I think it was Prof Angus Dalgleish the other day who said that any vaccine that needs 3 shots clearly doesn't work!
I don't know about everyone else here but I used to believe that vaccines against the big killer diseases were brilliant but now I am full of doubt. My mother used to talk of whole families being taken away in the middle of the night with diptheria (in the 1930s) and I read once how you die in a terrible way from it. So a vaccine to prevent it seemed an excellent thing. Likewise, I knew people at school with calipers because of polio. I read enough Victorian novels to know how dreadful TB was.
So vaccines seemed amazing, sensible, life-saving things. And now I just don't know. When my kids were babies I had arguments with doctors because I refused jabs that were for the non-killers. I figured you need a few illnesses so as to build up your immune system and my kids were fit and healthy.
But now I question all of it. Are we just the lucky ones who had vaccinations without side effects? Where did those old diseases go if the vaccines didn't work - it can't all be down to clean water and more food can it? Or can it?
"..- it can't all be down to clean water and more food can it? Or can it?"
Yes, it can!
Look at those areas of the world (specially the generational 'Refugee Camps') where good food and clean water are scarce, but inoculations are universal; Those have huge infant mortality!
The amount of vaccines now required is enormous and, in my mind, will seriously impair an immature immune system. I agree that babies and toddlers need exposure in varying degrees, although I do find it unusual to see newborns travelling on the tube.
I had what was required when a babe, DPT and oral polio. Nothing else. I chose not to vaccinate my children and they have chosen not to vaccinate their children, all are thriving. Is this a one off? who knows.
We now live in a time of clean water from a tap, bathing facilities, on the whole better living conditions. Access to fresh food is available, sadly underused for various reasons. Yes, this does make an enormous impact on life in general, especially babes.
Not to forget... the introduction of the various vaccinations came after the particular disease was on the wane, there are many graphs available to see this, I am pretty sure they are on Midwestern Doctor’s Substack.
Last thing, where are the controlled trials for the childhood vaccines? Why is there an increase in Autism, is there a link?
Just for interest, both my parents had TB during and just after WW2, they didn’t have a complete pair of lungs between them, both lived into their 90’s, hey ho
'So a vaccine to prevent it seemed an excellent thing' - a magic wand to wave at the horrible thing and make it go away seemed an excellent thing - this is how psyops work: they play into wishful thinking
'Are we just the lucky ones who had vaccinations without side effects?' - how do we know there were no side-effects? perhaps they just haven't shown up yet
'where did all the old diseases go..' who knows? you don't have to answer that question to make the case against vaccines - the burden of proof of safe and effective is on them, not us.
My mother had Asian flu when she was 14-15 yrs old, she said she’s never been as ill in her life as she was with that but recovered quickly with no lasting effects.
At 82 she’s had flu in different forms a handful of times, while it might have knocked off her feet for a few days she been fine.
My mother has never had a flu jab in her life either, her initial infection when she had the most robust immune system has stood her in good stead protecting her.
These days young children and teenagers are offered a flu spray for something that their bodies can deal with and learn to protect them for the rest of their lives.
If the last three years hasn’t taught people governments and pharma are not about health, then nothing will.
You may have heard about the Ottawa policewoman who started investigating the dramatic increase in SIDS deaths by asking the mothers about whether mother or baby had recently gotten shots. She got suspended for even asking.
0.4% infant mortality rate with live births of just over 600,000 means there were approximately 2,400 infant deaths in 2022. There were 214,000 abortions in 2021.
I'm definitely not the groupie type, but, I'm thinking of getting a 'Joel Smalley' tattoo on my left shoulder. Keep up your invaluable contribution to humanity Joel.
I believe it is accurate to say safety studies have not been done on childhood vaccines. Responses to FOIA requests support this. WIth that said, what can we learn from your graph?
Your data is for England and Wales, but the US CDC defines infant mortality as:
"Infant mortality is the death of an infant before his or her first birthday. The infant mortality rate is the number of infant deaths for every 1,000 live births."
It would be very interesting to plot the chart with the deaths that took place before the 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th birthday. We might learn much more.
Your chart shows that vaccines provide no measurable improvement in infant mortality (death before first birthday), but it also doesn't show any strong signals that the vaccines cause additional deaths. The slight inflection points you identify could be a very small signal or they could be noise. We would have to change the definition to something other than "infant" mortality, but we need to plot the same graph and show how the children fare over their childhood. Deaths from vaccines may not happen in the first year of life. The data to do this may not exist, but if it does we can learn much more. Larger inflection points that line up temporally with vaccine rollouts may become apparent if we look at death before the 5th birthday.
Some studies show that unvaccinated children are much healthier overall and vaccinated children have multiples higher incidences of a number of diseases and allergies. Death is an important metric but so is overall health.
You might find this interesting. It doesn't indicate whether the influenza vaccines tested were widely rolled out but seems that they were of little use regardless. Plus ca change.
This article shows nothing about Dr. Naggasi's findings of the massive spike in 'still born' babies in Vancouver BC after the roll-out of the MRNA (vaccine (?)).
Perhaps the data is not released by the government statistics departments. But, I do not think it is relevant in the current picture, to present data which does not encompass the entire timeline of this atrocity.
The only thing these charts prove to me, is that "A Virus" did not cause a spike in infant mortality.
This isn't about the virus or the COVID vaccine. We are now compelled to look beyond the last few years and examine whether this has been going on (perhaps to a less obvious extent) for a much longer time.
No flu vaccine in 1968. Likely just the flu itself. I read recently an article that told of 50% of the boys in Eton school being very badly ill simultaneously, so it was quite a big deal. But the important thing is how governments reacted. The British government at the time did discuss aggressive NPI measures but decided against frightening the general population. As a result we got on with life - no lockdowns, no fear-mongering, no hysteria. O to be back in 1968,
I think it was Prof Angus Dalgleish the other day who said that any vaccine that needs 3 shots clearly doesn't work!
I don't know about everyone else here but I used to believe that vaccines against the big killer diseases were brilliant but now I am full of doubt. My mother used to talk of whole families being taken away in the middle of the night with diptheria (in the 1930s) and I read once how you die in a terrible way from it. So a vaccine to prevent it seemed an excellent thing. Likewise, I knew people at school with calipers because of polio. I read enough Victorian novels to know how dreadful TB was.
So vaccines seemed amazing, sensible, life-saving things. And now I just don't know. When my kids were babies I had arguments with doctors because I refused jabs that were for the non-killers. I figured you need a few illnesses so as to build up your immune system and my kids were fit and healthy.
But now I question all of it. Are we just the lucky ones who had vaccinations without side effects? Where did those old diseases go if the vaccines didn't work - it can't all be down to clean water and more food can it? Or can it?
Check out the Midwestern Doctor’s substack. 100 years of vaccine harms or something similar. Fascinating
Yes it is.
"The Century of Evidence That Vaccines Cause Infant Deaths" https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/a-century-of-evidence-has-accumulated found it!
"..- it can't all be down to clean water and more food can it? Or can it?"
Yes, it can!
Look at those areas of the world (specially the generational 'Refugee Camps') where good food and clean water are scarce, but inoculations are universal; Those have huge infant mortality!
Coincidentally of course, the world’s greatest philanthropist, gates- dedicates zero dollars to food and clean water.
Hard to profit from food and water
Bingo. Can’t multiply your investment times 10 or 20. And it actually promotes health. A lose - lose for a vulture like him.
https://dissolvingillusions.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Dissolving-Illusions-Disease-Vaccines-and-The-Forgotten-History-FREE-Chapters-.pdf
https://winteroak.org.uk/2023/06/27/vaccine-evangelists-apostates-and-apologists-part-1-the-evangelists/
The amount of vaccines now required is enormous and, in my mind, will seriously impair an immature immune system. I agree that babies and toddlers need exposure in varying degrees, although I do find it unusual to see newborns travelling on the tube.
I had what was required when a babe, DPT and oral polio. Nothing else. I chose not to vaccinate my children and they have chosen not to vaccinate their children, all are thriving. Is this a one off? who knows.
We now live in a time of clean water from a tap, bathing facilities, on the whole better living conditions. Access to fresh food is available, sadly underused for various reasons. Yes, this does make an enormous impact on life in general, especially babes.
Not to forget... the introduction of the various vaccinations came after the particular disease was on the wane, there are many graphs available to see this, I am pretty sure they are on Midwestern Doctor’s Substack.
Last thing, where are the controlled trials for the childhood vaccines? Why is there an increase in Autism, is there a link?
Just for interest, both my parents had TB during and just after WW2, they didn’t have a complete pair of lungs between them, both lived into their 90’s, hey ho
KMT the amount that is listed now is beyond ridiculous, not a single person on the planet needs all, if any of those shots.
'So a vaccine to prevent it seemed an excellent thing' - a magic wand to wave at the horrible thing and make it go away seemed an excellent thing - this is how psyops work: they play into wishful thinking
'Are we just the lucky ones who had vaccinations without side effects?' - how do we know there were no side-effects? perhaps they just haven't shown up yet
'where did all the old diseases go..' who knows? you don't have to answer that question to make the case against vaccines - the burden of proof of safe and effective is on them, not us.
My mother had Asian flu when she was 14-15 yrs old, she said she’s never been as ill in her life as she was with that but recovered quickly with no lasting effects.
At 82 she’s had flu in different forms a handful of times, while it might have knocked off her feet for a few days she been fine.
My mother has never had a flu jab in her life either, her initial infection when she had the most robust immune system has stood her in good stead protecting her.
These days young children and teenagers are offered a flu spray for something that their bodies can deal with and learn to protect them for the rest of their lives.
If the last three years hasn’t taught people governments and pharma are not about health, then nothing will.
Dissolving my vaxxed illusions:
👇🏼
https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/dissolving-my-vaxxed-illusions?s=r
You may have heard about the Ottawa policewoman who started investigating the dramatic increase in SIDS deaths by asking the mothers about whether mother or baby had recently gotten shots. She got suspended for even asking.
0.4% infant mortality rate with live births of just over 600,000 means there were approximately 2,400 infant deaths in 2022. There were 214,000 abortions in 2021.
Truth. And a horrifying commentary on our culture
I'm definitely not the groupie type, but, I'm thinking of getting a 'Joel Smalley' tattoo on my left shoulder. Keep up your invaluable contribution to humanity Joel.
I believe it is accurate to say safety studies have not been done on childhood vaccines. Responses to FOIA requests support this. WIth that said, what can we learn from your graph?
Your data is for England and Wales, but the US CDC defines infant mortality as:
"Infant mortality is the death of an infant before his or her first birthday. The infant mortality rate is the number of infant deaths for every 1,000 live births."
It would be very interesting to plot the chart with the deaths that took place before the 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th birthday. We might learn much more.
Your chart shows that vaccines provide no measurable improvement in infant mortality (death before first birthday), but it also doesn't show any strong signals that the vaccines cause additional deaths. The slight inflection points you identify could be a very small signal or they could be noise. We would have to change the definition to something other than "infant" mortality, but we need to plot the same graph and show how the children fare over their childhood. Deaths from vaccines may not happen in the first year of life. The data to do this may not exist, but if it does we can learn much more. Larger inflection points that line up temporally with vaccine rollouts may become apparent if we look at death before the 5th birthday.
Some studies show that unvaccinated children are much healthier overall and vaccinated children have multiples higher incidences of a number of diseases and allergies. Death is an important metric but so is overall health.
You know I'm doing age of death from 0 to 105 for every birth cohort since 1880, right?! All these questions will be answered in the fullness of time!
I did not know. This is the first article of yours I have read. Thanks.
Include me in to share costs.
BTW, I seem to have lost my ability to post on Substack. Likely a javascript thing, though.
If you want to go further back than 1900, the Human Mortality Database goes back to 1841 for GRB/NW
https://www.mortality.org/Data/ZippedDataFiles
Thank you for all your work on this, Joel. It’s an amazing effort.
Would be happy if you would take this on. Inquiring minds want to know, and there are not many statisticians we trust.
Wait till you see the mortality after the covid "vaccine"...
You might find this interesting. It doesn't indicate whether the influenza vaccines tested were widely rolled out but seems that they were of little use regardless. Plus ca change.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2130832/pdf/jhyg00093-0019.pdf
This article shows nothing about Dr. Naggasi's findings of the massive spike in 'still born' babies in Vancouver BC after the roll-out of the MRNA (vaccine (?)).
Perhaps the data is not released by the government statistics departments. But, I do not think it is relevant in the current picture, to present data which does not encompass the entire timeline of this atrocity.
The only thing these charts prove to me, is that "A Virus" did not cause a spike in infant mortality.
This isn't about the virus or the COVID vaccine. We are now compelled to look beyond the last few years and examine whether this has been going on (perhaps to a less obvious extent) for a much longer time.
What is dashed black line?
Correlates in 1968 with "Hong Kong Flu" so possibly an upswing in vaccinations?
No flu vaccine in 1968. Likely just the flu itself. I read recently an article that told of 50% of the boys in Eton school being very badly ill simultaneously, so it was quite a big deal. But the important thing is how governments reacted. The British government at the time did discuss aggressive NPI measures but decided against frightening the general population. As a result we got on with life - no lockdowns, no fear-mongering, no hysteria. O to be back in 1968,
Fraid not.
This is December 1968.
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/imageserver/newspapers/P29pZD1DSFAxOTY4MDMyMy4yLjEzMSZjb2xvdXJzPTMyJmV4dD1naWYmYXJlYT0yJndpZHRoPTQwNw==
Fair enough - stand corrected on that.