51 Comments
Oct 21, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Right from the get-go Dr Rachel Clarke has been supported by The Guardian in promoting fear around Covid. She wrote an article circa April 2020 about watching people die. in ICU doctors see this every day, yet Clarke made it as though it was the 1st time in her life as a physician she witnessed a respiratory death. Then she pushed the masks, the lockdowns, and the vaccines. If not for wondrous doctors such as Dr Malhotra et al most of the public would be unaware of the lies being told to us by NHS doctors. Dr Clarke had the time to write and publish a book about Covid which came out in 2021. Can you imagine this? She was so overwhelmed she could manage to do this. Thank you Joel for drawing attention to doctors such as Clarke who have elongated the pandemic and have silenced physicians who care more for their patients than some doctor who is on the gravy train.

Expand full comment
author

Indeed. She deserved her place in the Hall of Shame a long, long time ago but in the grand scheme of things she's a no-mark. She overstepped that mark when she vilified Dr Malhotra.

Expand full comment
Oct 21, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Well said. Your substack posts are invaluable to me. And thank you for putting right all the wrongs that people like Rachel Clarke think they can get away with. More needs to be written about these types of NHS physicians who have been misleading the public on all matters about covid.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

Just ad hominem.

Expand full comment
Oct 21, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

I'd love to elaborate, but the entirety of @doctor_oxford's objection can be found in the single screenshot. that Joel has posted here.

One hot blast of ad hominem. Nothing else.

Expand full comment
Oct 21, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

I've long suspected shills like her are given thousands of bot followers to boost their apparent credibility.

Expand full comment

It's easy for bots to 'like', not so much to actually type.

Expand full comment

I suspect this is the case.

Expand full comment
Oct 21, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

They're taking the bot farms out before Elon Musk takes over, one was shutdown recently. It will be illuminating to see if the follower counts of these people drop suddenly.

Expand full comment

Seeing as about 70% of activity on twitter is bots, i would say thats a fair bet

Expand full comment

I didn't know it was that high. Wow... It makes sense. Twitter is ideal for the nastiest perception management campaigns.

Expand full comment

There is a fair deal of evidence to back it up. I believe it could even be higher.

Expand full comment
Oct 21, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

I wasn’t there but I gave Rachel a piece of my mind on twitter. Palliative care doctor, how horribly frightening is that! I did not get the impression Compassion was one of her strong points.

Expand full comment

That’s a cushy job in the NHS. I was lucky enough to spend a night in hospice and I thought of all the doctor and nurse jobs that I’ve seen in the NHS, this is for sure the most relaxed. They are lovely people, it’s a lovely environment. She should punch herself in the face for what she is currently doing.

Expand full comment

Even if she doesn’t punch herself in the face, she will eventually have to live with the consequences of encouraging her loved ones to have gene therapies

Expand full comment

She attacked the man whose dad died from hacksxxxine.

Shame upon shame.

Expand full comment

RECOMMENDING SM-102 (MODERNA) TO CHILDREN SHOULD MAKE YOUR BLOOD BOIL

STOP THE GENOCIDE

https://outraged.substack.com/p/recommending-sm-102-moderna-to-children

SAFETY DATA SHEETS must show the content and hazards of each ingredient in the chemical product supplied. The SDS for Cayman's SM-102 (Item No. 33474) accurately depicts that the mixture of chemicals in this product is 90% ethanol (a common solvent) and 10% SM-102. Although a common solvent, ethanol has several known serious hazards, which are addressed in Cayman's SDS. Neither the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), the Register of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS), nor the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Inventory of Classification and Labeling list any hazards associated with SM-102.

Cayman Chemical

TO CALL IT SAFE AND EFFECTIVE IS A CRIME

Expand full comment

ethanol is not the problem

SM-102, aka Luciferase, is the problem

Expand full comment
Oct 21, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

She's the one who encouraged teenagers to get jabbed without telling their parents. She has no shame. Or conscience. Biggest of the covid grifters.

Expand full comment

Trust the Science!

Expand full comment
Oct 21, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Just looking at her website contact page. https://www.doctoroxford.com/contact

You can’t get a better example of someone ‘living off the grift’ than that.

Expand full comment

For supporting and enabling an iatrogenocide by being a nasty, spiteful, vindictive, petty, meddlesome, censorious bitch trying to silence brave professional colleagues who dared speak the truth, she deserves more than to be ratioed on Twitter or getting her mugshot in the Hall of Shame. She should be rotting in prison quite frankly. Probably not going to happen so we'll have to hope that Karma will be swift and decisive.

Expand full comment

I, and all my friends & family know a lot more people who died or injured from the Covid Vaxx than from Covid.

And it’s concerning that people are still being injured & killed by the vaxx even if they don’t take anymore boosters!

Also as mentioned above, never before in history have we seen so many healthy athletes injured and/or killed all in such a short period of time???

The NIH, CDC, AMA, WHO, etc... all know the vaxx is bad & they are immune from taking it, yet they are trying to force our CHILDREN to take it???

Disgusting!

Expand full comment

She's been in the Hall of Shame from the start. Despicable woman. Such determined ignorance.

Expand full comment
Oct 21, 2022·edited Oct 21, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

"There are people like Dr Aseem Malhotra who have the integrity and courage to admit when they are wrong and do everything they can to put it right, even if it means destroying their reputation in the eyes of the ignorant majority."

---------

Well, I'll just continue where I left off with Dr. John Campbell.

It's pretty weak sauce "integrity" if you have to wait for your dad to kick, and the social pressure gives you a giant opening.

And you still use weasel words, JUST IN CASE....like "not totally safe". Which is manipulative and allows the exit route.

Integrity has its roots in the word wholeness, as in "integral".

The integral part was a long time ago.

Still, yay! Late better than never.

Herded lots of people to their doom by golly it's grand that the wind stopped blowing.

(I know, I know. We have to forgive, and "we are all in this together" and Kumbaya, and go pick up th wreckage of the corpses at the bottom of the cliff and Daddy really does love you. LOL>This is how I am when I wake up! 😅)

Expand full comment
author

Difficult to argue with that.

Expand full comment

I'm writing this up right now, (Not specifically) but this is a trailer effect...of how we are strongly conditioned to look for those gleaming heads on the telly to tell us what is correct.

And inability to fully shitcan this process when it is revealed to be useless and inaccurate.

The power of the "Expert" and the branding of the "Expert" is so strong, that even as they admittedly failed at Scale....we still want to believe!

Joel, thanks for tolerating my comments.

Expand full comment
author

I welcome them! Sometimes we need to stir things up to get the thinking matter working at full strength.

Expand full comment

It's a tough one, and I hate choosing the lesser evil. That's why I choose ALL EVIL. I have trouble forgiving those who are late to the party when I figured it out from the start. Or maybe I'm just a fucking genius. Ah, that's what it is. Love you, gurl.

Expand full comment

Well said

Expand full comment
Oct 21, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

I was really baffled by an article she wrote, in 2021 I think, about an unvaccinated patient of hers. I could not see how (if it was genuine) it complied with data protection or basic standards of professional life. Plus, she came across in it as hate filled, contemptuous of patients making their own decisions, and drunk on power. Authoritarian & vicious - not a desirable combination.

I really would not want a doctor with such apparent contempt for patients anywhere near my loved ones, vaccinated or not.

Expand full comment

This is what it will take for the many disabled people like Rachel to find that their puffed-up confidence in whatever they say is accepted as truth, will finally be scrutinized by those with a compassionate back-up for humanity! Awesome that there are so many comments pointing at her ignorance!

Expand full comment

Burning in hell would be too good for that evil bitch.

Expand full comment

If things get any hotter for her she could soon be travelling there at the speed of broomstick science.

Expand full comment

Harrison Faulkner from True North does a weekly show titled “ratio’d”. I think you’d enjoy it!

Expand full comment

Will Elon Musk bring back the downvote?

Expand full comment