It's still a pandemic *BECAUSE* of the vaccinated.
It's still a pandemic *BECAUSE* of the vaccinated.
New South Wales (NSW) revisited.
I’ve made an awful lot of mistakes in my life. But I try to learn from every one of them. For this reason, I keep returning to old models to see how they have fared against the ever-increasing empirical data.
So it is with New South Wales in Australia who are still releasing really useful data which, by-the-by, keeps me minded to believe that most of the people involved in the COVID scam do still honestly believe they are doing the right thing and are on the right side.
Alas, the data doesn’t care about sides or beliefs or anything. It simply exists and is open to interpretation. Whether you trust your own interpretation or someone else’s (including mine) is entirely up to you but here’s how I see it.
1.
No-one really died with/from/of COVID in NSW until 10-Jul-21, one week after the mass mRNA experiment began in earnest. Deaths peaked on 02-Oct-21, one month after the experiment peaked. The similarity in shape of the two distributions is quite apparent with both deaths and jabs ending around the same time at the end of Nov ‘21.
2.
Less than a month later (and in the middle of the Australian summer!), COVID deaths return - and they are three times worse than the previous winter. Coincidentally (or not), people start dying two weeks after the “booster” campaign starts on 11-Dec-21. Although there is some missing data, it looks like jabbing peaks around two weeks before the deaths peak on 29-Jan-22 and again, the similarity between the distributions of jabs and deaths is, well, quite remarkable.
3.
The following winter, COVID deaths emerge again, concomitantly with renewed jabbing. The data isn’t split by dose any more but I think we can assume this is dose 3 and even dose 4 for the really keen? Similar patterns of deaths coinciding with jabs with the former peaking on 06-Aug-22, two weeks after peek jabbing.
So… so far, so many coincidences. But, I have always maintained that if every death was properly recorded with jab status, we could have gotten to a conclusive position on jab-related mortality a long, long time ago.
NSW started sharing this valuable information in May 2022 and I am really grateful to @LCHF_Matt (Twitter) for painstakingly extracting the data from the weekly surveillance bulletins that NSW public health release in PDF format.
Clearly, there is no difference in COVID death rates according to your jab / no jab status.
However…
It is clear that the 4-jabbers are dying at substantially higher rates than every other dose status. In fact, the entire COVID death distribution in July to Aug 2022 is driven by the 4-jabbers.
Yes, of course, we could explain this away because the 4-jabbers are the oldest, weakest ones so they were more likely to die anyway, right? OK… So, it’s not stopping them from dying though?
Let’s park it there and conclude that at best, COVID jabs don’t prevent COVID deaths. But what about all those remarkable correlations between jab phases and COVID deaths? Can we dismiss those too? I think we should take a closer look at COVID cases and jabs.
1.
NSW has no COVID until one week after the mass mRNA experiment begins. The rise and fall (the distribution) of COVID cases is pretty much identical to the distribution of jabs.
2.
When NSW’s booster campaign gets under way in Dec ‘21, COVID cases explode - in the middle of summer!!! The scale on the y-axis goes from 12,000 to 350,000! Again, the distributions are remarkably similar.
3.
In winter 2022, COVID’s return is once again preceded by an increase in jabbing.
So, what do we have here?
A remarkable capability of the NSW population to consistently anticipate the coming of COVID (even completely out of season) and protect themselves with the experimental therapy?
A leaky vaccine that suppresses the natural immune defences and facilitates the emergence of immune-escape variants that inevitably result in “COVID deaths”?
My wager is, if the people of NSW stopped injecting themselves with this experimental toxin, their COVID problem will probably stop too.
P.S. If you believe the answer is #2, then it also implies that the jabbed are somewhat responsible for causing the COVID deaths of the unjabbed too. Something more to think about?
Your jab does not protect you but could be killing me.
Thank you to Rebekah Barnett pointing me in the direction of her interpretation of the ICU data (which is apparently somewhat at odds with NSW Public Health?! 🤪
Further credit - this post was prompted by my reading of this article from David Archibald which was emailed to me overnight.
"My wager is, if the people of NSW stopped injecting themselves with this experimental toxin, their COVID problem will probably stop too."
That would appear to be happening in various African nations. An initial Wave 1 (in some) then negligible cases/stats. What pandemic?
Seems the more jabbed a population the higher C19, cases/deaths, and also increases in all-cause mortality. We are not seeing a reversion to baseline for the latter in those 'developed' countries.
It all adds up to a rather odd situation.
By odd, I mean ghastly, horrific, and criminal.
That anyone is injecting these products into their citizens, despite the mountains of data, is mind boggling.
What safety signal are they waiting for? What is the stopping condition? Peter McCullough stated that they had realistically reached it in early 2021, based on precedent.
Great analysis thanks. And yet, NSW Health claims that the ICU data provide “irrefutable” evidence that the vaccines prevent severe illness. Entirely refutable of course ...
https://rebekahbarnett.substack.com/p/nsw-health-officials-straight-up