I think the difference in uptake is most companies aren't legally forcing people to get the third with dirty-tactics. As sad as it is, if people were told, get boosted or lose your job, I think the upkeep would dramatically rise over a relatively short period as those who have already taken 2 to put food on the table, would probably take 3 to do the same.
Thanks for these analyses. The relationship certainly seems inconsistent with the 'effective' narrative. I had a couple of questions please: Do the data comprise all counties or only some subset of counties (That is, are all counties obliged to report?) Are the hospitalisation rates defined in the same way everywhere? (e.g., do they distinguish between people admitted to hospital in order to treat a Covid-9 infection and those already in hospital, later found to be infected?) Are the data in the public domain? Many thanks.
The 'spike' protein, (or p78.3-493 as I like to call it, https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/spikes-and-knobs?s=w), is produced by oxidation and stress of cells. It may well have some function in response to stress and toxins. If the mRNA in the injectables does indeed make p78.3-463 then it's entirely plausible that this may affect symptoms in both positive and negative ways!
I think that could be. Say in the first couple weeks vaccines make you get covid and do nothing to reduce severity. Then say after that there is a period where it doesn't reduce cases, but at least reduces severity. These two could balance out and cause no clear association with hospitalization rates.
If vaccination could be found to be positively correlated across counties with cases, yet not associated with hospitalization, I think this would be consistent with your suggestion.
that last one shows you where you can emigrate at least, and where not to.
They forced old people to get booster around here s f killafornia to be able to see shows and attend concerts
I am segregated as unclean in apartheid land west
I think the difference in uptake is most companies aren't legally forcing people to get the third with dirty-tactics. As sad as it is, if people were told, get boosted or lose your job, I think the upkeep would dramatically rise over a relatively short period as those who have already taken 2 to put food on the table, would probably take 3 to do the same.
Thanks for these analyses. The relationship certainly seems inconsistent with the 'effective' narrative. I had a couple of questions please: Do the data comprise all counties or only some subset of counties (That is, are all counties obliged to report?) Are the hospitalisation rates defined in the same way everywhere? (e.g., do they distinguish between people admitted to hospital in order to treat a Covid-9 infection and those already in hospital, later found to be infected?) Are the data in the public domain? Many thanks.
Please do an analysis of urban v. rural counties.
The 'spike' protein, (or p78.3-493 as I like to call it, https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/spikes-and-knobs?s=w), is produced by oxidation and stress of cells. It may well have some function in response to stress and toxins. If the mRNA in the injectables does indeed make p78.3-463 then it's entirely plausible that this may affect symptoms in both positive and negative ways!
Twitbanned again?
Not AFAIK.
Just noticed the name change.
I think that could be. Say in the first couple weeks vaccines make you get covid and do nothing to reduce severity. Then say after that there is a period where it doesn't reduce cases, but at least reduces severity. These two could balance out and cause no clear association with hospitalization rates.
If vaccination could be found to be positively correlated across counties with cases, yet not associated with hospitalization, I think this would be consistent with your suggestion.
Thanks for these two links, both of which are disturbing.