Obviously I am on the side of the letter writer (and have indeed written many times to my own MP) so this criticism is intended to be wholly constructive and should be seen in that light.
I firmly believe that there is a worldwide operation being carried out by unknown groups and individuals with the compliance of many national governments and international organisations and commercial entities.
It is abundantly clear that among those international organisations and commercial entities are newspapers, TV and radio channels, search engines and social media organisations.
I would go so far as to say that none of this would have been possible without the connivance of the international and national media.
If that is so, it shows how important it is to tread carefully in that media landscape.
With that in mind, and with respect, I don't think it's a good idea to use phrases like 'globalist overlords' unless you have absolute proof of their identities and their activities.
As per the above, I have almost no doubt that there are such people involved in driving this but phrases like that without the evidence to substantiate their accuracy only allow an MP, and everyone he shows this letter to if they so wish, to dismiss it as the work of a crank.
This would be wholly unfair, but fairness is in short supply these days.
Put simply, I think we are best confining ourselves to absolute facts which we can prove, of which there is anyway no shortage.
At this stage, speaking for myself, my first goal is to wake up as many of my fellow Britons and humans around the world as I can; once enough people have come over to our side, the game is over with or without the support of the media.
Once the game is over, we can go about locating and punishing the guilty people.
But in the meantime we should (in my humble opinion) avoid using any language or allegation that opens us up to ridicule because in my experience a large percentage of my fellow Britons do not want to believe that what we say is true, because they fear the truth, and are looking for psychological cover for refusing to entertain it.
I also think these sorts of letters should be kept much briefer. Even if this MP is not deeply embedded in the other side of the narrative he is quite likely by dint of the selection process for members of parliament to be lazy, pliable, greedy, and fairly unintelligent.
Add to that the other human instinct, which I referenced above, which is to fear the truth in matters like this, and he will be looking for excuses not to read very far.
As I say, these are constructive criticisms and I am very much supportive of your general approach.
I suddenly realised while reading this letter by Doug Brodie’s to his MP, that I stopped breathing. Had to take some deep breaths before firing off a copy to my MP, Simon Jupp, the daily sceptic, and the vulgar daily mail (as a tip). Doug, you managed to wrap the covid narrative up nicely. I will share with as many friends as possible. Sadly my husband took two covid injections and has had headaches a few nights this week.. he is 79. I worry. Thank you.
Wow, thanks. Comprehensive post. Reiner Fuellmich has been one of the guiding lights through all of this. The fact the WEF held pandemic "games' in 1979 is well known. We do indeed need a new Magna Carta, but in very popular plain language everyone can understand.
I listened to Dolores Cahill just now saying about the burden of proof is now on politicians and trusts etc to prove a virus to justify lockdowns etc- it will be much easier than looking at and mulling over lots of data about masks/symptoms/tests/hospitalisations/cost/benefit/excess death- they are personally liable for harms of lockdowns and vaccines unless they can prove virus existence yes or no. I think this is the way forward.
With respect to the 0.84% absolute risk reduction with the Pfizer jab, this was known publicly prior to vaccine emergency use approval being given and jab roll out.
It wasn’t just released with the Pfizer document releases.
One infection prevented for every 119 people jabbed.
The presented trial data did not support emergency use approval, let alone mandates.
Peter Doshi had a British Medical Journal opinion piece in late November 2020, before vaccine roll out, that raised this issue explicitly.
EVERY SINGLE institution which should have protected the people failed throughout the western world: the courts, the police, the media, our political representatives, the professional bodies, the health professionals themselves, and of course public health cabals.
The revolution is coming, but it is internal, a flash of belated mass awareness that has been building for going on three years. Once it happens, everything will change. Articles like this show the tipping point that is almost here...
Wow, that’s very thorough and I love all the links. Unfortunately the Dr Yeadon interview won’t come up. I’ll try to find it. Edit: I now see that Brand New Tube has been hacked and is off line. Maybe someone didn’t like what Dr Yeadon had to say…
I have been following all the plandemic, vaxdemic, covid-hysteria stuff since the beginning. It astounded me that the public fell for it all back in March 2020 but I think the timing was right - the man in the street was ready to be terrorised, it made him feel special and worthwhile to be able to panic about a plague that could kill everyone. The man in the street (didn't he used to be on the Clapham omnibus?) felt his life wasn't very exciting before Covid. The Pandemic of Death was exciting - all the dumb rules and the possibility of chastising others who weren't scared enough! I'm not sure the WEF or anyone else actually planned it all. More likely the "global overlords" just saw a really good opportunity to make/take money. I don't know how we stop them continuing all the virus/plague/climate/Putin/inflation stuff. That man on the omnibus needs to decide he's had enough and even that may not be enough now because the politicians/global overlords have seen how easy he is to control. (Mind you, then I remember the pandemic roleplay in late 2019 by Bill Gates & Friends, the WHO changing definitions, the hounding of alternate voices, the lockstep of world politicians to lockdown and destroy their economies. Hmmm)
Outstanding article! People must step up immediately if we are to overturn this evil plan. We have nothing to lose. Death is preferable to living in their planned Hell on Earth. Together we can stop this. We are many. They are few.
I wrote to my MP, Paul Beresford (Surrey area) a while ago during the heat of the Canadian trucker times, complaining about having to test to get back in the uk after being abroad, at considerable cost and inconvenience to me and not the jabbed people in my group (a discriminatory and derogatory health tax if you will), noting a few of the points above and got an extremely robust and full reply (which I have archived for future reference) from his assistant calling all unjabbed people stubborn, and using info from full fact, etc. etc. Has anyone else had the pleasure of a response from their MP which isn't just a standard one?
Obviously I am on the side of the letter writer (and have indeed written many times to my own MP) so this criticism is intended to be wholly constructive and should be seen in that light.
I firmly believe that there is a worldwide operation being carried out by unknown groups and individuals with the compliance of many national governments and international organisations and commercial entities.
It is abundantly clear that among those international organisations and commercial entities are newspapers, TV and radio channels, search engines and social media organisations.
I would go so far as to say that none of this would have been possible without the connivance of the international and national media.
If that is so, it shows how important it is to tread carefully in that media landscape.
With that in mind, and with respect, I don't think it's a good idea to use phrases like 'globalist overlords' unless you have absolute proof of their identities and their activities.
As per the above, I have almost no doubt that there are such people involved in driving this but phrases like that without the evidence to substantiate their accuracy only allow an MP, and everyone he shows this letter to if they so wish, to dismiss it as the work of a crank.
This would be wholly unfair, but fairness is in short supply these days.
Put simply, I think we are best confining ourselves to absolute facts which we can prove, of which there is anyway no shortage.
At this stage, speaking for myself, my first goal is to wake up as many of my fellow Britons and humans around the world as I can; once enough people have come over to our side, the game is over with or without the support of the media.
Once the game is over, we can go about locating and punishing the guilty people.
But in the meantime we should (in my humble opinion) avoid using any language or allegation that opens us up to ridicule because in my experience a large percentage of my fellow Britons do not want to believe that what we say is true, because they fear the truth, and are looking for psychological cover for refusing to entertain it.
I also think these sorts of letters should be kept much briefer. Even if this MP is not deeply embedded in the other side of the narrative he is quite likely by dint of the selection process for members of parliament to be lazy, pliable, greedy, and fairly unintelligent.
Add to that the other human instinct, which I referenced above, which is to fear the truth in matters like this, and he will be looking for excuses not to read very far.
As I say, these are constructive criticisms and I am very much supportive of your general approach.
Thanks for sharing Joel. A very thorough summary of the covid narrative.
I suddenly realised while reading this letter by Doug Brodie’s to his MP, that I stopped breathing. Had to take some deep breaths before firing off a copy to my MP, Simon Jupp, the daily sceptic, and the vulgar daily mail (as a tip). Doug, you managed to wrap the covid narrative up nicely. I will share with as many friends as possible. Sadly my husband took two covid injections and has had headaches a few nights this week.. he is 79. I worry. Thank you.
Wow, thanks. Comprehensive post. Reiner Fuellmich has been one of the guiding lights through all of this. The fact the WEF held pandemic "games' in 1979 is well known. We do indeed need a new Magna Carta, but in very popular plain language everyone can understand.
Silence is complicity. Esp if you tried to get in elected position.
God bless Canada from Tx.... I thanked embassy here in States after Iran hostage info came out...
Ill thank you 40 yrs later... Trudeau will cause me heart attack he's so evil
Hiya,
I listened to Dolores Cahill just now saying about the burden of proof is now on politicians and trusts etc to prove a virus to justify lockdowns etc- it will be much easier than looking at and mulling over lots of data about masks/symptoms/tests/hospitalisations/cost/benefit/excess death- they are personally liable for harms of lockdowns and vaccines unless they can prove virus existence yes or no. I think this is the way forward.
Jo
https://tntradiolive.podbean.com/e/christine-massey-dr-kevin-corbett-dr-mark-bailey-part-2-on-dolores-cahill-show-09-july-2022/
With respect to the 0.84% absolute risk reduction with the Pfizer jab, this was known publicly prior to vaccine emergency use approval being given and jab roll out.
It wasn’t just released with the Pfizer document releases.
One infection prevented for every 119 people jabbed.
The presented trial data did not support emergency use approval, let alone mandates.
Peter Doshi had a British Medical Journal opinion piece in late November 2020, before vaccine roll out, that raised this issue explicitly.
(See https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/11/26/peter-doshi-pfizer-and-modernas-95-effective-vaccines-lets-be-cautious-and-first-see-the-full-data/)
EVERY SINGLE institution which should have protected the people failed throughout the western world: the courts, the police, the media, our political representatives, the professional bodies, the health professionals themselves, and of course public health cabals.
"We need to stop complying and start resisting."
--------
Damn right.
The revolution is coming, but it is internal, a flash of belated mass awareness that has been building for going on three years. Once it happens, everything will change. Articles like this show the tipping point that is almost here...
Yes, anyone silent is complicit. One is involved in crimes by commission and by omission.
Wow, that’s very thorough and I love all the links. Unfortunately the Dr Yeadon interview won’t come up. I’ll try to find it. Edit: I now see that Brand New Tube has been hacked and is off line. Maybe someone didn’t like what Dr Yeadon had to say…
I believe this is the Yeadon interview you mentioned, on Rumble, since the brand new tube site was having problems.
https://rumble.com/v1ee8yv-dr-mike-yeadon-fraud-fear-and-how-herd-mentality-has-brought-us-to-the-edge.html
Well said, that man!
I have been following all the plandemic, vaxdemic, covid-hysteria stuff since the beginning. It astounded me that the public fell for it all back in March 2020 but I think the timing was right - the man in the street was ready to be terrorised, it made him feel special and worthwhile to be able to panic about a plague that could kill everyone. The man in the street (didn't he used to be on the Clapham omnibus?) felt his life wasn't very exciting before Covid. The Pandemic of Death was exciting - all the dumb rules and the possibility of chastising others who weren't scared enough! I'm not sure the WEF or anyone else actually planned it all. More likely the "global overlords" just saw a really good opportunity to make/take money. I don't know how we stop them continuing all the virus/plague/climate/Putin/inflation stuff. That man on the omnibus needs to decide he's had enough and even that may not be enough now because the politicians/global overlords have seen how easy he is to control. (Mind you, then I remember the pandemic roleplay in late 2019 by Bill Gates & Friends, the WHO changing definitions, the hounding of alternate voices, the lockstep of world politicians to lockdown and destroy their economies. Hmmm)
Outstanding article! People must step up immediately if we are to overturn this evil plan. We have nothing to lose. Death is preferable to living in their planned Hell on Earth. Together we can stop this. We are many. They are few.
Thansk Doug and Joel.
I wrote to my MP, Paul Beresford (Surrey area) a while ago during the heat of the Canadian trucker times, complaining about having to test to get back in the uk after being abroad, at considerable cost and inconvenience to me and not the jabbed people in my group (a discriminatory and derogatory health tax if you will), noting a few of the points above and got an extremely robust and full reply (which I have archived for future reference) from his assistant calling all unjabbed people stubborn, and using info from full fact, etc. etc. Has anyone else had the pleasure of a response from their MP which isn't just a standard one?
Katie
Thank you. I have heard of using pine needle tea. I will find some💖💖