A very important letter to join in signing...the Chair of the MHRA, Stephen LightHouse, is standing down in July after 8 years in post....Raine should be indicted before she makes the decision to stand down. She made the unilateral decision for the MHRA to become an 'enabler', not the stringent regulator it should be for the nation's health. She has said at one of the MHRA's Board meetings that the 'vaccines' are "safe for most people".....how does that statement square with all the recorded adverse reactions and fatal outcomes ( post jab) on the MHRA'S Yellow Card reporting system? ( it is considered that the Yellow Cards capture only about 10% of actual harms and deaths).
Why was Pandemrix removed from market after far fewer recorded adverse reactions but these novel medications allowed to be rolled out indiscriminately, across the age ranges?
Such questions have already been posited and individual MPs contacted - apart from a few MPs the response is ' no response', or, the well worn and meaningless, "safe and effective". Under the leadership of June Raine, the MHRA is an unsafe and ineffective organisation. It is to be hoped this multi signed letter will initiate a forensic investigation of all those serving as Board members.
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is responsible
for ensuring the safety and efficacy of medicines used in the UK. It has become clear during the Covid-19 pandemic that the MHRA has failed to meet its responsibilities in multiple ways, despite prior warnings of inadequate regulation published in
Government reports:
● no requirement for manufacturers to demonstrate sufficient safety, before or after approvals;
● approvals for younger age groups and children in the absence of long-term safety
data, despite only negligible potential for benefit;
● failure to act promptly on evidence of adverse reactions, to rigorously assess safety evidence and to share it publicly to enable informed consent;
● failure to identify and address problems with manufacturing and quality control.
Bringing a new medicine to market typically takes around ten years but, under intense
political pressure, MHRA gave Conditional Marketing Authorisation for the Covid-19
vaccines after less than one year of clinical trials. It would appear that lessons have not been learned from the rushed Pandemrix Swine-Flu vaccine (2009) or from the report of the Cumberlege report (2020). There were numerous published reports and warnings about the risks of MHRA approving the Covid-19 vaccines on such limited evidence. Indeed, even the manufacturers claim to have been expecting to provide more safety evidence for the new vaccines before approval.
Unforeseen serious side-effects emerged immediately. The AstraZeneca vaccine was
suspended from use in young adults in many countries after only two months, but MHRA
was still attesting to its safety until JCVI advised that alternatives should be offered for under 40s.
Evidence of numerous vaccine-related side-effects has grown since approval. Serious
side-effects such as myocarditis, clotting problems, neurological problems and
immunosuppression have all been extensively reported.
MHRA did not follow through on its promised ‘Proactive Vigilance’. This was supposed to
have included population-level NHS data, segmented by vaccination status to look for any link between the vaccines and reported serious side-effects.
MHRA falls short of best practice safety management and governance seen in other safety critical sectors such as nuclear, aviation, defence and oil/gas. Shortcomings include:
● no process for investigating fatal/serious Yellow Card reports;
● no independent safety audits of MHRA;
● lack of accountability and no predetermined safety thresholds in stark contrast to regulators of other industries;
● close funding arrangements involving the pharmaceutical industry, creating serious
conflicts of interest.
The serious shortcomings identified raise grave concerns about the ability of MHRA to fulfil its statutory duty to protect the public from harm, by properly regulating the safety and effectiveness of medicines in the UK. Given the level of reported Covid-19 vaccine injuries and the excess deaths across all age groups, these products must be paused while they are properly investigated, and a full independent inquiry launched into MHRA’s regulatory processes and performance.
As here in Western Australia, where our government is conducting an “independent” review of its oft-cited “gold-standard” covid pandemic response, wherein I’m sure a few minor foibles and mea culpa’s will emerge to further anaesthetise the general public so smitten with the sociopathic, paternalistic shyster who sequestered their lives for 2 years and then forced them to be vaccinated to “keep them safe”, I’m sure the UK govt has already written the script around what it will publish in due course as its own covid mea culpa, something in this case to the tune of “the MHRA has investigated its own actions and decisions and has found them not only appropriate and proportional under the circumstances, but practically heroic as well”.
These medical agencies are nothing but big pharma springboards. They are useless for protecting the public and dangerous because following their wicked advice can get you killed. The CDC and FDA here is the US are perfect examples.
When this bubble bursts, there will be no fourth or fifth bubble, there will only be rubble.
The US economy and its financial system operate under the implicit belief that the Federal Reserve controls the direction of the economy and finance. This belief isn't in Fed influence, it's in Fed control: the Fed can reverse a stock market decline on a dime, it can reverse a recession, it can do "whatever it takes" to keep markets stable and expansive.
The history of the past 30 years seems to support this belief. Every time a financial crisis has manifested, the Fed has "saved the day" with some new policy extreme, changing the rules, jacking up its balance sheet 10-fold, and so on.
The flaw in this confidence in Fed control is the three speculative bubbles that have inflated and burst in the era of Fed Control, 1995 to the present. These bubbles could not have inflated without a "dovish" Fed pushing interest rates down and juicing the financial system with liquidity / credit. Since all speculative bubbles eventually burst, the Fed is forced into "rescue mode" which requires ever more extreme manipulation, oops, I mean intervention, to stabilize the bubble bursting and inflate the next bubble.
What few entertain as a possibility is the Fed is losing control of the economy and finance for systemic reasons that have nothing to do with Fed Policy per se. In other words, it's not a "Fed policy error" that brings the system down, it's much larger forces: diminishing returns and second order effects.
also, I read recently in a substack, a statement within MHRA's own documents, saying that the then Health Sec ( Hancock) had ordered the MHRA to authorise the jabs.
Does anybody remember the name of the science journal editor who apologized for the sad state of his journal (& possibly others) in terms of honesty a year ot two ago?
Does anybody remember the name of the science journal editor who apologized for the sad state of his journal (& possibly others) in terms of honesty a year ot two ago?
Thanks Joel. 100% Corruption. Of the government & all of it's agencies. None fit for purpose at all.
Democracy, or at the least the facade of democracy. Now being blown to smithereens by the ever growing list of it's failings.
The FACT that these failings have resulted in irreversible harms & deaths. Means that they are all collectively & singularly, GUILTY of, Gross Negligence, Dereliction of Duty, Crimes against Humanity & Genocide.
A very important letter to join in signing...the Chair of the MHRA, Stephen LightHouse, is standing down in July after 8 years in post....Raine should be indicted before she makes the decision to stand down. She made the unilateral decision for the MHRA to become an 'enabler', not the stringent regulator it should be for the nation's health. She has said at one of the MHRA's Board meetings that the 'vaccines' are "safe for most people".....how does that statement square with all the recorded adverse reactions and fatal outcomes ( post jab) on the MHRA'S Yellow Card reporting system? ( it is considered that the Yellow Cards capture only about 10% of actual harms and deaths).
Why was Pandemrix removed from market after far fewer recorded adverse reactions but these novel medications allowed to be rolled out indiscriminately, across the age ranges?
Such questions have already been posited and individual MPs contacted - apart from a few MPs the response is ' no response', or, the well worn and meaningless, "safe and effective". Under the leadership of June Raine, the MHRA is an unsafe and ineffective organisation. It is to be hoped this multi signed letter will initiate a forensic investigation of all those serving as Board members.
Thank you for posting this. Also please note that the report is the Perseus Paper, it is 36 pages, and very well organized.
https://togetherdeclaration.org/MHRA/
Here is the executive summary from that report :
The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) is responsible
for ensuring the safety and efficacy of medicines used in the UK. It has become clear during the Covid-19 pandemic that the MHRA has failed to meet its responsibilities in multiple ways, despite prior warnings of inadequate regulation published in
Government reports:
● no requirement for manufacturers to demonstrate sufficient safety, before or after approvals;
● approvals for younger age groups and children in the absence of long-term safety
data, despite only negligible potential for benefit;
● failure to act promptly on evidence of adverse reactions, to rigorously assess safety evidence and to share it publicly to enable informed consent;
● failure to identify and address problems with manufacturing and quality control.
Bringing a new medicine to market typically takes around ten years but, under intense
political pressure, MHRA gave Conditional Marketing Authorisation for the Covid-19
vaccines after less than one year of clinical trials. It would appear that lessons have not been learned from the rushed Pandemrix Swine-Flu vaccine (2009) or from the report of the Cumberlege report (2020). There were numerous published reports and warnings about the risks of MHRA approving the Covid-19 vaccines on such limited evidence. Indeed, even the manufacturers claim to have been expecting to provide more safety evidence for the new vaccines before approval.
Unforeseen serious side-effects emerged immediately. The AstraZeneca vaccine was
suspended from use in young adults in many countries after only two months, but MHRA
was still attesting to its safety until JCVI advised that alternatives should be offered for under 40s.
Evidence of numerous vaccine-related side-effects has grown since approval. Serious
side-effects such as myocarditis, clotting problems, neurological problems and
immunosuppression have all been extensively reported.
MHRA did not follow through on its promised ‘Proactive Vigilance’. This was supposed to
have included population-level NHS data, segmented by vaccination status to look for any link between the vaccines and reported serious side-effects.
MHRA falls short of best practice safety management and governance seen in other safety critical sectors such as nuclear, aviation, defence and oil/gas. Shortcomings include:
● no process for investigating fatal/serious Yellow Card reports;
● no independent safety audits of MHRA;
● lack of accountability and no predetermined safety thresholds in stark contrast to regulators of other industries;
● close funding arrangements involving the pharmaceutical industry, creating serious
conflicts of interest.
The serious shortcomings identified raise grave concerns about the ability of MHRA to fulfil its statutory duty to protect the public from harm, by properly regulating the safety and effectiveness of medicines in the UK. Given the level of reported Covid-19 vaccine injuries and the excess deaths across all age groups, these products must be paused while they are properly investigated, and a full independent inquiry launched into MHRA’s regulatory processes and performance.
As here in Western Australia, where our government is conducting an “independent” review of its oft-cited “gold-standard” covid pandemic response, wherein I’m sure a few minor foibles and mea culpa’s will emerge to further anaesthetise the general public so smitten with the sociopathic, paternalistic shyster who sequestered their lives for 2 years and then forced them to be vaccinated to “keep them safe”, I’m sure the UK govt has already written the script around what it will publish in due course as its own covid mea culpa, something in this case to the tune of “the MHRA has investigated its own actions and decisions and has found them not only appropriate and proportional under the circumstances, but practically heroic as well”.
Good luck! From the USA.
These medical agencies are nothing but big pharma springboards. They are useless for protecting the public and dangerous because following their wicked advice can get you killed. The CDC and FDA here is the US are perfect examples.
I’ve signed too.
Did you read Stephen Feldman’s substack about the missing yellow card reports?
https://open.substack.com/pub/feldmans/p/are-the-mhra-releasing-all-of-their?r=peo1w&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Signed 🙏
This is why we are being exterminated:
What If the Fed Has Lost Control?
When this bubble bursts, there will be no fourth or fifth bubble, there will only be rubble.
The US economy and its financial system operate under the implicit belief that the Federal Reserve controls the direction of the economy and finance. This belief isn't in Fed influence, it's in Fed control: the Fed can reverse a stock market decline on a dime, it can reverse a recession, it can do "whatever it takes" to keep markets stable and expansive.
The history of the past 30 years seems to support this belief. Every time a financial crisis has manifested, the Fed has "saved the day" with some new policy extreme, changing the rules, jacking up its balance sheet 10-fold, and so on.
The flaw in this confidence in Fed control is the three speculative bubbles that have inflated and burst in the era of Fed Control, 1995 to the present. These bubbles could not have inflated without a "dovish" Fed pushing interest rates down and juicing the financial system with liquidity / credit. Since all speculative bubbles eventually burst, the Fed is forced into "rescue mode" which requires ever more extreme manipulation, oops, I mean intervention, to stabilize the bubble bursting and inflate the next bubble.
What few entertain as a possibility is the Fed is losing control of the economy and finance for systemic reasons that have nothing to do with Fed Policy per se. In other words, it's not a "Fed policy error" that brings the system down, it's much larger forces: diminishing returns and second order effects.
More: http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2023/05/what-if-fed-has-lost-control.html
The state of Florida has now announced that the vaccine is a Bioweapon
also, I read recently in a substack, a statement within MHRA's own documents, saying that the then Health Sec ( Hancock) had ordered the MHRA to authorise the jabs.
ie they were " following orders".
' BSD ' The Shepherd says ' air now @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyBZhTaf1oU
https://youtube.com/watch?v=947by3X6_RU
https://youtube.com/watch?v=93_HZYqVijc
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZkoRCBQ46l4
https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZkoRCBQ46l4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEYOuYjqWwQ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0vRkEyF-DBY
Does anybody remember the name of the science journal editor who apologized for the sad state of his journal (& possibly others) in terms of honesty a year ot two ago?
Does anybody remember the name of the science journal editor who apologized for the sad state of his journal (& possibly others) in terms of honesty a year ot two ago?
A.k.a. Accessory.
Thanks Joel. 100% Corruption. Of the government & all of it's agencies. None fit for purpose at all.
Democracy, or at the least the facade of democracy. Now being blown to smithereens by the ever growing list of it's failings.
The FACT that these failings have resulted in irreversible harms & deaths. Means that they are all collectively & singularly, GUILTY of, Gross Negligence, Dereliction of Duty, Crimes against Humanity & Genocide.
Further to exposing the failings of the MHRA, Professor Norman Fenton has also declared the MHRA to be unfit for purpose via a damning takedown of June Raine, its boss, see https://wherearethenumbers.substack.com/p/the-mhra-is-not-fit-for-purpose?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2