Non-COVID excess deaths are 3 times greater than net COVID deaths (offset by flu, pneumonia and chronic lower respiratory conditions) and all the excess occurs since the start of the mRNA experiment.
Ahhhh it was all about protecting the elderly...wait what!!!! Australia locked its international borders, then when a few covid cases snuck in...do you know what they did here, they denied hospital access to covid infected elderly care residents. They kept them in or sent them back to aged care residences. Data already showed that age amongst other co-morbidities was a major risk factor, so the solution put the virus into aged care homes.
We destroyed our young, small businesses & locked down in case of Victoria for one of the longest lockdowns in the world & still managed to kill the aged in places they should have been safe. We opened up to omicron after vaccinating nearly 95% of our 16+ and look at what that is giving us now. Shameful what we do to the young, to family businesses & to the elderly.
I am an Aussie doctor and I clearly see that the shots are causing deaths. The more fascinating questions are your findings like the decreasing dementia deaths during natural Covid/ lockdowns. How can they have decreased or slowed down??? The implication is that lockdowns prevented dementia deaths perhaps because people stayed at home longer than usual before being fed into aged care facilities and hospitals as they normally would??? Did the slowing of usual dementia care pathways prevent deaths from dementia? In other words - “healthcare” kills
Off topic, a little: Joel, did you see Steve Kirsch's report on the Jeffrey Morris paper with Medicare deaths? Anybody can clearly see the rising daily death count. I'm a EE who knows about signals in noise. And about binomial distributions. Let the null hypothesis be that deaths are not related to the jab, i.e., random Bernoulli trials. Make a "matched filter" for a linear zero-mean additive signal. It's simply a weighted sum of the samples. Compare the value applying the filter to the data vs applying it to truly random data. The result is more than 20 standard deviations out for jab 2. It's what we EE's label as 26 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The first jab data gives 32 dB SNR. The "p value" is 0 in both cases.
I figure you and Matthew Crawford might appreciate seeing how I look at it.
Don’t worry, they’ll rationalize these by delayed diagnosis, the stress of lockdowns, etc. There is some degree of truth to it. If someone had cancer move from stage 3 to 4 that can be enough to lead to an early death. Also I know of people who could not have their blood pressure taken while doing a telehealth consultation. If they had sky-high B.P. missed the result was a stroke.
What's happening in Australia is what's been happening in Massachusetts, other US states, the UK, Germany, Europe, no doubt the rest of the world (except maybe Sweden?). There are subtle differences but the overall picture remains the same.
"It’s all about the blood. Deaths from blood, blood forming organs, blood cleaning organs, blood transport system (circulatory system including the heart), and blood-related cancers are all exceptionally higher since the “vaccine.”
Diseases and reactions to drugs almost always have specific symptoms. What happened in 2020, 2021, and 2022 is depicted in C, J, and I codes. The patterns, including SYMPTOM SPECTRUM PROFILE and AGE SPECTRUM PROFILE, are very different between 2020 and 2021 and are very similar between 2021 and 2022.
The mechanism of action at the cellular level regarding covid and regarding the “vaccine” will not be fully known for years. There are theories on both sides of the issue. But we do not have time to debate “the science” while people are dying en masse from blood-related ailments. The safest thing to do is to stop this “vaccine” now and study the data. The “vaccine” clearly is not preventing any deaths from covid. The data herein shows that. And the “vaccine” clearly is correlative of thousands of excess deaths in Massachusetts alone over the past 18 months. A simple correlation between two (2) state databases will give us the answer."
In a recent debate Mutton Crew leader Graham Bottley was trying to unconvincingly blame all excess deaths on covid and “long covid”.
I think your analyses, together with the work done by Prof. Norman Fenton and team, clearly show that most excess deaths correlate with the v@xx roll-out.
Thanks Joel for another brilliant demonstration of this in this analysis.
Oct 28, 2022·edited Oct 28, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
"Remember folks, correlation does not equal causation. There is nothing to see here."
We're fighting a system that was constructed in such a way as to always escape consequences, if necessary. I can go on and on, but what it really is, is the "counter-intuitive" construct. You know what's happening but you put it in the official sausage maker and it just doesn't come out. We've trained people to ignore common sense. Works great for them.
Oct 28, 2022·edited Oct 28, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
What's worrying is that deaths in the over 65s have been rising precipitously and continuously for 15 months since Apr 2021 and still show no sign of peaking as of July 2022, Younger age groups are at least 6 months behind, so we might reasonably expect them to follow the same pattern, which means a lot more excess deaths in younger people still to come, with no end in sight at present and no sign that the most likely cause of these deaths will be withdrawn from use. That's something more than 'just' a public health catastrophe.
In the UK, Rashi Sanook is refusing to open an investigation into the Covid 'vaccines'. Is he going to also refuse to open a public enquiry into the reasons why British people are dropping dead in unexpectedly large numbers?
Whew, you had me worried until you told me there was nothing to see here!
Many thanks for this Australian context, Joel. I will share it with over 100 of my unrequited Aussie pollies, "experts" and hacks.
Can you believe this?!:
https://rebekahbarnett.substack.com/p/vaccination-on-your-doorstep
Ahhhh it was all about protecting the elderly...wait what!!!! Australia locked its international borders, then when a few covid cases snuck in...do you know what they did here, they denied hospital access to covid infected elderly care residents. They kept them in or sent them back to aged care residences. Data already showed that age amongst other co-morbidities was a major risk factor, so the solution put the virus into aged care homes.
We destroyed our young, small businesses & locked down in case of Victoria for one of the longest lockdowns in the world & still managed to kill the aged in places they should have been safe. We opened up to omicron after vaccinating nearly 95% of our 16+ and look at what that is giving us now. Shameful what we do to the young, to family businesses & to the elderly.
I am an Aussie doctor and I clearly see that the shots are causing deaths. The more fascinating questions are your findings like the decreasing dementia deaths during natural Covid/ lockdowns. How can they have decreased or slowed down??? The implication is that lockdowns prevented dementia deaths perhaps because people stayed at home longer than usual before being fed into aged care facilities and hospitals as they normally would??? Did the slowing of usual dementia care pathways prevent deaths from dementia? In other words - “healthcare” kills
Off topic, a little: Joel, did you see Steve Kirsch's report on the Jeffrey Morris paper with Medicare deaths? Anybody can clearly see the rising daily death count. I'm a EE who knows about signals in noise. And about binomial distributions. Let the null hypothesis be that deaths are not related to the jab, i.e., random Bernoulli trials. Make a "matched filter" for a linear zero-mean additive signal. It's simply a weighted sum of the samples. Compare the value applying the filter to the data vs applying it to truly random data. The result is more than 20 standard deviations out for jab 2. It's what we EE's label as 26 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The first jab data gives 32 dB SNR. The "p value" is 0 in both cases.
I figure you and Matthew Crawford might appreciate seeing how I look at it.
Don’t worry, they’ll rationalize these by delayed diagnosis, the stress of lockdowns, etc. There is some degree of truth to it. If someone had cancer move from stage 3 to 4 that can be enough to lead to an early death. Also I know of people who could not have their blood pressure taken while doing a telehealth consultation. If they had sky-high B.P. missed the result was a stroke.
What's happening in Australia is what's been happening in Massachusetts, other US states, the UK, Germany, Europe, no doubt the rest of the world (except maybe Sweden?). There are subtle differences but the overall picture remains the same.
"It’s all about the blood. Deaths from blood, blood forming organs, blood cleaning organs, blood transport system (circulatory system including the heart), and blood-related cancers are all exceptionally higher since the “vaccine.”
Diseases and reactions to drugs almost always have specific symptoms. What happened in 2020, 2021, and 2022 is depicted in C, J, and I codes. The patterns, including SYMPTOM SPECTRUM PROFILE and AGE SPECTRUM PROFILE, are very different between 2020 and 2021 and are very similar between 2021 and 2022.
The mechanism of action at the cellular level regarding covid and regarding the “vaccine” will not be fully known for years. There are theories on both sides of the issue. But we do not have time to debate “the science” while people are dying en masse from blood-related ailments. The safest thing to do is to stop this “vaccine” now and study the data. The “vaccine” clearly is not preventing any deaths from covid. The data herein shows that. And the “vaccine” clearly is correlative of thousands of excess deaths in Massachusetts alone over the past 18 months. A simple correlation between two (2) state databases will give us the answer."
https://coquindechien.substack.com/p/mors-ex-cruentum-sanguinem
In a recent debate Mutton Crew leader Graham Bottley was trying to unconvincingly blame all excess deaths on covid and “long covid”.
I think your analyses, together with the work done by Prof. Norman Fenton and team, clearly show that most excess deaths correlate with the v@xx roll-out.
Thanks Joel for another brilliant demonstration of this in this analysis.
Its 2-1 in Taiwan
https://pete843.substack.com/p/update-on-taiwan-excess-deaths
Damn. That’s stark.
Pictures worth a thousand words, at least.
Thank you.
"Remember folks, correlation does not equal causation. There is nothing to see here."
We're fighting a system that was constructed in such a way as to always escape consequences, if necessary. I can go on and on, but what it really is, is the "counter-intuitive" construct. You know what's happening but you put it in the official sausage maker and it just doesn't come out. We've trained people to ignore common sense. Works great for them.
The younger groups have the 5 month delay evident but the over 65 just instant increase. Interesting.
Thanks
Depopulation is the goal; apparently it is working as designed.
Thank goodness for our president; things could be so much worse! 🤞🤫🤫
Thanks for staying on it Joel....you’re definitely a reality check for what’s occurring
What's worrying is that deaths in the over 65s have been rising precipitously and continuously for 15 months since Apr 2021 and still show no sign of peaking as of July 2022, Younger age groups are at least 6 months behind, so we might reasonably expect them to follow the same pattern, which means a lot more excess deaths in younger people still to come, with no end in sight at present and no sign that the most likely cause of these deaths will be withdrawn from use. That's something more than 'just' a public health catastrophe.
In the UK, Rashi Sanook is refusing to open an investigation into the Covid 'vaccines'. Is he going to also refuse to open a public enquiry into the reasons why British people are dropping dead in unexpectedly large numbers?