48 Comments

Simple but powerful data ..

Expand full comment

Thank you for your diligent work. Too bad they got found out just when they thought they had an elegant solution for under-funded pension plans. What a mess!

Expand full comment
May 24, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Thank you Joel…As you ironically say, Why didn’t they do ( an analysis) it?

Mmmm🤔 I wonder…..72 year old lady almost finished off by Pfizer Booster,Of course the vaccines were rolled out to PROTECT THE ELDERLY that’s why they were chosen to be FIRST in the queue …Step this way to the showers,for a nice shower and change of clothes 😳 🥲

I wonder why there was also a pre ordered 2 years supply of Medazolam, used up in two months at the start of the plandemic,in the UK.

Sadly most of my contemporaries still believe our UK Gov. is looking after us…🤯🤬

Expand full comment

They say public health and safety

Translate:. Murderous killing And maiming

Expand full comment

Did Andrew Cuomo move to England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿?

Expand full comment
May 24, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

To make matters worse, many of the “deaths ‘involving’ COVID” will have been faked (mis-attributed), as revealed by hero funeral director John O’Looney of Milton Keynes in his testimony to the Reiner Fuellmich Grand Jury crimes against humanity trial here: https://odysee.com/@redpillmedia:f/Grand-Jury---Testimony---John-O%27Looney:6

Expand full comment

'that the vaccine has a dual mode of fatal action - it kills in its own right and induces COVID mortality too.'- of course my interpretation must be different! The vac either kills you fairly quickly by the shock of injection, effect of the nanoparticles or whatever else is in there. Or the mRNA starts to actually produce p78.3-493 (there is zero evidence that this protein comes from a virus or that it is spike shaped!)(and there is so much difference in its molecular weight between different papers that what they all keep calling the 'spike' cannot be the same protein or even the same polymer) . This protein or proteins are produced by oxidation and stress in people and cell culture so may be involved in stress response, may bind to the ACE-2 receptor (which protects against lung injury), so symptoms labelled as COVID (just about anything) may be a result of its expression. I wonder if they knew what this protein might do, or if they want to see if the mRNA works? https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/spikes-and-knobs?s=w

Expand full comment

I don't think this kind of data analysis is allowed. I wonder if they've created a culture and groupthink where government employees just don't look in certain directions. People get fired for such analysis.

I'm sure the people in the care homes observe this, especially the spike in deaths after rolling out the vaccine. I wonder how many of them did somersaults in their mind to not recognize the direct relationship to the vaccine.

Expand full comment

It might be worthwhile to include a graph of vaccination rates.

Expand full comment

Could so many people in government have been fooled into this lie? Or are they accessories to a crime, buying into a eugenicist dream?

Expand full comment

URGENT! Please vote! Health Canada doing a twitter poll asking true or false that vaccines prevent serious illness! https://twitter.com/GovCanHealth/status/1529114746951180295

Expand full comment

To my taste, the narrative to the cumulative deaths diagram depends too much on the assumption of 1,900 expected deaths. What if we "expect" 2,500 deaths per week? Sure, the dislocation would still be there, but the "excess" would disappear.

I am asking because I am looking at comparable data from Germany (not care home residents, but the 80+ population), and one has to very careful regarding population dynamics. At the beginning of 2018, there were around 5 million people 80+ in Germany, now it's more than 6 million.

Expand full comment

Think you mean "end of week 1 2021", not 2022.

Expand full comment

Thanks so much for considering this. Wow, the clear spike in deaths at the time of the vaccine roll out is a very clear signal which should have been picked up! I also found some more info from the ONS here, which may be pertinent to the analysis:

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/deathsinthecaresectorenglandandwales/2020

“In England, there were 155,376 deaths of care home residents in 2020 (wherever the death occurred); this is an increase of 18.5% compared with 2019 (n 131,149 deaths) and 18.3% compared with the five-year average between 2015 and 2019 (131,384 deaths).”

So if we just look at the all cause deaths and ignore the shenanigans of how deaths are classified, another story could be [there are 6 bullet points, might have to expand the comment to see them all]:

1. The weekly average death rate in 2019 is 2500, and this seems to be stable over the prior 5 year period.

2. Due to governmental policies, there were 24,000 excessive deaths in 2020. Since the weekly death rate in the latter half of 2020 remains below the background rate of 2500, these excessive deaths must have all occurred earlier.

3. The excessive deaths would have decreased the care home population, and also killed off the most vulnerable, so by the time the graph begins, there are less deaths than normal, in proportion. By the end of the year, as the care home places begin to refill, and the weekly rate is heading back to normal, with some evidence of additional covid deaths.

4. Then the vaccination comes along and clearly wipes out another 20,000. Again, this would have decreased the population, which was only just recovering, and killed off the most vulnerable at that time.

5. For most of the rest of the year, the rate remains below the pre-2020 background rate, due to the second wiping out of the vulnerable population, and only recovers to the 2500 level as the places that have been vacated slowly fill up again towards the end of the year (if I have done my sums right, the total deaths in 2021, even with the vaccination kill off, were 126,000, 5000 below the average of the pre-2020 years).

6. Nevertheless, we see clear spikes in weekly deaths which reach above the background 2500 rate whenever vaccination programme is re-activated: week of September 16th 2021 when the carehomes got the first booster (would be worth marking this on the graph too); the run up to Christmas, when the government was telling people to get the booster if they wanted to see their family at Christmas, when there is sustained period of above background death rate; and the 4th dose beginning at the end of March 2022 (again worth marking the rollout on the graph).­­­­­­­

Expand full comment

Yes Joel. It still amazes me that we don't have to spend long looking at the data to see obvious patterns... And yet the authorities still do nothing.

Expand full comment

Sent to twitter. You are welcome. let’s see if they print it? Thank you for your continued work, efforts, truth, integrity.

Expand full comment