Or perhaps you are jibing (agreeing) with what some might view as the jibes (insults) contained in his (rational and well-evidenced) cutting remarks to his MSP?
I wish he had a Substack. Doug Brodie’s cogent analysis of the blatant BS needs a broader audience. Thank you to Joel for this service & introducing me to this tremendous content.
Not so long ago, climate change cultists were claiming that 'climate science denial' was dead and that all they had to deal with now were the 'mitigation deniers and delayers' questioning the economic and technological feasibility of Net Zero, plus those pointing out its increasingly evident harms. Turns out that the harms of Net Zero have woken the public up to the scam 'science' as well, the 'science' which supposedly provides the justification for Net Zero policies. They're getting hit by both 'science deniers' AND 'Net Zero deniers' now and the attacks are increasingly hitting home. The Met Office for instance is now coming under intense pressure to explain their overwhelming use of 'junk' rated weather stations. The data from one of those junk stations, Cambridge Botanical Gardens, on just one hot day in July 2019, was actually used by 'scientists' to do an extreme weather attribution study 'proving' that it was climate change which was responsible for the 'record' high temperature measured at CBG that day. This pseudoscientific study was then obligingly amplified by the press which of course provided more grist to the mill to justify the collectivist Net Zero agenda. The Met Office were quite happy to go along with this blatant deception. The public have been so conned it's unreal.
A good slap on the bottom for the inbred child minded mob with money and their gang of weak minded dollar grovelers followed by the tail wagging groupies. Sad, sad procession of human trash.
Time marches on but man is moving backwards, instead of enjoying the richness this life has to offer we are in a downward spiral of self harming with all of this net zero nonsense. It does not matter what zero we are aiming for just pick one and the damage to humans will be the same. We seem to be living in an age of extremes and madness will be the end result.
I have very little climate knowledge myself but I wouldn't be surprised if it's not responsible for all the rain we're having?! What goes up must come down! Eventually?!
Watch GeoengineeringWatch.net. Weather manipulation and chem trails are all part and parcel of the globalist agenda. The one thing I find a mystery is those spraying our skies with chemicals will also suffer the consequences as will their families and friends. Why would anyone do,this?
Good question! You might ask Bill Gates why he intends to spray tiny carbon particles into the upper atmosphere? At the same time, ask if he actually has any clue what the effects would be? I see Gates now has the Canadian Government on board with this idiotic scheme? I guess he doesn't want to spend his own money. Canadians are just stupid enough to go along.
You might(?) be correct Joel? But, humans generally don't do scale very well and there are too many variables in this equation to give any conclusion. Within Earth's climactic sphere there are hundreds of cycles running simultaneously. Far more than any human (or computer) can precisely calculate. The "Great Pronouncements" and predictions about climate variations, amount to nothing more than grasping for recognition! I really don't know whether Al Gore was self-deluded or just greedy. But, his hysteric predictions about "Sea Level Rise" were my first clues about the fraud of climate predictions.
I saw a discussion of Hunga Tonga effects in a chemtrails/contrails thread the other day - wish I could share it, but Facebook is down... probably too much moisture in the stratosphere right now, I'll try to log in a bit later. LOL!
Steve Koonin's book 'Unsettled' is useful. He even mentions the need for scientific integrity at the start of it, as if he's aware that not all scientists have this quality.
When people are too lazy to keep records, even for their own locations, then they can be mislead and 'spoonfed' all manner of Bullshit about almost anything. "Storm of the century", "Historic cold/heat", "Catastrophic Hurricanes" (Most don't even know the Beaufort Scale)
NASA have the pictures of Hunga Tonga exploding on its website. From the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Article...... There was enough water vapour to "fill more than 58, 000 Olympic-size swimming pools. The water vapour propelled in to the stratosphere was "...equal to 10% of the water already present in that atmospheric layer.....The excess water vapor...could remain in the stratosphere for several years." This could certainly impact the global temperature, making for more warmth as well as the effect of El Nino.
These interesting ( to say the least) facts don't get any 'publicity'....people might start THINKING and asking QUESTIONS. A dual activity most unwelcome to those purporting to 'own the science.'
The saturation of the warming potential of atmospheric CO2 is a scientific fact which is studiously ignored by the climate alarmist fraternity. I did cover it obliquely in my broadside by linking to a paper by my Bcc colleague Ed Hoskins. Search for “decades-old hoax”.
As a Reform Party member following the WEF Globalist coup for the last four years, I read this article with joy and gratitude. Packed full with powerful evidence, an excellent expose of the corruption of our nation unfolding in front of us. As Neil says, a storm is coming and we in Reform are ready to ride it. Down with these dirty traitors!
Mark Steyn, Dan Wootton, Calvin Robinson and Lawrence Fox all culled from GB News for going against the official establishment narrative. The Neil Oliver monologue I linked to in my post turns out to be historic as it was his last on live TV. He has now been shunted off to an online slot and censor-in-chief Ofcom will probably shut that down before long.
My Scottish perspective gives a glimmer of hope for the next general election. If enough people in each constituency concentrate their vote on a single non-Uniparty candidate (such as Reform), they could succeed by splitting the Uniparty vote the way the separatist SNP have succeeded in Scotland since 2007 by splitting the Unionist Con/Lab/Lib vote.
I rest my case. The resistance to the (made up by the fossil fuel industry) 'WEF Globalist coup' that you've been eagerly observing for the past four years has encouraged you to resist doing anything to reduce carbon emissions and feel glee at other people saying they are too and to continue to support the fossil fuel industry (who conned you) as it causes a climate crisis that mostly affects the people who had the least to do with its cause https://jowaller.substack.com/p/are-we-doomed
Thoughtful piece, Douglas - thank you. Connoisseurs (and fellow victims) of the Scottish government's characteristically illiterate perspective on Net Zero might find interesting my review of their "Energy Stratgy and Just Transition plan" - https://richardlyon.substack.com/p/then-a-miracle-occurs
A brilliant essay. You should contact Mr Innes Munro innes.munro@parliament.scot for a place at Sir Edward’s “Let’s Talk Energy” summit (Strathpeffer, 22 March) and ask to give a 15-minute presentation.
That’s what my Bcc colleague Euan Mearns of Energy Matters fame is boldly planning to do.
Powerful. I am liking the jib of Mr Brodie’s cut, well played sir.
I think you like the cut (shape) of his jib (triangular sail), ie you approve of him.
Or perhaps you are jibing (agreeing) with what some might view as the jibes (insults) contained in his (rational and well-evidenced) cutting remarks to his MSP?
All of the above.
I wish Brodie was my neighbour.
I wish he had a Substack. Doug Brodie’s cogent analysis of the blatant BS needs a broader audience. Thank you to Joel for this service & introducing me to this tremendous content.
Not so long ago, climate change cultists were claiming that 'climate science denial' was dead and that all they had to deal with now were the 'mitigation deniers and delayers' questioning the economic and technological feasibility of Net Zero, plus those pointing out its increasingly evident harms. Turns out that the harms of Net Zero have woken the public up to the scam 'science' as well, the 'science' which supposedly provides the justification for Net Zero policies. They're getting hit by both 'science deniers' AND 'Net Zero deniers' now and the attacks are increasingly hitting home. The Met Office for instance is now coming under intense pressure to explain their overwhelming use of 'junk' rated weather stations. The data from one of those junk stations, Cambridge Botanical Gardens, on just one hot day in July 2019, was actually used by 'scientists' to do an extreme weather attribution study 'proving' that it was climate change which was responsible for the 'record' high temperature measured at CBG that day. This pseudoscientific study was then obligingly amplified by the press which of course provided more grist to the mill to justify the collectivist Net Zero agenda. The Met Office were quite happy to go along with this blatant deception. The public have been so conned it's unreal.
https://cliscep.com/2019/08/03/one-day-heatwave-at-cambridge-botanical-gardens-made-20-times-more-likely-by-climate-change-experts-say/
Quite simply the best critique I've seen yet on this issue. Bravo!
A good slap on the bottom for the inbred child minded mob with money and their gang of weak minded dollar grovelers followed by the tail wagging groupies. Sad, sad procession of human trash.
Time marches on but man is moving backwards, instead of enjoying the richness this life has to offer we are in a downward spiral of self harming with all of this net zero nonsense. It does not matter what zero we are aiming for just pick one and the damage to humans will be the same. We seem to be living in an age of extremes and madness will be the end result.
I'm starting to see a lot more people talking about Hunga Tonga... so fascinating! Thank you for sharing this.
I have very little climate knowledge myself but I wouldn't be surprised if it's not responsible for all the rain we're having?! What goes up must come down! Eventually?!
Watch GeoengineeringWatch.net. Weather manipulation and chem trails are all part and parcel of the globalist agenda. The one thing I find a mystery is those spraying our skies with chemicals will also suffer the consequences as will their families and friends. Why would anyone do,this?
..." Why would anyone do,this?"
Good question! You might ask Bill Gates why he intends to spray tiny carbon particles into the upper atmosphere? At the same time, ask if he actually has any clue what the effects would be? I see Gates now has the Canadian Government on board with this idiotic scheme? I guess he doesn't want to spend his own money. Canadians are just stupid enough to go along.
The majority of Canadians
LOL.......May we agree on "Too many Canadians"?
In my opinion, one is too many?
But, then look at how many of us fell for 'The Jab'..................
The ruling classes set off hundreds of nuclear devices to test how big and how lethal they could make them.
They don't appear to care about contaminating themselves or others.
You might(?) be correct Joel? But, humans generally don't do scale very well and there are too many variables in this equation to give any conclusion. Within Earth's climactic sphere there are hundreds of cycles running simultaneously. Far more than any human (or computer) can precisely calculate. The "Great Pronouncements" and predictions about climate variations, amount to nothing more than grasping for recognition! I really don't know whether Al Gore was self-deluded or just greedy. But, his hysteric predictions about "Sea Level Rise" were my first clues about the fraud of climate predictions.
Definitely greedy by the looks of him.
I saw a discussion of Hunga Tonga effects in a chemtrails/contrails thread the other day - wish I could share it, but Facebook is down... probably too much moisture in the stratosphere right now, I'll try to log in a bit later. LOL!
Steve Koonin's book 'Unsettled' is useful. He even mentions the need for scientific integrity at the start of it, as if he's aware that not all scientists have this quality.
Love Jamie Jessop.
So very well said Doug,
Thanks for sharing Joel.
C L I M A T A R D S
When people are too lazy to keep records, even for their own locations, then they can be mislead and 'spoonfed' all manner of Bullshit about almost anything. "Storm of the century", "Historic cold/heat", "Catastrophic Hurricanes" (Most don't even know the Beaufort Scale)
NASA have the pictures of Hunga Tonga exploding on its website. From the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Article...... There was enough water vapour to "fill more than 58, 000 Olympic-size swimming pools. The water vapour propelled in to the stratosphere was "...equal to 10% of the water already present in that atmospheric layer.....The excess water vapor...could remain in the stratosphere for several years." This could certainly impact the global temperature, making for more warmth as well as the effect of El Nino.
These interesting ( to say the least) facts don't get any 'publicity'....people might start THINKING and asking QUESTIONS. A dual activity most unwelcome to those purporting to 'own the science.'
And none of it's necessary:
https://www.brugesgroup.com/blog/more-carbon-dioxide-cannot-absorb-more-infrared-radiation
The saturation of the warming potential of atmospheric CO2 is a scientific fact which is studiously ignored by the climate alarmist fraternity. I did cover it obliquely in my broadside by linking to a paper by my Bcc colleague Ed Hoskins. Search for “decades-old hoax”.
As a Reform Party member following the WEF Globalist coup for the last four years, I read this article with joy and gratitude. Packed full with powerful evidence, an excellent expose of the corruption of our nation unfolding in front of us. As Neil says, a storm is coming and we in Reform are ready to ride it. Down with these dirty traitors!
Mark Steyn, Dan Wootton, Calvin Robinson and Lawrence Fox all culled from GB News for going against the official establishment narrative. The Neil Oliver monologue I linked to in my post turns out to be historic as it was his last on live TV. He has now been shunted off to an online slot and censor-in-chief Ofcom will probably shut that down before long.
My Scottish perspective gives a glimmer of hope for the next general election. If enough people in each constituency concentrate their vote on a single non-Uniparty candidate (such as Reform), they could succeed by splitting the Uniparty vote the way the separatist SNP have succeeded in Scotland since 2007 by splitting the Unionist Con/Lab/Lib vote.
I rest my case. The resistance to the (made up by the fossil fuel industry) 'WEF Globalist coup' that you've been eagerly observing for the past four years has encouraged you to resist doing anything to reduce carbon emissions and feel glee at other people saying they are too and to continue to support the fossil fuel industry (who conned you) as it causes a climate crisis that mostly affects the people who had the least to do with its cause https://jowaller.substack.com/p/are-we-doomed
🙏🏽
Thoughtful piece, Douglas - thank you. Connoisseurs (and fellow victims) of the Scottish government's characteristically illiterate perspective on Net Zero might find interesting my review of their "Energy Stratgy and Just Transition plan" - https://richardlyon.substack.com/p/then-a-miracle-occurs
A brilliant essay. You should contact Mr Innes Munro innes.munro@parliament.scot for a place at Sir Edward’s “Let’s Talk Energy” summit (Strathpeffer, 22 March) and ask to give a 15-minute presentation.
That’s what my Bcc colleague Euan Mearns of Energy Matters fame is boldly planning to do.
Thanks, Douglas, and excellent suggestion.
I thoroughly enjoyed reading your letter/lesson/cri de coeur.
Thank you.
Whatever reply you receive, it's bound to be a disappointment.