Not at all. I would love to hear your thoughts or odds you'd give to these excess deaths being the tip of the iceberg or if these excess deaths are like a car pile up where the majority of the damage is done early on but maybe another car or two fails to stop in time and add to the pile up? and everyone else will be able to stop in time.
Not at all. I would love to hear your thoughts or odds you'd give to these excess deaths being the tip of the iceberg or if these excess deaths are like a car pile up where the majority of the damage is done early on but maybe another car or two fails to stop in time and add to the pile up? and everyone else will be able to stop in time.
Ex are these excess deaths going to trail back to normal levels or near zero excess when adoption of boosters drops? Ex In Canada, shot 1 is 88, shot 2 82 percent. Shot 3 51 percent. Shot 4, 12 percent. Shot 5 like 2 or 3 percent. I'm sure 6, 7 and 8 Trudeau bought for 2023 and 2024 will mostly go down the drain.
Or is the damage done and even if they stop taking additional doses, those who have been dosed are headed to one inevitable, sad, outcome within 2 to 5 years. More doses just trending towards 0 to 2 years and less towards 5.
So far, everything I've analysed appears to show the acute phase returning to a plateau as fewer people line up for another dose (perhaps all the really dumb ones are dead already?). However, I also observe new baselines or tide marks that are higher than before the experiment. This will also result from ("lockdown") denial of healthcare though. Regardless, IMO, it doesn't really matter - killed by policy interventions against COVID or killed by the mRNA experiment - you were killed by the government, their advisers, Big Tech enablers, MSM and various other supporters all-the-same.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I agree the reason behind the deaths is less important than the lives lost and ensuring blame is placed squarely on the responsible parties.
I do still think if this is tip of the iceberg or mostly over is an important topic to discuss as it could radically alter life in the future. Ex if for example 25 percent of the population became freeloaders over the next two years, due to vaccine related, disability before going on to die three years later, the drain on the system would be immense. We'd have children, elderly and 25% of the working age population leeching/draining resources while producing none.
Likewise if say 25 to 50 percent just flat out drops death suddenly in their sleep over the next five years. As this would large happen in Western nations and not-happen to certain vaccine-skeptic demographics. So you'd see a shift in ethnicity/ethnic makeup of some countries that might lead to social unrest over perceived, taught or even encouraged grievances. You'd also see a radically drop in Western populations compared to Asia, specifically China and half of India would be effected as about 50% took the mRNA shots. So India's manufacturing/military/power base would be crippled. The Wests would be.
Since China did not roll out the mRNA vaccine basically and went with more traditional SinoVax, geopolitically it would massively shift population distribution globally. With it potentially military power... You'd go for 1 Billion people supporting a lesser-equipped army versus 600M or so in the US+NATO Allies to 1 Billion versus 120M (assuming 2 doses of the vaccine is lethal over five years -- ie the iceberg scenario).
If its the car-pile up scenario were most of the injuries/deaths are in... then not much changes. Like 1B versus 598M rather than 600M. Very tragic that 2M people died unnecessarily for no benefit -- however -- the upside (if there is such a thing) is life might return to something similar to "normal" and the geopolitical status-quo continue for a while longer.
Not at all. I would love to hear your thoughts or odds you'd give to these excess deaths being the tip of the iceberg or if these excess deaths are like a car pile up where the majority of the damage is done early on but maybe another car or two fails to stop in time and add to the pile up? and everyone else will be able to stop in time.
Ex are these excess deaths going to trail back to normal levels or near zero excess when adoption of boosters drops? Ex In Canada, shot 1 is 88, shot 2 82 percent. Shot 3 51 percent. Shot 4, 12 percent. Shot 5 like 2 or 3 percent. I'm sure 6, 7 and 8 Trudeau bought for 2023 and 2024 will mostly go down the drain.
Or is the damage done and even if they stop taking additional doses, those who have been dosed are headed to one inevitable, sad, outcome within 2 to 5 years. More doses just trending towards 0 to 2 years and less towards 5.
So far, everything I've analysed appears to show the acute phase returning to a plateau as fewer people line up for another dose (perhaps all the really dumb ones are dead already?). However, I also observe new baselines or tide marks that are higher than before the experiment. This will also result from ("lockdown") denial of healthcare though. Regardless, IMO, it doesn't really matter - killed by policy interventions against COVID or killed by the mRNA experiment - you were killed by the government, their advisers, Big Tech enablers, MSM and various other supporters all-the-same.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. I agree the reason behind the deaths is less important than the lives lost and ensuring blame is placed squarely on the responsible parties.
I do still think if this is tip of the iceberg or mostly over is an important topic to discuss as it could radically alter life in the future. Ex if for example 25 percent of the population became freeloaders over the next two years, due to vaccine related, disability before going on to die three years later, the drain on the system would be immense. We'd have children, elderly and 25% of the working age population leeching/draining resources while producing none.
Likewise if say 25 to 50 percent just flat out drops death suddenly in their sleep over the next five years. As this would large happen in Western nations and not-happen to certain vaccine-skeptic demographics. So you'd see a shift in ethnicity/ethnic makeup of some countries that might lead to social unrest over perceived, taught or even encouraged grievances. You'd also see a radically drop in Western populations compared to Asia, specifically China and half of India would be effected as about 50% took the mRNA shots. So India's manufacturing/military/power base would be crippled. The Wests would be.
Since China did not roll out the mRNA vaccine basically and went with more traditional SinoVax, geopolitically it would massively shift population distribution globally. With it potentially military power... You'd go for 1 Billion people supporting a lesser-equipped army versus 600M or so in the US+NATO Allies to 1 Billion versus 120M (assuming 2 doses of the vaccine is lethal over five years -- ie the iceberg scenario).
If its the car-pile up scenario were most of the injuries/deaths are in... then not much changes. Like 1B versus 598M rather than 600M. Very tragic that 2M people died unnecessarily for no benefit -- however -- the upside (if there is such a thing) is life might return to something similar to "normal" and the geopolitical status-quo continue for a while longer.