They are doing the same thing in Canada. I am thoroughly convinced that they aggregate a pile of data and run it through an AI to find usable statistics. Aside from public comments to that effect, it is the only way to account for the bizarre statistical abuses that no human could come up with reliably without severe cognitive dissonance. AI has no cognitive dissonance, so there is no level of absurdity they won't stoop to.
Remember the Scottish data used to first report crude deaths, then changed to rates per 100K, despite all the rigging, the fully vaccinated showed higher death rate per 100K than "Unvaccinated". That is, people injected with the serum didn't die at the rate they expected in the 21 days, likely due to youthful vaccinees forgetting they are supposed to die for the perpetuation of fear and propaganda through mislabelling. They then changed to age standardized mortality to overcome this problem. But when in the last week of October, even that failed, they wrote the following- I still remember the awful coverup note at the bottom
"In the last week, age-standardised mortality rates for COVID-19 deaths are similar for people who have received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine compared to individuals that are unvaccinated or have received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, however the confidence intervals for the unvaccinated age-standardised mortality rates are wide. In the last week, the mean age of unvaccinated individuals with a confirmed COVID-19 related death was 71.5 years old, whereas the mean age of individuals that received 2 doses of vaccine and had a confirmed COVID-19 related death was 77.5 years old."
Just why no Scotman called up to ask PHS if they were by any chance aware what the mean age of deaths in the group they failed to report was. Was it by any chance even lower than 71.5? The partially Vaccinated? How about mean of dead with and without injection? Same or different?
Suggest you read the footnotes in the report. The likely explanation for higher covid rates among the vaccinated is that they are good at taking tests so their cases are reported. The same table shows that the unvaccinated who catch covid (whether reported or not) have to go to hospital and die in higher proportions than the vaccinated. I am all for treating data with scepticism but not ok with statistical ignorance.
You know damm well why they are doing this.
They are doing the same thing in Canada. I am thoroughly convinced that they aggregate a pile of data and run it through an AI to find usable statistics. Aside from public comments to that effect, it is the only way to account for the bizarre statistical abuses that no human could come up with reliably without severe cognitive dissonance. AI has no cognitive dissonance, so there is no level of absurdity they won't stoop to.
Remember the Scottish data used to first report crude deaths, then changed to rates per 100K, despite all the rigging, the fully vaccinated showed higher death rate per 100K than "Unvaccinated". That is, people injected with the serum didn't die at the rate they expected in the 21 days, likely due to youthful vaccinees forgetting they are supposed to die for the perpetuation of fear and propaganda through mislabelling. They then changed to age standardized mortality to overcome this problem. But when in the last week of October, even that failed, they wrote the following- I still remember the awful coverup note at the bottom
https://www.publichealthscotland.scot/media/9994/21-11-03-covid19-publication_report.pdf
"In the last week, age-standardised mortality rates for COVID-19 deaths are similar for people who have received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine compared to individuals that are unvaccinated or have received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, however the confidence intervals for the unvaccinated age-standardised mortality rates are wide. In the last week, the mean age of unvaccinated individuals with a confirmed COVID-19 related death was 71.5 years old, whereas the mean age of individuals that received 2 doses of vaccine and had a confirmed COVID-19 related death was 77.5 years old."
Just why no Scotman called up to ask PHS if they were by any chance aware what the mean age of deaths in the group they failed to report was. Was it by any chance even lower than 71.5? The partially Vaccinated? How about mean of dead with and without injection? Same or different?
Don't blame them. A product or service does not exist, or exist for long, if it has no or little customers.
Suggest you read the footnotes in the report. The likely explanation for higher covid rates among the vaccinated is that they are good at taking tests so their cases are reported. The same table shows that the unvaccinated who catch covid (whether reported or not) have to go to hospital and die in higher proportions than the vaccinated. I am all for treating data with scepticism but not ok with statistical ignorance.