In a sensible world, this chap's article would be splashed all over the world's newspapers and there would be discussions on all serious discussion and news programmes. Politicians would be pontificating about how the scientists duped them and how we must all take back control, learn lessons, heal ourselves, protect the vulnerable and all the other sound-bites de jour.
In our current world, this article will be read and discussed by people who aren't surprised and already knew it was all terrible. Everyone else will remain ignorant and only idleness or the lack of an invitation will stop them taking further jabs. All extra deaths which can't be labelled covid will just be sighed over as signs of how unpredictable life is.
The only people who can or will take notice-who can fight through the absolute mass formation and brainwashing, are those who have either suffered directly from the shots or have family/friends who have suffered or have died as a result of the shots. Sadly, there are people in these catagories who still can't make the connection. These are beyond all hope.
Agreed but people will still find other reasons for the death because they are all jabbed and encouraged each other to get jabbed. Deaths reported of sportsmen or news readers can be commented on ("how sad" "what bad luck" "probably took drugs" "undiagnosed illness probably") and then forgotten. It's only going to surface if several people in your street drop dead within a week or a month with no obvious sign of illness and of a variety of ages. That doesn't seem to be happening.
If you follow https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ this looks to be picking up steam... Dowd also suggests even though less people are boosting the death toll remains seriously elevated.
I spoke to a Great Barrington sub-author in April 2020 - and he'd looked at the data from WHO -- and concluded the virus was pretty much in line with the lethality of a bad flu year.
For the life of him he could not understand why they were locking the world down.
The VFR indicates the deaths we know of so far, go listen to McCullough's prediction for those with Myocarditis in five years time... The so called Turbo cancers. And yet they keep on jabbing.
Thanks for linking the paper. Are the error bands (e.g. in Fig. 9) based on statistical uncertainty and basically assuming white noise? I suspect this wouldn't account for the fact that much of the dynamics has inherent temporal correlation. A white noise assumption would be incorrect.
There could easily be a bump in vaccination due to policy, closely followed by a bump in infections due to seasonality. Then the correlation is spurious, no matter the calculated uncertainty.
Edit: The correlation shown in Fig. 2 graph is quite convincing though. As an interested reader, I would suggest focusing on that.
“The global economy was facing the worst collapse since the second world war as coronavirus began to strike in March, well before the height of the crisis, according to the latest Brookings-FT tracking index. “The index comes as the IMF prepares to hold virtual spring meetings this week, when it will release forecasts showing the deepest contraction for the global economy since the 1930s great depression. FT.comhttps://archive.ph/UUfl2
Makes you wonder... are they trying to exterminate before the collapse occurs (it will result in mass starvation - murder rape disease) --- but might be failing?
They appear to be trying to create a deadly mutation ... so far no luck
Just FYI, I took the 144 million figure from the Ministerial reply to Andrew Bridgen MP's speech in the House of Commons on Friday 17th March, and made a guess at the relevant total excess deaths 2020-2023 inclusive. I came up with a figure of one death potentially linked to 782 jabs.
In an experiment, it is up to the experimenter to prove that the effects are not caused by the experiment.
One potential response is that the 2020 deaths cannot possibly be the result of jabs. Fair enough, but I said experiment with some deliberation.
There were 78,002 excess deaths in 2020, against a standard deviation of 6,096. I'll be interested to hear any explanation the government may have.
In a sensible world, this chap's article would be splashed all over the world's newspapers and there would be discussions on all serious discussion and news programmes. Politicians would be pontificating about how the scientists duped them and how we must all take back control, learn lessons, heal ourselves, protect the vulnerable and all the other sound-bites de jour.
In our current world, this article will be read and discussed by people who aren't surprised and already knew it was all terrible. Everyone else will remain ignorant and only idleness or the lack of an invitation will stop them taking further jabs. All extra deaths which can't be labelled covid will just be sighed over as signs of how unpredictable life is.
Alas, I cannot disagree with anything you say.
The only people who can or will take notice-who can fight through the absolute mass formation and brainwashing, are those who have either suffered directly from the shots or have family/friends who have suffered or have died as a result of the shots. Sadly, there are people in these catagories who still can't make the connection. These are beyond all hope.
The thing is that almost no one is able to ignore deaths in the family.
Agreed but people will still find other reasons for the death because they are all jabbed and encouraged each other to get jabbed. Deaths reported of sportsmen or news readers can be commented on ("how sad" "what bad luck" "probably took drugs" "undiagnosed illness probably") and then forgotten. It's only going to surface if several people in your street drop dead within a week or a month with no obvious sign of illness and of a variety of ages. That doesn't seem to be happening.
Maybe in Wales
Send it to Mark Rutte and ask if he wants a similar independent scrutiny of his Nut Zero diktats publishing...
Scamentists, you mean. Abolish tax-paid funding of "science", and intellectual property other than trademark
It is just more and more obvious with each dose, since each dose is more and more deadly.
ICUs still don't get it that they deal with the survivors only, while the large portion of people just die before they even get to any care.
If you follow https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/ this looks to be picking up steam... Dowd also suggests even though less people are boosting the death toll remains seriously elevated.
I suspect the worst is yet to come.
The key term here, is “short term” How will life expectancy look five to ten years from now?
Yes, this is something that's been bothering me for a while.
What we've seen so far are the clinically significant effects. If the spike protein can cross the blood brain barrier in mice
(https://www.nature.com/articles/s41593-020-00771-8)
then what subclinical damage might we expect in humans?
I don't expect to see a true answer to that question for many decades but I'm rather afraid it won't be what we'd all like to hear.
Thanks Joel. I'll need to ask around to get a clue as to what's going on ! :-/
I'm baffled.
Conspiracy No More: Pfizer Documents Reveal That Pfizer 'Vaccines' Contain GRAPHENE OXIDE
One of the reasons why Pfizer wanted to HIDE their documents for 75 Years
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/conspiracy-no-more-pfizer-documents
I don't believe that was GO in the vaccine it was more to do with the testing apparatus.
Listen to Karen Kingston interview for the details and read this post
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/shocking-here-is-what-really-is-in
Totally.
The jabs do not reduce infection (likely increase it), leaving the jabbed with the VFR plus the IFR.
I spoke to a Great Barrington sub-author in April 2020 - and he'd looked at the data from WHO -- and concluded the virus was pretty much in line with the lethality of a bad flu year.
For the life of him he could not understand why they were locking the world down.
I suppose that it's just a casual relationship between mRNA (non-vaccines) and death.
LOL. What a difference a letter makes!
The other thing to keep in mind is these numbers can only go in one direction, that is they will keep getting worse.
Any thoughts on what the VFR will be next year? In two years? Five years?
The VFR indicates the deaths we know of so far, go listen to McCullough's prediction for those with Myocarditis in five years time... The so called Turbo cancers. And yet they keep on jabbing.
Thanks for linking the paper. Are the error bands (e.g. in Fig. 9) based on statistical uncertainty and basically assuming white noise? I suspect this wouldn't account for the fact that much of the dynamics has inherent temporal correlation. A white noise assumption would be incorrect.
There could easily be a bump in vaccination due to policy, closely followed by a bump in infections due to seasonality. Then the correlation is spurious, no matter the calculated uncertainty.
Edit: The correlation shown in Fig. 2 graph is quite convincing though. As an interested reader, I would suggest focusing on that.
Well it supports what we have already suspected, but it doesn't seem like we have much to go on there.
I am rendering svg videos now to understand the US data. https://video.pervaers.com
Such a conundrum
Yup Joel --
I see it in your pictures --
And here you can see a (my latest) statistical analysis:
https://timellison.substack.com/p/undeniable-confirmation-of-the-high
I've done this analysis for the U.S., U.K., and Canada.
Would love to get my hands on Weekly Mortality and Weekly Injections for a few other countries.
Have such DATA ?
Thanks,
TimE.
Vanden Bossche interview - Cassandra was right in the end as well
https://highwire.thehighwire.vididio.media/1637275291839.mp4
“The global economy was facing the worst collapse since the second world war as coronavirus began to strike in March, well before the height of the crisis, according to the latest Brookings-FT tracking index. “The index comes as the IMF prepares to hold virtual spring meetings this week, when it will release forecasts showing the deepest contraction for the global economy since the 1930s great depression. FT.com https://archive.ph/UUfl2
Collapse Imminent: https://thephilosophicalsalon.com/a-self-fulfilling-prophecy-systemic-collapse-and-pandemic-simulation/
The Illusion of Stability, the Inevitability of Collapse http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2021/09/the-illusion-of-stability-inevitability.html
Fed is sharply increasing the amount of help it is providing to the financial system https://www.cnbc.com/2019/10/23/fed-repo-overnight-operations-level-to-increase-to-120-billion.html Banks did not trust each other - similar situation when Lehman collapsed
And now - the Central Banks are f789ed - if they lower interest rates we will be using wheelbarrows of near worthless cash to buy a loaf of bread ...
So they are forced to raise rates ... and raising rates crashes the value of bank assets...
The entire financial system is insolvent... and the Central Banks continue to raise rates... driving the banks further into insolvency.
This will end in total catastrophe.
This is a must watch https://youtu.be/5m75wFQiQ4c
Makes you wonder... are they trying to exterminate before the collapse occurs (it will result in mass starvation - murder rape disease) --- but might be failing?
They appear to be trying to create a deadly mutation ... so far no luck
Just FYI, I took the 144 million figure from the Ministerial reply to Andrew Bridgen MP's speech in the House of Commons on Friday 17th March, and made a guess at the relevant total excess deaths 2020-2023 inclusive. I came up with a figure of one death potentially linked to 782 jabs.
In an experiment, it is up to the experimenter to prove that the effects are not caused by the experiment.
One potential response is that the 2020 deaths cannot possibly be the result of jabs. Fair enough, but I said experiment with some deliberation.
There were 78,002 excess deaths in 2020, against a standard deviation of 6,096. I'll be interested to hear any explanation the government may have.
And again, thanks for the blog.