Sep 19, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley, Tore A. Gulbrandsen
I always have a wry chuckle when I see fact checkers say "correlation does not equal causation". The whole point of any RCT is to infer causation from correlation.
Correlation just means something needs to be studied in more detail before releasing an untested medicine on the population. How odd the fact checkers never mention that.
Well, maybe we need to look at confounding issues when looking at all the unvaccinated. We should only look at the ones that died. Then we'll see clearly that 100% of those who died were unvaccinated!
Sorry. Just trying to peel back the veil the murderers wrap around their game. They have nothing and they know it, but they'll still play mind games.
Thanks for being logical. Thought crimes, such as using logic and facts, need wider distribution. Thanks Joel.
The placebo effect of not being injected has saved lives. The non injected are tricking the figures by just thinking themselves to qualify for being in the non dead category.
It's all in their minds and that's what is stopping them from dying.
So the non injected need to be called out for not playing the game.
A logical and comprehensive explanation of the sound-minded. I never understood how blatantly stupid those fact-checkers could be so, blatantly stupid. In reality, responding to their idiocy is arguing with an attention-deficit hyperactive individual who has been paid to act so profoundly stupid. It's just not worth it. But unfortunately, this society is plagued by it. I wonder if it ever crosses their mind that they are mules, being used to achieve mass indoctrination. Totally expendableble, already written off..
It took 5 years between the birth of the first deformed baby and the withdrawal of the drug. And that was when the symptoms were distressingly obvious.
Please keep up the good work and expect several more years of frustration.
Is it just me or is this woefully underappreciated? I find this to be one of the most compelling analyses based on "public health" data so far.
I also find it strange that it is out of the motherland of propaganda that we seem to be able to get some of the most worthwhile official statistics . You know, still technically garbage compared to what they could be, but hey.
A brilliant article , thank you for all your hard work you are exposing the disgusting actions of the government's and I fully applaud you for all the wonderful work you do.
Sep 20, 2023·edited Sep 20, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley
Great article, many thanks. Another way to confirm causal realtionships is the Bradford Hill Analysis. Another data analyst, Wilson Sy, applied thie method to Australia and wrote a paper. I did a summary on it titled: Hard raw data: There never was a Covid Pandemic in Australia in 2020 which was well received. https://markusmutscheller.substack.com/p/hard-raw-data-there-never-was-a-covid
I don't think anyone died. I think they were transported by aliens, and the aliens wanted the vaccinated more because they have, well , you know, salt mines on the planet Delerium, you know, and they needed compliant slave labour.
Yeah, I think this data might deserve even more scrutiny and could be even more damning. But then again, at this point it's hardly a matter of missing proof anymore, is it. You can lead the horse to water... We just need to make the politicians drink from the fountain of truth instead of drinking the Kool-Aid...
Maybe. Or maybe we are overestimating the evidence. There is a complete lack of data for those first two weeks. As you will probably know, I'm thinking of the infamous ;) RT-PCR test, Ct values in particular. We've already got nearly useless data on test count and positivity rates.
An excellent analysis. I am a retired RN who saw red flags with the roll out of this 'Bioweapon.' While all of my, now grown, 5 kids, got their small handful of vaccines, my youngest, a daughter, was permanently disabled after her Gardasil vaccine at the age of 17. She is 30 now.
I am looking for data regarding vaccines and death within the first 3 days. I was able to get this data for the US via the CDC VAERS dataser. I have been unable to get this same data for the UK and Europe. I have dropped a poster about this event on Twitter (now X). The 7,277 people who died within 72 hrs has not HAD ONE person try to debunk it. I have dropped this poster about 100X on X without censure. It is my little pebble in the pond to wake people up. I am an unknown. My own kids barely know my name.LOL
Do you have this data or links where I might get it?
I can go to the sites I think might have that info but get stuck on their landing pages.
I am not a statistician or data analyst. Just a citizen doing what I can do.
Hi, I recalled this question a little late. Sorry, I don't know of any other sources than the yellow card system for UK, the VAERS for US and Eudravigilance for EU. Hopefully you'll find what you're looking for, we need all the hands we can get for this struggle.
I read all these articles on deaths, jabs, statistics, graphs and whatnot because I like to know whether my original opinion and decision about the last 3 years is still valid. I admit I don't understand everything you stats people say but I understand enough to know my decision just keeps getting more valid. I have noticed that the Believers are not so firm in their beliefs anymore even though they don't read any of this stuff. Imagine the hysteria if they somehow started reading these articles!
There are people who do understand the stats and do read this stuff. A few of us respond to point out the errors in the analyses. Inevitably, we are blocked and our comments are deleted.
Don't kid yourself that articles like this one cannot be answered.
Are you blocked and deleted? That's a pity because I'd quite like to see your analyses of these articles if you still think the jabs are safe and effective and that the measures imposed to control covid were reasonable. Most people don't want to discuss any of it because everyone ends up being all emotional and that's never very useful. I'm sure Joel Smalley and Tore Gulbrandsen wouldn't mind you commenting on what you think is wrong. Nobody learns anything if nobody discusses anything.
BTW, is there a way for us to have a conversation outside of someone else's article? I saved my last response to you, deleted by Lataster, in which I hoped that we could discuss the Monge BMJ article further.
PS. Apologies to the host for being off-topic. I'm fairly new to this platform and I don't know what is available. I'll happily delete this post once answered.
I always have a wry chuckle when I see fact checkers say "correlation does not equal causation". The whole point of any RCT is to infer causation from correlation.
Correlation just means something needs to be studied in more detail before releasing an untested medicine on the population. How odd the fact checkers never mention that.
Well, maybe we need to look at confounding issues when looking at all the unvaccinated. We should only look at the ones that died. Then we'll see clearly that 100% of those who died were unvaccinated!
Sorry. Just trying to peel back the veil the murderers wrap around their game. They have nothing and they know it, but they'll still play mind games.
Thanks for being logical. Thought crimes, such as using logic and facts, need wider distribution. Thanks Joel.
The placebo effect of not being injected has saved lives. The non injected are tricking the figures by just thinking themselves to qualify for being in the non dead category.
It's all in their minds and that's what is stopping them from dying.
So the non injected need to be called out for not playing the game.
A logical and comprehensive explanation of the sound-minded. I never understood how blatantly stupid those fact-checkers could be so, blatantly stupid. In reality, responding to their idiocy is arguing with an attention-deficit hyperactive individual who has been paid to act so profoundly stupid. It's just not worth it. But unfortunately, this society is plagued by it. I wonder if it ever crosses their mind that they are mules, being used to achieve mass indoctrination. Totally expendableble, already written off..
Scientists are puzzled. Except the ones who aren’t. As usual...
My Dad (who is a retired professor) said (tongue in cheek) that the fall in deaths in the unvaccinated is the unvaccinated “maliciously not dying”.
Thank you for that succinct analysis.
We can take a lesson from history here by looking at the Thalidomide catastrophe.
https://www.thalidomidetrust.org/about-us/history-of-thalidomide/
It took 5 years between the birth of the first deformed baby and the withdrawal of the drug. And that was when the symptoms were distressingly obvious.
Please keep up the good work and expect several more years of frustration.
Is it just me or is this woefully underappreciated? I find this to be one of the most compelling analyses based on "public health" data so far.
I also find it strange that it is out of the motherland of propaganda that we seem to be able to get some of the most worthwhile official statistics . You know, still technically garbage compared to what they could be, but hey.
.
The Covid Fallen
And Those That Continue To Die
Every Day
Weren't Prepared For This War.
Who Among You Expected Them To Be ?
And Who Still Does ?
It Is A Serious Question.
And If You Can't Get Past That.
You Are Not Prepared Either.
.
.
- From Thomas Lewis
Clowns To The Left Of Me ...
Jokers To The Right ...
Here I Am:
UselessLiberal.com
.
A brilliant article , thank you for all your hard work you are exposing the disgusting actions of the government's and I fully applaud you for all the wonderful work you do.
Thank you for the kind words.
Great article, many thanks. Another way to confirm causal realtionships is the Bradford Hill Analysis. Another data analyst, Wilson Sy, applied thie method to Australia and wrote a paper. I did a summary on it titled: Hard raw data: There never was a Covid Pandemic in Australia in 2020 which was well received. https://markusmutscheller.substack.com/p/hard-raw-data-there-never-was-a-covid
I don't think anyone died. I think they were transported by aliens, and the aliens wanted the vaccinated more because they have, well , you know, salt mines on the planet Delerium, you know, and they needed compliant slave labour.
OK, its just a theory.
Oh wow, I hadn't seen this article.
And there I was thinking there was no sign of the US Q3 situation (Europe Q4) in the ONS data.
Thank you so much.
If I had known I would've quoted you on this in the summer deaths article. The ONS data is the one thing that didn't fit into the picture.
It's probably not the last time I've written about it though.
Now how do we move from population-level evidence to something stronger?
Yeah, I think this data might deserve even more scrutiny and could be even more damning. But then again, at this point it's hardly a matter of missing proof anymore, is it. You can lead the horse to water... We just need to make the politicians drink from the fountain of truth instead of drinking the Kool-Aid...
Maybe. Or maybe we are overestimating the evidence. There is a complete lack of data for those first two weeks. As you will probably know, I'm thinking of the infamous ;) RT-PCR test, Ct values in particular. We've already got nearly useless data on test count and positivity rates.
An excellent analysis. I am a retired RN who saw red flags with the roll out of this 'Bioweapon.' While all of my, now grown, 5 kids, got their small handful of vaccines, my youngest, a daughter, was permanently disabled after her Gardasil vaccine at the age of 17. She is 30 now.
I am looking for data regarding vaccines and death within the first 3 days. I was able to get this data for the US via the CDC VAERS dataser. I have been unable to get this same data for the UK and Europe. I have dropped a poster about this event on Twitter (now X). The 7,277 people who died within 72 hrs has not HAD ONE person try to debunk it. I have dropped this poster about 100X on X without censure. It is my little pebble in the pond to wake people up. I am an unknown. My own kids barely know my name.LOL
Do you have this data or links where I might get it?
I can go to the sites I think might have that info but get stuck on their landing pages.
I am not a statistician or data analyst. Just a citizen doing what I can do.
I would be so appreciative on finding this info.
Warm Regards,
Lauren
Hello Tore
Thanks for the like but could you help me?
I am looking for links to obtain data on the Vaccines and the deaths AFTER Vaccine in the first 3 days. (UK, Europe and elsewhere if possible)
Regards, Lauren
Hi, I recalled this question a little late. Sorry, I don't know of any other sources than the yellow card system for UK, the VAERS for US and Eudravigilance for EU. Hopefully you'll find what you're looking for, we need all the hands we can get for this struggle.
So it seems that the UNjabbed are acutally getting healthier!
Must be the Vit D they are all taking.
Agree Susan. Vit D and all the other vitamins and our positive attitude has enriched our souls and the gullibility of our fellows is astonishing
someone has to pick up the slack of those made sick by the jabs.
Very important. Utterly expected.
I read all these articles on deaths, jabs, statistics, graphs and whatnot because I like to know whether my original opinion and decision about the last 3 years is still valid. I admit I don't understand everything you stats people say but I understand enough to know my decision just keeps getting more valid. I have noticed that the Believers are not so firm in their beliefs anymore even though they don't read any of this stuff. Imagine the hysteria if they somehow started reading these articles!
There are people who do understand the stats and do read this stuff. A few of us respond to point out the errors in the analyses. Inevitably, we are blocked and our comments are deleted.
Don't kid yourself that articles like this one cannot be answered.
Are you blocked and deleted? That's a pity because I'd quite like to see your analyses of these articles if you still think the jabs are safe and effective and that the measures imposed to control covid were reasonable. Most people don't want to discuss any of it because everyone ends up being all emotional and that's never very useful. I'm sure Joel Smalley and Tore Gulbrandsen wouldn't mind you commenting on what you think is wrong. Nobody learns anything if nobody discusses anything.
BTW, is there a way for us to have a conversation outside of someone else's article? I saved my last response to you, deleted by Lataster, in which I hoped that we could discuss the Monge BMJ article further.
PS. Apologies to the host for being off-topic. I'm fairly new to this platform and I don't know what is available. I'll happily delete this post once answered.
I am blocked where we were last interacting. Lataster blocked and deleted me. There are others.
Time will tell about this substack.