The leading German research hospital (Charite) is doing an observational study on the covid vaccines. A few weeks ago, the lead author estimated that 0.8% of vaccinees had severe side effects, underreporting factor of 40.
Of course, that was not an acceptable opinion to voice, even the Charite critisised the research for releasing the data.
Since there haven't been hardly any adverse effects nor death from hacksxxxxine the world health whorganization (sic) is gonna give its whore self the power to dictate hacksxxxxines for every life form on planet, women and mens first
Spell it out for us Joel, that's a little over 1% of the clot-shot have an adverse reaction do we know how serious these were?
Re VAERS: I'd argue that under-reporting is moot when C19 jabs are associated with more reports than all other vaccines together over the last 30 years. Please set me straight if I'm missing something here.
Considering how effective and safe the cheap, off-patent treatments are, yes. The entire vaccine is surplus as anything other than a patent platform. That's ok, though, a patent platform for future royalties and licensing was all it was ever meant to be. And a collar for humanity.
Austria is one of the countries with the worst vax fanaticism, the most denial of side effects by politicians, media and doctors, some of the messiest data around and worst infiltration by pharma lobbyists. That it is near the top of the list, with the least underreporting tells me that the total underreporting factor is much, much higher.
If this is true it suggests at least 1% of the “vaxed” were injured as a consequence. Compare that to the mortality rate of ~0.2% of Covid infections, before or after “vax” campaigns, and we start to understand the potential magnitude of the harms done by order of coercion of the state.
The problem with cardiotoxicity is that it flies under the radar of general fatigue, malaise, other more acute problems, etc. Most people won't recognize how far their system is from optimal unless they engage in enough regular strenuous activity to have a baseline.
I'm only on my first cup of coffee, so it's very likely I'm missing the point, but your charts and the words under them don't seem to match. For Pfizer/Biontech, Poland seems to be the highest at almost 30x URF, but you say the lowest, Iceland and the Netherlands, which don't even show as a blip, are highest: "Iceland and the Netherlands have the highest rates for Pfizer-BioNTech, almost 30 times higher than Poland."
The leading German research hospital (Charite) is doing an observational study on the covid vaccines. A few weeks ago, the lead author estimated that 0.8% of vaccinees had severe side effects, underreporting factor of 40.
Of course, that was not an acceptable opinion to voice, even the Charite critisised the research for releasing the data.
More (in German): https://www.kleinezeitung.at/lebensart/gesundheit/6137204/Studie-von-Mediziner-Matthes_Wie-hoch-ist-das-Risiko-von
I think you know what Steve Kirsch has to say about the cdc VAERS URF.
Since there haven't been hardly any adverse effects nor death from hacksxxxxine the world health whorganization (sic) is gonna give its whore self the power to dictate hacksxxxxines for every life form on planet, women and mens first
7.2 is a lower limit, and these are adverseeve ts this far. More will reveal themselves over time.
Spell it out for us Joel, that's a little over 1% of the clot-shot have an adverse reaction do we know how serious these were?
Re VAERS: I'd argue that under-reporting is moot when C19 jabs are associated with more reports than all other vaccines together over the last 30 years. Please set me straight if I'm missing something here.
Considering how effective and safe the cheap, off-patent treatments are, yes. The entire vaccine is surplus as anything other than a patent platform. That's ok, though, a patent platform for future royalties and licensing was all it was ever meant to be. And a collar for humanity.
Spot on: collar is the aim, massive theft meanwhile!!!
Austria is one of the countries with the worst vax fanaticism, the most denial of side effects by politicians, media and doctors, some of the messiest data around and worst infiltration by pharma lobbyists. That it is near the top of the list, with the least underreporting tells me that the total underreporting factor is much, much higher.
Too true and whether that's collar, choke chain or garotte I wish to avoid it entirely...
If this is true it suggests at least 1% of the “vaxed” were injured as a consequence. Compare that to the mortality rate of ~0.2% of Covid infections, before or after “vax” campaigns, and we start to understand the potential magnitude of the harms done by order of coercion of the state.
The problem with cardiotoxicity is that it flies under the radar of general fatigue, malaise, other more acute problems, etc. Most people won't recognize how far their system is from optimal unless they engage in enough regular strenuous activity to have a baseline.
How does the calculation work please? How do you estimate the URF and with what criteria? Without that it's not verifiable. thanks
John Dee has explored EudraVigilance also:
https://jdee.substack.com/p/digging-deeper-into-eudravigilance-54d?s=r
I'm only on my first cup of coffee, so it's very likely I'm missing the point, but your charts and the words under them don't seem to match. For Pfizer/Biontech, Poland seems to be the highest at almost 30x URF, but you say the lowest, Iceland and the Netherlands, which don't even show as a blip, are highest: "Iceland and the Netherlands have the highest rates for Pfizer-BioNTech, almost 30 times higher than Poland."
What am I missing? Please?
I think the nations which most assiduously reported AEs have low URFs.
Ideally, you’d see every AE reported for an URF of 1.0.
Such a nation would have the highest AE rate but what you see is what actually happened.