I follow your substack and appreciate your work to uncover the true statistics to do with Covid and vaxes.
In my reading it seems that deaths blamed on Covid in 2020 were often mislabelled and in fact were due to other primary causes. Some are the iatrogenic hospital murders of patients who tested positive to Covid using the flawed PCR test at high cycles. (the developer of the test said they were unsuited to Coronavirus and he died before 2020). They were treated with the new "covid" treatment protocols that ensured the patients caught Hospital Pneumonia so they could be intubated and given remdesivir to kill them. These deaths are a confounding factor and should be treated as non covid deaths. As the extent of the iatrogenic deaths is concealed it is difficult to put a number to them. It makes your job harder to separate the data properly.
A very small portion of all excess deaths can be attributed only to the COVID. The vast majority are related to the political and public "health" response.
Exactly. Talk about a scandal - an unexposed scandal. "Mass homicide" - maybe not "first degree homicide" - really occurred ... and nobody is investigating these crimes (at least among official investigator organizations). Your Substack is. Hundreds of Substacks are. But, for now, we don't count, I guess.
Giving morphine and midazolam to someone on a ventilator is ok (you wouldn't want to be on a ventilator and wide awake). The problem was giving it to people who were not ventilated but just in oxygen or not even that, with inevitable depression of their own respiration.
A recent BBC propaganda piece reported UK ONS stats that the unvaccinated led all cause deaths compared with the "vaccinated." It looks as though they do not define "vaccination" until after a 2 week period post hoc.
The data is an intentional mess right up to and including the actual presence of a hitherto imaginary "virus," a meaningless "RAT" test, and a computer generated in silico "sequence," not to mention the appallingly obvious, ONS black box, uncontrolled, invalid, modelled "effectiveness."
Yes the pcr developer died shortly before the pandemic and he wasnt very old and had no sickness except he had curiously pneumonia!! From what he died ! Which is strange. To me he got murdered with a synthetic respiratory pathogen or anthrax and then not treated properly. This same killing method has been used or tried on others according to their personal accounts.
yep. preemptive murder. they didn't want him telling the truth about the PCR test because they needed to create fear and panic by lying about how many people were getting covid.
Just to add for those interested, the US government paid for every step in the treatment for Covid, even over $100,000 per patient. FEMA in the US kicked in up to $8000. for funeral expenses. The flu and the Vax treatment and death got nothing. Would you want any other cause on the death certificate? I see this as a definite confounding factor. A Utah coroner agreed after two people were classified as Covid related deaths after gunshot wounds killed them. Makes attributing deaths correctly difficult, especially prior to 2021 when the government was actively trying to boost Covid deaths reported to promote the vax in 2021!
Sep 29, 2023·edited Sep 29, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley
Great info. I documented the surge in excess deaths in the state of Michigan between the first week in March 2020 and May 2nd, 2020. Expected deaths went from negative the week ending right before the lockdowns to more than 75 percent "excess deaths" by mid-April. My question: How is that even possible?
FYI - LinkedIn would be a great platform for you to post this on. I don’t post often on LI, but when I do, i get a surprisingly large amount of DMs from business and healthcare professionals.
FYI - LinkedIn would be a great platform for you to post this on. I don’t post often on LI, but when I do, i get a surprisingly large amount of DMs from business and healthcare professionals.
Joel, looking at the registration data, as invalid as it is, I was always troubled that the mortality towers in the graph presented by ONS sometimes seemed to appear to be altered after a few days from the previous update. I'm aware their releases are provisional data and no doubt some datasets could be late but lining up screenshots from roughly a year apart, it seems that death registrations in some weeks have actually been revised downwards. ONS have assured me they are only using raw data rather than some sort of modelling but barring some sort of unwanted graphical artefact from my adjustments, it doesn't look right. We aren't talking huge amounts but it seems odd. I'm looking into this.
With all due respect, this is one of the most contrived analyses I've ever seen. It is instantly obvious looking at your figures 10, 12, and 14 that what you are saying about this data is misleading. Choosing intervals without regard to where the peaks and valleys actually lie and ignoring the periods in between the peaks obscures the underlying data.
Insinuating that the mortality rate went DOWN in Oct 2020 - Dec 2020 is beyond ridiculous. It is true that the different peaks have different heights for different groups, but all you can say about it is that whatever caused the peak in Apr 2020 was (edit: more or less) severe than whatever caused the peak in Jan 2021.
I'm not saying anything about the relative severity of different waves. It is largely immaterial whether an epidemic wave killed 20K or 30K people. They killed a lot of people. The outcome is going to be different each time and the factors that determine the severity are manifold. The waves tend to get smaller because we develop broader immunity and better treatments, but that doesn't preclude a mutation which has more severe outcomes.
I follow your substack and appreciate your work to uncover the true statistics to do with Covid and vaxes.
In my reading it seems that deaths blamed on Covid in 2020 were often mislabelled and in fact were due to other primary causes. Some are the iatrogenic hospital murders of patients who tested positive to Covid using the flawed PCR test at high cycles. (the developer of the test said they were unsuited to Coronavirus and he died before 2020). They were treated with the new "covid" treatment protocols that ensured the patients caught Hospital Pneumonia so they could be intubated and given remdesivir to kill them. These deaths are a confounding factor and should be treated as non covid deaths. As the extent of the iatrogenic deaths is concealed it is difficult to put a number to them. It makes your job harder to separate the data properly.
Thanks for all your hard work.
A very small portion of all excess deaths can be attributed only to the COVID. The vast majority are related to the political and public "health" response.
Exactly. Talk about a scandal - an unexposed scandal. "Mass homicide" - maybe not "first degree homicide" - really occurred ... and nobody is investigating these crimes (at least among official investigator organizations). Your Substack is. Hundreds of Substacks are. But, for now, we don't count, I guess.
You give Midazowlan to someone on a respirator? I say that's premeditated.
Giving morphine and midazolam to someone on a ventilator is ok (you wouldn't want to be on a ventilator and wide awake). The problem was giving it to people who were not ventilated but just in oxygen or not even that, with inevitable depression of their own respiration.
The death stats tell the story, just an ordinary flu season until all the hoopla.
A recent BBC propaganda piece reported UK ONS stats that the unvaccinated led all cause deaths compared with the "vaccinated." It looks as though they do not define "vaccination" until after a 2 week period post hoc.
The data is an intentional mess right up to and including the actual presence of a hitherto imaginary "virus," a meaningless "RAT" test, and a computer generated in silico "sequence," not to mention the appallingly obvious, ONS black box, uncontrolled, invalid, modelled "effectiveness."
Yes the pcr developer died shortly before the pandemic and he wasnt very old and had no sickness except he had curiously pneumonia!! From what he died ! Which is strange. To me he got murdered with a synthetic respiratory pathogen or anthrax and then not treated properly. This same killing method has been used or tried on others according to their personal accounts.
yep. preemptive murder. they didn't want him telling the truth about the PCR test because they needed to create fear and panic by lying about how many people were getting covid.
Just to add for those interested, the US government paid for every step in the treatment for Covid, even over $100,000 per patient. FEMA in the US kicked in up to $8000. for funeral expenses. The flu and the Vax treatment and death got nothing. Would you want any other cause on the death certificate? I see this as a definite confounding factor. A Utah coroner agreed after two people were classified as Covid related deaths after gunshot wounds killed them. Makes attributing deaths correctly difficult, especially prior to 2021 when the government was actively trying to boost Covid deaths reported to promote the vax in 2021!
Great info. I documented the surge in excess deaths in the state of Michigan between the first week in March 2020 and May 2nd, 2020. Expected deaths went from negative the week ending right before the lockdowns to more than 75 percent "excess deaths" by mid-April. My question: How is that even possible?
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/something-doesnt-add-up?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
FYI - LinkedIn would be a great platform for you to post this on. I don’t post often on LI, but when I do, i get a surprisingly large amount of DMs from business and healthcare professionals.
Joel, what is the green dotted line in Figure 1? Thanks
Ah ha moment
No it is not a mistake - it is not stupidity - it is not about 5G -- not about $$$... not about Great Resets...
This is INTENTIONAL. And 6 billion are now primed for detonation
This is The Smoking Gun
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/5-ways-to-skin-a-genetically-modified/
FYI - LinkedIn would be a great platform for you to post this on. I don’t post often on LI, but when I do, i get a surprisingly large amount of DMs from business and healthcare professionals.
Joel, looking at the registration data, as invalid as it is, I was always troubled that the mortality towers in the graph presented by ONS sometimes seemed to appear to be altered after a few days from the previous update. I'm aware their releases are provisional data and no doubt some datasets could be late but lining up screenshots from roughly a year apart, it seems that death registrations in some weeks have actually been revised downwards. ONS have assured me they are only using raw data rather than some sort of modelling but barring some sort of unwanted graphical artefact from my adjustments, it doesn't look right. We aren't talking huge amounts but it seems odd. I'm looking into this.
With all due respect, this is one of the most contrived analyses I've ever seen. It is instantly obvious looking at your figures 10, 12, and 14 that what you are saying about this data is misleading. Choosing intervals without regard to where the peaks and valleys actually lie and ignoring the periods in between the peaks obscures the underlying data.
Insinuating that the mortality rate went DOWN in Oct 2020 - Dec 2020 is beyond ridiculous. It is true that the different peaks have different heights for different groups, but all you can say about it is that whatever caused the peak in Apr 2020 was (edit: more or less) severe than whatever caused the peak in Jan 2021.
I'm not saying anything about the relative severity of different waves. It is largely immaterial whether an epidemic wave killed 20K or 30K people. They killed a lot of people. The outcome is going to be different each time and the factors that determine the severity are manifold. The waves tend to get smaller because we develop broader immunity and better treatments, but that doesn't preclude a mutation which has more severe outcomes.