I’ve been dispensing for my patients since early 2021. It’s good to be an independent doctor, disconnected from insurance. Thank you for telling the truth! God willing, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube & LinkedIn will fail & collapse soon.
Joel, April 2020 - I read this article in The Sun newspaper in U.K. Around same time I had seen @Prof Thomas J Borody and two recovered patients (obese) being interviewed on Sky News Australia.
Anti-parasitic drug could kill off coronavirus in just TWO days, scientists discover | The Sun
The lies and manipulation around this have been outrageous and caused pain, suffering and death. We all know why - no emergency use authorisation if a safe and effective medication already exists. The campaign to discredit and obliterate Ivemectin was focused and encompassed all health related bureaucratic systems. Andrew Hill's dishonesty around his study highlights the unethical behaviour of medical professionals who knew that this drug was safe. Too few stood up and fought back. In my opinion they too are complicit in mass manslaughter.
My last substack was on this very thing. We must repeat often, until it gets through to more and more people and the health bureaucrats who suppressed this effective product need to be charged with malpractice and worse.
Rancourt conjectures that many diagnoses of Covid may be incorrect.
The sufferers die, not of Covid, but of the co-morbidity of bacteria pneumonia. This would normally be treated with anti-biotics, but, because doctors believe the Covid diagnosis, they do not prescribe antibiotics and the patient dies.
Ivermectin has a well established anti-biotic effect, and it may be this - dealing with the bacterial pneumonia - which saves people's lives rather than any direct effect on the supposed Covid.
Please remember that the 92% represents relative risk reduction - the absolute risk reduction among regular takers of ivermectin- was 0.0176%- meaning that 10,000 people would have to take it regularly to avoid one death.
A postive 'covid' test or 'covid' death is non-specific and meaningless. Suppression of symptoms and antibiotic effect may account for decreased likelihood of testing positive.
This is not a randomised controlled study, so placebo effect (up to 50% benefit) is not taken into account and ivermectin takers are self selected not randomly chosen.
So you're saying that Ivermectin reduces the risk of dying from COVID, and this knowledge could have saved much unnecessary death?
The COVID that you insisted during the height of the pandemic "no longer exists as a deadly pathogen"?
Either by this logic you should eat your words as much as "scientists" (that totally homogenous group), or there is a mountain of cognitive dissonance here.
You must feel SO frustrated, but please continue getting this (new-old) news out there.
I’ve been dispensing for my patients since early 2021. It’s good to be an independent doctor, disconnected from insurance. Thank you for telling the truth! God willing, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube & LinkedIn will fail & collapse soon.
The problem is I can’t get Ivermectin anywhere.
Joel, April 2020 - I read this article in The Sun newspaper in U.K. Around same time I had seen @Prof Thomas J Borody and two recovered patients (obese) being interviewed on Sky News Australia.
Anti-parasitic drug could kill off coronavirus in just TWO days, scientists discover | The Sun
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11401060/anti-parasitic-drug-kill-coronavirus-two-days/
The lies and manipulation around this have been outrageous and caused pain, suffering and death. We all know why - no emergency use authorisation if a safe and effective medication already exists. The campaign to discredit and obliterate Ivemectin was focused and encompassed all health related bureaucratic systems. Andrew Hill's dishonesty around his study highlights the unethical behaviour of medical professionals who knew that this drug was safe. Too few stood up and fought back. In my opinion they too are complicit in mass manslaughter.
From Dr Sabine Hazan-Steinberg:
“...Cure seekers said it … first patient treated in April 2020 protocol written in April approved in July”
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04482686
My last substack was on this very thing. We must repeat often, until it gets through to more and more people and the health bureaucrats who suppressed this effective product need to be charged with malpractice and worse.
Joel, See Dr Sabine Hazan-Steinberg video
https://youtu.be/3vu_2NLDSeI
https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/google-and-facebook-owe-compensation - this would be one huge step closer to a just world.
Rancourt conjectures that many diagnoses of Covid may be incorrect.
The sufferers die, not of Covid, but of the co-morbidity of bacteria pneumonia. This would normally be treated with anti-biotics, but, because doctors believe the Covid diagnosis, they do not prescribe antibiotics and the patient dies.
Ivermectin has a well established anti-biotic effect, and it may be this - dealing with the bacterial pneumonia - which saves people's lives rather than any direct effect on the supposed Covid.
https://odysee.com/@jermwarfare:2/Denis-Rancourt-all-cause-mortality:e
Google, Linkedin, Facebook, Twitter and MSM be like: 'We were just following FBI orders'.
Iver-what...never heard of it...oh, you mean the horse paste...... sorry, I am play a dr on tv.......
We should try the censors for horsing around and paste this post in their indictments.
https://www.cureus.com/articles/111851-regular-use-of-ivermectin-as-prophylaxis-for-covid-19-led-up-to-a-92-reduction-in-covid-19-mortality-rate-in-a-dose-response-manner-results-of-a-prospective-observational-study-of-a-strictly-controlled-population-of-88012-subjects
Please remember that the 92% represents relative risk reduction - the absolute risk reduction among regular takers of ivermectin- was 0.0176%- meaning that 10,000 people would have to take it regularly to avoid one death.
A postive 'covid' test or 'covid' death is non-specific and meaningless. Suppression of symptoms and antibiotic effect may account for decreased likelihood of testing positive.
This is not a randomised controlled study, so placebo effect (up to 50% benefit) is not taken into account and ivermectin takers are self selected not randomly chosen.
Jo
So you're saying that Ivermectin reduces the risk of dying from COVID, and this knowledge could have saved much unnecessary death?
The COVID that you insisted during the height of the pandemic "no longer exists as a deadly pathogen"?
Either by this logic you should eat your words as much as "scientists" (that totally homogenous group), or there is a mountain of cognitive dissonance here.
Thank you for that first graphic. The source is https://c19ivermectin.com/
Very helpful, thank you.