The State and Big Pharma sponsored “fact” checkers have been deployed to further smear and discredit Andrew Bridgen.
This is not in any way to establish any facts of the matter but simply to serve as a distraction from the fact(!) that he is asking too many pertinent questions.
Maybe the COVID “vaccines” are not gene therapy but they have just as little in common with proper vaccines too and does that, in itself, stop them from being potentially harmful?
Not to be too distracted ourselves, I don’t want to make a big deal about it but, with permission, this is what Mike Yeadon has to say on the matter:
I don’t think it matters, but I agree not to call them “gene therapy”.
Same or different technology compared with prior vaccines? (different).
Decades of safe clinical experience with the technology? (No, essentially none in a public health setting).
Are there reasonable grounds to hold concerns about the safety and tolerability of these gene-based injections? (Yes. They unequivocally convey an unavoidable toxic liability, as several of us have been warning before any of these injections received emergency use authorization).
And, of course, in the greatest twist of irony of all, what really, really matters is that Mike can’t actually make his valuable contributions to the debate that should be happening on this subject, where he is most eminently qualified, because he’s censored too!
I can’t tweet. If I use my daughters account to post, virtually no one will know who the account owner is.
You could post in quotes, “This from Dr Mike Yeadon, still banned from his second Twitter account, early in 2022”.
Oh well, dragged into another debate when I said I shouldn’t (thanks, Joey K)…
Do you know why Pfizer and Moderna SEC filings call them gene therapy? Honest question...
Per se, no, but they are transfecting agents. Novel, and potentially dangerous.