Jan 13, 2023·edited Jan 13, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley
My tuppence, for what it's worth: Last summer, when a friend who was about to start a (non-scientific) position with Moderna vehemently refuted my use of the term "gene therapy", I did some searching for my response to him. Below are some sources that mention or discuss the term. The use of the term for the experimental mRNA products marketed as protecting against SARS2 does sound like it comes somewhat down to semantics. The search string I used was "gene therap".
Moderna's annual reports state that US and EU agencies classify mRNA as gene therapy:
All we need do is respond with the video of Bayer Pharmaceuticals executive, Stefan Oelrich, addressing the World Health Summit in Berlin back in October 2021 stating that these injections are indeed a gene editing technology.
The fact checkers must be getting desperate to try and discredit Bridgen on what appears to be such an arbitrary point. They know that they can’t attack him on the reality of the death and damage these toxic shots are causing.
Jan 13, 2023·edited Jan 13, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley
Here is a definitive explanation as to the correct terminology vs the COVID-19 'vaccines' by Scientific and Technical writer Mark Pickles. (Fully referenced).
Jan 13, 2023·edited Jan 13, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley
I somewhere (CDC, FDA, ...) read the definition of gene therapy and, man, it matches the clot shot perfect! According to that a gene therapy does not modify your DNA, nothing to do with that.
As medical doctor for 45 years who was struck from the medical register for my opposition to the pathogenicity Covid hoax and mRNA . I must respectfully disagree with Mike ,it is too early to say that the mRNA is not incorporated into the recipient DNA. There is also a question over the meaning of the words Gene Therapy. The mRNA utilizes the human DNA to produce a glycoprotein that surly is therapy using the recipient gene on a temporary basis if not a permanent basis . Definitions are now flexible and can be changed to facilitate any argument.
I always hated the word "therapy" in this context. Therapy implies healing. Healing is categorically not what these fake vaccines are about. Though it is awkward, I have called them gene manipulators.
Mike Yeadon's early warnings were published in May 2020. Thank goodness for censorship or his concern about media presenting “vaccine hesitancy” as the "province of science-hating conspiracy theorists" might have gotten far more traction against these transfections.
The possibility of incorporation of mRNA fragments from Covid19 jabs into Human DNA can't be ruled out just now, especially since they have been observed located near the cell nucleus. Check out my friend and former coworker Prof Ted Steele who shows you how we have evolved by taking up the genetic code of other life forms.
The FDA defined gene therapy in July 2018 and has not changed it since. Per the FDA's
website as of this writing:
"Human gene therapy seeks to modify or manipulate the expression of a gene
or to alter the biological properties of living cells for therapeutic use. Genetherapy is a technique that modifies a person's genes to treat or cure disease …"
Here's where Asspciated Press/fact checkers went wrong. They only used ONE part of the FDA's definition of a gene
therapy — the part about modifying expression of a gene — in its debunking attempt. But
the full definition also includes the words "or to alter the biological properties of living
cells," which is precisely what the COVID shots do.
The mRNA in the COVID jab are molecules that contain genetic instructions for making
various proteins. mRNA COVID shots deliver synthetic mRNA with a genetic code that
instructs your cells to produce a modified form of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
Do you know why Pfizer and Moderna SEC filings call them gene therapy? Honest question...
Per se, no, but they are transfecting agents. Novel, and potentially dangerous.
Semantics in a killing field.
My tuppence, for what it's worth: Last summer, when a friend who was about to start a (non-scientific) position with Moderna vehemently refuted my use of the term "gene therapy", I did some searching for my response to him. Below are some sources that mention or discuss the term. The use of the term for the experimental mRNA products marketed as protecting against SARS2 does sound like it comes somewhat down to semantics. The search string I used was "gene therap".
Moderna's annual reports state that US and EU agencies classify mRNA as gene therapy:
2020 annual report, pp 106, 107, 116:
https://www.annreports.com/moderna/moderna-ar-2020.pdf
2021 annual report (referred to as "10-K"), pp 63, 65:
https://www.annreports.com/moderna/moderna-ar-2021.pdf
FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), second set of bullet points with categorizations:
https://www.fda.gov/combination-products/jurisdictional-information/transfer-therapeutic-biological-products-center-drug-evaluation-and-research
A 32-page document, apparently submitted to an FDA meeting by two researchers, discusses the term at length:
https://downloads.regulations.gov/FDA-2022-N-0336-2500/attachment_1.pdf
A "vaccine" press release posing as an informational article, from the American Society of Gene & Cell Therapy (ASGCT):
https://asgct.org/research/news/august-2021/pfizer-vaccine-approved-by-fda
All we need do is respond with the video of Bayer Pharmaceuticals executive, Stefan Oelrich, addressing the World Health Summit in Berlin back in October 2021 stating that these injections are indeed a gene editing technology.
"Public Health", if it means anything at all, should be to protect us from what is happening.
Instead, it seems that they've been training for years to actually do this: force these injections into as much of the population as possible.
The entire apparatus is setup for this.
I really hope, that people start to recognize that "Public Health", as it is now, needs to be ripped down to its roots.
There's a video of one of the 2 big pharma companies openly calling the vaccines gene therapy...
The fact checkers must be getting desperate to try and discredit Bridgen on what appears to be such an arbitrary point. They know that they can’t attack him on the reality of the death and damage these toxic shots are causing.
Here is a definitive explanation as to the correct terminology vs the COVID-19 'vaccines' by Scientific and Technical writer Mark Pickles. (Fully referenced).
https://markpickles.files.wordpress.com/2022/03/gene-therapy-for-british-children.pdf
I somewhere (CDC, FDA, ...) read the definition of gene therapy and, man, it matches the clot shot perfect! According to that a gene therapy does not modify your DNA, nothing to do with that.
As medical doctor for 45 years who was struck from the medical register for my opposition to the pathogenicity Covid hoax and mRNA . I must respectfully disagree with Mike ,it is too early to say that the mRNA is not incorporated into the recipient DNA. There is also a question over the meaning of the words Gene Therapy. The mRNA utilizes the human DNA to produce a glycoprotein that surly is therapy using the recipient gene on a temporary basis if not a permanent basis . Definitions are now flexible and can be changed to facilitate any argument.
I hope that your readers can help me put out the truth. I’m a Jewish woman. My husband and I lost relatives in the Holocaust. My Rabbi lost 4 siblings!! Yet we all feel that Holocaust comparisons are perfectly warranted. Please make my retweet of MP Bridgen’s words, and my article about the truth, go viral. https://twitter.com/BikurRofim/status/1613602714927104000 https://truth613.substack.com/p/as-a-jewish-woman-i-support-mp-andrew
I always hated the word "therapy" in this context. Therapy implies healing. Healing is categorically not what these fake vaccines are about. Though it is awkward, I have called them gene manipulators.
Mike Yeadon's early warnings were published in May 2020. Thank goodness for censorship or his concern about media presenting “vaccine hesitancy” as the "province of science-hating conspiracy theorists" might have gotten far more traction against these transfections.
https://web.archive.org/web/20200902094801/https://astutenews.com/2020/05/trumps-warp-speed-vaccine-czar-oversaw-an-infamously-botched-vaccination-why-a-third-of-americans-want-to-dodge-this-one/
The possibility of incorporation of mRNA fragments from Covid19 jabs into Human DNA can't be ruled out just now, especially since they have been observed located near the cell nucleus. Check out my friend and former coworker Prof Ted Steele who shows you how we have evolved by taking up the genetic code of other life forms.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321258358_Reverse_Transcriptase_Mechanism_of_Somatic_Hypermutation_60_Years_of_Clonal_Selection_Theory
The Definition of Gene Therapy (From Dr Mercola)
The FDA defined gene therapy in July 2018 and has not changed it since. Per the FDA's
website as of this writing:
"Human gene therapy seeks to modify or manipulate the expression of a gene
or to alter the biological properties of living cells for therapeutic use. Genetherapy is a technique that modifies a person's genes to treat or cure disease …"
Here's where Asspciated Press/fact checkers went wrong. They only used ONE part of the FDA's definition of a gene
therapy — the part about modifying expression of a gene — in its debunking attempt. But
the full definition also includes the words "or to alter the biological properties of living
cells," which is precisely what the COVID shots do.
The mRNA in the COVID jab are molecules that contain genetic instructions for making
various proteins. mRNA COVID shots deliver synthetic mRNA with a genetic code that
instructs your cells to produce a modified form of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.