Don Rumsfeld, a Fascist creep who I presume died a miserable death, as do all evil people, was CEO of the drug company GD Searle that discovered the potent neurotoxin, and artificial sweetener apartame trademarked as Nutrasweet. Rumsfeld pushed the toxin through U.S. federal regulatory despite the known neurotoxicity. Searle was sold to Monsanto which is a Fascist corporation that knows it is causing liver cancer with its potent carcinogen, glyphosate, poisoning the world's food supply. Mosanto was sold to a Fascist corporation, Bayer, run by Nazis swine. Bayer, which perfected killing people in WWII Germany, more recenly killed people with Baycol, and other deadly prescription drugs, and produces carcinogens to poison the world's food supply. It's only a matter of time before they do some so-called vertical integration of Fascist corporate murder, and buy a few conumer product producers. Unilever is a perfect target, and now is the time as Bayer seems to like buying Fascist corporate liabilities due to knowingly killing people. They need a vaccine division so expect Bayer to buy Pfizer any day now.
This post is filled with disinformation. Below is a paper on classification of Glyphosate by the EU and the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) with many Links for those who do not subscribe to hysteria.
Oh, because the NIH which is running a eugenics bioweapon genocide on the planet is a reputable source for information about a known potent hepatocarcinogen that will cost the criminal scum at Monsanto, now Bayer, hundreds of billions of dollars.
Did you notice that the authors come from the European Food Safety Authority, Italy?
From the disclaimer - PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), and Bookshelf are scientific literature databases offered to the public by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). NLM is not a publisher, but rather <b>collects, indexes, and archives scientific literature published by other organizations</b>. The presence of any article, book, or document in these databases does not imply an endorsement of, or concurrence with, the contents by NLM, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), or the U.S. Federal Government.
It's interesting what one can find out if one actually looks into things rather than allowing one's preconceived ideas to cloud one's judgement.
I did read it, and if you find it convincing then clearly you're a moron, or lack any background in science or engineering.
Let's start with the obvious flaws taken verbatim from this idiocy.
"The full composition of the formulation [glyphosate, and it's associated application vehicles] is not disclosed by the manufacturers, therefore, it is impossible for researchers to apply mixture toxicity methods and attribute toxicity to specific ingredients." That's enough to invalidate the entire review. If the idiots doing the review don't even know what they're looking at the review is invalid aside from any retrospective studies looking at glyohosate, in addition to being statistically so weak as to not be meaningful, don't even look at all the ingredients being applied, not to mention metabolites of whatever is in the mixture since metabolites are often more of a problem than the compounds themselves.
"Epidemiological studies of farmers and consumers have very limited information on actual exposure levels (Ntzani et al. 2013), and use the pesticide active substance as descriptor, combining individuals exposed to different formulations without discriminating the different compositions. In the regulatory context, each formulation should be assessed according to its composition, identifying the role of the active substance and of the other ingredients; and the risk management measures are set for the chemical responsible for the effect, either active substance or co-formulant." That's self-explantory even to someone lacking a modicum of background in science or engineering. This, aside from the impossibility of determining a correlation coefficient for dietary exposure to glyphosate and associated compounds, and cancers make this review less than compelling. There are numerous other obvious flaws in it but you're lack of any background in a rigorous science make them meaningless to you.
I'm sure, in your little mind, it invalidates the plethora of expert testimony, and the plethora of Monsanto emails about covering up the carcinogenicity of glyphosate, not to mention the long history of brutally Fascist fuckery of Monsanto. I'm sure in your little mind that if the NIH curated it, in addition to running a eugenics bioweapon genocide on humanity, it must be valid. Don't forget to get your Pfizer, Moderna, or J&J vax, plus boosters. Science after all.
I'm not validating anything to do with Monsanto or glyphosate but when someone posts BS I call them out. I wonder who has the smaller mind when they turn to ad hominem attacks in lieu of arguing their point. You have revealed yourself and I have no interest in any further discussion with you.
My sentiments exactly you amusing little pseudointellectual twerp. You posted a heap of shit, likely without even reading it, thinking because it's from the NIH it must mean something so I called your dumb ass out. Now move along.
Isn’t it interesting how the regulatory agencies, whether medical or other, manage to approve various products w/out proper studies or oversight just long enough to cause potential damage &/or death, before issuing an “oopsie” recall?
Bingo... don't get me started on rapeseed oil replacing sunflower oil in the majority of bakery goods and practically everything else (even in spread which claims to be organic). Rape is high in erucic acid and pretty toxic alongside much of it being bioengineered/GM. Reminds me of the days when Ancel Keys started the whole low fat food campaign (woop woop said Big Food) based on a ridiculous and spurious piece of research, that then led to the replacement of (many good) fats in processed foods with sugar in the form of high fructose corn syrup that led to a catastrophic increase in Type 2 Diabetes (woop woop said Big Pharma..). I could go on and on...
I was using the Dove dry shampoo before the recall. It was fairly simple to sign into their website and request a refund check. This must really be costing them! They also asked for additional comments and I said "I was really enjoying your product before the recall. Hopefully you can develop a replacement product that isn't poison."
they don't smear people as anti-shampoo? hmm. Interesting.
I am *now* anti-shampoo, but I used to wash my children's hair with all the products.
I respect that but do understand I still need to report this comment to the proper authorities. Wrong think is not allowed to spread unabated
Bite me.
Good one!!
Don Rumsfeld, a Fascist creep who I presume died a miserable death, as do all evil people, was CEO of the drug company GD Searle that discovered the potent neurotoxin, and artificial sweetener apartame trademarked as Nutrasweet. Rumsfeld pushed the toxin through U.S. federal regulatory despite the known neurotoxicity. Searle was sold to Monsanto which is a Fascist corporation that knows it is causing liver cancer with its potent carcinogen, glyphosate, poisoning the world's food supply. Mosanto was sold to a Fascist corporation, Bayer, run by Nazis swine. Bayer, which perfected killing people in WWII Germany, more recenly killed people with Baycol, and other deadly prescription drugs, and produces carcinogens to poison the world's food supply. It's only a matter of time before they do some so-called vertical integration of Fascist corporate murder, and buy a few conumer product producers. Unilever is a perfect target, and now is the time as Bayer seems to like buying Fascist corporate liabilities due to knowingly killing people. They need a vaccine division so expect Bayer to buy Pfizer any day now.
This post is filled with disinformation. Below is a paper on classification of Glyphosate by the EU and the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) with many Links for those who do not subscribe to hysteria.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5515989/
Oh, because the NIH which is running a eugenics bioweapon genocide on the planet is a reputable source for information about a known potent hepatocarcinogen that will cost the criminal scum at Monsanto, now Bayer, hundreds of billions of dollars.
Did you read it? Of course not.
Did you notice that the authors come from the European Food Safety Authority, Italy?
From the disclaimer - PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), and Bookshelf are scientific literature databases offered to the public by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). NLM is not a publisher, but rather <b>collects, indexes, and archives scientific literature published by other organizations</b>. The presence of any article, book, or document in these databases does not imply an endorsement of, or concurrence with, the contents by NLM, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), or the U.S. Federal Government.
It's interesting what one can find out if one actually looks into things rather than allowing one's preconceived ideas to cloud one's judgement.
I did read it, and if you find it convincing then clearly you're a moron, or lack any background in science or engineering.
Let's start with the obvious flaws taken verbatim from this idiocy.
"The full composition of the formulation [glyphosate, and it's associated application vehicles] is not disclosed by the manufacturers, therefore, it is impossible for researchers to apply mixture toxicity methods and attribute toxicity to specific ingredients." That's enough to invalidate the entire review. If the idiots doing the review don't even know what they're looking at the review is invalid aside from any retrospective studies looking at glyohosate, in addition to being statistically so weak as to not be meaningful, don't even look at all the ingredients being applied, not to mention metabolites of whatever is in the mixture since metabolites are often more of a problem than the compounds themselves.
"Epidemiological studies of farmers and consumers have very limited information on actual exposure levels (Ntzani et al. 2013), and use the pesticide active substance as descriptor, combining individuals exposed to different formulations without discriminating the different compositions. In the regulatory context, each formulation should be assessed according to its composition, identifying the role of the active substance and of the other ingredients; and the risk management measures are set for the chemical responsible for the effect, either active substance or co-formulant." That's self-explantory even to someone lacking a modicum of background in science or engineering. This, aside from the impossibility of determining a correlation coefficient for dietary exposure to glyphosate and associated compounds, and cancers make this review less than compelling. There are numerous other obvious flaws in it but you're lack of any background in a rigorous science make them meaningless to you.
I'm sure, in your little mind, it invalidates the plethora of expert testimony, and the plethora of Monsanto emails about covering up the carcinogenicity of glyphosate, not to mention the long history of brutally Fascist fuckery of Monsanto. I'm sure in your little mind that if the NIH curated it, in addition to running a eugenics bioweapon genocide on humanity, it must be valid. Don't forget to get your Pfizer, Moderna, or J&J vax, plus boosters. Science after all.
I'm not validating anything to do with Monsanto or glyphosate but when someone posts BS I call them out. I wonder who has the smaller mind when they turn to ad hominem attacks in lieu of arguing their point. You have revealed yourself and I have no interest in any further discussion with you.
My sentiments exactly you amusing little pseudointellectual twerp. You posted a heap of shit, likely without even reading it, thinking because it's from the NIH it must mean something so I called your dumb ass out. Now move along.
Bourla to his production team managers: "Hey, did you remember to put benzene in the bivalent boosters?"
Isn’t it interesting how the regulatory agencies, whether medical or other, manage to approve various products w/out proper studies or oversight just long enough to cause potential damage &/or death, before issuing an “oopsie” recall?
I guess if they can’t force the jab, there are plenty of other avenues to slowly kill us off
Bingo... don't get me started on rapeseed oil replacing sunflower oil in the majority of bakery goods and practically everything else (even in spread which claims to be organic). Rape is high in erucic acid and pretty toxic alongside much of it being bioengineered/GM. Reminds me of the days when Ancel Keys started the whole low fat food campaign (woop woop said Big Food) based on a ridiculous and spurious piece of research, that then led to the replacement of (many good) fats in processed foods with sugar in the form of high fructose corn syrup that led to a catastrophic increase in Type 2 Diabetes (woop woop said Big Pharma..). I could go on and on...
What do we do??? I live in a townhouse w/ no ability to “farm” things….
Too bad the mRNA products aren't French leek crumbles:
https://www.fda.gov/safety/recalls-market-withdrawals-safety-alerts/daily-harvest-issues-voluntary-recall-french-lentil-leek-crumbles-due-potential-health-risk
Good thing I've been using dish soap to wash my hair.
I love it! Lmao!
I had the same question. It's a Brave New World.
Dry shampoo? Do you use that whilst having a dry shower?
I once knew a guy who used to "dry" mop his floor. It was filthy. True story.
Instead of singing in the dry shower, tell dry humor jokes.
Alas, Unilver has only one lever over doctors and govts, whereas pfizer has plenty.
The list of what won’t kill us grows shorter and shorter, and more unaffordable and difficult to obtain.
Real food, moderate exercise, a good night’s sleep, fresh air, ☀️ shine without burning 🥵 🔥 will do even better than not killing you.
Very true. Forgive my gloom and doom take. It’s all too easy to be discouraged from time to time.
Take 2 bottles of Benzene into the shower? Not me.
I'm bald.
May be our corrupted Congress is working on extending liability protection for all industries, as we speak ...
Great. I just used mine this morning. I guess if they can’t get u to take the shots they will get you some other way
Hahaha ha ha!
Benzine. WTF.
Class one carcinogen.
I wash my hair and self with coconut oil soap.
I make it myself.
Works great.
No benzine. :)
Maybe folks can burn 🔥 the shampoo 🧴 this winter ❄️ to keep warm while they try to deal with high ⛽️ fuel prices and without 🇷🇺 Russian oil.
I was using the Dove dry shampoo before the recall. It was fairly simple to sign into their website and request a refund check. This must really be costing them! They also asked for additional comments and I said "I was really enjoying your product before the recall. Hopefully you can develop a replacement product that isn't poison."