I think the Govt are well aware that there are many more unvaccinated than they would care to admit. Am I naive in thinking this is why it would have been so difficult to enforce vaccine passports as it would have excluded too many people?
They're never gonna pull this off... What they're trying to do is just tooooo big. They think they're so freakin' clever, but they're not. They're sheltered rich people who've been petted and pampered their entire lives, and they're FOOLS.
'They' are disconnected 'Authoritarians' and power hungry for control. It's not about "rich people". There are many many many "rich people" who totally disagree with these bad actors.
Well, obviously you're right. What I'm saying is, the people behind the people behind the curtain are the richest people on Earth. It IS to do with how rich they are, in my opinion, because they've been the wealthiest 200 or so families on Earth for maybe thousands of years, at least since Rome. They're called the Venetians, or "the City of London," or the "Black Nobility," as they like to call themselves-- I can't see what's "noble" about them, they're inbred psychopathic freaks! I'd say "authoritarian" is a nice word for them... maybe-- "Genocidal Demonic Freaks"? "Satan's Spawn"? These are not the people we can see talking on TV and so forth, they stay in the shadows.
In short, when you know someone lies on a regular basis, just disbelieve whatever they say until and unless they furnish undeniable proof they're not lying again.
Very good. Indeed when you lie with stats you have to reconcile your fake numbers with all the other stats so that the whole picture is consistent. You cannot fake them all. This reconciliation process is very hard and sometimes not even possible.
The real take out is that they are knowingly lying and deceiving us. We know it and must act accordingly. Thank you Joel and Prof Fenton for exposing those lies and spreading the truth
Oct 11, 2022·edited Oct 11, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
I commented on Professor Fenton's blog on this. As it was a sub-sample of people registered with a GP, it's just possible that 8% of adults is near the mark. For this to be the case, the NHS mass jabbing coercion campaign would have had to be exceptionally aggressive (it was) and extraordinarily successful and influential with regard to registered patients. That being the case, it's conceivable that unregistered patients would be MUCH less likely to get jabbed. Alternatively, the NHS could be routinely recording those who didn't get jabbed as vaccinated. Seeing as how GPs were and still are getting paid for every person they manage to con into getting injected, then there is a definite incentive for them to do this. Also, I think I am correct in recalling that Covid immunisations were not recorded initially on a patient's medical record; a separate, purpose-built database was set up for this for some strange reason and there were quite a few issues matching this new database to a patient's medical records.
Yes, the vaccine passport was to be the springboard for digital IDs and programmable digital currency. They'll have to find some other way of introducing it now, which I'm sure they will.
Can you include Joel's false NHS covid pass entry in the post? This too might offer an explanation of the erroneous data, as well as might prompt others to check and report back - might give us some insight in to this potential fraud?
My thought is that governments are counting individual doses as a person, ie a person who has two initial plus booster is counted as three people vaxxed. Been reports of covid 'cases' counted similarly. Creative accounting straight outta 'How To Lie With Statistics'.
Bottom line: "Either way, the ONS estimate of proportion unvaccinated must not be used for any comparisons of vaccine efficacy or safety of the whole England population."
I can add this to the list of things that skew statistics, which previously included:
1) not counting people in the first week or two after their jab (actually counting any deaths or cases this time as occurring in the "unvaccinated")
2) ignoring all-cause mortality among the sub-populations
Underestimating the unvaxxed group is strategy #1 to 'prove' the vax works. Here in Washington we count anybody without VERIFIABLE vaccination as 'unvaxxed'. So if you're not in the hospital system because you were jabbed at Walgreens or whatever, you're counted as unvaxxed. It's datacrime.
What you don’t see is there are over 20,000,000 deaths bc the manipulate the data to fit their narrative. And rising everyday. The truth is out more and more every day
Do you think it's deliberate fraud on behalf of the surgeries as they get paid per jab given and so they've just said everyone has it, or do you think it's deceit on behalf of the Government or just old fashioned incompetence that people have been registered as vaccinated when they weren't? Also, can you think of any way that a large enough set of people could be polled who have checked their records to see how widespread the false recordkeeping is? It was a great article BTW
But they have to do this now, not just to try to pressure people into getting vaxxed (that ship has sailed), but to explain why 90% of the dead are vaxxed. If they admit the % vaccinated is only, say, 70 or 80%, well, it just doesn't look good...
I think the Govt are well aware that there are many more unvaccinated than they would care to admit. Am I naive in thinking this is why it would have been so difficult to enforce vaccine passports as it would have excluded too many people?
One of many reasons.
Agree…but the threat of them was all part of the coercion and I will never forgive or forget what Govts did to us..
They're never gonna pull this off... What they're trying to do is just tooooo big. They think they're so freakin' clever, but they're not. They're sheltered rich people who've been petted and pampered their entire lives, and they're FOOLS.
'They' are disconnected 'Authoritarians' and power hungry for control. It's not about "rich people". There are many many many "rich people" who totally disagree with these bad actors.
Well, obviously you're right. What I'm saying is, the people behind the people behind the curtain are the richest people on Earth. It IS to do with how rich they are, in my opinion, because they've been the wealthiest 200 or so families on Earth for maybe thousands of years, at least since Rome. They're called the Venetians, or "the City of London," or the "Black Nobility," as they like to call themselves-- I can't see what's "noble" about them, they're inbred psychopathic freaks! I'd say "authoritarian" is a nice word for them... maybe-- "Genocidal Demonic Freaks"? "Satan's Spawn"? These are not the people we can see talking on TV and so forth, they stay in the shadows.
I agree with you. It really sounds like intentional trickery, deceit, playing with numbers to me.
In short, when you know someone lies on a regular basis, just disbelieve whatever they say until and unless they furnish undeniable proof they're not lying again.
Very good. Indeed when you lie with stats you have to reconcile your fake numbers with all the other stats so that the whole picture is consistent. You cannot fake them all. This reconciliation process is very hard and sometimes not even possible.
The real take out is that they are knowingly lying and deceiving us. We know it and must act accordingly. Thank you Joel and Prof Fenton for exposing those lies and spreading the truth
I commented on Professor Fenton's blog on this. As it was a sub-sample of people registered with a GP, it's just possible that 8% of adults is near the mark. For this to be the case, the NHS mass jabbing coercion campaign would have had to be exceptionally aggressive (it was) and extraordinarily successful and influential with regard to registered patients. That being the case, it's conceivable that unregistered patients would be MUCH less likely to get jabbed. Alternatively, the NHS could be routinely recording those who didn't get jabbed as vaccinated. Seeing as how GPs were and still are getting paid for every person they manage to con into getting injected, then there is a definite incentive for them to do this. Also, I think I am correct in recalling that Covid immunisations were not recorded initially on a patient's medical record; a separate, purpose-built database was set up for this for some strange reason and there were quite a few issues matching this new database to a patient's medical records.
The separate system was operated by the treasury departments of govts around the world.
Nothing to do with health. That’s why they didn’t append Vax records to medical records.
Ultimately it’s to enable cashless CBDCs.
Yes, the vaccine passport was to be the springboard for digital IDs and programmable digital currency. They'll have to find some other way of introducing it now, which I'm sure they will.
Can you include Joel's false NHS covid pass entry in the post? This too might offer an explanation of the erroneous data, as well as might prompt others to check and report back - might give us some insight in to this potential fraud?
Exactly, if you hadn't had the vaccine by May 2022, who on Earth would have decided to go ahead after that time!?
My thought is that governments are counting individual doses as a person, ie a person who has two initial plus booster is counted as three people vaxxed. Been reports of covid 'cases' counted similarly. Creative accounting straight outta 'How To Lie With Statistics'.
No, they are literally counting people as vaxxed who have never been anywhere near it. https://metatron.substack.com/p/evidence-of-incorrect-vaccination?autoPlay=true
Well, that's a whole other level of fraud. But, cant say Im surprised in the least. Gotta keep the psyop rolling somehow I suppose
More likely, they're just lying without thinking that much... ;)
Hahaha. Touche. Good chance you are very correct
Ta.
I thought I was wrong once, but I was mistaken. ;) ha
Just like the US counted every positive, as a new case. 🤦🏻♀️
Exactly
Thanks for the detailed demonstration! Makes things (the real story) seem more clear. Clouds are lifting. 👍 Great job!
Bottom line: "Either way, the ONS estimate of proportion unvaccinated must not be used for any comparisons of vaccine efficacy or safety of the whole England population."
I can add this to the list of things that skew statistics, which previously included:
1) not counting people in the first week or two after their jab (actually counting any deaths or cases this time as occurring in the "unvaccinated")
2) ignoring all-cause mortality among the sub-populations
3) not stratifying the data by enough age groups
4) not accounting for "healthy user bias"
...
Thank you Professor Fenton💕💕
Sorry, but I just want to slap the shit out of that smug red-headed bitch.
Underestimating the unvaxxed group is strategy #1 to 'prove' the vax works. Here in Washington we count anybody without VERIFIABLE vaccination as 'unvaxxed'. So if you're not in the hospital system because you were jabbed at Walgreens or whatever, you're counted as unvaxxed. It's datacrime.
What you don’t see is there are over 20,000,000 deaths bc the manipulate the data to fit their narrative. And rising everyday. The truth is out more and more every day
Do you think it's deliberate fraud on behalf of the surgeries as they get paid per jab given and so they've just said everyone has it, or do you think it's deceit on behalf of the Government or just old fashioned incompetence that people have been registered as vaccinated when they weren't? Also, can you think of any way that a large enough set of people could be polled who have checked their records to see how widespread the false recordkeeping is? It was a great article BTW
In two of the formulas, it should read 40,800,239 instead of 42,800,239. But this is just a typo, the computations are correct.
But they have to do this now, not just to try to pressure people into getting vaxxed (that ship has sailed), but to explain why 90% of the dead are vaxxed. If they admit the % vaccinated is only, say, 70 or 80%, well, it just doesn't look good...