Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bloke's avatar

Obviously I am on the side of the letter writer (and have indeed written many times to my own MP) so this criticism is intended to be wholly constructive and should be seen in that light.

I firmly believe that there is a worldwide operation being carried out by unknown groups and individuals with the compliance of many national governments and international organisations and commercial entities.

It is abundantly clear that among those international organisations and commercial entities are newspapers, TV and radio channels, search engines and social media organisations.

I would go so far as to say that none of this would have been possible without the connivance of the international and national media.

If that is so, it shows how important it is to tread carefully in that media landscape.

With that in mind, and with respect, I don't think it's a good idea to use phrases like 'globalist overlords' unless you have absolute proof of their identities and their activities.

As per the above, I have almost no doubt that there are such people involved in driving this but phrases like that without the evidence to substantiate their accuracy only allow an MP, and everyone he shows this letter to if they so wish, to dismiss it as the work of a crank.

This would be wholly unfair, but fairness is in short supply these days.

Put simply, I think we are best confining ourselves to absolute facts which we can prove, of which there is anyway no shortage.

At this stage, speaking for myself, my first goal is to wake up as many of my fellow Britons and humans around the world as I can; once enough people have come over to our side, the game is over with or without the support of the media.

Once the game is over, we can go about locating and punishing the guilty people.

But in the meantime we should (in my humble opinion) avoid using any language or allegation that opens us up to ridicule because in my experience a large percentage of my fellow Britons do not want to believe that what we say is true, because they fear the truth, and are looking for psychological cover for refusing to entertain it.

I also think these sorts of letters should be kept much briefer. Even if this MP is not deeply embedded in the other side of the narrative he is quite likely by dint of the selection process for members of parliament to be lazy, pliable, greedy, and fairly unintelligent.

Add to that the other human instinct, which I referenced above, which is to fear the truth in matters like this, and he will be looking for excuses not to read very far.

As I say, these are constructive criticisms and I am very much supportive of your general approach.

Expand full comment
Mary Ann's avatar

Thanks for sharing Joel. A very thorough summary of the covid narrative.

Expand full comment
71 more comments...

No posts