How wonderful! Nobody is dying anymore! Presumably the few deaths occurring are in the wicked unjabbed who deserve what they get. Well, hallejulah and praise the Lord, we have been saved. (and other total nonsense).
Still, at least with nobody dying now we don't have to worry about nobody being born to replace them.
I don't even think they are being transparent with the data from the FOI requests. There seems to be obfuscation at every turn. I think the reality is much worse. They are trying their best to not let the normies wake up to what's actually going on around them.
In the US, accidental deaths have the longest lag time getting entered into the CDC - often 6+ months.
For example at the end of 2021 the CDC had logged a total of 268,996 accidental deaths, but it would grow to 313,496 deaths by June of 2022.
Since accidental deaths comprise a larger slice of "all cause mortality" in the younger cohort perhaps this is part of the delay you are seeing?
To your larger point, it is unacceptable that we taxpayers who fund the agencies to collect and report this data have such shit product. If this was privatized these agencies would be fired and replaced by the taxpayers so we could have some competence, clarity, and rigor.
The CDC does not work for you, a taxpayer. They have have their own foundation and receive funding from Bill Gates, etc. Yes, the receive Federal funding as well. They do not respond to taxpayers only to high ranking Gov't officials (executive branch), Congress set this up and are just not interested and or do not care. Other agencies have the same issues, FDA, Dept. Agriculture, etc. Follow the money.
"We have the best government that money can buy. It's just that you and I do not have enough to purchase access and/or decision making." my quote but you can use it.
The only possible way to fix this is to reelect no one. But as we have learned since 2020 and 2022 elections:
"The people who cast the votes don't decide an election, the people who count the votes do."
The German equivalent, Statistisches Bundesamt, is unable to provide the breakdown of causes of death (Todesursachenstatistik) for 2021. Usually such reports were published during summer; now they just moved the promised date from November to mid December...
That reeks of withholding registrations. Exactly the same thing as is happening in the Philippines, my monitoring jurisdiction... from reasonably regular reporting for 2021, Jan to September, the wheels then fell off! The huge spike in deaths was noted, then someone made the decision to cover up!
Don’t know if you watched Senator Johnson hold a round table with all the doctors fighting for us in the USA. Each and everyone of these doctors are people with integrity and care for their fellow man.
It makes sense to me that the younger adult deaths associated with acute and progressive damage from the primary two shots given in 2021 have peaked, and younger adults are refusing the boosters that would otherwise maintain those death peaks in 2022. Old and very old people are back to dying on time from everything that is usually expected to kill them, instead of dying just a bit earlier from neglect, isolation, acute effects of gene jab or immune suppression leading to more infections with Covid and not Covid etc. I wonder if the fetal deaths are now declining too. I hardly think many UK pregnant women are still opting for boosters so the ones that do manage to get pregnant two years after their last primary dose might be ok. Pregnant women can also die from complications of carrying a gene-jab-deceased fetus that does not get ejected naturally or removed medically on time, but I think that specific number of maternal deaths would be too small to identify since the maternal mortality rate in the UK is very low overall. But I thought of another reason for the decline. Maybe there is a secret underground movement among nurses to fill those syringes with saline instead of booster gene juice, and some of the formerly compliant supervisors are comfortable looking the other way. I kind of think the German nurse who got fired but not otherwise punished for doing that might have been the scapegoat that keeps the others safe.
About to grab a cuppa then grab the latest file version, then open the mince pie tin and munch my way through some ideas on how to estimate missing counts.
So, it could actually be that close to 25,000 people have already died as a direct result of the Covid 19 'vaccines'! And it is relatively early days. And the MHRA figures are for the UK only, I presume. My goodness the total for the whole word must be extraordinary. Good job the media ignores the data as the politicians would be quaking in their boots.
Good for him. It makes me tear my hair out how everybody looks away. One man is in prison for trying to highlight the dangers of the so-called vaccines. He hopes to use the statistics on adverse effects in his defence but will anybody listen? If they do, they will no doubt explain it away. We are dealing with a corrupt load of puppets who pretend they are doing the right thing. How can it be right to sacrifice a life today no matter what you think is coming tomorrow?
Morning! I'm promoting this issue as 'Joel's holes' over in my substack. One subscriber has asked what difference is found between the first release of your FOI file and the latest ONS update (with error correction). A good question and I suspect the answer is not a lot. Have you had a quick look at differences?
If I am seeing straight, drop-off for over 45s occurs from Dec 2021 (which could be tail-off of usual Winter deaths), below 40 all in Sept 2021. It looks most likely to be a reporting artefact, but if not it invites speculation. Reduced booster uptake among young people therefore fewer vaccine related deaths, for example?
Fascinating. If data is being withheld, why make it so obviously anomalous? Hmmm...So will the next narrative be that the mRNA vaccines actually do modify your DNA and the proverbial fountain of youth has been found?
I don't think it is being withheld. I genuinely think it is the inadequacy of the system that the highest statistics authority in the country seems disinterested in fixing. These are deaths reported to the coroner for investigation and they aren't recorded in the mortality dataset until he has established a cause of death. Yeah, STUPID, right? Exactly at the time when suspicious deaths are being referred to the coroner is the time that they aren't recorded in the data for analysis for intelligent, discerning data analysts to identify the safety signal. Instead, we have the ONS and the UKSA. And people die.
Do they give the number of deaths reported to the coroner or do they just leave them out entirely?
If they report total deaths by registration date including coroner reported deaths you may be able to estimate the “backlog” by subtracting the total deaths registered from the total deaths by date.
Of course not! They claim they only get reports after the coroner has certified. The system is flawed and they don't even recognise the problem. But we're supposed to trust their analyses?
Ah yes. It’s important that the coroner confirms that the person is actually dead. All those people misdiagnosed as dead could really mess with the figures.
How wonderful! Nobody is dying anymore! Presumably the few deaths occurring are in the wicked unjabbed who deserve what they get. Well, hallejulah and praise the Lord, we have been saved. (and other total nonsense).
Still, at least with nobody dying now we don't have to worry about nobody being born to replace them.
I don't even think they are being transparent with the data from the FOI requests. There seems to be obfuscation at every turn. I think the reality is much worse. They are trying their best to not let the normies wake up to what's actually going on around them.
In the U.S., I would just be happy if we could get all-cause by vax status, honestly defined.
You and me both! I've given up trying to get that raw data.
In the US, accidental deaths have the longest lag time getting entered into the CDC - often 6+ months.
For example at the end of 2021 the CDC had logged a total of 268,996 accidental deaths, but it would grow to 313,496 deaths by June of 2022.
Since accidental deaths comprise a larger slice of "all cause mortality" in the younger cohort perhaps this is part of the delay you are seeing?
To your larger point, it is unacceptable that we taxpayers who fund the agencies to collect and report this data have such shit product. If this was privatized these agencies would be fired and replaced by the taxpayers so we could have some competence, clarity, and rigor.
The CDC does not work for you, a taxpayer. They have have their own foundation and receive funding from Bill Gates, etc. Yes, the receive Federal funding as well. They do not respond to taxpayers only to high ranking Gov't officials (executive branch), Congress set this up and are just not interested and or do not care. Other agencies have the same issues, FDA, Dept. Agriculture, etc. Follow the money.
"We have the best government that money can buy. It's just that you and I do not have enough to purchase access and/or decision making." my quote but you can use it.
The only possible way to fix this is to reelect no one. But as we have learned since 2020 and 2022 elections:
"The people who cast the votes don't decide an election, the people who count the votes do."
Joseph Stalin
Welcome to the 21st Century, Comrade
The German equivalent, Statistisches Bundesamt, is unable to provide the breakdown of causes of death (Todesursachenstatistik) for 2021. Usually such reports were published during summer; now they just moved the promised date from November to mid December...
https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Gesundheit/Todesursachen/verzoegerung-daten-todesfaelle.html;jsessionid=571759D58F33D0F71ACD36C30F74DB04.live722
That reeks of withholding registrations. Exactly the same thing as is happening in the Philippines, my monitoring jurisdiction... from reasonably regular reporting for 2021, Jan to September, the wheels then fell off! The huge spike in deaths was noted, then someone made the decision to cover up!
Don’t know if you watched Senator Johnson hold a round table with all the doctors fighting for us in the USA. Each and everyone of these doctors are people with integrity and care for their fellow man.
https://substack.com/app-link/post?publication_id=748806&post_id=89245096&utm_source=post-email-title&isFreemail=true&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo1NjQ1NTAwNSwicG9zdF9pZCI6ODkyNDUwOTYsImlhdCI6MTY3MDQ0MDM1NywiZXhwIjoxNjczMDMyMzU3LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNzQ4ODA2Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.LVkqj-P-EFf0dUcCBv2NkYhakfIyd40HAD7ogm2W2ys
It makes sense to me that the younger adult deaths associated with acute and progressive damage from the primary two shots given in 2021 have peaked, and younger adults are refusing the boosters that would otherwise maintain those death peaks in 2022. Old and very old people are back to dying on time from everything that is usually expected to kill them, instead of dying just a bit earlier from neglect, isolation, acute effects of gene jab or immune suppression leading to more infections with Covid and not Covid etc. I wonder if the fetal deaths are now declining too. I hardly think many UK pregnant women are still opting for boosters so the ones that do manage to get pregnant two years after their last primary dose might be ok. Pregnant women can also die from complications of carrying a gene-jab-deceased fetus that does not get ejected naturally or removed medically on time, but I think that specific number of maternal deaths would be too small to identify since the maternal mortality rate in the UK is very low overall. But I thought of another reason for the decline. Maybe there is a secret underground movement among nurses to fill those syringes with saline instead of booster gene juice, and some of the formerly compliant supervisors are comfortable looking the other way. I kind of think the German nurse who got fired but not otherwise punished for doing that might have been the scapegoat that keeps the others safe.
I hadn't heard that. Can you provide a link?
About to grab a cuppa then grab the latest file version, then open the mince pie tin and munch my way through some ideas on how to estimate missing counts.
Younger people usually get an obituary. Take a big enough city, maybe Brighton, and see if the obits track the proffered statistics.
Look at the 2018 archive as a baseline or choose a base year from Joel's data.
Nice idea - all we need now is somebody with enough time to spare!
Somebody has asked me how many people have died as a result of the Covid "vaccines" so I looked at the MHRA Yellow Card stats which showed 2,362 deaths as far as I can tell. Is that really the case? I thought it was far more. Are these cumulative figures, does anybody know please? It is important as the person concerned is in prison for trying to stop people having the jabs as he thought they would be dangerous, and he now needs some proof that he was right! https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting#annex-1-vaccine-analysis-print
Yellow card is at least ten times under reported.
So, it could actually be that close to 25,000 people have already died as a direct result of the Covid 19 'vaccines'! And it is relatively early days. And the MHRA figures are for the UK only, I presume. My goodness the total for the whole word must be extraordinary. Good job the media ignores the data as the politicians would be quaking in their boots.
Andrew Bridgen, MP, made a detailed speech in the Commons yesterday, to a rapt audience of 5 members.
Last week he was reassured by WEF minion PM Sunak that the injections were safe and effective.
Good for him. It makes me tear my hair out how everybody looks away. One man is in prison for trying to highlight the dangers of the so-called vaccines. He hopes to use the statistics on adverse effects in his defence but will anybody listen? If they do, they will no doubt explain it away. We are dealing with a corrupt load of puppets who pretend they are doing the right thing. How can it be right to sacrifice a life today no matter what you think is coming tomorrow?
"This data brought to you by Pfizer"?
Thanks Joel. Is there anything as individuals that we can do to put pressure on to improve things?
Keep writing to MPs, government agencies, the media....
Morning! I'm promoting this issue as 'Joel's holes' over in my substack. One subscriber has asked what difference is found between the first release of your FOI file and the latest ONS update (with error correction). A good question and I suspect the answer is not a lot. Have you had a quick look at differences?
If I am seeing straight, drop-off for over 45s occurs from Dec 2021 (which could be tail-off of usual Winter deaths), below 40 all in Sept 2021. It looks most likely to be a reporting artefact, but if not it invites speculation. Reduced booster uptake among young people therefore fewer vaccine related deaths, for example?
Fascinating. If data is being withheld, why make it so obviously anomalous? Hmmm...So will the next narrative be that the mRNA vaccines actually do modify your DNA and the proverbial fountain of youth has been found?
I don't think it is being withheld. I genuinely think it is the inadequacy of the system that the highest statistics authority in the country seems disinterested in fixing. These are deaths reported to the coroner for investigation and they aren't recorded in the mortality dataset until he has established a cause of death. Yeah, STUPID, right? Exactly at the time when suspicious deaths are being referred to the coroner is the time that they aren't recorded in the data for analysis for intelligent, discerning data analysts to identify the safety signal. Instead, we have the ONS and the UKSA. And people die.
Do they give the number of deaths reported to the coroner or do they just leave them out entirely?
If they report total deaths by registration date including coroner reported deaths you may be able to estimate the “backlog” by subtracting the total deaths registered from the total deaths by date.
Of course not! They claim they only get reports after the coroner has certified. The system is flawed and they don't even recognise the problem. But we're supposed to trust their analyses?
Ah yes. It’s important that the coroner confirms that the person is actually dead. All those people misdiagnosed as dead could really mess with the figures.
Hi Joel,
I follow the ONS all cause mortality. I don't see the things you are seeing. I put a chart up on my substack in case it helps.
https://richarda697.substack.com/p/excess-mortality-in-england-and-wales?sd=pf