"My wager is, if the people of NSW stopped injecting themselves with this experimental toxin, their COVID problem will probably stop too."
That would appear to be happening in various African nations. An initial Wave 1 (in some) then negligible cases/stats. What pandemic?
Seems the more jabbed a population the higher C19, cases/deaths, and also increases in all-cause mortality. We are not seeing a reversion to baseline for the latter in those 'developed' countries.
It all adds up to a rather odd situation.
By odd, I mean ghastly, horrific, and criminal.
That anyone is injecting these products into their citizens, despite the mountains of data, is mind boggling.
What safety signal are they waiting for? What is the stopping condition? Peter McCullough stated that they had realistically reached it in early 2021, based on precedent.
Me too! The paper by Eroshenko et al (2020) on ADE raised enough concerns. Plus no translational research. From there after reading over 100 academic papers plus analysing data from the UK, Israel and NSW keeps me firmly in the control group!
When Mike Yeadon said there was never a successful coronavirus vax, and all previous attempts resulted in the death of 100% of the animals. Can't remember if he said it in spring of 2020 or spring of 2021. Vanden Bossche was saying the same. Their stories never changed.
Great analysis thanks. And yet, NSW Health claims that the ICU data provide “irrefutable” evidence that the vaccines prevent severe illness. Entirely refutable of course ...
Everyone is entitled to an interpretation! ;-) You article gave me the best belly laugh I've had in a long while. You're an excellent writer. Thank you!! (I've linked to your article in the post script).
1. Interpretations are "racist, sexist, and bigoted!"
2. We rely on the data and science. (Queerly, the NSW CHO in 2021 insisted that she did not need to look at the data to know that faccines were safe and effective. She also advised people to MASTURBATE instead of bunga bunga to avoid catching C19....)
3. I've sent that article of Rebekah's to the NSW Premier who wrote back flicking it off to his Health Minister. Rebekah is now on the run from them!)
For those that wish to see it, it is all very clear. The mRNA Toxin is killing not saving lives. Yet our news outlets are quiet of what should be the biggest scandal in the history of this century.
Yes. That the way I’ve seen it since the beginning. MSM has failed to identify, comprehend and scoop the very biggest story of perhaps the past few thousand years. We are in a revolution that fails to be televised.
By doing what they are doing, the intelligence gained will identify who the critical thinkers are (enemies of the state). Our turn will come soon enough, they are winnowing out the chaff.
They court disaster in ways they haven’t even fully imagined yet. And they’ve imagined plenty. They’re specialty seems to be to go for causing the most harm. They exhibit suicidal tendencies with their psychopathology.
This is something which still plays on my mind. The consensus (among Covid/Lockdown fanatics and their more rational opposition) is that the 'pandemic is over'. But it's clearly not 'over' in places like NSW and the mass 'vaccination' campaign is a huge curve ball which might yet throw up some nasty surprises in the northern hemisphere this winter. Let's hope that Vanden Bossche and others were wrong about the emergence of a new, more virulent vaccine escape variant. According to what GVDB was saying several months ago, it's now well overdue, but we should remain very vigilant, just in case this man-made virus supercharged by a dangerous man-made 'vaccine' does take off again unexpectedly.
It's only over in the fanatical camp as a way to deal with their cognitive dissonance that every single intervention has failed (at best). Rather than admit this, or indeed the prospect that every intervention has made the situation worse, they can simply draw a line under it and move on whilst still dogmatically proclaiming that they did everything right and the situation would otherwise have been much worse.
If a new, more deadly wave of SC-2 does emerge this winter, we're going to see the mother of all World Championship Mental Gymnastics events play out amongst our revered leaders as they reposition themselves in an attempt to advise us that the perfect storm of deadly Covid, outbreaks of non-Covid disease in the immune compromised and severe adverse reactions to the 'vaccine' itself could have been 'much worse' if not for their timely interventions.
Literally the covid version of hanging the "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" banner on the aircraft carrier.
Yet they're still doling out cash left and right for hospitals to find covid cases, and still paying them money to put patients onto vents that will kill them.
Regrettably, given the virus cannot be sterilised due to mass vaccination with leaky vaccines. That is, we cannot achieve herd immunity - not even close. We would require evolutionary processes to inexplicably cease for GVB to be wrong. That's not going to happen.
The time will come. The question is, how damaged are the immune systems of the vaccinated, and consequentially, how much resultant suffering will occur?
I live in the USA, in the mountains & many people & families were split on the Covid vaccine as well.
But because it’s a small town & everyone knows everyone’s business, we saw how fast the jab killed our elderly parents, every cancer survivor who took the jab who was elderly experienced their cancer come raging back after being in remission for over a decade & killed every one of them!
I have seen & heard this about other diseases that came back after the jab.
Not to mention all the new injuries this “depopulation vaccine” has caused?!
Ask any Coronor & Funeral Home about how many clots are in the blood of the jabbed & many will tell you if they don’t get government money!
Also Life Insurance companies are trying to get their info out there about how many more deaths they have from the vaxx & NOT Covid!
But our lying state-run TV & state-run Big Tech are paid by Big Pharma to keep their lying commercials on to make more billions & they do not care how many of us die from using us as Guinea pigs.
If Real Justice still existed in America then MANY dirty lying greedy evil politicians & those who get millions or billions of government money would be in prison & being invested, Instead of our innocent & MAGA President Trump?!?
I think this is true even outside of close-knit communities. Vax take up has fallen off a cliff everywhere. Yes, a lot of it will be lethargy and much due to the withdrawal of the unethical coercion but I would not be surprised that the direct anecdotal exposure to its harm is not also a major factor.
The smaller petri dish of a small community is easy to read, isn't it? I think that's why more rural areas are harder to baffle with bs. Everyone sees the truth around them every day.
A commenter by the name of Paul Della on the ‘Dystopian Down Under’ Substack made the following comment on the 16 September:
“I would suggest deep down many people now know they have been misled and lied to and refuse to acknowledge it, if they lie to themselves there is no reason to investigate further or admit they what they (should) inherently know.”
Paul has nailed the problem. For me, the events of the last two and a half years have exposed astonishing facets about the propensity for self-deception that must exist in human psychology. I never dreamed that could have been the case in a Western country with ‘free’ media. I have found it extraordinary how so many supposedly ‘educated’ people have been able to suppress innate natural curiosity and not see the pattern of deceit in the way the injectable products have been ‘marketed’. Like automatons, so many people have just taken as gospel the words of ‘advice’ urging more-and-more jabs, pumped out by talking heads on television, reading their scripts from a teleprompter.
An interesting piece of collateral information that many may not be aware of is that there may be an inverse relationship between the level of tertiary education that a person has acquired and their susceptibility to fraudsters. Some years ago I attended a public seminar conducted by the senior police officer responsible for investigating internet fraud in the Australian state in which I live. I was surprised to learn that the persons most likely to fall victim to the likes of Nigerian scammers were well ‘educated’ professional people who worked and moved in a ‘high-trust’ social environment. The corollary is that the ordinary working bloke having a beer in a pub is more likely to smell a rat and detect fraud. This tendency would not apply in all cases, however. Like everything else with social attributes, it would be an overlapping bell curve for each of the two social groupings.
This psychological susceptibility to fraud would also help explain why so many ‘educated’ people have blindly fallen victim to the assertions of activists and their media enablers claiming that the world is on the brink of catastrophic disaster due to the human-generated portion of the trace gas of Carbon Dioxide – an assertion that actually has no basis in empirical science. The accelerating decay of the West is very troubling indeed.
Sep 22, 2022·edited Sep 23, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
Thailand, my adopted home for the last two decades, was the first country in the world after China to officially record a case of COVID way back in December 2019 With no vaccines available at that time, Thais turned to local clinics and pharmacies for inexpensive, over-the-counter medications (predominantly the anti-malaria treatment chloroquine) in a bid to keep the "novel virus" at bay. Seemingly, it worked.
From the first case being diagnosed to the start of the roll-out of "safe and effective" vaccines in February 2021, infection rates remained reassuringly low, with the COVID-related death toll remained double figures. This picture was to change dramatically, however, as the injections roll-outpicked up speed and intensity, with both cases and deaths rising and falling dramatically in successive waves, as happened elsewhere.
Today, with 80 percent of the kingdom's 70 million-strong population having had at least one injection, Thailand has (according to the latest Worldometers data) suffered 32,671 COVID-related deaths. Mercifully, rececent months have seen the mortality rate decline steadily into double figures - - and fewer Thais are rushing to roll up their sleeves for a pandemic which appears to be all but over.
Looking back at events here over the last two and half years or so, one can't help wondering whether the Land of Smiles might have been better advised to stick to the tried and trusted "old medicine" that appeared to work so well in the early stages of the pandemic, rather than resort to new-fangled vaccines which fail to prevent transmission and infection and can cause serious side effects and death.
Unfortunately, once the "vaccines" arrived, it became increasingly difficult to obtain previously-available alternatives such as chloroquine and ivermectin (I managed to lay in a stock of the latter via mail order from India!). Currently, the officlal emphasis is on much more costly (and from what I have researched) less effective and potentially more hazardous drugs such as Remdesivir and Molnupiravir.
I take my hat off to the Thai administration on one score, at least. They set an example to the world by acknowledging that the vaccines were causing collatoral damage, and established a government compensation scheme which appears to be working quite well.
Next time around, Heaven forbid, there must be no indemnity for vaccine manufacturers against damage caused by experimental products rushed to market without lengthy, properly conducted and transparent trials.
Australian Public Service is a Top Down organisation, just like a military. What you "see" is determined by whoever is above you. Do never forget that. When a government health officer is paid to NOT see something no amount of DATA will change what he is required to "see"...what
Excellent work, we don't need to be Sherlock Holmes, to figure out that we are being totally conned, and led like Sheeple to the slaughter. But the hardest thing to understand, is that in 1992 at the World Goverment conference in Rio-De-janiro over 200 world Governments all agreed to do the same things, and in very small print, for the first time, a short paragraph, about world de-population, they all signed, and it's got bigger, and bigger every meeting since, this global mass slaughter has been approved by over 200 Governments, 7.8 Billion people will be culled by 60% or more, we are all experimental lambs, being led to the slaughter. But we will make $Billions for the Pharma's, before we all die.
Sep 22, 2022·edited Sep 22, 2022Liked by Joel Smalley
Very good analysis. I think the only-part that fails is the end of Section 3 where you state:
"Yes, of course, we could explain this away because the 4-jabbers are the oldest, weakest ones so they were more likely to die anyway, right? OK… So, it’s not stopping them from dying though?"
This presupposes, the deaths didn't change or would not have been different if they had 0 vaccines versus 4 vaccines in the extremely elderly and extremely sick. I feel the case can be made, death rate/deaths did drop with a pre/post vaccination examination but we cannot say it is as a result of the shots because of survivor bias and we cannot say those lives saved exceed those directly taken by vaccine deaths.
Looking at early Health Canada Daily Epidemiological Survey updates in early 2021, something like 90% of deaths were people over 65 and 80% were over 70 and 72% were over 80. So we should expect assuming only "over 65" could get a 4th booster and many of the unvaccinated are younger, healther individuals on average (which is my finding/personal experience), we'd see approximately 9:1 death ratio with zero vaccination if we just compared over 65 to under 65. After 4 shots (limited to over 65 group where I live in Canada), it looks like roughly, the 4-shot cohort are dying in the per-million at a ratio of 2:1 or 3:1 compared to the (mostly younger and likely under 65, unvaccinated cohort).
I feel like a drop of 9:1 to 3:1 or 2:1 is a sign of perhaps efficacy in those who survive the shot. The ....canary on the coalmine is how many people died as direct result of the 4 rounds of shot in order for those who did not die, to live? I think vaccine-deaths, over the short term and believe highly over the long-term will exceed the "lives saved". Furthermore, there could be "survivor bias" where the death-rate drops to 3:1 or 2:1 because covid-19 already culled the weak in the first three or four waves, so its not vaccine efficacy so much as improving average health in the population.
On the other flipside of the coin/argument, to play devil's advocate, most of those unvaccinated people have natural immunity now from prior infection. So if 4 shots dropped the death ratio from 9:1 to 3:1 or 2:1 when compared against unvaccinated people, most with natural immunity, does the prior-infection giving natural immunity outweigh the survivor bias effect? If so, then this would point to short-term 4th booster efficacy that is competitive with natural immunity/prior infection. IF. IF. IF. I feel as though there are lot of IFs to this equation.
That's true too. I'm not sure of the role it would play. The less-virulent strain should benefit both the unvaccinated and 4 shot cohort, right? I am not confident if it would benefit each equally or significantly though. My intuition would be elderly have weaker immune systems and younger people have stronger immune systems, so an older stronger and newer weaker strain likely will never "kill" a young-person either way. The newer weaker-strain might be fought off by elderly immune system were the ancestral stronger would kill. So one might suppose a weaker strain would benefit the elderly more; initially, yet on the other hand, if they survived the stronger strain, obviously, they have the survivor bias and would likely survive a weaker version of the same strain (with build up immunity from prior infection, no?). So I am not sure if the effect of virulence weakening would be statistically significant unless it allowed it to reach many elderly immune systems with no prior infection.
Does a less virulent strain somehow change the ratio of deaths to be more in favor of the elderly and less in favor of youthful immune systems? Honestly, I have never looked into the topic so I have no factual-idea of the ratio would change as virulence changes or remain equal. My intuition says that factor would be statistically insignificant.
The real-wildcard there is it is less-virulent but faster-infection-rate/more-cases. So its the old 0.1% death rate of 100,000 cases a month or 0.05% of 1,000,000 cases a month. Even 50% virulence, if its 10x more infectious, isn't a reduction in fatalities. Its a rather huge catch-22. So the increase in deaths-per-million could be from greater infectivity not necessarily VIAIDS
“Some people see lines, and graphs, and data… at this point, all I see is one less Karen, a few less petty tyrants, one less virtue signaler on Twitter.”
I think the analysis is difficult due to insufficient data - one would expect toxicity to be related to total spike protein dose with a time factor.... thus Modernas booster should be more toxic that Phizer and the closer the jabs were together there should also be an increase in negative impact
I know two who took 3 doses without a lot of symptom with AZ being 1&2 the P 3 and then took Moderna 4..... they both experienced noticeable side effects on No 4.... but we have to remember co morbidities dont just add to poor outcome they multiply...
This analysis does not measure the direct impact of "vaccine" toxicity though. It examines the potential mechanism that mass "vaccination" leads to mass outbreaks of COVID which subsequently (and inevitably) lead to COVID death.
Big confounding factor is that they opened Australia up from lockdown after the jabs. So the initial spike in cases and deaths was due to opening up after vax campaign.
"My wager is, if the people of NSW stopped injecting themselves with this experimental toxin, their COVID problem will probably stop too."
That would appear to be happening in various African nations. An initial Wave 1 (in some) then negligible cases/stats. What pandemic?
Seems the more jabbed a population the higher C19, cases/deaths, and also increases in all-cause mortality. We are not seeing a reversion to baseline for the latter in those 'developed' countries.
It all adds up to a rather odd situation.
By odd, I mean ghastly, horrific, and criminal.
That anyone is injecting these products into their citizens, despite the mountains of data, is mind boggling.
What safety signal are they waiting for? What is the stopping condition? Peter McCullough stated that they had realistically reached it in early 2021, based on precedent.
I got to that position back in summer 2020 when all the monkeys died in the animal study!
Me too! The paper by Eroshenko et al (2020) on ADE raised enough concerns. Plus no translational research. From there after reading over 100 academic papers plus analysing data from the UK, Israel and NSW keeps me firmly in the control group!
I wish there were studies comparing unvaxxed with unvaxxed recovered.
When Mike Yeadon said there was never a successful coronavirus vax, and all previous attempts resulted in the death of 100% of the animals. Can't remember if he said it in spring of 2020 or spring of 2021. Vanden Bossche was saying the same. Their stories never changed.
Great analysis thanks. And yet, NSW Health claims that the ICU data provide “irrefutable” evidence that the vaccines prevent severe illness. Entirely refutable of course ...
https://rebekahbarnett.substack.com/p/nsw-health-officials-straight-up
Everyone is entitled to an interpretation! ;-) You article gave me the best belly laugh I've had in a long while. You're an excellent writer. Thank you!! (I've linked to your article in the post script).
Ah thank you! Appreciate it.
"Everyone is entitled to an interpretation!"
1. Interpretations are "racist, sexist, and bigoted!"
2. We rely on the data and science. (Queerly, the NSW CHO in 2021 insisted that she did not need to look at the data to know that faccines were safe and effective. She also advised people to MASTURBATE instead of bunga bunga to avoid catching C19....)
3. I've sent that article of Rebekah's to the NSW Premier who wrote back flicking it off to his Health Minister. Rebekah is now on the run from them!)
For those that wish to see it, it is all very clear. The mRNA Toxin is killing not saving lives. Yet our news outlets are quiet of what should be the biggest scandal in the history of this century.
Yes. That the way I’ve seen it since the beginning. MSM has failed to identify, comprehend and scoop the very biggest story of perhaps the past few thousand years. We are in a revolution that fails to be televised.
Maybe it was all designed to purge Sheeple but not thinking humans?
Possibly. Except judging by those existing at the top doesn’t seem like they want any remaining thinking humans?
By doing what they are doing, the intelligence gained will identify who the critical thinkers are (enemies of the state). Our turn will come soon enough, they are winnowing out the chaff.
They court disaster in ways they haven’t even fully imagined yet. And they’ve imagined plenty. They’re specialty seems to be to go for causing the most harm. They exhibit suicidal tendencies with their psychopathology.
All our news outlets are brought to you by Pfizer these days.
https://rumble.com/vo082r-everything-brought-to-you-by-pfizer.html
This is something which still plays on my mind. The consensus (among Covid/Lockdown fanatics and their more rational opposition) is that the 'pandemic is over'. But it's clearly not 'over' in places like NSW and the mass 'vaccination' campaign is a huge curve ball which might yet throw up some nasty surprises in the northern hemisphere this winter. Let's hope that Vanden Bossche and others were wrong about the emergence of a new, more virulent vaccine escape variant. According to what GVDB was saying several months ago, it's now well overdue, but we should remain very vigilant, just in case this man-made virus supercharged by a dangerous man-made 'vaccine' does take off again unexpectedly.
https://jaimejessop.substack.com/p/a-warning-the-vaccines-are-the-very
It's only over in the fanatical camp as a way to deal with their cognitive dissonance that every single intervention has failed (at best). Rather than admit this, or indeed the prospect that every intervention has made the situation worse, they can simply draw a line under it and move on whilst still dogmatically proclaiming that they did everything right and the situation would otherwise have been much worse.
If a new, more deadly wave of SC-2 does emerge this winter, we're going to see the mother of all World Championship Mental Gymnastics events play out amongst our revered leaders as they reposition themselves in an attempt to advise us that the perfect storm of deadly Covid, outbreaks of non-Covid disease in the immune compromised and severe adverse reactions to the 'vaccine' itself could have been 'much worse' if not for their timely interventions.
There is no variants and no virus. We are being poisoned!
Literally the covid version of hanging the "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" banner on the aircraft carrier.
Yet they're still doling out cash left and right for hospitals to find covid cases, and still paying them money to put patients onto vents that will kill them.
Regrettably, given the virus cannot be sterilised due to mass vaccination with leaky vaccines. That is, we cannot achieve herd immunity - not even close. We would require evolutionary processes to inexplicably cease for GVB to be wrong. That's not going to happen.
The time will come. The question is, how damaged are the immune systems of the vaccinated, and consequentially, how much resultant suffering will occur?
There is no virus
I'll let my wife know. She's in bed, sick, after I, after spending a week in bed sick, gave her the non-virus. I'm sure she'll be relieved to hear...
She along with all of us has been is being poisoned. She is detoxing, this is what a cold/flu is
I live in the USA, in the mountains & many people & families were split on the Covid vaccine as well.
But because it’s a small town & everyone knows everyone’s business, we saw how fast the jab killed our elderly parents, every cancer survivor who took the jab who was elderly experienced their cancer come raging back after being in remission for over a decade & killed every one of them!
I have seen & heard this about other diseases that came back after the jab.
Not to mention all the new injuries this “depopulation vaccine” has caused?!
Ask any Coronor & Funeral Home about how many clots are in the blood of the jabbed & many will tell you if they don’t get government money!
Also Life Insurance companies are trying to get their info out there about how many more deaths they have from the vaxx & NOT Covid!
But our lying state-run TV & state-run Big Tech are paid by Big Pharma to keep their lying commercials on to make more billions & they do not care how many of us die from using us as Guinea pigs.
If Real Justice still existed in America then MANY dirty lying greedy evil politicians & those who get millions or billions of government money would be in prison & being invested, Instead of our innocent & MAGA President Trump?!?
I think this is true even outside of close-knit communities. Vax take up has fallen off a cliff everywhere. Yes, a lot of it will be lethargy and much due to the withdrawal of the unethical coercion but I would not be surprised that the direct anecdotal exposure to its harm is not also a major factor.
The smaller petri dish of a small community is easy to read, isn't it? I think that's why more rural areas are harder to baffle with bs. Everyone sees the truth around them every day.
The small Michigan town I grew up in is somewhat close-minded. The people are split about in half, some pro-vax-injury, some anti-vax-injury.
A commenter by the name of Paul Della on the ‘Dystopian Down Under’ Substack made the following comment on the 16 September:
“I would suggest deep down many people now know they have been misled and lied to and refuse to acknowledge it, if they lie to themselves there is no reason to investigate further or admit they what they (should) inherently know.”
Paul has nailed the problem. For me, the events of the last two and a half years have exposed astonishing facets about the propensity for self-deception that must exist in human psychology. I never dreamed that could have been the case in a Western country with ‘free’ media. I have found it extraordinary how so many supposedly ‘educated’ people have been able to suppress innate natural curiosity and not see the pattern of deceit in the way the injectable products have been ‘marketed’. Like automatons, so many people have just taken as gospel the words of ‘advice’ urging more-and-more jabs, pumped out by talking heads on television, reading their scripts from a teleprompter.
An interesting piece of collateral information that many may not be aware of is that there may be an inverse relationship between the level of tertiary education that a person has acquired and their susceptibility to fraudsters. Some years ago I attended a public seminar conducted by the senior police officer responsible for investigating internet fraud in the Australian state in which I live. I was surprised to learn that the persons most likely to fall victim to the likes of Nigerian scammers were well ‘educated’ professional people who worked and moved in a ‘high-trust’ social environment. The corollary is that the ordinary working bloke having a beer in a pub is more likely to smell a rat and detect fraud. This tendency would not apply in all cases, however. Like everything else with social attributes, it would be an overlapping bell curve for each of the two social groupings.
This psychological susceptibility to fraud would also help explain why so many ‘educated’ people have blindly fallen victim to the assertions of activists and their media enablers claiming that the world is on the brink of catastrophic disaster due to the human-generated portion of the trace gas of Carbon Dioxide – an assertion that actually has no basis in empirical science. The accelerating decay of the West is very troubling indeed.
Yes, but not really that astonishing. Charles Mackay told us all about it almost 200 years ago!!
Thailand, my adopted home for the last two decades, was the first country in the world after China to officially record a case of COVID way back in December 2019 With no vaccines available at that time, Thais turned to local clinics and pharmacies for inexpensive, over-the-counter medications (predominantly the anti-malaria treatment chloroquine) in a bid to keep the "novel virus" at bay. Seemingly, it worked.
From the first case being diagnosed to the start of the roll-out of "safe and effective" vaccines in February 2021, infection rates remained reassuringly low, with the COVID-related death toll remained double figures. This picture was to change dramatically, however, as the injections roll-outpicked up speed and intensity, with both cases and deaths rising and falling dramatically in successive waves, as happened elsewhere.
Today, with 80 percent of the kingdom's 70 million-strong population having had at least one injection, Thailand has (according to the latest Worldometers data) suffered 32,671 COVID-related deaths. Mercifully, rececent months have seen the mortality rate decline steadily into double figures - - and fewer Thais are rushing to roll up their sleeves for a pandemic which appears to be all but over.
Looking back at events here over the last two and half years or so, one can't help wondering whether the Land of Smiles might have been better advised to stick to the tried and trusted "old medicine" that appeared to work so well in the early stages of the pandemic, rather than resort to new-fangled vaccines which fail to prevent transmission and infection and can cause serious side effects and death.
Unfortunately, once the "vaccines" arrived, it became increasingly difficult to obtain previously-available alternatives such as chloroquine and ivermectin (I managed to lay in a stock of the latter via mail order from India!). Currently, the officlal emphasis is on much more costly (and from what I have researched) less effective and potentially more hazardous drugs such as Remdesivir and Molnupiravir.
I take my hat off to the Thai administration on one score, at least. They set an example to the world by acknowledging that the vaccines were causing collatoral damage, and established a government compensation scheme which appears to be working quite well.
Next time around, Heaven forbid, there must be no indemnity for vaccine manufacturers against damage caused by experimental products rushed to market without lengthy, properly conducted and transparent trials.
You mean 2019, not 2020 for first case?
No evidence of “new” variants. No evidence of the first variant. Only evidence of iatrogenic death
I said this very thing to a friend who has fallen for the narrative hard.
This won’t stop until the jabs stop. As long as people line up for them, this madness will continue.
Quite revealing, even a government health officer should be able to see it..........hmmm
Australian Public Service is a Top Down organisation, just like a military. What you "see" is determined by whoever is above you. Do never forget that. When a government health officer is paid to NOT see something no amount of DATA will change what he is required to "see"...what
his/her superior requires them to see.
Dead on the money.
Excellent work, we don't need to be Sherlock Holmes, to figure out that we are being totally conned, and led like Sheeple to the slaughter. But the hardest thing to understand, is that in 1992 at the World Goverment conference in Rio-De-janiro over 200 world Governments all agreed to do the same things, and in very small print, for the first time, a short paragraph, about world de-population, they all signed, and it's got bigger, and bigger every meeting since, this global mass slaughter has been approved by over 200 Governments, 7.8 Billion people will be culled by 60% or more, we are all experimental lambs, being led to the slaughter. But we will make $Billions for the Pharma's, before we all die.
Very good analysis. I think the only-part that fails is the end of Section 3 where you state:
"Yes, of course, we could explain this away because the 4-jabbers are the oldest, weakest ones so they were more likely to die anyway, right? OK… So, it’s not stopping them from dying though?"
This presupposes, the deaths didn't change or would not have been different if they had 0 vaccines versus 4 vaccines in the extremely elderly and extremely sick. I feel the case can be made, death rate/deaths did drop with a pre/post vaccination examination but we cannot say it is as a result of the shots because of survivor bias and we cannot say those lives saved exceed those directly taken by vaccine deaths.
Looking at early Health Canada Daily Epidemiological Survey updates in early 2021, something like 90% of deaths were people over 65 and 80% were over 70 and 72% were over 80. So we should expect assuming only "over 65" could get a 4th booster and many of the unvaccinated are younger, healther individuals on average (which is my finding/personal experience), we'd see approximately 9:1 death ratio with zero vaccination if we just compared over 65 to under 65. After 4 shots (limited to over 65 group where I live in Canada), it looks like roughly, the 4-shot cohort are dying in the per-million at a ratio of 2:1 or 3:1 compared to the (mostly younger and likely under 65, unvaccinated cohort).
I feel like a drop of 9:1 to 3:1 or 2:1 is a sign of perhaps efficacy in those who survive the shot. The ....canary on the coalmine is how many people died as direct result of the 4 rounds of shot in order for those who did not die, to live? I think vaccine-deaths, over the short term and believe highly over the long-term will exceed the "lives saved". Furthermore, there could be "survivor bias" where the death-rate drops to 3:1 or 2:1 because covid-19 already culled the weak in the first three or four waves, so its not vaccine efficacy so much as improving average health in the population.
On the other flipside of the coin/argument, to play devil's advocate, most of those unvaccinated people have natural immunity now from prior infection. So if 4 shots dropped the death ratio from 9:1 to 3:1 or 2:1 when compared against unvaccinated people, most with natural immunity, does the prior-infection giving natural immunity outweigh the survivor bias effect? If so, then this would point to short-term 4th booster efficacy that is competitive with natural immunity/prior infection. IF. IF. IF. I feel as though there are lot of IFs to this equation.
Also consider the fact that the naturally selected virus should be less virulent too.
There is no virus, no virus has been proven to exist, look at Dr Sam Bailey’s videos
That's true too. I'm not sure of the role it would play. The less-virulent strain should benefit both the unvaccinated and 4 shot cohort, right? I am not confident if it would benefit each equally or significantly though. My intuition would be elderly have weaker immune systems and younger people have stronger immune systems, so an older stronger and newer weaker strain likely will never "kill" a young-person either way. The newer weaker-strain might be fought off by elderly immune system were the ancestral stronger would kill. So one might suppose a weaker strain would benefit the elderly more; initially, yet on the other hand, if they survived the stronger strain, obviously, they have the survivor bias and would likely survive a weaker version of the same strain (with build up immunity from prior infection, no?). So I am not sure if the effect of virulence weakening would be statistically significant unless it allowed it to reach many elderly immune systems with no prior infection.
Does a less virulent strain somehow change the ratio of deaths to be more in favor of the elderly and less in favor of youthful immune systems? Honestly, I have never looked into the topic so I have no factual-idea of the ratio would change as virulence changes or remain equal. My intuition says that factor would be statistically insignificant.
The real-wildcard there is it is less-virulent but faster-infection-rate/more-cases. So its the old 0.1% death rate of 100,000 cases a month or 0.05% of 1,000,000 cases a month. Even 50% virulence, if its 10x more infectious, isn't a reduction in fatalities. Its a rather huge catch-22. So the increase in deaths-per-million could be from greater infectivity not necessarily VIAIDS
“Some people see lines, and graphs, and data… at this point, all I see is one less Karen, a few less petty tyrants, one less virtue signaler on Twitter.”
- Joe Pantoliano, “The Matrix”, probably.
I think the analysis is difficult due to insufficient data - one would expect toxicity to be related to total spike protein dose with a time factor.... thus Modernas booster should be more toxic that Phizer and the closer the jabs were together there should also be an increase in negative impact
I know two who took 3 doses without a lot of symptom with AZ being 1&2 the P 3 and then took Moderna 4..... they both experienced noticeable side effects on No 4.... but we have to remember co morbidities dont just add to poor outcome they multiply...
This analysis does not measure the direct impact of "vaccine" toxicity though. It examines the potential mechanism that mass "vaccination" leads to mass outbreaks of COVID which subsequently (and inevitably) lead to COVID death.
Joel, what is your take on the accuracy of the info from Our World in Data? particularly this chart for covid deaths by vaccination status for over 50s in the US - https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/united-states-rates-of-covid-19-deaths-by-vaccination-status?country=~50%2B
Big confounding factor is that they opened Australia up from lockdown after the jabs. So the initial spike in cases and deaths was due to opening up after vax campaign.