Nov 29, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

As I mentioned before I am involved with a group that takes testimony from individuals who had a family member killed by the Covid protocols. Usually it was a spouse who was killed, sometimes a brother or sister.

These are gut wrenching, lengthy first hand accounts that go into excruciating detail as to what happened in the hospitals as their loved one was, for money, killed by the hospital system.

These individuals are also looking to and/or are pursuing legal actions and are in possession of the hospital records.

Through their testimony and the records you get to see the naked truth of what happened. Not one of those deceased individuals died from "Covid." This is crystal clear from all the evidence.

Yet EVERY single one of those who were killed by the protocols were LISTED as having died from "Covid."

The group can't keep up with the volume of stories that are coming in. There also aren't enough lawyers to process and prosecute this volume of cases.

This group met last night, it meets each Monday. To hear about "Covid deaths" in light of such testimony seems like some sort of sick joke.

To hear anyone talk about a "Covid death" is laughable to me- I've also looked at volumes of coded "Covid deaths" and seen numerous death certificates of individuals who were listed as a "Covid death." There isn't a single instance of any one of these deaths actually being caused by "Covid", regardless if one believes such a disease even exists.

I'm rather certain at this point that once scrutinized and contextualized every single listing of "Covid death" is fraudulent and that there is no such thing.

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Keep up good work like that, and the charlatans will soon be gasping for breath...

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022·edited Nov 29, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

And if we stopped testing for 'COVID-19' would we know there was ANYTHING untoward happening ?

And therein is how you generate 'a pandemic of a novel virus' for which you need to spend BILLIONS developing a 'cure.' Even for the virus narrative converts the denial of natural immunity is one of the biggets crimes of the last 3 years of which there are many ! https://www.bmj.com/content/374/bmj.n2101/rr-0

Expand full comment


The Harmacide hacksxxxine tis a bioweapon.

It makes your body produce the bioweapon that it then sheds to others.

Check Dr Ana and Karen Kingston in Maria Zee yesterday...

Remember they told us they didn't have the virus to begin with that they had to use the computer generated bioweapon for hacksxxxine.

That was the tell.

The bioweapon installs device and biology foreign to Womanity that tells it to make more.

Riddle solved...

Now how we can heal our blood?


Is there a natural source of EDTA to chelate the metal bioweapon outta us?

Scared in San Francisco killafornia.

Twas all a lie to get us to inject our own demise.

Don't do it

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022·edited Nov 29, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

This question, posed by Joel, particularly resonated with me:

“Period 1 - The first recorded COVID death in England & Wales occurs in the week ending 26-Jan-20. there are a handful of other deaths that occur over the next couple of months.

"But that’s the odd thing. If COVID is so transmissible, how come there were so few COVID deaths during the peak mortality season? Moreover, how come deaths only explode and are sustained over the period of maximum disruption to the health and social welfare system?"

My comment: Indeed. This is extremely "odd."

One “known knowable” about Covid spikes in deaths is that they happen in the peak “flu” season - which is late November through February or into early March.

This happened in 2020-2021 and again in the same months in 2021-2022. However, we didn’t see ANY (official or “confirmed”) “Covid deaths” in these months in late 2019 and early 2020.

As Joel asks, why did deaths caused by this virus wait until April 2020 to explode? This is when ILI (and Covid) deaths are petering out. So the explanation for these spikes in April 2020 deaths should NOT be a super contagious respiratory virus. The explanation SHOULD be found elsewhere.

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Iatrogenesis? I think you mean iatrogenocide.

Expand full comment

Joel, you are focussing on excess death data (as more analysts should!) My latest article focusses on Covid “cases.” I conclude that the (real) "Covid" case numbers must have been massive in the “flu” months of November, December 2019 and then January and February 2020.

If my “early spread” hypothesis is correct, this means the real IFR for Covid is probably or perhaps LOWER than for the flu. That is, I think a lot more people were contracting Covid than typically get an ILI.

One reason I believe this is true is that probably half of “Covid cases” are asymptomatic. I’ve never heard of an “asymptomatic” case of the flu or an asymptomatic case of an ILI. So the Covid numbers would be at least double the typical flu numbers. This means the denominator (total cases) that gives us IFR for Covid should be double whatever the denominator of “flu cases” is any a typical flu season.

As you (and me) are pointing out, a lot of conclusions or assumptions simply don’t make sense.

Here are a few excerpts from my piece that might better make some of my main points. The last paragraph of these excerpts might be particularly germane to your recent articles. This suggests almost all of the “Covid deaths” after April 1 must have been “iatrogenic” and/or collateral damage from the lockdowns and panic.

"Two reasons lead me to conclude that the virus was already “petering out” on its own by the date of the mid-March lockdowns.

Approximately one third of the population had already been exposed to the virus by this date … and thus had already acquired natural immunity to the original virus.

2) Winter viruses ALWAYS peter out beginning in late March and April when the weather warms up.

The massive surge in “positive cases” is also no doubt explained by the fact that the cycle thresholds on PCR tests were set so high (intentionally in my opinion).  As studies later revealed, as many as 80 to 90 percent of these positives might have been “negatives” if cycle thresholds had been, say 25.

In other words, I believe the spring 2020 surge in “cases” was a mirage. Yes, some people were still getting real Covid, but this percentage was a tiny fraction of the scary figures being published on a daily basis.

We all remember many people who were “sick” from “something” in the flu season months of November, December, January and February (my two children and myself are in this group). However, I bet few of my readers remember many people in their network of friends and family members who were suddenly getting sick with a “flu-like” illness in April or May 2020.

... In a severe or even typical flu season, on average, at least 10 million Americans become sick every month in the three peak months of a six-month flu season (per the CDC’s own historic ILI statistics). Why couldn’t or wouldn’t the same number of people have have been infected with this highly-contagious novel coronavirus?

Indeed, a known knowable about Covid is that cases spiked dramatically in the peak months of the flu seasons of 2020-21 and then again in 2021-2022 (even after most of the population had been vaccinated).

However, according to the official narrative, the novel coronavirus infected virtually no one in the peak months of the 2019-2020 ILI season. Instead, cases didn’t explode until late March and April 2020, when typically an ILI is dying out. And this spike in cases occurred even though the entire country had locked down to prevent the “spread” of “cases” and almost the entire population was wearing masks to prevent the same outcome.

Expand full comment

It's a shame the BBC has forgotten that it's meant to use people like you to tell the truth to people like me! I heard the World Service banging on about how awful China is for imposing dreadful lockdowns on those poor people who, it seems, are mostly refusing to take the jabs. Apparently the Chinese jabs are only about 60% efficient at stopping the virus in its tracks. As opposed to the Safe and Effective Pfizer or Moderna ones which are, as we know, over 95% efficient at stopping people dying. So, presumably the BBC would tell us that all those excess deaths were unvaccinated fools or 80-year olds snatched away before their time by germs spread by the wicked unjabbed.

(I never believed Covid was a deadly killer because not enough people were dying. It was weird how quickly that became an unacceptable viewpoint!)

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Kissing my finger tips! All you need to do to get to Valhalla now is say "there is no virus".

Expand full comment

Haha. "Interesting" is the new metaphor for QED. You are dropping truhg bombs with every post. Time for me to upgrade.

Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley

Keep up your excellent work. Can you get back on Twitter, now that the Stasi are less in control?

Mildly controversial views are now permitted there.

Slightly off-topic, I've been reading the excellent 2021 book 'The Dawn of Everything' by the late David Graeber and David Wengrow. Relevant to the question 'what kind of society do we want?', assuming that we don't want top-down tyranny led by Central Bankers, also given that slow economic decline if not collapse now looks inevitable.

See Nate Hagens' website 'The Great Simplification'. Economies run on surplus energy, not on printed money.

Expand full comment

They want to exterminate us. It's that simple. All your evidence supports this.


Expand full comment
Nov 29, 2022·edited Nov 29, 2022

Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted

Anthony S. Fauci, M.D.,

H. Clifford Lane, M.D., and Robert R. Redfield, M.D.

"On the basis of a case definition requiring a diagnosis of pneumonia, the currently reported case fatality rate is approximately 2%.4 In another article in the Journal, Guan et al.5 report mortality of 1.4% among 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19; these patients had a wide spectrum of disease severity. If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively."


So it's long been know. Known from the start.

"CoVID has given us the opportunity for a reset."

- Justin Trudeau (née Castro)

Expand full comment

The first recorded COVID death in England & Wales occurs in the week ending 26-Jan-20. there are a handful of other deaths that occur over the next couple of months.

But that’s the odd thing. If COVID is so transmissible, how come there were so few COVID deaths during the peak mortality season?


Cause there were a whole lot of 'unrecorded' "covid deaths" before we had tests. The virus was with us all winter 2019 and we didn't even notice.

Expand full comment

Iatrogenic = relating to illness caused by medical examination or treatment. "drugs may cause side effects which can lead to iatrogenic disease"

"The shot is safe and effective. Ok it's not that effective. Ok it causes AIDS and cancer."

Expand full comment

I'm no expert in statistics, but I've been following the Covid debacle closely since the beginning.

In a BMJ rapid response published in December 2020, I noted: "To put things in perspective, consider that over the past eleven months, globally 1.64 million deaths have been attributed to COVID-19. These 1.64 million deaths must be seen in context with the 56 million deaths expected in the world annually."

Just think about that...

1.64 million deaths attributed to COVID-19 in 11 months...and that was with them throwing in every death they could to beat up the numbers...

1.64 million deaths...likely to be mostly elderly people with comorbidities, and near death anyway.

And on the basis of that number, they implemented what has turned out to be a global mass population jab response, across billions of people of all ages and health status, with 'leaky vaccines' that don't prevent infection nor transmission.


How did this happen? How was a 'vaccine solution' implemented against a virus/disease it was known from the beginning wasn't a serious threat to most people?.

Link to my BMJ rapid response: Liberal democracies being turned upside down to 'protect health services', 18 December 2020: https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4847/rr-16

Expand full comment