenced which chronologues the capture of power for more than a century, during which time democracy has increasingly been a mirage.
Agreed Joel.. with 2 exceptions.. the Propaganda Machine-Tech Media division [Google, ect.] aided and abetted by AI can swing large blocks of voters without their awareness in the least.. [ check out Professor Dr Robert Epstein's work on behavioral Research and Tech electoral manipulation.. via social apps.. according to his team of { 1500 election auditors covering the last US Presidential election}
Google alone swung between 3 to 5 Million votes away from Trump.. 2] we also must go back to paper ballots ...we can regain Bona Fide election results.. but digital tallies are too easily manipulated..
It wasn’t really an experiment, it was a pre-planned, globally coordinated “plandemic”. Reiner Fuellmich and his colleagues presented copious evidence of this in his 2022 Covid-19 Crimes Against Humanity model trial, see my two-part post kindly hosted by Joel: https://metatron.substack.com/p/reiner-fuellmichs-grand-jury-court.
Unfortunately, Dr Fuellmich is now languishing in a German police cell facing trial on a trumped-up charge of embezzlement, see https://principia-scientific.com/breaking-top-lawyer-exposing-covid-crimes-is-arrested/.
Over a year ago I effectively accused my MP of being complicit in these crimes by asking him to deny twenty simple questions which explain the sequence of how the “plandemic” was perpetrated. He didn’t reply, see https://metatron.substack.com/p/an-open-letter-to-my-mp-culpable?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email. It’s nice that my first question to my MP relates to the Boris Johnson’s skulduggery highlighted by Joel above.
Joel’s last image relates to yesterday’s House of Commons “debate” on excess deaths secured by Andrew Bridgen MP. It only lasted 30 minutes. Dr John Campbell has posted the video, accompanied with his own commentary. The good news is the cheering that Mr Bridgen got from the public gallery through the screen of security glass and the abusive shouting down of the Minister, something I have never heard before. See https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97qRUqYLNu0&t=366s.
Neil Oliver is one of the very few public commentators who understands and exposes how the general public are being horribly abused on multiple fronts by our treasonous puppet politicians acting on behalf of their psychopathic globalist overlords and paymasters. In his latest monologue Neil rails against these abuses just sufficiently obliquely as to (hopefully) avoid being taken out by Big Brother Ofcom.
He opens with “For the past few years we have been marched from bad to worse by people who are bad, and getting worse every day … Anyone here in the UK who looks on at Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer [must] shudder at the thought and ask, how in the name of all that’s holy did we find ourselves asked to choose between two men who, by their every action, have failed the people of this country in every measurable way”.
Neil’s 10-minute monologue here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37aN3_9rzas. Full episode here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UgGZJJGu078.
PROTOCOLS OF THE MEETINGS OF THE LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION . . . Protocol X – Preparing for Power . . . (((SARS-CoV2)))
❝. . . utterly exhaust humanity with dissention, hatred, struggle, envy and even by the use of torture, by starvation, by the inoculation of diseases. by want, so that the “Goyim” see no other issue than to take refuge in our complete sovereignty in money and in all else.❞
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/protocol-x-preparing-for-power-sars
Please read and learn about Bridgen. https://miriaf.co.uk/open-letter-to-andrew-bridgen/
Miris's work is beyond awesome. She's been empowering the people since the beginning of this scam show with her https://www.informedconsentmatters.co.uk/
Value your input and I agree, sadly.
Have you seen this https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/david-webb-the-great-taking,
The comments are goldmine too.
There's no polite or moderate way to describe these Parliamentarians. To continue to deliberately ignore excess deaths and to refuse to explore the possible reasons for those deaths on behalf of the victims and the electorate in general is evil. The politicians supposedly democratically elected to represent us are content to watch us die whilst they turn a blind eye to the likely causes of those deaths because in all probability they will be revealed as being complicit in the deaths because they voted for deadly lockdowns and wholeheartedly supported - and in many cases promoted - the mass, aggressively coerced (and even mandated) rollout of 'safe and effective vaccines', which have demonstrably proved to be neither. Parliament needs a thorough de-lousing, Cromwell style.
Funding Both Sides: How Jewish Money Controls British Politics . . .
“During the previous Labour government, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown were ardent Zionists because they accepted the justice of Israel’s cause, not because Labour’s chief fund-raisers were first the Jew Michael Levy and then the Jew Jonathan Mendelsohn (both are now members of the House of Lords). And during the current Conservative government, David Cameron, Theresa May and Boris Johnson have been ardent Zionists because they too accept the justice of Israel’s cause, not because the Conservatives’ chief fund-raisers have been first the Jew Sir Mick Davis and then the Jew Sir Ehud Sheleg.”
https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/10/04/funding-both-sides-how-jewish-money-controls-british-politics/
What has been also overlooked is earlier in the day there was a debate for a second reading put forward by the only other Upstanding MP’s in the house, Christopher Chope, Ester McVey and Philip Davies on a bill to increase the vaccine damage payment scheme amount. In the discussion it was made clear they have had to extensively increase the dept dealing with these claims and one of the stats revealed was over the course of the scheme which was started in the seventies only around 270 claims have been made for all vaccines in all that time. Yet in the last two years nearly 7000 have been made for covid alone!! BBC didn’t report on that at all!!
“This is the big lie of big lies, wherein we are supposed to believe that in this process of the World Government’s depopulation of humans, we are also saving the earth, which will save humanity. No rationalization could be more absurd”
I love wearing this Orwell 1984 shirt: https://shorturl.at/bex08
It's perfect for these tyrant times!
"Make Orwell 1984 fiction again!"
Time to clean out these globalist 300 WEF WHO UN satanic charlatans?
Only 300? There's 640 odd who didn't bother to represent themselves or their constituents. What a disgrace.
Correct...I use “300” to refer to the globalist satanic cabal that has been pulling the strings behind our “democratic” governments giving us only the illusion of freedom and democracy when really it is nothing more than a criminal satanic pedophilic cartel spanning likely millennia.
Ah, I see!
https://open.substack.com/pub/drjacobnordangard/p/why-the-president-of-the-club-of?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=1mvqkq
The masses need to remove the blindfold first.
Sooooo many of therm, dear Jessica.
It’s hard to imagine what else would encourage them to open their sleepy eyes. I guess it’s a propaganda induced stupor. Most people are very much conditioned to only think and talk about tv series, sport or survival. Maybe as survival becomes much more difficult that might have an effect... but i won’t hold my breath 😂
I’ve always thought that the only way those fast asleep will ONLY wake up if it affects their own lives and/or family. And still many refuse to see. Many don’t question why their loved one is DEAD now... one Doctor put it this way. It’s called AGITATED DENIAL. Their soul KNOWS something is wrong but they choose to NOT SEE IT, NOT HEAR IT, and NOT TALK ABOUT IT because it’s too painful and will shift their PARADIGM instantly and it’s too much to bear. Sad times indeed.
Absolutely I’ve got fiends who’s friends and relatives have died suddenly from “undiagnosed conditions” or got vaccine injured and they are like what? Even if it was the vaccine what can I do about it. The end. So yeah apparently death isn’t enough to raise the curtain of denial.
So incredibly true. Bogged down in there own self absorption; NFL. Taylor Swift /Kelce, Draft Kings. Facebook, Twitter ad infinitum. Won't know what ran over them when it happens. All done through the clever intentions of the elites over many years to dumb them down so as to make then vulnerable to what we are witnessing.
Yes i see that there has been a long push for people to disengage in any conversations that involve politics, philosophy, religion or understanding the reason for why the world is like it is, when I was growing up I remember these topics were labelled boring and if I ever tried to engage friends in meaty conversations i was quickly told this is boring you’re boring. They planned this for what more than a century? They have certainly achieved their aim however maybe once the bread runs out the circuses won’t be enough?
Get on with it then - DO it. I’ve been wishing them dead for years but personally unable to exorcise these satanists... do tell us all HOW?
It is about 100 years past time.
No matter how you vote, you still get government that is never friendly to the citizen. The answer is no politicians and no government.
100%
Because in reality they are selected. Not elected.
See Corbyn. He was not selected to say the least.
What a disgusting and despicable showing in the house with the exception of one courageous man who figures he’s already old and has not much to lose so stands for what he knows is the truth and just.
Er... a non -showing...
It’s over. If you want justice you’re going to have to go get it yourself. All institutions are corrupted and those in power aren’t even pretending they have your interests in mind. The democratic experiment is over.
Margaret Thatcher once said "You can vote in Socialism but you have to shoot your way out".
This is not "Socialism"! It is a modified Fascism, masquerading as Socialism.
A wolf in sheep's clothing.
The Welfare State can be taken away with the stroke of a pen, and the Sheep can't even reach the "Wolves", so they will turn on each other and complete the slaughter?????
We need to stop blaming "the voters." The elections are RIGGED.
In 2021, we ran the largest exit poll ever conducted in California (all counties, over 30K responses) after the "Recall Newsom" election. 98% reported that they voted "yes" to oust Newsom. Based upon the large sample size (% of the number who voted) the statistical analysis and margin of error showed that no less than 96% who voted in that election, voted to oust Newsom.
California is the state that sent Reagan to the White House. In 2020, SF was having "gays for Trump" and "Trannies for Trump" parades! Not that the MSM would cover any of THAT.
Until we get our elections back, none of this changes. People who say the "voters" in California deserve Newsom, should ALSO be saying that the whole country deserves Biden, "cuz that's who they voted for."
If we all deserve this tyranny, it is because we've let the DEMONS take over our elections systems, not because we're all "voting wrong."
Yup-our only voice has been taken from us.
Yes. And it's a sticky widget locating a "civil" remedy, as all of those in office (via the rigged elections) immediately go to work creating barriers to correcting the problem by passing new elections codes that will block almost all attempts to correct the situation. The codes THEMSELVES are now the reason the elections are ABLE to be so fully rigged.
Lawyers and litigants generally go into court trying to locate a code that was "violated." And they miss the entire point by not challenging the ENFORCABILITY of the codes which are CAUSING this level of election fraud to continue. Laws passed by the legislature which only CAUSE/ALLOW rampant election fraud are subject to direct challenge.
We are in serious trouble now because we've not paid the price in ADVANCE of the problem.
The price of freedom is constant vigilance. There are ALWAYS evil people fighting behind the scenes for more power, and they ALWAYS claim it's for our "own good" which is why "public health/welfare" is normally their sales-pitch. That, and "saving children" or "saving the planet."
Correct Mark but most people have a slave mentality, via Matrix programming. This is why they believe they NEED to be governed aka ruled. Vast majority of folks in this comment section are not voluntaryists but statists and have that mindset. They believe there NEEDS to be a ruling class and that “authority” is to be obeyed. Joel Smalley doesn't appear to have worked things out yet but to be fair dropping the belief in statism is a gradual process. Good luck to him and anyone else on that journey.
Folks like Joy Lucette Garner are absolutely oblivious. Fast asleep. They have no grasp whatsoever.
I give ZERO legitimacy to the CURRENT government nightmare we are suffering. I confronted SCOTUS myself to learn that they are ALL fully onboard with the agenda to EXTERMINATE the American people. I am most assuredly NOT "asleep." I SEE. I KNOW.
"No grasp whatsoever???" Insults are not an argument for a "better world" which you've YET to explain the creation of. You act as if I cannot see that we currently live under complete despotism and tyranny, and that they're planning for MUCH WORSE tomorrow.
The only "solution" you've offered is "no form of government." And that would be great IF those who've highjacked it AGREED with you about this. They do not. And it's a well-oiled machine headed for us all right now. We (the people who prefer freedom) might want to consider getting together and AGREEING to be organized enough to stop them. Hiding in the woods is probably not going to save anyone from what's coming after they finish dividing us up, (to make it easier to finish us off).
As I fervently exhausted my last possible CIVIL remedy to prevent the extermination of the American people at the hands of the U.S. government, my brief was concluded with these words:
"Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long
established should not be changed for light and transient
causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that
mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are
sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the
forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long
train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the
same Object evinces a design to reduce them under
absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to
throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards
for their future security.
Declaration of Independence (July 4, 1776).
When SCOTUS (U.S. Supreme Court) formally "declares" the extermination of the American people to be a "Constitutionally authorize" action of government, the gig is obviously up. I was so hoping for a CIVIL remedy. And I tried very hard for this. I had previously once fought a group of Rockefeller trustfund babies in Federal Court and WON. (It was over some Intellectual property rights.) But now I see that on the ultimate issue of this wholesale extermination of the American people, SCOTUS will not bend, not ONE INCH in the direction of saving the people of this Nation. On this issue, they are entirely bent toward the collapse of the one Nation who's people might still have stood in the way their "One World Order."
Not voting will not stop them. I wish it could help stop them. But it won't. We shall see how well humanity can fend off their next couple of assaults WITHOUT organizing to marshal our own forces, and instead, immediately descending into a Mad Max world as the only "solution" anyone has the IQ to come up with after dozens of the older "soft-kill" jabs. I would prefer an organized approach, as I believe it gives us a better shot at survival. But then, that would violate your "rule" because it might look like a structure, which you would call a "government."
The fact "we the people" have ALLOWED criminals to overtake our government (while we were watching football, movies, etc.)) and violate literally everything which the Constitution specifically PROHIBITS the government from doing to us, does NOT mean there's no way to self-govern. But then, you'd READ the Constitution to understand this. Most of the people arguing against any form of organized agreement between humans (i.e., civilization) cannot manage to make up their own bed in the morning, let alone get it together enough to get off of their parent's tits. But they are very busy insulting other people.
"I give zero legitimacy to CURRENT government"
"The fact "we the people" have ALLOWED criminals to overtake our government (while we were watching football, movies, etc.)) and violate literally everything which the Constitution specifically PROHIBITS the government from doing to us, does NOT mean there's no way to self-govern. But then, you'd READ the Constitution to understand this."
Thank you for proving my point. I'm not insulting you, I am just stating facts. You are subservient to institutions of authority, such as "the constitution", which is literally a document from the ruling class that introduced the federal state, taxation and criminalised challenge of it. You still believe that governance is legitimate and are blindly regurgitating Matrix programming. A Constitutional Republic is just a form of governance. All governance is tyrannical. You are absolutely oblivious. Demonstrably so.
The Constitution is NOT an "authority" over people. It is a proclamation of the LIMITATIONS of any entity purporting to serve the people as a "government" may DO to people. It proclaims that ANY form of government which violates the principal that individual God-given rights may NOT be trampled by the the collective government, nor any mob, majority, "network" or otherwise. It affirms that it is not only our right, but our DUTY to deny the legitimacy of ANY structure which performs tyranny upon us.
If you'd ever bothered to READ it, you'd understand this. But you haven't. Someone told you it was written by "white males" and that it was the cause of slavery. An you've no idea that it was this document which ultimately led to abolishing slavery, (at least the overt version;-)
You see, this entire "Matrix" of slavery, with it's illusion of "choice" is under the FRAUD that our captors are somehow still entitled to their positions of power, EVEN THOUGH they've broken the contract. Rather than wipe my arse with the contract, light it on fire, and then piss on it's ashes, I go to enforce it against the swine who used it to obtain their pretense of legitimacy.
At worst, the Constitution is very good PREMISE to start from, i.e., no "network" no "structure" no "organization" and no GOVERNMENT has ANY legitimacy so long as it violates our God-given rights, INSTEAD OF protecting them.
But then, you'd have to READ the document to understand it's value. My guess is, you couldn't recite the 1st ten Amendments to save your life. You see a document that has as it's sole purpose the delineation of strict LIMITS on the functions of ANY "network" purporting to govern ANYTHING (let alone people) as a source of a problem, when the document itself contains extremely valuable strategies for avoiding tyranny, if indeed anyone was vigilant enough to enforce it BEFORE their "network" has been overtaken by despots.
"The Constitution is NOT an "authority" over people. It is a proclamation of the LIMITATIONS of any entity purporting to serve the people as a "government" may DO to people. It proclaims that..."
Things with zero authority can proclaim anything... You are contradicting yourself as you are clueless. Simply repeating what you've been told to believe without thinking about it. I suggest you go do some research about the document written by the ruling class that you revere. I suggest you read the anti Federalist papers.
Oh, I am still waiting for an answer: WHAT will keep the managers of your "network" (sounds so much better than "guvment") from breaking literally EVERY agreement made therein? What will keep it's members from doing so?
What will protect a farm/family/production from random marauders who wish to pillage? Your own guns? What if they have more firepower? Back to the Mad Max utopia without any pretense of a civilization. You see it as heaven. I view it as hell.
Okay Neo. You'll free humanity from the Matrix by going online to insult random people you don't approve of. The only thing you're truly interested in, is seeing yourself as smarter and better than others, and also seeing how much MORE bad frequencies you can create by being abusive and insulting to others. And if there's anything I am quite certain of about this fraudulent system we now inhabit, it's that those who wish to destroy us within it, use the frequencies YOU want to create MORE of as FOOD, both metaphorically and literally, i.e., adrenochrome.
So you have all of the answers for escaping the Matrix? Good. It must've worked out very well for you so far. But where are you right now? Living off of others? Can you even even manage to make your own bed in the morning? No wonder the very thought of ANY form of "SELF-governance" is so fully abhorrent to you. Trolling around the internet looking for opportunities to level person insults at others is hardly going to "wake up the masses" Neo - even if you manage to find another character to support your attacks on us "asleep" people, and confirm for you that it's a correct method of 'helping humanity get out of the Matrix".
Maybe spend a little more time outside of the Matrix before you come back. Your energy here is abusive, egotistical, dismissive, nasty, and dark;-) With your approach, nobody would suspect you are in any way "enlightened" to anything of value.
"Voting" is a sin. Okay. I have YET to hear your version of "civilization" that works WITHOUT any pretense of self-governance, and is able to maintain even a pretense of any freedom. I guess in your world, there are no "rights" upon which any person can, or should, stand to defend. Or, if such defense were to take place, it's "every man for himself?" If someone else has bigger guns, THEY RULE without dispute, take what they please, etc.? Oh, but that would mean that these rulers would have to get together and make AGREEMENTS with one another, to do these awful things to others who are weaker. THEY will have agreements with one another, an THEY will "vote" on how to divide the booty once they've conquered.
Or we just trash the idea of any sort of civilization? But what EXACTLY would stop evil people from getting together and AGREEING to kill you and your family? You are opposed even to the idea of making any agreements with the people in your own community - that you will protect each other's rights if marauders come to end a human in your group? No agreements whatsoever? No plans to get together and defend ANYTHING, let alone anyone's rights within the community?
Sounds lovely. Good luck with that.
Yeah, just insult me and write me off as a blithering idiot, a brainwashed zombie. Nice. Keep the insults coming because you are UNABLE to say what sort of world WOULD work for humanity. All you can think of is what you don't want. But the universe doesn't work that way. You have to be able to identify what you DO want, and HOW it would work.
Dreaming that evil will just fall away and nobody will have any need for other humans in order to live with any measure of freedom - let alone any pretense of prosperity that cannot EASILY be taken by evil ones who DO get make agreements with other humans for the purpose of robbing and injuring others - is NOT a practical solution to the evil that exists.
In the world you've so far (in very limited terms) attempted to describe, there is only a nightmare of "might makes right" possible. And the ones who have no others with whom they've made enforceable agreements will ALWAYS be the weaker ones. Such a world could ONLY work if there were NO EVIL in the world. Not being evil yourself does not prevent others from visiting evil upon you. But you can dream.
I did not make an argument against voting. I made an argument that the elections are all fully RIGGED. Therefore, those in so-called "authority" at this moment in time, have ZERO legitimacy in their positions. NOBODY actually agreed to any of this.
Before the internet, they were fully ABLE to "rig" HOW we voted, (most people did not yet understand what the MSM actually was) so there was no need to rig the voting system itself, since they could still get the majority to vote how they wished. Now they just straight up rig the voting systems (beyond all comprehension) because far too many people now understand what's happening and will not vote the way they wish us to. So then they moved to banning free speech, particularly that which dares imply the elections are fully rigged. This is their death rattle. It's their last attempt to claim their "authority" was granted to them "by the people."
Tossing out the entire idea of ANY form of "self-governance" in response to learning that rigging elections is HOW despots gain control, is not necessarily the best "solution."
The technology to correct this issue is CHEAP, SIMPLE, and EASY to deploy. Within ANY "network" or system, (even if it's confined only to "trading") there will NEED to be a set of LIMITS placed upon those purporting to be "serving" us in managing that network for us.
At least READ the Declaration of Independence for IDEAS. If actually enforced, (rather than ignored because we're all too busy watching football, circus and bread) it's a healthy way to view the intrinsic value of humanity, i.e., that we are ALL entitled to basic human rights, i.e., rights that NO PERSON, collective, "network" or other organization or structure of civilization is EVER entitled to violate.
The cabal is moving fast on it's "final solution" at this time. I do not see merely avoiding the "sin" of voting as an effective means by which we may prevent our own extermination and enslavement. Who knows though? Maybe you're right and humanity is not entitled to make agreements with one another to either have, or protect ANY fundamental rights. Maybe we're all just worthless flotsam, not worthy of such things. Mad Max here we come;-)
The act of voting is an agreement to be "self governing." When adults don't bother with any of their own business, which may include the benefits we agree to accept and enjoy in a civilized world for a pre-agreed price, we become "abandoned" property.
The fantasy that we will be "left alone" if we refuse to participate in our own self governance is just that, a FANTASY. When the people with whom we've made an "agreement" for self governance BREAK the agreement by rigging the elections, we either CORRECT the situation, or we build new societies WHEREIN we make new AGREEMENTS for self-governance. Civilization requires these agreements, and it requires that the agreements are NOT broken.
The alternatives to self-governance are (1) hiding in the hills (or caves) alone UNTIL the nearest "government" finds you and tells you someone else owns the land, or else joining a "vote-less" cult, i.e., a dictatorship. See how that worked out for the Jonestown victims.
Just because it's a SERIOUS battle to get ourselves to a state of self governance (and it requires VIGILANCE to maintain it) does not mean that self-governance is a bad idea. There are many advantages to living within a civilized world with laws that people agree to live by, and which are enforced.
The premise of the founding of this Nation was that government's only real LEGITIMATE function was to protect our rights, and only to the extent that it did so was it legitimate. Perverting and disregarding our founding documents is the problem. The problem was not created by the act of "voting."
Even in a small community, there must always be a starting premise that there are certain individual rights (God-given) that cannot EVER be "voted" away by the mob. And the community issues that can be resolved by vote, cannot ever by subject to, or vulnerable to, election fraud. But that part takes vigilance.
Refusing to participate in any form of self-governance, on ANY level, is not the answer. And people who refuse to vote are in no position to complain that the elections are rigged. They certainly have no standing to seek any civil remedy. And they make it harder to prove the rigging occurred.
If what you're really hoping for is a fall of this Republic, don't be so certain something MUCH WORSE won't arrive to take control.
Yes, you're right, government itself is fraud, ditto elections. The American writer, Gary D Barnett, writes excellently on that fact (and re. the many aspects of this evil global coup d'etat) in his regular articles.
I'm an Englishwoman, 64, and came across his writings early on in this heinous global takeover. I've been 'awake' (re. many, many big subjects in life) for 40-45 years.
I don't understand why the masses feel that they should obey so-called 'authority'. What a tragedy that most people do. I've had my own mind from a very early age.
Voting that is rigged is the problem. It is a fraudulent "contract." The ONLY agreement I personally made with this FARCE of a government we're faced with right now, was premised upon their OWN adherence to the U.S. Constitution which prohibits almost EVERYTHING they're up to right now. Our current government has ZERO legitimacy at this time, because it was ONLY legitimate IF it served the function of protecting my inherent GOD-GIVEN rights. It was the ONLY premise under-which I ever agreed to ANYTHING.
I'm not "asleep" merely because I don't agree that the ONLY solution is to "not vote."
Nor do I agree that not voting will STOP this machine that's determined to exterminate MOST of humanity.
Your Mad Max world, wherein we make no agreements with others, is folly. The problem is not that people form groups which voluntarily enter into agreements. It is that the power-hungry people DO enter into agreements with EACH OTHER to destroy the rest of us. And they don't just disappear one day because you decided not to vote. They are NOT going to stop in their tracks and say, "Oh my, voter turn-out is dismal. I guess we need to stop slaughtering people now and let them have their freedom."
We need a better "plan" than THAT. Pretending this is not happening is the zenith of "asleep."
Voting is the act by which we make agreements with other humans in a civil-ized manner. Again, certain rights are NOT EVER to be violated, and nobody can vote these away. At least this was the INTENTION of our founding documents. But most of us refused to be responsible for GUARDING and PROTECTING those rights. WE got soft, and we let it all slip away.
Civilization and the most effective strategies for protecting individual rights within a civilization are NOT the problem. The problem is that we ALL lost touch with our RESPONSIBILITY to self-govern via vigilance. Your "solution" is to simply dream of a world were there is nothing left that is civilized at all, no agreements whatsoever, and no structures within which to hope we might have help in defending ourselves from a neighbor who has 6 hefty sons, more weapons than us, and who wants to take EVERYTHING we have because he CAN, (because we have no agreements with a local group of armed men who might rescue us and our daughters;-)
Keeping our agreements "secret" is the mechanism by which the FRAUD occurs in this process. But the secrecy is "for our own good" right? And we go along with this because nobody wants to be ACCOUNTABLE/responsible for what they voted for? This day and age the technology to shield one's identity while ALSO allow each and every voter to verify that THEIR particular vote was counted AS IT WAS CAST is very available, simple, cheap, expedient, EASY.
Without ANY agreements that there are a number of individual rights which CANNOT EVER be trampled upon, (either by vote, the government, OR your neighbors) all you end up with is the law of the jungle, where the stronger and better armed simply take what they want, whenever they want.
Are you CERTAIN you can beat Bubba and his sons when they come to take whatever you have worked for? Or might you want to make some AGREEMENTS with other HUMANS who will help you protect your rights, and those of your loved ones? Just because we've lost our way, and ENTIRELY FAILED to enforce our rights as enshrined in our founding documents, does not mean that it was a "bad idea" to begin with. WE failed. WE got lazy. Now we're going to pay for it. Have you ever ONCE in your life attempted to audit an election? I had not attempted this until I was in my 40's. And by then it was all screwed up, way far gone.
Go find your utopian hole in the ground, or wherever. But sooner or later, if you ever do create something worth taking, someone bigger and stronger than you will come and take what they wish, including your life if they want that too. It might be "Bubba and his sons" or it might be a debauched government run amuck.
But hey, until then, you'll live without ANY responsibilities, not to family or community, until a T-Rex visits you.
So what EXACTLY would you call your civilization capable of protecting ANY individual rights? A "collective" with NO VOTE when it comes to solving community issues or improving the collective conditions?
Call it whatever you want to, to live together in any sort of cooperative civilization, we MUST make agreements, and not ONLY with those in our immediate vicinity. By what means do you suggest ANY rights can be protected within a civilization without AGREEMENTS?
Because we were ALL negligent, we LOST the ability to ENFORCE our rights. The best solution might not be to ENTIRELY ABANDON the premise that we DO have certain rights that CANNOT EVER be violated, whether Bubba shows up with his guns or not.
IF you want protection from "T-Rex" (and yes, VILE monsters DO exist) you get together with others who wish to defeat the monster, and in order to prevail, one must make AGREEMENTS with other humans.
You've yet to answer a SINGLE question I have posed. Instead you've offered insults, suggesting that I am "in the Matrix" and faltering around as one of the brain-dead zombies does.
Bad form. You claim to have all of the answers. So ANSWER at least ONE of my questions. Without making agreements with others as to how we will protect our rights (to not have Bubba come and take our stuff, and even our lives whenever he wants to - just because he's bigger) how EXACTLY will you defend yourself?
"often essential" is how they word it. That reads into unlawful requirement or mandate in practice. That's the only good thing to come out of this charade. They are shown naked by 98% of those unwilling now to take another injection. Even in the face of this outright rejection, they carry on unencumbered are the media mafia. The message is the money.
Yes, the government is a deadly virus. I have been saying that for years. For those who would like to explore this idea in more detail please visit me at https://TheNAP.org.
No Show Cowards. The blood on their hands will never wash off.
"Out damned spot"!
I live just 5 miles from Lady Macbeth's Cawdor Castle!
Trouble is there is no viable alternative at the moment except for the party Andrew Bridgen stands for the Reclaim Party.
Red, Green or Blue is a vote for the WHO!!🤷🏻♂️
There comes a point when we must accept that democracy no longer exists (if it ever did) and seek an alternative solution.
Via another of my favourite "stackers" https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/tragedy-and-hope-101 I'm reading the book referenced which chronologues the capture of power for more than a century, during which time democracy has increasingly been a mirage.
Agreed Joel.. with 2 exceptions.. the Propaganda Machine-Tech Media division [Google, ect.] aided and abetted by AI can swing large blocks of voters without their awareness in the least.. [ check out Professor Dr Robert Epstein's work on behavioral Research and Tech electoral manipulation.. via social apps.. according to his team of { 1500 election auditors covering the last US Presidential election}
Google alone swung between 3 to 5 Million votes away from Trump.. 2] we also must go back to paper ballots ...we can regain Bona Fide election results.. but digital tallies are too easily manipulated..
Dr. Robert Epstein's work was brilliant. Can you post a link so we can re-read that?
Just go to Russell Brands Stay Free podcast interview on Sept 28... great stuff..
That empty sea of green seats devoid of human backsides is for me the definitive image of the decade.
I'm ashamed to say that I did vote for this back when I believed that we lived in a functioning democracy and that my vote meant something.
A people’s republic!! ….. not a Chinese people’s republic mind!!😉😳🤣
Be careful that you understand "What you don't want". China has benefited its Citizens more than any "Western" country has in the past 30 years??
Like "Democracy", Communism is merely a label.....