As I mentioned before I am involved with a group that takes testimony from individuals who had a family member killed by the Covid protocols. Usually it was a spouse who was killed, sometimes a brother or sister.
These are gut wrenching, lengthy first hand accounts that go into excruciating detail as to what happened in the hospitals as their loved one was, for money, killed by the hospital system.
These individuals are also looking to and/or are pursuing legal actions and are in possession of the hospital records.
Through their testimony and the records you get to see the naked truth of what happened. Not one of those deceased individuals died from "Covid." This is crystal clear from all the evidence.
Yet EVERY single one of those who were killed by the protocols were LISTED as having died from "Covid."
The group can't keep up with the volume of stories that are coming in. There also aren't enough lawyers to process and prosecute this volume of cases.
This group met last night, it meets each Monday. To hear about "Covid deaths" in light of such testimony seems like some sort of sick joke.
To hear anyone talk about a "Covid death" is laughable to me- I've also looked at volumes of coded "Covid deaths" and seen numerous death certificates of individuals who were listed as a "Covid death." There isn't a single instance of any one of these deaths actually being caused by "Covid", regardless if one believes such a disease even exists.
I'm rather certain at this point that once scrutinized and contextualized every single listing of "Covid death" is fraudulent and that there is no such thing.
Are these people getting support for their grief and bewilderment? As these stories are revealed, I feel that safe holding spaces are incredibly important. I'm a counsellor and know that this is a very particular kind of trauma. As is the experience of those who are becoming aware of the, let's say, untruths and miscreations.
Yes they are. There are multiple resources available which most utilize.
You are correct in what you say. It is brutal, completely traumatizing.
These crimes are still happening here in the US inside hospitals.
Again I have to reiterate that you can't really be prepared for or understand what happened until you hear these stories up close and in detail. It's often described as a horror show with the hospital being turned into gas chambers. The average person who hears this can't come to grips with this reality.
To think that doctors and nurses have been actively killing large numbers of people is too much for most to process.
The cognitive dissonance and fear has led to the denial of a reality too horrendous to contemplate for so many. Whatever happened to "first do no harm ".
German doctors and nurses killed over a quarter of a million people inside hospitals, and this isn't even what people think of when they think of the Holocaust. Maybe if they'd made one of the hospitals (some of which ran their own crematoria) into a notable Holocaust memorial, more people today would be equipped to wrap their minds about what is happening.
The statistic that doctors participated more than any other profession in the Nazi party used to seem to me like an odd historical quirk, not particularly meaningful. I now completely see why that was, and it's sickening.
And if we stopped testing for 'COVID-19' would we know there was ANYTHING untoward happening ?
And therein is how you generate 'a pandemic of a novel virus' for which you need to spend BILLIONS developing a 'cure.' Even for the virus narrative converts the denial of natural immunity is one of the biggets crimes of the last 3 years of which there are many ! https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2101/rr-0
Precisely why the Drosten RT-PCR regime is so criminal - not just how it was "done and dusted" over 3 days in February 2020, answering the call from the WHO to deliver a process the spec for which was signed off by a person who worked for the UK MHRA at the time, with the "help" of compromised people drowning in conflicts of interest, but how so many power mad brownshirts/apparatchiks/commissars/"thought Police types thought they could get away with its promotion. A fraud in plain sight once the Iller report exposed it which makes the next 30 months from Feb 2020 of massive debt funded Govt expenditure on useless T&T and PPE from which a lot of people enriched themselves fraudulently a signal example of contempt for all the (taxpaying) citizens of the UK ( and Sunak has skin in the game of not running down the fraudsters anywhere near hard enough ) - and this country's taxpayers will be paying the price for that "laxity", the kindest word I could use to not fall foul of the Moderator, for many many decades. I want a sceptic billionaire to buy space in all MSM to unmask all the "actors", and name them so they never get to do "this" ever again.
Thank you. Just scoped issue 113; any UK Govt document that relies on modelling is dead in the water imho. Any UK Govt document that states that SARS COV2 is the causative agent for Covid 19 equally holed below the waterline. No mention of "spike protein" means that this document should have pride of place in a public toilet for "use by all". Not checked for "Lipid Nano Particle" or "toxic" but that might be too much to ask...
Thank you - I have seen this before. Kary Mullis confirmed PCR test cannot be used for identifying live or dead material therefore "indications of infectivity" as mentioned more than once in this document are pure unadulterated guesswork. The giveaways (for this non scientist) are the amount of caveats in bold, the fact that "false positive" is not mentioned once. The Reverse Transcriptase element has been thoroughly torpedoed by people "who know" time and again, the lab testing rigour similarly, and the CT rates as well. I well recall FoI requests revealing CT rates north of 40 in some testing regimes and also the reluctance to publish these as a matter of course. Dr MY fingered these frauds a long time ago and it amazes me - but only to some degree - that any reliance on this snake oil test still exists. But then the narrative is still being pushed...
Yes and besides the RNA sequences that the PCR faithfully amplifies have never been shown to come from an entity, nor that the entity is transmissible, infectious nor pathogenic. They could just be from the original patient's cells, or any of the other gunk in his unpurified sample. The genome for the original WT SARS that Drosten designed his protocol from was mix and matched, cut and pasted with gay computer abandon from 56 million short sequence reads. They wanted to make it look at bit like a previously fantasied bat virus cos it adds a nice vampire slant to the fairy story.
The original Wuhan patient reported fever, chest tightness, unproductive cough, pain and weakness for 1 week on presentation - in one of the most densely populated cities in the world- but the cause must be a virus right?
Dr Masanori Fukushima, Professor Emeritus at Kyoto University and Director and Chairman of Translational Research Informatics Center in Japan warns about COVID-19 vaccine harms to the Japanese Ministry of Health. He held a press conference yesterday. He was furious, pounding the table with his fist as to what he is witnessing vs the harms from the mass vaccination program. At least 2,000 dead Japanese, 50% of deaths from heart or cardiovascular problems after vaccination.
''anyone inciting this vaccine without any academic acumen it is to be condemned.'
''the harm caused by this vaccine is a worldwide problem.'
''Billions of lives could be at risk.''
''it was delusional to think a vaccine would fix the pandemic. This misunderstanding has finally come to light and now it is understood how dangerous it is to wrap the mRNA in lipid nanoparticles.''
"You are ignoring science ! It's a disaster. You spend trillions of yen on the vaccine & inciting people to inject it.....due to the vaccine natural immunity has been suppressed"
Chief Microbiologist and Laboratory Specialist Dr. Jared Bullard-The head of Cadham Provincial Laboratory in Winnipeg testifes undert oath. '' PCR tests do nothing more than confirm the presence of fragments''
''Dr. Bullard testified that a PCR test will detect ANY viral RNA that is present in a sample 99.9% of the time''
''Samples tested at a Ct of over 25, according to Dr. Bullard’s report, produced no viable lab cultures.''
Thank you for this; the blindingly bleeding obvious question which occurs to me is that a qualified expert , knowledge, training and by experience in laboratories, knows this, states it before a "judicial"type hearing requiring an oath, and it is publicly available. Fast forward to Whitty, Vallance, Raine, van Tam, UKHSA, JCVI, NHS Trust CEOs downwards, various Health secretaries and several Prime Ministers all mandating use thereof with a litany of outright (provable) lies - enough falsehoods (leading to harms and deaths) to get the sack in a position trust and responsibility in any private sector setting. As scary as the whole scamdemic is and as every SARS COV2 facet which gets aired more and more, this complete lack of professional ethics and morality, repeated episodes too, spells disaster for the UK - and our kids will leave here soon enough, never to return.
Yes ''this complete lack of professional ethics and morality, repeated episodes too, spells disaster for the UK - and our kids will leave here soon enough, never to return'' - and WORSE the MAJORITY of the public ARE STILL comatose to it all !!
This question, posed by Joel, particularly resonated with me:
“Period 1 - The first recorded COVID death in England & Wales occurs in the week ending 26-Jan-20. there are a handful of other deaths that occur over the next couple of months.
"But that’s the odd thing. If COVID is so transmissible, how come there were so few COVID deaths during the peak mortality season? Moreover, how come deaths only explode and are sustained over the period of maximum disruption to the health and social welfare system?"
My comment: Indeed. This is extremely "odd."
One “known knowable” about Covid spikes in deaths is that they happen in the peak “flu” season - which is late November through February or into early March.
This happened in 2020-2021 and again in the same months in 2021-2022. However, we didn’t see ANY (official or “confirmed”) “Covid deaths” in these months in late 2019 and early 2020.
As Joel asks, why did deaths caused by this virus wait until April 2020 to explode? This is when ILI (and Covid) deaths are petering out. So the explanation for these spikes in April 2020 deaths should NOT be a super contagious respiratory virus. The explanation SHOULD be found elsewhere.
No, with respect, I don't think so - iatrogenocide can only happen as a result of iatrogenesis as I understand it ( the former being evidence of a massive event, indicative of the scale of the latter ?)
Joel, you are focussing on excess death data (as more analysts should!) My latest article focusses on Covid “cases.” I conclude that the (real) "Covid" case numbers must have been massive in the “flu” months of November, December 2019 and then January and February 2020.
If my “early spread” hypothesis is correct, this means the real IFR for Covid is probably or perhaps LOWER than for the flu. That is, I think a lot more people were contracting Covid than typically get an ILI.
One reason I believe this is true is that probably half of “Covid cases” are asymptomatic. I’ve never heard of an “asymptomatic” case of the flu or an asymptomatic case of an ILI. So the Covid numbers would be at least double the typical flu numbers. This means the denominator (total cases) that gives us IFR for Covid should be double whatever the denominator of “flu cases” is any a typical flu season.
As you (and me) are pointing out, a lot of conclusions or assumptions simply don’t make sense.
Here are a few excerpts from my piece that might better make some of my main points. The last paragraph of these excerpts might be particularly germane to your recent articles. This suggests almost all of the “Covid deaths” after April 1 must have been “iatrogenic” and/or collateral damage from the lockdowns and panic.
"Two reasons lead me to conclude that the virus was already “petering out” on its own by the date of the mid-March lockdowns.
Approximately one third of the population had already been exposed to the virus by this date … and thus had already acquired natural immunity to the original virus.
2) Winter viruses ALWAYS peter out beginning in late March and April when the weather warms up.
The massive surge in “positive cases” is also no doubt explained by the fact that the cycle thresholds on PCR tests were set so high (intentionally in my opinion). As studies later revealed, as many as 80 to 90 percent of these positives might have been “negatives” if cycle thresholds had been, say 25.
In other words, I believe the spring 2020 surge in “cases” was a mirage. Yes, some people were still getting real Covid, but this percentage was a tiny fraction of the scary figures being published on a daily basis.
We all remember many people who were “sick” from “something” in the flu season months of November, December, January and February (my two children and myself are in this group). However, I bet few of my readers remember many people in their network of friends and family members who were suddenly getting sick with a “flu-like” illness in April or May 2020.
... In a severe or even typical flu season, on average, at least 10 million Americans become sick every month in the three peak months of a six-month flu season (per the CDC’s own historic ILI statistics). Why couldn’t or wouldn’t the same number of people have have been infected with this highly-contagious novel coronavirus?
Indeed, a known knowable about Covid is that cases spiked dramatically in the peak months of the flu seasons of 2020-21 and then again in 2021-2022 (even after most of the population had been vaccinated).
However, according to the official narrative, the novel coronavirus infected virtually no one in the peak months of the 2019-2020 ILI season. Instead, cases didn’t explode until late March and April 2020, when typically an ILI is dying out. And this spike in cases occurred even though the entire country had locked down to prevent the “spread” of “cases” and almost the entire population was wearing masks to prevent the same outcome.
And I actually think the antibody tests "miss" a fair percentage of people who were previously infected. Scientists debate how long IgG antibodies last, but several studies say detectable levels of antibodies wane, fade or disappear as soon as two or three months after infection.* Antibodies also "fade" more rapidly in people who had mild or asymptomatic cases - which might be half of the people with a Covid case. Some small percentage of people never develop detectable levels of antibodies. Actually, older people seem more likely to test positive for antibodies, which would mean that younger people are less likely to test positive.
I also think the antibody tests - especially the "authorized" assays - could have been manipulated to show fewer positives (this would conceal evidence of early spread).
For these and other reasons, I think the antibody tests and studies that we do have are missing a lot of likely early cases.
*Fading IgG antibodies don't necessarily mean someone doesn't have immunity though. T cells, etc. might better explain natural immunity. I focus on the IgG antibodies because at least they can be measured, although they might not last that long in some or many people.
I think far more people actually had Covid in November - January. But people didn't begin to be tested for antibodies on a wide basis until late April/first weeks of May. For many of these people, their antibody tests might have faded so they are not counted. That is, for those who got an antibody test on, say, May 10, but had Covid symptoms around, say, December 10th- This would be five months after they had symptoms.
Also, the non-authorized or non-certified tests seem to have produced a lot higher percentage of positive results. Which I think is interesting and IMO explains the big effort that was made to discredit these allegedly "garbage" tests. (I don't think they were garbage tests).
It's a Bill Rice original theory: The PCR tests were manipulated to inflate cases (especially after the lockdowns) and the antibody tests in April and May might have been manipulated to REDUCE the percentage of positives (which would conceal evidence of early spread). And concealing evidence of early spread was (and still is) very important to certain people, per my hypothesis.
I occasionally engage in a friendly debate with Will Jones, who has done great work on all Covid topics. At another site, I was defending your view and mine that the spike in deaths in April and May really couldn't be explained by a sudden explosion of the coronavirus.
Here's what I wrote to Will:
Will, you write: "the reason that deaths didn't explode until the spring appears to be that Covid was not the dominant winter virus but was competing with all the other usual viruses."
So your hypothesis is that the novel coronavirus was NOT the "dominant winter virus" - and thus wasn't producing excess deaths because it had yet to become the dominant virus ... but somewhere around April 2020 this changed ... and it did become the "dominant virus"? Furthermore, this was a far-deadlier virus than the flu and so this is largely the reason we didn't see a noticeable spike in deaths until April?
I might be mis-stating your theory, but if I'm not I'm skeptical this would largely explain the huge spike in deaths in April and May 2020.
In history, is there any example of a deadly virus that suddenly exploded .... in April?
I still think the iatrogenesis/panic/faulty protocol theory is a better explanation for the sudden spike in deaths. If I'm right that tens of millions of people in America had already been infected by the novel coronavirus by February, a big spike in deaths should have already shown up ... if this virus is as lethal and deadly as the experts believe - or if the IFR was 0.4 (four times higher than the flu). But, I still think the IFR for Covid is the same or lower than the flu. Isn't that the finding of Ionnadis - at least for the population under 65?
Regarding the question of what WAS the "dominant" virus in the winter of 2019-2020, I think we need to look at the data on flu tests given (and the percentage of people testing positive for flu) plus the raw numbers of the tests administered. Per my research (which I'll write about soon), the number of flu tests given in the first weeks of 2020 was more than double (125 percent greater) the number of tests given in the same weeks of 2016. About 25 percent of these tests in 2020 were coming back positive for flu. However, this means 75 percent were negative for the flu. And the number of tests administered was an all-time high. Something was making millions of "extra" people (far more than the previous five-year norm) go to the doctor and get a flu test. Of course not all of these people had Covid - but I think a good percentage did. It's probably an unknown unknowable how many really had been exposed to this virus. The "known knowable" though is that a lot more people went to the doctor and got a flu test in the "flu season" of 2019-2020. Another known knowable is that these people sick with an ILI weren't dying. They were sick, but they didn't die.
Also, as I have pointed out, there were hardly any people complaining of Covid symptoms in April and May 2020. If this virus did belatedly explode in the spring of 2020, it seems like there would have been a big spike of people visiting the doctor for a bad cough, fever, chills, shortness of breath, etc in the post-lockdown weeks and months. I actually don't remember hearing of anyone in my town who was sick with these symptoms in April and May. But it seems like half my town experienced these symptoms in December and January. I think the same observations could be made about 80 percent of the communities in America. We know we had a spike of deaths in April and May - but we didn't have a corresponding spike of "sick" people in the same time period. That doesn't make sense to me.
I appreciate your comments. We all need people to poke holes in our theories. But, so far, I'm sticking to my guns!
I've saved two of those. I'm going to do a big story soon on all the contemporaneous reports from Nov - March that show that the flu season of 2019-2020 was "severe" and "widespread." The evidence is overwhelming this was the case. I've found 30 articles on school closings around America. These flu numbers were also revised downward significantly - surprise! surprise! That's another way they have tried to conceal evidence of early spread - they are trying to re-write the history on what was a terrible ILI year. The ILI evidence is another way that's trying to tell us when the real "first wave" of this virus happened.
Yes 'antibodies' are a convenient surrogate biomarker as they can be easily measured with a colour change test. All vaccines are ineffective and harmful and have to been shown to be doing something so vaccinologists add adjuvants and toxins to them to bump up the effect of poisoning the body and producing globulins and inflammatory proteins.
> One reason I believe this is true is that probably half of “Covid cases” are asymptomatic. I’ve never heard of an “asymptomatic” case of the flu or an asymptomatic case of an ILI.
Hi, I have an interest in medical stuff and my mom is a nurse.
A disease like herpes (like Herpes Simplex) is often asymptomatic, that's why it spreads so much. It's not a strong virus. and a normal healthy body deals with it very well. Herpes is most communicable when there are open sores.
High blood pressure doesn't have symptoms. You have to measure your blood pressure with a machine.
In the first 4-7 days of the flu a person is normally asymptomatic, and that's the period a person is MOST communicable by far. So when a person gets symptoms, they can transmit the virus very little. Which makes lockdowns ridiculous and anti-science.
Thanks. So when a person gets a flu they may initially be asymptomatic, but they don't stay that way. Most if not all later become "symptomatic." That's why so many people go to the doctor with flu-like symptoms and medicine companies make billions selling flu and cold medicines.
However, with Covid maybe half of "cases" never even develop symptoms ever or very mild symptoms. So I still think there is a big difference between official "flu cases" and official "Covid cases." The Covid case numbers would be far higher than the flu numbers - probably at least double?
This is not real clear. My wife and dad and several other people I know have super immune systems. They might have the initial period of asymptomatic high contagion for flu but never get symptoms. We just don't know for sure since doctors won't test for flu at all in normal pre-COVID times. If it looks like flu, coughs like flu, has nasal drainage like flu, then it's flu. Treat for symptoms and get lots of water and rest. Re evaluate in 2 weeks. If there are no symptoms, go back to work and spread the love. (sarcasm)
I do not go to the doctor for flu symptoms unless 1) I cannot get enough sleep for coughing or 2) my over the counter meds are not working well (specifically cough meds).
Proving actual COVID cases existed is super rare because the PCR test, and how it was used, was outright incorrect, results were exaggerated by far. No competent medical doctor would allow those PCR tests. In fact an Australian gov't official admitted on video they had only 5 proven COVID cases.
99.9% of claimed COVID cases were probably normal flu, which kills unhealthy and the elderly anyway. The only pandemic was a pandemic of anti-science paranoia.
I've written in other articles there's actually no way to "confirm" a case of early Covid. This is because the CDC's definition requires a positive PCR test. Well, the first PCR test wasn't even given in America until January 17, 2020. The only way to "confirm" a case in, say, December or November, would be get into a time machine and take back a lot of PCR tests to test those people in November and December.
They've rigged the definitions so there can't be any "confirmed" early cases. The first "official" or confirmed case in America is still listed as January 19, 2020!
> there's actually no way to "confirm" a case of early Covid.
I would agree that that is reasonable. The PCR test was used incorrectly, and as COVID-19 is claimed to be a new virus, there is no gold-standard for an anti-body test. And another person in another comment on another post says not all people have antibodies to a given disease. That's an interesting concept.
Yes, I don't think the antibody tests that have been given are "capturing" all the people who had the virus at an earlier date. Per my research, as you note, some percentage of the population never develops "detectable" antibodies. One study said 1 to 5 percent never develop antibodies. Another study said this percentage might be as high as 8 percent. Those aren't big percentages, but still, they tell us that the antibody results we have seen should or could be at least a little higher.
I focus so much on antibody tests only because that's the only way to have some kind of hard or scientific data on presumed "early" cases. One could also assume that some percentage of the people who were "sick" with an ILI in November - March actually had Covid. Personally, for reasons too detailed to get into here, I think maybe 20 to 30 percent of the people who went to the doctor and got a "negative" flu tests probably had Covid. That would be many millions of people right there.
It's a shame the BBC has forgotten that it's meant to use people like you to tell the truth to people like me! I heard the World Service banging on about how awful China is for imposing dreadful lockdowns on those poor people who, it seems, are mostly refusing to take the jabs. Apparently the Chinese jabs are only about 60% efficient at stopping the virus in its tracks. As opposed to the Safe and Effective Pfizer or Moderna ones which are, as we know, over 95% efficient at stopping people dying. So, presumably the BBC would tell us that all those excess deaths were unvaccinated fools or 80-year olds snatched away before their time by germs spread by the wicked unjabbed.
(I never believed Covid was a deadly killer because not enough people were dying. It was weird how quickly that became an unacceptable viewpoint!)
Keep up your excellent work. Can you get back on Twitter, now that the Stasi are less in control?
Mildly controversial views are now permitted there.
Slightly off-topic, I've been reading the excellent 2021 book 'The Dawn of Everything' by the late David Graeber and David Wengrow. Relevant to the question 'what kind of society do we want?', assuming that we don't want top-down tyranny led by Central Bankers, also given that slow economic decline if not collapse now looks inevitable.
See Nate Hagens' website 'The Great Simplification'. Economies run on surplus energy, not on printed money.
H. Clifford Lane, M.D., and Robert R. Redfield, M.D.
"On the basis of a case definition requiring a diagnosis of pneumonia, the currently reported case fatality rate is approximately 2%.4 In another article in the Journal, Guan et al.5 report mortality of 1.4% among 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19; these patients had a wide spectrum of disease severity. If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively."
The first recorded COVID death in England & Wales occurs in the week ending 26-Jan-20. there are a handful of other deaths that occur over the next couple of months.
But that’s the odd thing. If COVID is so transmissible, how come there were so few COVID deaths during the peak mortality season?
-----------------------------
Cause there were a whole lot of 'unrecorded' "covid deaths" before we had tests. The virus was with us all winter 2019 and we didn't even notice.
I'm no expert in statistics, but I've been following the Covid debacle closely since the beginning.
In a BMJ rapid response published in December 2020, I noted: "To put things in perspective, consider that over the past eleven months, globally 1.64 million deaths have been attributed to COVID-19. These 1.64 million deaths must be seen in context with the 56 million deaths expected in the world annually."
Just think about that...
1.64 million deaths attributed to COVID-19 in 11 months...and that was with them throwing in every death they could to beat up the numbers...
1.64 million deaths...likely to be mostly elderly people with comorbidities, and near death anyway.
And on the basis of that number, they implemented what has turned out to be a global mass population jab response, across billions of people of all ages and health status, with 'leaky vaccines' that don't prevent infection nor transmission.
Really...
How did this happen? How was a 'vaccine solution' implemented against a virus/disease it was known from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people?.
As I mentioned before I am involved with a group that takes testimony from individuals who had a family member killed by the Covid protocols. Usually it was a spouse who was killed, sometimes a brother or sister.
These are gut wrenching, lengthy first hand accounts that go into excruciating detail as to what happened in the hospitals as their loved one was, for money, killed by the hospital system.
These individuals are also looking to and/or are pursuing legal actions and are in possession of the hospital records.
Through their testimony and the records you get to see the naked truth of what happened. Not one of those deceased individuals died from "Covid." This is crystal clear from all the evidence.
Yet EVERY single one of those who were killed by the protocols were LISTED as having died from "Covid."
The group can't keep up with the volume of stories that are coming in. There also aren't enough lawyers to process and prosecute this volume of cases.
This group met last night, it meets each Monday. To hear about "Covid deaths" in light of such testimony seems like some sort of sick joke.
To hear anyone talk about a "Covid death" is laughable to me- I've also looked at volumes of coded "Covid deaths" and seen numerous death certificates of individuals who were listed as a "Covid death." There isn't a single instance of any one of these deaths actually being caused by "Covid", regardless if one believes such a disease even exists.
I'm rather certain at this point that once scrutinized and contextualized every single listing of "Covid death" is fraudulent and that there is no such thing.
Are these people getting support for their grief and bewilderment? As these stories are revealed, I feel that safe holding spaces are incredibly important. I'm a counsellor and know that this is a very particular kind of trauma. As is the experience of those who are becoming aware of the, let's say, untruths and miscreations.
Yes they are. There are multiple resources available which most utilize.
You are correct in what you say. It is brutal, completely traumatizing.
These crimes are still happening here in the US inside hospitals.
Again I have to reiterate that you can't really be prepared for or understand what happened until you hear these stories up close and in detail. It's often described as a horror show with the hospital being turned into gas chambers. The average person who hears this can't come to grips with this reality.
To think that doctors and nurses have been actively killing large numbers of people is too much for most to process.
The cognitive dissonance and fear has led to the denial of a reality too horrendous to contemplate for so many. Whatever happened to "first do no harm ".
German doctors and nurses killed over a quarter of a million people inside hospitals, and this isn't even what people think of when they think of the Holocaust. Maybe if they'd made one of the hospitals (some of which ran their own crematoria) into a notable Holocaust memorial, more people today would be equipped to wrap their minds about what is happening.
The statistic that doctors participated more than any other profession in the Nazi party used to seem to me like an odd historical quirk, not particularly meaningful. I now completely see why that was, and it's sickening.
Are these cases from all over the US...or one state in particular?
All over the US.
There's a case where a guy in a hospital had 3 negative COVID tests, but died, and his death certificate reason was died of COVID.
Is this in the UK?
It's in the US.
You can read/listen to some of the case files here:
https://chbmp.org/cases/
Keep up good work like that, and the charlatans will soon be gasping for breath...
We can hope
And if we stopped testing for 'COVID-19' would we know there was ANYTHING untoward happening ?
And therein is how you generate 'a pandemic of a novel virus' for which you need to spend BILLIONS developing a 'cure.' Even for the virus narrative converts the denial of natural immunity is one of the biggets crimes of the last 3 years of which there are many ! https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2101/rr-0
Precisely why the Drosten RT-PCR regime is so criminal - not just how it was "done and dusted" over 3 days in February 2020, answering the call from the WHO to deliver a process the spec for which was signed off by a person who worked for the UK MHRA at the time, with the "help" of compromised people drowning in conflicts of interest, but how so many power mad brownshirts/apparatchiks/commissars/"thought Police types thought they could get away with its promotion. A fraud in plain sight once the Iller report exposed it which makes the next 30 months from Feb 2020 of massive debt funded Govt expenditure on useless T&T and PPE from which a lot of people enriched themselves fraudulently a signal example of contempt for all the (taxpaying) citizens of the UK ( and Sunak has skin in the game of not running down the fraudsters anywhere near hard enough ) - and this country's taxpayers will be paying the price for that "laxity", the kindest word I could use to not fall foul of the Moderator, for many many decades. I want a sceptic billionaire to buy space in all MSM to unmask all the "actors", and name them so they never get to do "this" ever again.
I've been reading Scotsgov documents here they have no plans to return us to normal, ever !
They mention the emergence of a ''vaccine escape mutant'' LOL over xmas which will return the NPI's and i suspect this is why we are seeing the CCP protest stuff here now on MSM as our restrictions are not that bad, get on with it mate and all that ! https://www.gov.scot/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-modelling-epidemic-issue-no-113/
Thank you. Just scoped issue 113; any UK Govt document that relies on modelling is dead in the water imho. Any UK Govt document that states that SARS COV2 is the causative agent for Covid 19 equally holed below the waterline. No mention of "spike protein" means that this document should have pride of place in a public toilet for "use by all". Not checked for "Lipid Nano Particle" or "toxic" but that might be too much to ask...
PAGE- 6 https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/926410/Understanding_Cycle_Threshold__Ct__in_SARS-CoV-2_RT-PCR_.pdf
Thank you - I have seen this before. Kary Mullis confirmed PCR test cannot be used for identifying live or dead material therefore "indications of infectivity" as mentioned more than once in this document are pure unadulterated guesswork. The giveaways (for this non scientist) are the amount of caveats in bold, the fact that "false positive" is not mentioned once. The Reverse Transcriptase element has been thoroughly torpedoed by people "who know" time and again, the lab testing rigour similarly, and the CT rates as well. I well recall FoI requests revealing CT rates north of 40 in some testing regimes and also the reluctance to publish these as a matter of course. Dr MY fingered these frauds a long time ago and it amazes me - but only to some degree - that any reliance on this snake oil test still exists. But then the narrative is still being pushed...
Yes and besides the RNA sequences that the PCR faithfully amplifies have never been shown to come from an entity, nor that the entity is transmissible, infectious nor pathogenic. They could just be from the original patient's cells, or any of the other gunk in his unpurified sample. The genome for the original WT SARS that Drosten designed his protocol from was mix and matched, cut and pasted with gay computer abandon from 56 million short sequence reads. They wanted to make it look at bit like a previously fantasied bat virus cos it adds a nice vampire slant to the fairy story.
The original Wuhan patient reported fever, chest tightness, unproductive cough, pain and weakness for 1 week on presentation - in one of the most densely populated cities in the world- but the cause must be a virus right?
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3
Jo
🐒
Dr Masanori Fukushima, Professor Emeritus at Kyoto University and Director and Chairman of Translational Research Informatics Center in Japan warns about COVID-19 vaccine harms to the Japanese Ministry of Health. He held a press conference yesterday. He was furious, pounding the table with his fist as to what he is witnessing vs the harms from the mass vaccination program. At least 2,000 dead Japanese, 50% of deaths from heart or cardiovascular problems after vaccination.
https://twitter.com/ShortShort_News/status/1597605601357754370
direct quotes:
''anyone inciting this vaccine without any academic acumen it is to be condemned.'
''the harm caused by this vaccine is a worldwide problem.'
''Billions of lives could be at risk.''
''it was delusional to think a vaccine would fix the pandemic. This misunderstanding has finally come to light and now it is understood how dangerous it is to wrap the mRNA in lipid nanoparticles.''
"You are ignoring science ! It's a disaster. You spend trillions of yen on the vaccine & inciting people to inject it.....due to the vaccine natural immunity has been suppressed"
This was one of the more powerful take downs of the PCRap test. Ignored by MSM of course.
https://www.jccf.ca/manitoba-chief-microbiologist-and-laboratory-specialist-56-of-positive-cases-are-not-infectious/
Chief Microbiologist and Laboratory Specialist Dr. Jared Bullard-The head of Cadham Provincial Laboratory in Winnipeg testifes undert oath. '' PCR tests do nothing more than confirm the presence of fragments''
''Dr. Bullard testified that a PCR test will detect ANY viral RNA that is present in a sample 99.9% of the time''
''Samples tested at a Ct of over 25, according to Dr. Bullard’s report, produced no viable lab cultures.''
Thank you for this; the blindingly bleeding obvious question which occurs to me is that a qualified expert , knowledge, training and by experience in laboratories, knows this, states it before a "judicial"type hearing requiring an oath, and it is publicly available. Fast forward to Whitty, Vallance, Raine, van Tam, UKHSA, JCVI, NHS Trust CEOs downwards, various Health secretaries and several Prime Ministers all mandating use thereof with a litany of outright (provable) lies - enough falsehoods (leading to harms and deaths) to get the sack in a position trust and responsibility in any private sector setting. As scary as the whole scamdemic is and as every SARS COV2 facet which gets aired more and more, this complete lack of professional ethics and morality, repeated episodes too, spells disaster for the UK - and our kids will leave here soon enough, never to return.
Yes ''this complete lack of professional ethics and morality, repeated episodes too, spells disaster for the UK - and our kids will leave here soon enough, never to return'' - and WORSE the MAJORITY of the public ARE STILL comatose to it all !!
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/hsr2.790
Joel,
The Harmacide hacksxxxine tis a bioweapon.
It makes your body produce the bioweapon that it then sheds to others.
Check Dr Ana and Karen Kingston in Maria Zee yesterday...
Remember they told us they didn't have the virus to begin with that they had to use the computer generated bioweapon for hacksxxxine.
That was the tell.
The bioweapon installs device and biology foreign to Womanity that tells it to make more.
Riddle solved...
Now how we can heal our blood?
Vinegar?
Is there a natural source of EDTA to chelate the metal bioweapon outta us?
Scared in San Francisco killafornia.
Twas all a lie to get us to inject our own demise.
Don't do it
Too late for millions of people and chelation of heavy metals won't stop 5G from activating the graphene in synthetic lipids. Those are the killers.
This question, posed by Joel, particularly resonated with me:
“Period 1 - The first recorded COVID death in England & Wales occurs in the week ending 26-Jan-20. there are a handful of other deaths that occur over the next couple of months.
"But that’s the odd thing. If COVID is so transmissible, how come there were so few COVID deaths during the peak mortality season? Moreover, how come deaths only explode and are sustained over the period of maximum disruption to the health and social welfare system?"
My comment: Indeed. This is extremely "odd."
One “known knowable” about Covid spikes in deaths is that they happen in the peak “flu” season - which is late November through February or into early March.
This happened in 2020-2021 and again in the same months in 2021-2022. However, we didn’t see ANY (official or “confirmed”) “Covid deaths” in these months in late 2019 and early 2020.
As Joel asks, why did deaths caused by this virus wait until April 2020 to explode? This is when ILI (and Covid) deaths are petering out. So the explanation for these spikes in April 2020 deaths should NOT be a super contagious respiratory virus. The explanation SHOULD be found elsewhere.
Iatrogenesis? I think you mean iatrogenocide.
No, with respect, I don't think so - iatrogenocide can only happen as a result of iatrogenesis as I understand it ( the former being evidence of a massive event, indicative of the scale of the latter ?)
Ah. You may be right.
Some tell me that's a rare event....
Joel, you are focussing on excess death data (as more analysts should!) My latest article focusses on Covid “cases.” I conclude that the (real) "Covid" case numbers must have been massive in the “flu” months of November, December 2019 and then January and February 2020.
If my “early spread” hypothesis is correct, this means the real IFR for Covid is probably or perhaps LOWER than for the flu. That is, I think a lot more people were contracting Covid than typically get an ILI.
One reason I believe this is true is that probably half of “Covid cases” are asymptomatic. I’ve never heard of an “asymptomatic” case of the flu or an asymptomatic case of an ILI. So the Covid numbers would be at least double the typical flu numbers. This means the denominator (total cases) that gives us IFR for Covid should be double whatever the denominator of “flu cases” is any a typical flu season.
As you (and me) are pointing out, a lot of conclusions or assumptions simply don’t make sense.
Here are a few excerpts from my piece that might better make some of my main points. The last paragraph of these excerpts might be particularly germane to your recent articles. This suggests almost all of the “Covid deaths” after April 1 must have been “iatrogenic” and/or collateral damage from the lockdowns and panic.
"Two reasons lead me to conclude that the virus was already “petering out” on its own by the date of the mid-March lockdowns.
Approximately one third of the population had already been exposed to the virus by this date … and thus had already acquired natural immunity to the original virus.
2) Winter viruses ALWAYS peter out beginning in late March and April when the weather warms up.
The massive surge in “positive cases” is also no doubt explained by the fact that the cycle thresholds on PCR tests were set so high (intentionally in my opinion). As studies later revealed, as many as 80 to 90 percent of these positives might have been “negatives” if cycle thresholds had been, say 25.
In other words, I believe the spring 2020 surge in “cases” was a mirage. Yes, some people were still getting real Covid, but this percentage was a tiny fraction of the scary figures being published on a daily basis.
We all remember many people who were “sick” from “something” in the flu season months of November, December, January and February (my two children and myself are in this group). However, I bet few of my readers remember many people in their network of friends and family members who were suddenly getting sick with a “flu-like” illness in April or May 2020.
... In a severe or even typical flu season, on average, at least 10 million Americans become sick every month in the three peak months of a six-month flu season (per the CDC’s own historic ILI statistics). Why couldn’t or wouldn’t the same number of people have have been infected with this highly-contagious novel coronavirus?
Indeed, a known knowable about Covid is that cases spiked dramatically in the peak months of the flu seasons of 2020-21 and then again in 2021-2022 (even after most of the population had been vaccinated).
However, according to the official narrative, the novel coronavirus infected virtually no one in the peak months of the 2019-2020 ILI season. Instead, cases didn’t explode until late March and April 2020, when typically an ILI is dying out. And this spike in cases occurred even though the entire country had locked down to prevent the “spread” of “cases” and almost the entire population was wearing masks to prevent the same outcome.
Yep. April 2020, NYC already had 25% of people with antibodies. That's millions and millions of 'cases' that we missed IN NYC ALONE.
And I actually think the antibody tests "miss" a fair percentage of people who were previously infected. Scientists debate how long IgG antibodies last, but several studies say detectable levels of antibodies wane, fade or disappear as soon as two or three months after infection.* Antibodies also "fade" more rapidly in people who had mild or asymptomatic cases - which might be half of the people with a Covid case. Some small percentage of people never develop detectable levels of antibodies. Actually, older people seem more likely to test positive for antibodies, which would mean that younger people are less likely to test positive.
I also think the antibody tests - especially the "authorized" assays - could have been manipulated to show fewer positives (this would conceal evidence of early spread).
For these and other reasons, I think the antibody tests and studies that we do have are missing a lot of likely early cases.
*Fading IgG antibodies don't necessarily mean someone doesn't have immunity though. T cells, etc. might better explain natural immunity. I focus on the IgG antibodies because at least they can be measured, although they might not last that long in some or many people.
I think far more people actually had Covid in November - January. But people didn't begin to be tested for antibodies on a wide basis until late April/first weeks of May. For many of these people, their antibody tests might have faded so they are not counted. That is, for those who got an antibody test on, say, May 10, but had Covid symptoms around, say, December 10th- This would be five months after they had symptoms.
Also, the non-authorized or non-certified tests seem to have produced a lot higher percentage of positive results. Which I think is interesting and IMO explains the big effort that was made to discredit these allegedly "garbage" tests. (I don't think they were garbage tests).
It's a Bill Rice original theory: The PCR tests were manipulated to inflate cases (especially after the lockdowns) and the antibody tests in April and May might have been manipulated to REDUCE the percentage of positives (which would conceal evidence of early spread). And concealing evidence of early spread was (and still is) very important to certain people, per my hypothesis.
Don't forget that early on in NYC you didn't even need a positive test to count as a covid death, only covid symptoms.
But back then tests were restricted to people who were very sick with covid symptoms, and 75% of them were still coming back negative.
I occasionally engage in a friendly debate with Will Jones, who has done great work on all Covid topics. At another site, I was defending your view and mine that the spike in deaths in April and May really couldn't be explained by a sudden explosion of the coronavirus.
Here's what I wrote to Will:
Will, you write: "the reason that deaths didn't explode until the spring appears to be that Covid was not the dominant winter virus but was competing with all the other usual viruses."
So your hypothesis is that the novel coronavirus was NOT the "dominant winter virus" - and thus wasn't producing excess deaths because it had yet to become the dominant virus ... but somewhere around April 2020 this changed ... and it did become the "dominant virus"? Furthermore, this was a far-deadlier virus than the flu and so this is largely the reason we didn't see a noticeable spike in deaths until April?
I might be mis-stating your theory, but if I'm not I'm skeptical this would largely explain the huge spike in deaths in April and May 2020.
In history, is there any example of a deadly virus that suddenly exploded .... in April?
I still think the iatrogenesis/panic/faulty protocol theory is a better explanation for the sudden spike in deaths. If I'm right that tens of millions of people in America had already been infected by the novel coronavirus by February, a big spike in deaths should have already shown up ... if this virus is as lethal and deadly as the experts believe - or if the IFR was 0.4 (four times higher than the flu). But, I still think the IFR for Covid is the same or lower than the flu. Isn't that the finding of Ionnadis - at least for the population under 65?
Regarding the question of what WAS the "dominant" virus in the winter of 2019-2020, I think we need to look at the data on flu tests given (and the percentage of people testing positive for flu) plus the raw numbers of the tests administered. Per my research (which I'll write about soon), the number of flu tests given in the first weeks of 2020 was more than double (125 percent greater) the number of tests given in the same weeks of 2016. About 25 percent of these tests in 2020 were coming back positive for flu. However, this means 75 percent were negative for the flu. And the number of tests administered was an all-time high. Something was making millions of "extra" people (far more than the previous five-year norm) go to the doctor and get a flu test. Of course not all of these people had Covid - but I think a good percentage did. It's probably an unknown unknowable how many really had been exposed to this virus. The "known knowable" though is that a lot more people went to the doctor and got a flu test in the "flu season" of 2019-2020. Another known knowable is that these people sick with an ILI weren't dying. They were sick, but they didn't die.
Also, as I have pointed out, there were hardly any people complaining of Covid symptoms in April and May 2020. If this virus did belatedly explode in the spring of 2020, it seems like there would have been a big spike of people visiting the doctor for a bad cough, fever, chills, shortness of breath, etc in the post-lockdown weeks and months. I actually don't remember hearing of anyone in my town who was sick with these symptoms in April and May. But it seems like half my town experienced these symptoms in December and January. I think the same observations could be made about 80 percent of the communities in America. We know we had a spike of deaths in April and May - but we didn't have a corresponding spike of "sick" people in the same time period. That doesn't make sense to me.
I appreciate your comments. We all need people to poke holes in our theories. But, so far, I'm sticking to my guns!
I'm sure I'm not the only one who remembers these:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/15/health/flu-season-early-start/index.html
https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/06/us-flu-season-arrives-early-driven-by-an-unexpected-virus.html
https://time.com/5746409/early-flu-season-2019-2020/
I've saved two of those. I'm going to do a big story soon on all the contemporaneous reports from Nov - March that show that the flu season of 2019-2020 was "severe" and "widespread." The evidence is overwhelming this was the case. I've found 30 articles on school closings around America. These flu numbers were also revised downward significantly - surprise! surprise! That's another way they have tried to conceal evidence of early spread - they are trying to re-write the history on what was a terrible ILI year. The ILI evidence is another way that's trying to tell us when the real "first wave" of this virus happened.
Yes 'antibodies' are a convenient surrogate biomarker as they can be easily measured with a colour change test. All vaccines are ineffective and harmful and have to been shown to be doing something so vaccinologists add adjuvants and toxins to them to bump up the effect of poisoning the body and producing globulins and inflammatory proteins.
' antibodies' have absolutely nothing to do with immunity to being ill though https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/to-be-well-studied-one-must-read
🐒
> One reason I believe this is true is that probably half of “Covid cases” are asymptomatic. I’ve never heard of an “asymptomatic” case of the flu or an asymptomatic case of an ILI.
Hi, I have an interest in medical stuff and my mom is a nurse.
A disease like herpes (like Herpes Simplex) is often asymptomatic, that's why it spreads so much. It's not a strong virus. and a normal healthy body deals with it very well. Herpes is most communicable when there are open sores.
High blood pressure doesn't have symptoms. You have to measure your blood pressure with a machine.
In the first 4-7 days of the flu a person is normally asymptomatic, and that's the period a person is MOST communicable by far. So when a person gets symptoms, they can transmit the virus very little. Which makes lockdowns ridiculous and anti-science.
Thanks. So when a person gets a flu they may initially be asymptomatic, but they don't stay that way. Most if not all later become "symptomatic." That's why so many people go to the doctor with flu-like symptoms and medicine companies make billions selling flu and cold medicines.
However, with Covid maybe half of "cases" never even develop symptoms ever or very mild symptoms. So I still think there is a big difference between official "flu cases" and official "Covid cases." The Covid case numbers would be far higher than the flu numbers - probably at least double?
Mostly correct except:
> Most if not all later become "symptomatic."
This is not real clear. My wife and dad and several other people I know have super immune systems. They might have the initial period of asymptomatic high contagion for flu but never get symptoms. We just don't know for sure since doctors won't test for flu at all in normal pre-COVID times. If it looks like flu, coughs like flu, has nasal drainage like flu, then it's flu. Treat for symptoms and get lots of water and rest. Re evaluate in 2 weeks. If there are no symptoms, go back to work and spread the love. (sarcasm)
I do not go to the doctor for flu symptoms unless 1) I cannot get enough sleep for coughing or 2) my over the counter meds are not working well (specifically cough meds).
Proving actual COVID cases existed is super rare because the PCR test, and how it was used, was outright incorrect, results were exaggerated by far. No competent medical doctor would allow those PCR tests. In fact an Australian gov't official admitted on video they had only 5 proven COVID cases.
99.9% of claimed COVID cases were probably normal flu, which kills unhealthy and the elderly anyway. The only pandemic was a pandemic of anti-science paranoia.
I've written in other articles there's actually no way to "confirm" a case of early Covid. This is because the CDC's definition requires a positive PCR test. Well, the first PCR test wasn't even given in America until January 17, 2020. The only way to "confirm" a case in, say, December or November, would be get into a time machine and take back a lot of PCR tests to test those people in November and December.
They've rigged the definitions so there can't be any "confirmed" early cases. The first "official" or confirmed case in America is still listed as January 19, 2020!
> there's actually no way to "confirm" a case of early Covid.
I would agree that that is reasonable. The PCR test was used incorrectly, and as COVID-19 is claimed to be a new virus, there is no gold-standard for an anti-body test. And another person in another comment on another post says not all people have antibodies to a given disease. That's an interesting concept.
Yes, I don't think the antibody tests that have been given are "capturing" all the people who had the virus at an earlier date. Per my research, as you note, some percentage of the population never develops "detectable" antibodies. One study said 1 to 5 percent never develop antibodies. Another study said this percentage might be as high as 8 percent. Those aren't big percentages, but still, they tell us that the antibody results we have seen should or could be at least a little higher.
I focus so much on antibody tests only because that's the only way to have some kind of hard or scientific data on presumed "early" cases. One could also assume that some percentage of the people who were "sick" with an ILI in November - March actually had Covid. Personally, for reasons too detailed to get into here, I think maybe 20 to 30 percent of the people who went to the doctor and got a "negative" flu tests probably had Covid. That would be many millions of people right there.
It's a shame the BBC has forgotten that it's meant to use people like you to tell the truth to people like me! I heard the World Service banging on about how awful China is for imposing dreadful lockdowns on those poor people who, it seems, are mostly refusing to take the jabs. Apparently the Chinese jabs are only about 60% efficient at stopping the virus in its tracks. As opposed to the Safe and Effective Pfizer or Moderna ones which are, as we know, over 95% efficient at stopping people dying. So, presumably the BBC would tell us that all those excess deaths were unvaccinated fools or 80-year olds snatched away before their time by germs spread by the wicked unjabbed.
(I never believed Covid was a deadly killer because not enough people were dying. It was weird how quickly that became an unacceptable viewpoint!)
Kissing my finger tips! All you need to do to get to Valhalla now is say "there is no virus".
Haha. "Interesting" is the new metaphor for QED. You are dropping truhg bombs with every post. Time for me to upgrade.
Keep up your excellent work. Can you get back on Twitter, now that the Stasi are less in control?
Mildly controversial views are now permitted there.
Slightly off-topic, I've been reading the excellent 2021 book 'The Dawn of Everything' by the late David Graeber and David Wengrow. Relevant to the question 'what kind of society do we want?', assuming that we don't want top-down tyranny led by Central Bankers, also given that slow economic decline if not collapse now looks inevitable.
See Nate Hagens' website 'The Great Simplification'. Economies run on surplus energy, not on printed money.
They want to exterminate us. It's that simple. All your evidence supports this.
https://dystopianliving.substack.com/p/your-owners-want-you-dead
Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted
Anthony S. Fauci, M.D.,
H. Clifford Lane, M.D., and Robert R. Redfield, M.D.
"On the basis of a case definition requiring a diagnosis of pneumonia, the currently reported case fatality rate is approximately 2%.4 In another article in the Journal, Guan et al.5 report mortality of 1.4% among 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19; these patients had a wide spectrum of disease severity. If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively."
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejme2002387
So it's long been know. Known from the start.
"CoVID has given us the opportunity for a reset."
- Justin Trudeau (née Castro)
The first recorded COVID death in England & Wales occurs in the week ending 26-Jan-20. there are a handful of other deaths that occur over the next couple of months.
But that’s the odd thing. If COVID is so transmissible, how come there were so few COVID deaths during the peak mortality season?
-----------------------------
Cause there were a whole lot of 'unrecorded' "covid deaths" before we had tests. The virus was with us all winter 2019 and we didn't even notice.
Iatrogenic = relating to illness caused by medical examination or treatment. "drugs may cause side effects which can lead to iatrogenic disease"
"The shot is safe and effective. Ok it's not that effective. Ok it causes AIDS and cancer."
I'm no expert in statistics, but I've been following the Covid debacle closely since the beginning.
In a BMJ rapid response published in December 2020, I noted: "To put things in perspective, consider that over the past eleven months, globally 1.64 million deaths have been attributed to COVID-19. These 1.64 million deaths must be seen in context with the 56 million deaths expected in the world annually."
Just think about that...
1.64 million deaths attributed to COVID-19 in 11 months...and that was with them throwing in every death they could to beat up the numbers...
1.64 million deaths...likely to be mostly elderly people with comorbidities, and near death anyway.
And on the basis of that number, they implemented what has turned out to be a global mass population jab response, across billions of people of all ages and health status, with 'leaky vaccines' that don't prevent infection nor transmission.
Really...
How did this happen? How was a 'vaccine solution' implemented against a virus/disease it was known from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people?.
Link to my BMJ rapid response: Liberal democracies being turned upside down to 'protect health services', 18 December 2020: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4847/rr-16