Thanks Joel. And.... this is using dodgy underreported and under recorded CDC data..... and misdiagnosed (knowingly and intentionally) by many doctors......, imagine the Truth with the actual real data...... and same for Adverse Effects too.....
Even a staunch, vaccine-promoting journalist oughta be curious enough to want to know why more people have been dying in the last 2 years. I guess unless it’s something that could be helped by a trillion dollar drug industry it’s just not important or interesting enough.
Thanks for doing the hard slog the "experts" won't. Most of the medical industry here in America is concerned with laying the foundation for total censorship of anyone who questions CDC/FDA/WHO in the next "pandemic", and presumably about anything and everything, The near complete denial of continuing excess mortality makes the whole system look like it has been turned into a killing machine. Meanwhile I have been seeing an increasing number of articles mocking the anxiety of men and particularly white men for their increasing mortality rate.
My neighbor is an airline pilot. Found out yesterday he is diagnosed with ALS. I am not suprised, (have been expecting sad news re this person in particular, because they took all the jabs offered and early on) and for this I am seen as callous by the person who informed me of all this. I suppose I am.
Looks like it's time to implement the "climate change" lockdowns to help cover all of this up... and there's still no one being arrested for what's being done.
I'm a bit confused - the 85+ age group had less death after the jabs? Yet everyone else had more death? It would be illogical to think that was because the jabs worked so is it because those over 85 who might have died post-jab were already dead? Or have I misunderstood?
Joel, in spite of the obvious issues with data accuracy from the gubmint fear porn purveyors, it seems to me that the -52% excess death rate for the 85+ cohort might stem from a lack of immune response to the jab. The lack of response could account for the relative lack of adverse side effects. If we had the means to assess the immune response of this cohort relative to the others, we might find something that further supports your analysis. Key takeaways are always the same: the jabs don't prevent infection, transmission, or hospitilization. Those standing at the edge of the grave with one foot on a banana peel were the first to go when the bug arrived. The second "wave" of deaths had much less to do with the bug than the effects of the jab. Criminal bastards.
Thanks Joel, I was using this data for a talk but was a bit worried about the % difference column in your pre- and post-vax era deaths. Given these are actual numbers rather than rates, do you need to correct for the first period being only 1 years, compared to 2 years in the post vax era? The results are bad enough without being accused of exagerating!
Thanks Joel. And.... this is using dodgy underreported and under recorded CDC data..... and misdiagnosed (knowingly and intentionally) by many doctors......, imagine the Truth with the actual real data...... and same for Adverse Effects too.....
And doctors are baffled.
This is assuming the data is relatively accurate. I think the truth is much more devastating.
The plan is proceeding as expected.
Even a staunch, vaccine-promoting journalist oughta be curious enough to want to know why more people have been dying in the last 2 years. I guess unless it’s something that could be helped by a trillion dollar drug industry it’s just not important or interesting enough.
Even if it's not COVID...you would (incorrectly) assume our world would want to know why...so sad...so so sad.
Joel , Thank you , they know ... it’s to control and depopulate the sheep.... oh and to make money 💰 lots of money .
Thanks for doing the hard slog the "experts" won't. Most of the medical industry here in America is concerned with laying the foundation for total censorship of anyone who questions CDC/FDA/WHO in the next "pandemic", and presumably about anything and everything, The near complete denial of continuing excess mortality makes the whole system look like it has been turned into a killing machine. Meanwhile I have been seeing an increasing number of articles mocking the anxiety of men and particularly white men for their increasing mortality rate.
My neighbor is an airline pilot. Found out yesterday he is diagnosed with ALS. I am not suprised, (have been expecting sad news re this person in particular, because they took all the jabs offered and early on) and for this I am seen as callous by the person who informed me of all this. I suppose I am.
So this is saying that the vast majority of the excess deaths are directly related to people dying from/with Covid?
As you go down the age groups that ratio changes with more excess deaths in the younger groups not associated with dying from/with Covid?
I track the weekly ONS Eng & Wales data and the % of those from/with Covid is tiny (at all ages)!
Looks like it's time to implement the "climate change" lockdowns to help cover all of this up... and there's still no one being arrested for what's being done.
The data isn't improving.........
I'm a bit confused - the 85+ age group had less death after the jabs? Yet everyone else had more death? It would be illogical to think that was because the jabs worked so is it because those over 85 who might have died post-jab were already dead? Or have I misunderstood?
Was looking at UK deaths week 30 2023 compared to week 30 2016 for 45 - 64 year olds, I think it was about 25% higher in 2023.
Population +3.5%
Joel, in spite of the obvious issues with data accuracy from the gubmint fear porn purveyors, it seems to me that the -52% excess death rate for the 85+ cohort might stem from a lack of immune response to the jab. The lack of response could account for the relative lack of adverse side effects. If we had the means to assess the immune response of this cohort relative to the others, we might find something that further supports your analysis. Key takeaways are always the same: the jabs don't prevent infection, transmission, or hospitilization. Those standing at the edge of the grave with one foot on a banana peel were the first to go when the bug arrived. The second "wave" of deaths had much less to do with the bug than the effects of the jab. Criminal bastards.
Thanks Joel, I was using this data for a talk but was a bit worried about the % difference column in your pre- and post-vax era deaths. Given these are actual numbers rather than rates, do you need to correct for the first period being only 1 years, compared to 2 years in the post vax era? The results are bad enough without being accused of exagerating!