Seems to me Doug should collect all his writings into a book. The whole sorry episode needs solid landmarks and substack posts and open letters are a bit ephemeral. I'd buy a copy!

Expand full comment

Thanks for all yr great work! You’ve made things BETTER-- My support of Dowd’s “Cause Unknown” is this vid.

Thanks again!

(make things) BETTER


Expand full comment

Living in the UK and being a critical thinker is a recipe for serious despondency. Mr. Brodie, I could not agree more with everything you wrote in this substack. I seriously considered “calling the police on Matt Hancock” after I read his messages to a civil servant and to George Osborne. The man admitted criminal activity. Someone must do it. On a less serious note, I was wondering if your writings may have helped push Nicola out of her post? If so, thank you. Hope you will reconsider, or at least throw us a bone every now and then. Your writings inspire. And boy, do we need that💕

Expand full comment

Please don't stop writing, Mr Brodie, because you are good at it - always interesting, well researched and unemotional. And who knows, one day you might write to a politician with enough backbone to reply to you!

Expand full comment

This is amazing journalism. Thank you for all your hard work. This article in itself takes on board many different people's viewpoints that all appear to lead to the same path.

Expand full comment

Great stuff Douglas ! Yup, there is no social contract. They are involved in open treason and more. Oh and BTW as stunning as the 0 COVID deaths in Scottish docs and nurses recorded over 3 years despite msm claims to the contrary it's even more revelatory to realise there were in fact ZERO deaths amongst all police, all teachers and shop workers over the same 3 years ! Again despite msm claims to the contrary !



Expand full comment

The scum of the earth will not stop trying to destroy humanity.

Expand full comment

Thanks - you've been one of the amazing lights in an otherwise dark past three years. I know that things are to some extent 'back to normal' (in terms of the mania phase only) so I understand your decision but genuinely thanks for your thoughts and writings over this sometimes lonely and dark period. People like you really did make a difference to people like me who were otherwise quite isolated in their views.

Expand full comment

Richard Willett Retweeted

Christianne van Wijk


Steps towards one world order:

1.Make governments do atrocious things 💉

2.Throw these governments under the bus

3.Exalt the new ‘alternative’ heroes: Brands, Musks. Shun the true whistleblowers (Icke)

4.Use new heroes to bring in one world gov.

1:38 AM · Mar 8, 2023


Expand full comment

Thanks for everything! You have been a light shining in the darkness. God bless!

Expand full comment

No point in calling the police. Their function is not to uphold the law without fear or favour but to enforce the law, break the law and turn the other way when the law is broken, with extreme prejudice. They're worse than bloody useless quite frankly.

Expand full comment

Most swans in this country are mute swans so it's good that Joel used a whooper swan in the graphic.

Expand full comment

You will be missed.

Expand full comment

The March 26th Coronavirus Bill was not the first piece of Covid legislation. I've attempted to inform MSM, others like Toby Young, newspapers, Sky and Conservative Woman and they won't mention it.

The first bit of covid legislation was actually in February 2020, not march as commonly thought.

And the Secretary of State for Health Matt Hancock was responsible for it - as stated on the legislation itself.


The first piece of “coronavirus” legislation was introduced at 2.30 pm on the 10th February 2020 without Parliamentary oversight or debate and is now revoked.

This was The Health Protection (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020 Statutory Instrument and it was subsequently amended on the 25th February 2020.

This piece of legislation required a statement of "serious and imminent threat” by the Chief Medical Officer to justify any measures to be taken.


Rather prophetically there was an unannounced and totally unpublicised release of a statement on the 30th January 2020 (the exact same day the WHO declared pandemic) by the 4 Chief Medical Officers of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland on this very subject.

It stated:

"the 4 UK Chief Medical Officers consider it prudent for our governments to escalate planning and preparation in case of a more widespread outbreak.

For that reason, we are advising an increase of the UK risk level from low to moderate. This does not mean we think the risk to individuals in the UK has changed at this stage, but that government should plan for all eventualities.”"


This statement was made 11 days before the piece of legislation it was required for was written and laid before Parliament and came into force the very same afternoon.

But why did the UK Government, namely Matt Hancock who was in charge of Health at the time, think a statement that did NOT include the words serious, imminent nor threat be used as a serious and imminent threat statement?

How did the 4 CMOs know 11 days in advance of a Statutory Instrument being written that “medical advice” would be required?

Why was this “advice” basically hidden on a webpage on a different department’s section and not on the DHSC webpages and why was it not linked to the Serious and Imminent Threat Declaration?

As this was part of a FOI request answer then either the above is the only advice given by the CMOs or the DHSC have withheld more detailed advice.

Expand full comment

Thanks for posting Joel. Mr. Brodie an outstanding truth seeker indeed. Thank you Mr. Brodie.

Expand full comment

You'll be much missed. Have a great retirement - you've earned it.

Expand full comment