To: Mr Innes Munro, Constituency Assistant to Sir Edward Mountain, my MSP
Cc: Sir Edward Mountain MSP, Douglas Ross MSP/MP, ReformĀ UK
Bcc: Various
Dear Mr Munro,
My Net Zero climate change broadside
Thank you for your invitation to apply for a place at Sir Edward Mountainās forthcoming āLetās Talk Energy Summitā:
ā¦ theĀ chance to share your views on Energy in the Highlands and discuss these with a diverse panel of industry professionals from the hydrogen sector, representatives relative to pylons and substations, boiler efficiency and household energy specialists, and Edward Mountain MSP.
I will pass on going to this depressing event. On the plus side, it has given me the pretext and motivation to write this anti-Net Zero broadside which I hope will be conveyed far and wide. The title mimics My Net Zero climate change rantĀ of 18 long months ago.
I have given my views on the futility of the UKās misguided Net Zero energy policies to Sir Edward (Conservative MSP head of the Holyrood Net Zero Committee) many times previously, e.g. here, hereĀ and here. He always chose to fob me off rather than give any written answer to my points.
The gist of my prior emails is that the man-made global warming hypothesis is a decades-old hoaxĀ and that it is pointless for the UK to self-harm by striving to reduce CO2 emissions, never mind trying to eliminate them completely and especially not unilaterally when the non-Western world is not paying a blind bit of notice to the Westās "climate change" ideology, bar humouring lip service.
My response to contrived alarmist pleading such as ā2023 was the hottest in 125,000 yearsā consists of two words which will be alien to many people, two words which give smoking gun proof that the campaign against alleged man-made global warming (aka āclimate changeā) is a deceitful conspiracy: Hunga Tonga. All the world can now see that meteorological authorities (e.g. the UK Met Office), the MSM and social media, politicians, COP28 activistsĀ and NGOs have conspired to suppress all news and views going against the man-made global warming narrative regarding the climatic impact of the 2022 Hunga Tonga undersea volcanic eruption which spewed massive quantities of water vapour, the most powerful greenhouse gas, high into the stratosphere to cause a huge spike in global temperature.
They obviously did this in order to continue their puerile pretence that every rise in global temperatures is due to man-made CO2 emissions, no matter the true cause. Between the periodic transient spikes of natural El Nino warming in the years prior to the unprecedented Hunga Tonga spike, global temperatures have been hovering close to where they were some 25 years ago despite all the dire predictions ā a meteorologically stable situation (discounting the non-CO2 effects) which Net Zero proponents fraudulently describe as a āclimate emergencyā.
A search for Hunga TongaĀ on green billionaire-bribed BBC NewsĀ yields zilch of relevance. They especially want to suppress Hunga Tonga because it confirmed that water vapour is a much more potent global warming agent than CO2. The fatal flaw in the Mickey Mouse scaremongering put out by these globalist conspirators is that it is so easily seen through. According to the UN IPCC's disputed climate modelling, CO2-forced global warming is supposed to happen at a slow but steady rate of about 0.2Ā°C per decade, not as a sudden jump of 0.9Ā°C in 10 monthsĀ as happened in 2023, with a minor assist from a relatively weak, now waning ElĀ Nino.
My colleague Jaime Jessop has documented this Hunga Tonga chicanery in her Hunga GamesĀ and follow-up posts, as has the indefatigable Paul Homewood. Once the Hunga Tonga atmospheric water vapour dissipates, I predict that the global temperature spike will subside into continued flatlining (bar natural ENSO events) followed by a resumption of the global cooling trend which apparently started in 2016, mapping neatly onto the studiously-ignored regular AMO cycleĀ which caused the global cooling scareĀ of the 1960s-70s.
As to the futile āsolutionsā to the non-problem of āclimate changeā, technologies like wind power, green hydrogen and carbon capture and storage are hopelessly impractical, ruinously expensive and unsustainable. These pointless malinvestments are being exploited by grifters to make an opportunist profit on the back of false establishment propaganda and never-justified subsidies which have to be paid for by long-suffering, hard-pressed tax-payers, businesses and households.
Sir Edward should instead be seeking to reduce our ever-soaring energy costs and avoid the grid blackouts which are looming because of his disastrous Net Zero policies. The UK came close to minor blackouts last cold, dark, windless December as documented in this postĀ by Jaime Jessop. Far more important are the major blackouts which are guaranteed in the futureĀ by our suicidal reliance on weather-dependent renewables and the running down of our essential fossil fuel and nuclear electricity generation capabilities.
The recent T4 electricity supply auction for 2027-28Ā revealed an almost total failure to secure any new-build CGCT or other large-scale generation, unsurprising given the insane Con/Lab/Lib/SNP Uniparty plans to shut down all fossil fuel electricity generation. These Uniparty politicians are criminally irresponsibleĀ in having no credible electricity supply backup plan for when the wind doesnāt blow and the sun doesnāt shine, other than severe rationing (smart meters to the fore). Their ācrimes against thermodynamicsā Net Zero plans are eviscerated in this postĀ by energy analyst David Turver, and this.
Even the climate change fanatics of the bought-and-paid-for Daily Telegraph are backtracking, with Jeremy Warner admitting that unilateral Net Zero is pointlessĀ and Matthew Lynn saying that (non-paywalled copy) āNet Zero ... is crushing the life out of the economyā. The days of Net Zero are surely numbered, as exemplified by the catalogue of failures in this Net Zero samizdatĀ and this.
Instead of the mis-labelled āgreenā technologies being pushed by Sir Edward and his colleagues, we should be encouraging domestic fracking and the full exploitation of North Sea oil and gas resources, vigorously developing nuclear power and removing all the Net Zero constraints on fossil fuel energy use, including clean coal. In short, we should scrap Net ZeroĀ (new petition), as pledged by the Reform Party, including its suspiciously anti-humanityĀ evolution into a war on farming.
Pursuing astronomically-expensive Net Zero is certain to lead to stunted economic growth, impoverishment and deindustrialisation. Net Zero-provoked industrial tragediesĀ such as the pending shutdown of the Port Talbot blast furnacesĀ and the Grangemouth oil refineryĀ together with ongoing degradations toĀ and malinvestments inĀ our energy infrastructure are reducing the UK to being an insecure basket case, all for the fatuous purpose of offshoring our CO2 emissions.
For years I thought that our politicians were too non-technical to understand these engineering issues. I now believe that impoverishment and deindustrialisation has been their deliberate plan all along, or at least the plan they are following like subservient puppets (or unthinking muppets) at the bidding of their psychopathic globalist overlords who believe that āthe real enemy, then, is humanity itselfā (Club of Rome). I have never seen any credible rebuttal of this opinion (they would say conspiracy theory), which coincides suspiciously with the hardships and malfeasances inflicted on the people by the deep stateās globally-coordinated, Uniparty-complicit, unlawful, malign, destructive, easily seen through, no worse than fluĀ Covid-19 āplandemicā.
Maybe the reason why an unusually high number of MPs have already announced they are standing downĀ at the next general election (95 to date) is because many have belatedly realised they are being used as pawns in globalist conspiracies to commit crimes against humanity. Itās high time for someone in authority to stand up and come clean. Sadly, that is unlikely to happen because they are in too deep, here taunted in parliament on crimes against humanity.
For years the incumbent UK Uniparty political class (Con/Lab/Lib/SNP) has shown deep hostility to the electorate they are supposed to serve. It doesnāt matter which party is in power as they all back the same self-harming, never-endorsed globalist policies like UN IPCC Net Zero, UN Agenda 2030, WHO-controlled āpandemicā preparedness and IOM-facilitated immigration. It is no longer so-called right versus left that should matter to the electorate, it should be freedom versus 1984-style totalitarianism.
In this 3-minute video, Neil Oliver senses that the long-simmering anger of the people against being abused on multiple fronts is coming to the boil and that our unrepentant oppressors are belatedly getting nervous of the storm which could be coming. He continues in the same vein in his latest monologue, ripping into WEF Davos placeman Rishi Sunak and lambasting our useless Uniparty politicians and their globalist controllers. The best hope for the future may be that people stop voting for the lying, treasonous Uniparty, before they try to lock us into their ulterior goal of tyrannical one-world governance.
Yours faithfully,
Douglas Brodie, Nairn, 5 March 2024
Powerful. I am liking the jib of Mr Brodieās cut, well played sir.
I wish Brodie was my neighbour.