I think it was Prof Angus Dalgleish the other day who said that any vaccine that needs 3 shots clearly doesn't work!
I don't know about everyone else here but I used to believe that vaccines against the big killer diseases were brilliant but now I am full of doubt. My mother used to talk of whole families being taken away in the middle of the night with diptheria (in the 1930s) and I read once how you die in a terrible way from it. So a vaccine to prevent it seemed an excellent thing. Likewise, I knew people at school with calipers because of polio. I read enough Victorian novels to know how dreadful TB was.
So vaccines seemed amazing, sensible, life-saving things. And now I just don't know. When my kids were babies I had arguments with doctors because I refused jabs that were for the non-killers. I figured you need a few illnesses so as to build up your immune system and my kids were fit and healthy.
But now I question all of it. Are we just the lucky ones who had vaccinations without side effects? Where did those old diseases go if the vaccines didn't work - it can't all be down to clean water and more food can it? Or can it?
You may have heard about the Ottawa policewoman who started investigating the dramatic increase in SIDS deaths by asking the mothers about whether mother or baby had recently gotten shots. She got suspended for even asking.
0.4% infant mortality rate with live births of just over 600,000 means there were approximately 2,400 infant deaths in 2022. There were 214,000 abortions in 2021.
I'm definitely not the groupie type, but, I'm thinking of getting a 'Joel Smalley' tattoo on my left shoulder. Keep up your invaluable contribution to humanity Joel.
I believe it is accurate to say safety studies have not been done on childhood vaccines. Responses to FOIA requests support this. WIth that said, what can we learn from your graph?
Your data is for England and Wales, but the US CDC defines infant mortality as:
"Infant mortality is the death of an infant before his or her first birthday. The infant mortality rate is the number of infant deaths for every 1,000 live births."
It would be very interesting to plot the chart with the deaths that took place before the 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th birthday. We might learn much more.
Your chart shows that vaccines provide no measurable improvement in infant mortality (death before first birthday), but it also doesn't show any strong signals that the vaccines cause additional deaths. The slight inflection points you identify could be a very small signal or they could be noise. We would have to change the definition to something other than "infant" mortality, but we need to plot the same graph and show how the children fare over their childhood. Deaths from vaccines may not happen in the first year of life. The data to do this may not exist, but if it does we can learn much more. Larger inflection points that line up temporally with vaccine rollouts may become apparent if we look at death before the 5th birthday.
Some studies show that unvaccinated children are much healthier overall and vaccinated children have multiples higher incidences of a number of diseases and allergies. Death is an important metric but so is overall health.
You might find this interesting. It doesn't indicate whether the influenza vaccines tested were widely rolled out but seems that they were of little use regardless. Plus ca change.
This article shows nothing about Dr. Naggasi's findings of the massive spike in 'still born' babies in Vancouver BC after the roll-out of the MRNA (vaccine (?)).
Perhaps the data is not released by the government statistics departments. But, I do not think it is relevant in the current picture, to present data which does not encompass the entire timeline of this atrocity.
The only thing these charts prove to me, is that "A Virus" did not cause a spike in infant mortality.
I think it was Prof Angus Dalgleish the other day who said that any vaccine that needs 3 shots clearly doesn't work!
I don't know about everyone else here but I used to believe that vaccines against the big killer diseases were brilliant but now I am full of doubt. My mother used to talk of whole families being taken away in the middle of the night with diptheria (in the 1930s) and I read once how you die in a terrible way from it. So a vaccine to prevent it seemed an excellent thing. Likewise, I knew people at school with calipers because of polio. I read enough Victorian novels to know how dreadful TB was.
So vaccines seemed amazing, sensible, life-saving things. And now I just don't know. When my kids were babies I had arguments with doctors because I refused jabs that were for the non-killers. I figured you need a few illnesses so as to build up your immune system and my kids were fit and healthy.
But now I question all of it. Are we just the lucky ones who had vaccinations without side effects? Where did those old diseases go if the vaccines didn't work - it can't all be down to clean water and more food can it? Or can it?
You may have heard about the Ottawa policewoman who started investigating the dramatic increase in SIDS deaths by asking the mothers about whether mother or baby had recently gotten shots. She got suspended for even asking.
0.4% infant mortality rate with live births of just over 600,000 means there were approximately 2,400 infant deaths in 2022. There were 214,000 abortions in 2021.
I'm definitely not the groupie type, but, I'm thinking of getting a 'Joel Smalley' tattoo on my left shoulder. Keep up your invaluable contribution to humanity Joel.
I believe it is accurate to say safety studies have not been done on childhood vaccines. Responses to FOIA requests support this. WIth that said, what can we learn from your graph?
Your data is for England and Wales, but the US CDC defines infant mortality as:
"Infant mortality is the death of an infant before his or her first birthday. The infant mortality rate is the number of infant deaths for every 1,000 live births."
It would be very interesting to plot the chart with the deaths that took place before the 2nd, 3rd, 4th or 5th birthday. We might learn much more.
Your chart shows that vaccines provide no measurable improvement in infant mortality (death before first birthday), but it also doesn't show any strong signals that the vaccines cause additional deaths. The slight inflection points you identify could be a very small signal or they could be noise. We would have to change the definition to something other than "infant" mortality, but we need to plot the same graph and show how the children fare over their childhood. Deaths from vaccines may not happen in the first year of life. The data to do this may not exist, but if it does we can learn much more. Larger inflection points that line up temporally with vaccine rollouts may become apparent if we look at death before the 5th birthday.
Some studies show that unvaccinated children are much healthier overall and vaccinated children have multiples higher incidences of a number of diseases and allergies. Death is an important metric but so is overall health.
If you want to go further back than 1900, the Human Mortality Database goes back to 1841 for GRB/NW
https://www.mortality.org/Data/ZippedDataFiles
Thank you for all your work on this, Joel. It’s an amazing effort.
Would be happy if you would take this on. Inquiring minds want to know, and there are not many statisticians we trust.
Wait till you see the mortality after the covid "vaccine"...
You might find this interesting. It doesn't indicate whether the influenza vaccines tested were widely rolled out but seems that they were of little use regardless. Plus ca change.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2130832/pdf/jhyg00093-0019.pdf
This article shows nothing about Dr. Naggasi's findings of the massive spike in 'still born' babies in Vancouver BC after the roll-out of the MRNA (vaccine (?)).
Perhaps the data is not released by the government statistics departments. But, I do not think it is relevant in the current picture, to present data which does not encompass the entire timeline of this atrocity.
The only thing these charts prove to me, is that "A Virus" did not cause a spike in infant mortality.
What is dashed black line?
Correlates in 1968 with "Hong Kong Flu" so possibly an upswing in vaccinations?