Just think, if as much effort by the NHS, via the GP’s, went into promoting Vitamin D intake, weight loss, exercise and if early treatments for covid had been made available, we would all be living in a different world, in so many ways. Grateful I declined, sad for the millions who did not.
You can predict the type of response you're getting by the first sentence or two. In this letter they made it very clear that the content is propaganda and *not* science or medicine.
Mar 10, 2022·edited Mar 10, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
Leaving aside the "science" I find it absoutely shocking that our ruling elites seem to be semi-literate. This is a serious point; if they are unable to produce a literate (and much vetted/edited public document) how on earth can we have any faith in their ability to manage events far more taxing than writing a literate and coherent sentence?
Remarkable that the last paragraph of the official response claimed the that the vaccinated are LESS likely to infect others... most private medical sources believe otherwise: because the vaccinated better tolerate viral loads and thus are therefore asymptomatic, they are MORE likely to shed more virus with every breath they exhale!
If governmental authorities want to crack down on disinformation, why do they spread so much of it about?
The unrelenting insistence of a product that has demonstrably failed it's purpose makes it clear that it's intended purpose is much more nefarious than what people assume.
We are well past the point where ignorance is an excuse.
I'm not sure that the charge of staggering ignorance is wholly fair, although there obviously is such ignorance among most of the frontline medical staff, GPs, etc, promoting and delivering these toxins. Such claims appear less valid for those higher up the chain.
Surely it is now obvious to everybody who has done their research that the path was cleared for these toxins by denying any other readily available and effective treatment for the virus (that alone caused untold numbers of deaths). It is also obvious from the data releases from the FDA & Pfizer (and remember they will be keeping the "best" until last) that the toxins were approved despite the evidence, not because of it.
The risks of the vaccines were well known at the time of their approval, as were a number the mechanisms by which they cause such immense systemic damage. The biodistribution studies alone should have been enough to prevent their approval. As a result, everything goes beyond risks; instead, they knew with absolute certainly that severe damage would be caused to millions worldwide.
We are really dealing with criminal, willful intent here, not well-intentioned ignorance.
My regards for the NHS started to disappear several years ago and my respect for it as an organisation is probably on a par with vaccine effectiveness for the double jabbed - way, way below zero.
There are too many places where it has gone wrong and possibly most of these being that professional medics are no longer being allowed to use their professional opinions instead being controlled with regards to what medications to issue, how and when (one of the reasons why we have issues with antibiotics resistance - over-subscribing where not needed has never been the real problem); issuing vaccines without thought or consideration and increasingly adding to a growing list with nobody questioning whether or not they are needed, what the potential impact on people may be etc. And it covers all aspects and areas and not just the treatment or prevention of sickness. The level of propaganda it issues (very interesting facts considered yesterday regarding smoking deaths and costs to health services which are the opposite of what is claimed) and whether this comes from Govt or the WHO or both I don't know. Possibly because I don't care. What I do know is that I have zero trust in most medical professionals when they demonstrate to me that they just 'follow orders' rather than engage their own brains and maybe that is the issue. We can point to facts that life expectancy and health has decreased since the WHO became operational and look at increasing drug costs and questionable protocols but at the end of the day, these are the people who make the decisions on the ground.
And it isn't just the medical professional. I work in Higher Education and prior to this Further Education. There are processes and procedures regarding how qualifications are approved and within this (currently) a heavy emphasis on sustainability and the environment. Whilst that is another example of elite influence and pushing of what they claim to be 'settled science'; there isn't anything to actually stop lecturers requesting students question and critique issues surrounding this. But many decided some years ago that to meet targets they would prefer to teach to pass assignments and exams ......
Is there anywhere in public provided services where professionals can actually be professional?
We have reached third world class health and welfare despite having first rate hospitals and staff. The evils of modern government exists in enforcing the dogmas of climate change, natural immunity, early prophylactics, masking, mental strain, child abuse, denial of scientific protocol and political argument, and now subversive ‘enemy’ tactical warfare in Ukraine. Those who resist are marked for exclusion.
Their response is a continued covert operational psyop to fulfill their quest. The evidence of several US sponsored biolabs on the borders of Russia has exposed their deceptive ‘biomedical nuclear warfare’ path forward. Tens, if not hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians and Russians and their warriors are being genocided in their quest.
Only expletives come to mind when reading C Winters response. Someone who has an injured loved one is going to do more than use some bad language; this an observation, not a recommendation. What do these people think they are playing at?
The only answer to this is that people have been selected and put in place to do this on purpose. You cannot be this stupid, so that only leaves one option. It wouldn’t take that many, as long as they were in all the right places.
What I am suggesting is that this is truly Spectre, in real life. If there ever was any mass psychosis, it was in the recent product of the universities (ages 25 to 45). They seemed most eager to follow without question. I found this astonishing, even though I knew there was something wrong with them, for years. We even had meetings about how to communicate with them. This was at VP level, at one of the worlds largest defense contractors.
The perpetrators knew that these people in the group I described above were in all the right places at the right time. They knew it would be sloppy and obvious, but like the US 2020 election, they knew it would not matter. Justin Trudeau has done the sane world an enormous favor by exposing himself and the organization so completely. I keep thinking that his fate will have something to do with a trap door and piranha.
Mar 10, 2022·edited Mar 10, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
First sentence: "The Government is clear that the country's fantastic health and social care staff are our greatest asset."
- he is using the word "fantastic" incorrectly.
- "asset" should be plural.
That the Department of Health and Social Care puts somebody incapable of writing a sentence in charge of correspondence and public enquiries tells me all I need to know about its competence.
Political dickheads do this all the time. You write to complain about something, they write back with the history of the thing you're complaining about.
Mar 10, 2022·edited Mar 10, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
EXCELLENTLY WRITTEN LETTER BY NHS STAFF. SAVE THIS ONE FOR HISTORY. Hopefully the talking heads had all their shots. Thus, they will soon be able to speak, or not, from experience, according to the most recent stats coming out. Oh yah, I forgot. Never mind, their all taking Ivermectin or Hydroxycholoroquin on the down low. PS big thanks for the Pfizer interpretation you aided Jessica (and all of us) with. She published in the Childrens Health Defense, chd.org, yesterday and definately credited You brother.
I do think succinct rebuttals are needed, with references to well done studies and references to the proper debunkings of poorly done atudies that are cited to support the narrative. As a reference that can be provided, and a tool for establishing the rationale undergirding a counter-narrative opinion.
Just think, if as much effort by the NHS, via the GP’s, went into promoting Vitamin D intake, weight loss, exercise and if early treatments for covid had been made available, we would all be living in a different world, in so many ways. Grateful I declined, sad for the millions who did not.
You can predict the type of response you're getting by the first sentence or two. In this letter they made it very clear that the content is propaganda and *not* science or medicine.
Leaving aside the "science" I find it absoutely shocking that our ruling elites seem to be semi-literate. This is a serious point; if they are unable to produce a literate (and much vetted/edited public document) how on earth can we have any faith in their ability to manage events far more taxing than writing a literate and coherent sentence?
Remarkable that the last paragraph of the official response claimed the that the vaccinated are LESS likely to infect others... most private medical sources believe otherwise: because the vaccinated better tolerate viral loads and thus are therefore asymptomatic, they are MORE likely to shed more virus with every breath they exhale!
If governmental authorities want to crack down on disinformation, why do they spread so much of it about?
The unrelenting insistence of a product that has demonstrably failed it's purpose makes it clear that it's intended purpose is much more nefarious than what people assume.
We are well past the point where ignorance is an excuse.
I'm not sure that the charge of staggering ignorance is wholly fair, although there obviously is such ignorance among most of the frontline medical staff, GPs, etc, promoting and delivering these toxins. Such claims appear less valid for those higher up the chain.
Surely it is now obvious to everybody who has done their research that the path was cleared for these toxins by denying any other readily available and effective treatment for the virus (that alone caused untold numbers of deaths). It is also obvious from the data releases from the FDA & Pfizer (and remember they will be keeping the "best" until last) that the toxins were approved despite the evidence, not because of it.
The risks of the vaccines were well known at the time of their approval, as were a number the mechanisms by which they cause such immense systemic damage. The biodistribution studies alone should have been enough to prevent their approval. As a result, everything goes beyond risks; instead, they knew with absolute certainly that severe damage would be caused to millions worldwide.
We are really dealing with criminal, willful intent here, not well-intentioned ignorance.
My regards for the NHS started to disappear several years ago and my respect for it as an organisation is probably on a par with vaccine effectiveness for the double jabbed - way, way below zero.
There are too many places where it has gone wrong and possibly most of these being that professional medics are no longer being allowed to use their professional opinions instead being controlled with regards to what medications to issue, how and when (one of the reasons why we have issues with antibiotics resistance - over-subscribing where not needed has never been the real problem); issuing vaccines without thought or consideration and increasingly adding to a growing list with nobody questioning whether or not they are needed, what the potential impact on people may be etc. And it covers all aspects and areas and not just the treatment or prevention of sickness. The level of propaganda it issues (very interesting facts considered yesterday regarding smoking deaths and costs to health services which are the opposite of what is claimed) and whether this comes from Govt or the WHO or both I don't know. Possibly because I don't care. What I do know is that I have zero trust in most medical professionals when they demonstrate to me that they just 'follow orders' rather than engage their own brains and maybe that is the issue. We can point to facts that life expectancy and health has decreased since the WHO became operational and look at increasing drug costs and questionable protocols but at the end of the day, these are the people who make the decisions on the ground.
And it isn't just the medical professional. I work in Higher Education and prior to this Further Education. There are processes and procedures regarding how qualifications are approved and within this (currently) a heavy emphasis on sustainability and the environment. Whilst that is another example of elite influence and pushing of what they claim to be 'settled science'; there isn't anything to actually stop lecturers requesting students question and critique issues surrounding this. But many decided some years ago that to meet targets they would prefer to teach to pass assignments and exams ......
Is there anywhere in public provided services where professionals can actually be professional?
They know they have no defence, and the pharmas and Gates screwed them. Shared on twitter.
We have reached third world class health and welfare despite having first rate hospitals and staff. The evils of modern government exists in enforcing the dogmas of climate change, natural immunity, early prophylactics, masking, mental strain, child abuse, denial of scientific protocol and political argument, and now subversive ‘enemy’ tactical warfare in Ukraine. Those who resist are marked for exclusion.
Their response is a continued covert operational psyop to fulfill their quest. The evidence of several US sponsored biolabs on the borders of Russia has exposed their deceptive ‘biomedical nuclear warfare’ path forward. Tens, if not hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians and Russians and their warriors are being genocided in their quest.
Only expletives come to mind when reading C Winters response. Someone who has an injured loved one is going to do more than use some bad language; this an observation, not a recommendation. What do these people think they are playing at?
The only answer to this is that people have been selected and put in place to do this on purpose. You cannot be this stupid, so that only leaves one option. It wouldn’t take that many, as long as they were in all the right places.
What I am suggesting is that this is truly Spectre, in real life. If there ever was any mass psychosis, it was in the recent product of the universities (ages 25 to 45). They seemed most eager to follow without question. I found this astonishing, even though I knew there was something wrong with them, for years. We even had meetings about how to communicate with them. This was at VP level, at one of the worlds largest defense contractors.
The perpetrators knew that these people in the group I described above were in all the right places at the right time. They knew it would be sloppy and obvious, but like the US 2020 election, they knew it would not matter. Justin Trudeau has done the sane world an enormous favor by exposing himself and the organization so completely. I keep thinking that his fate will have something to do with a trap door and piranha.
They are evil, plain and simple . Nazi doctors. They KNOW what they are doing.
The Ontario Government Pays Family Physicians for Vaccine Coercion. The US Government Bribes the Media To Push the Vaccine
World governments continue pushing death jabs despite the release of Pfizer data
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-ontario-government-pays-family
First sentence: "The Government is clear that the country's fantastic health and social care staff are our greatest asset."
- he is using the word "fantastic" incorrectly.
- "asset" should be plural.
That the Department of Health and Social Care puts somebody incapable of writing a sentence in charge of correspondence and public enquiries tells me all I need to know about its competence.
Political dickheads do this all the time. You write to complain about something, they write back with the history of the thing you're complaining about.
EXCELLENTLY WRITTEN LETTER BY NHS STAFF. SAVE THIS ONE FOR HISTORY. Hopefully the talking heads had all their shots. Thus, they will soon be able to speak, or not, from experience, according to the most recent stats coming out. Oh yah, I forgot. Never mind, their all taking Ivermectin or Hydroxycholoroquin on the down low. PS big thanks for the Pfizer interpretation you aided Jessica (and all of us) with. She published in the Childrens Health Defense, chd.org, yesterday and definately credited You brother.
I do think succinct rebuttals are needed, with references to well done studies and references to the proper debunkings of poorly done atudies that are cited to support the narrative. As a reference that can be provided, and a tool for establishing the rationale undergirding a counter-narrative opinion.