The royals are globalists, many of whom support massive global depopulation. Here's what Prince Phillip (Queen Elizabeth's husband) stated: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”
These are the type of people the ignorant and gullible praise.
Or as many have discovered to our silent terror, almost every person we have known, loved, grown up with, worked and studied alongside, dated or befriended, with very few exceptions.
The only thing they realeased was a shit storm of brainwashing and propaganda, Joel. That, it pains me to say,even those considered awake, are still buying into. But anyway, looking at the weather today, at least all those street BBQs in celebration of child sacraficing, elite paedo rings might get rained off. Such a shame
Well - the British Royalty is part of the Constitution and Government - His Majesty’s Government, etc so it is not anachronistic or irrelevant as all our institutions are entwined with it. The value of the monarchy is not in the power it holds (none) but the power it denies others. A coup in the UK would be very difficult. And what’s the alternative? A de facto elected monarch. Our monarch has no power, the US monarch is a demented despot, France’s monarch thinks he’s Napoleon. . As for cost. £84 million a year to cover all costs of official duties at home and abroad- staff, travel, maintenance/repair of buildings. The Palaces are property of the Crown, not the monarch, and so are not part of royal wealth. George III signed over most of his royal estates to the State in exchange for an annual stipend - now the Sovereign Grant. At the time land values and rents were dropping and he thought he was making a good deal. Today that property - owned by the Crown Estates - yields its profits to the Treasury, which in 2022 was £140+ million. It is out of these receipts the Sovereign Grant is paid. So in fact the royals cost us nothing, and we get a surplus. However. I won’t be watching the Coronation because a spoilt, ignorant, nitwit is being crowned. The monarchy is supposed to be apolitical. If they have a political view we are not supposed to know it. We never knew the late Queen’s opinion about Climate Change or if she had one. We have no doubt about Charles’ as he’s been haranguing us fir decades. The monarch is supposed to serve the interests if the people. Idiot Charles serves the interests of the WEF and a consortium of misanthropic ideologues. Pox on’t.
And there’s more bad news for Meghan, she was not the first coloured person in the British royal family. Queen Charlotte married to the mad king has a Spanish prince father and a Moorish mother.
Can a Yank jump in? I was dismayed by the defense of Prince Philip who actually wanted to reincarnate covid-like and kill off people. Now Chuck gets grief, deservedly. I like the UK. (England swings like a pendulum do.)
You include the hideous crimes of monarchs in the past. I can call you on that and raise you a 100-fold with every supposedly better form of gov't. Ask Matt Hancock just how democide feels.
Royalty? Whom would you prefer as your murderer? About 70% went Nazi over the "pandemic." Not much stock of "good" folks to put in charge. But do we deserve better?
He must be the first King who's published a LadyBird Book - on climate change, co-authored by Emily Shuckburgh, the Cambridge climate scientist appointed as the first director of the Climate Repair Centre, which aims to 'fix' our broken climate via geo-engineering. As one of the "headless chicken brigade", I find it somewhat amusing that this madcap former heir to the throne, and now King, would buddy up with an unhinged 'climate scientist' to publish a silly little Ladybird Book obviously designed to brainwash kids about man-made climate change.
The following phrase does NOT belong in this diatribe, "the dark history of slavery ... for which royals of the far-distant past are responsible". Please buy and read Black Rednecks and White Liberals by Thomas Sowell (https://archive.org/details/blackredneckswhi0000sowe) to get a good perspective on the subject. The British went far out of their way to reduce the amount of slavery rampant in the world for millenia.
Now if the British forced natives in their colonies to eat too much grain and not enough animal-based foods, then the following phrase is quite damning, "the dark history of ... colonial abuses for which royals of the far-distant past are responsible".
I had a mildly favorable impression of Queen Elizabeth II and have a strong negative impression of Chuck III. Interestingly, my dad was a native in the British and French empires and the remnants of the Ottoman empire, and he found the British least oppressive.
We went out with a friend last night who is of a certain age and is still very much a monarchist. Her standard argument for retaining the monarchy rests on the same old, tired argument that the royal family bring more tourist income to the UK than it costs to keep them. This is provably false and is just one part of my many arguments for republicanism. She’s also very much in denial of the Covid scam. However, I think it’s still worth chipping away at that one as I occasionally see chinks of light getting through! Not so the anti-royal argument. I guess you need to pick your battles ...
The WHO ends the Corona crisis the day before the Corona tion
The royals are globalists, many of whom support massive global depopulation. Here's what Prince Phillip (Queen Elizabeth's husband) stated: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”
These are the type of people the ignorant and gullible praise.
Moronic NPCs... I like it. See also:
Sheeple
Normies
Jabtards
Maskholes
Woketards
Useful Idiots
Uncritical Thinkers
Brain dead MSM-hypnotised zombies
Cockup not Conspiracy
Compliant Automatons
Existential Threats to Prosperity & Humanity
Or as many have discovered to our silent terror, almost every person we have known, loved, grown up with, worked and studied alongside, dated or befriended, with very few exceptions.
The only thing they realeased was a shit storm of brainwashing and propaganda, Joel. That, it pains me to say,even those considered awake, are still buying into. But anyway, looking at the weather today, at least all those street BBQs in celebration of child sacraficing, elite paedo rings might get rained off. Such a shame
Well - the British Royalty is part of the Constitution and Government - His Majesty’s Government, etc so it is not anachronistic or irrelevant as all our institutions are entwined with it. The value of the monarchy is not in the power it holds (none) but the power it denies others. A coup in the UK would be very difficult. And what’s the alternative? A de facto elected monarch. Our monarch has no power, the US monarch is a demented despot, France’s monarch thinks he’s Napoleon. . As for cost. £84 million a year to cover all costs of official duties at home and abroad- staff, travel, maintenance/repair of buildings. The Palaces are property of the Crown, not the monarch, and so are not part of royal wealth. George III signed over most of his royal estates to the State in exchange for an annual stipend - now the Sovereign Grant. At the time land values and rents were dropping and he thought he was making a good deal. Today that property - owned by the Crown Estates - yields its profits to the Treasury, which in 2022 was £140+ million. It is out of these receipts the Sovereign Grant is paid. So in fact the royals cost us nothing, and we get a surplus. However. I won’t be watching the Coronation because a spoilt, ignorant, nitwit is being crowned. The monarchy is supposed to be apolitical. If they have a political view we are not supposed to know it. We never knew the late Queen’s opinion about Climate Change or if she had one. We have no doubt about Charles’ as he’s been haranguing us fir decades. The monarch is supposed to serve the interests if the people. Idiot Charles serves the interests of the WEF and a consortium of misanthropic ideologues. Pox on’t.
Kaiser Sose Saxe-Coburg-Gotha...
The greatest trick the devil played was to convince us he (didn't exist) was benign... Just another billionaire business.
‘CO₂ Reduction’ Is a Mass Murder Policy Designed by Wall Street and the City of London https://larouchepub.com/special_report/2019/2019-eir-special-report-co2-redux-is-murder.pdf
What are the odds of Zelensky popping up at the coronation? 🙄
Have you seen this?
Here’s the video of a stadium full of people in the UK singing the old favourite “stick that coronation up your arse”
In the key of D 😂😂😂
https://fb.watch/klRxmquDdr/?mibextid=YCRy0i
And there’s more bad news for Meghan, she was not the first coloured person in the British royal family. Queen Charlotte married to the mad king has a Spanish prince father and a Moorish mother.
Can a Yank jump in? I was dismayed by the defense of Prince Philip who actually wanted to reincarnate covid-like and kill off people. Now Chuck gets grief, deservedly. I like the UK. (England swings like a pendulum do.)
You include the hideous crimes of monarchs in the past. I can call you on that and raise you a 100-fold with every supposedly better form of gov't. Ask Matt Hancock just how democide feels.
Royalty? Whom would you prefer as your murderer? About 70% went Nazi over the "pandemic." Not much stock of "good" folks to put in charge. But do we deserve better?
He must be the first King who's published a LadyBird Book - on climate change, co-authored by Emily Shuckburgh, the Cambridge climate scientist appointed as the first director of the Climate Repair Centre, which aims to 'fix' our broken climate via geo-engineering. As one of the "headless chicken brigade", I find it somewhat amusing that this madcap former heir to the throne, and now King, would buddy up with an unhinged 'climate scientist' to publish a silly little Ladybird Book obviously designed to brainwash kids about man-made climate change.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/jan/15/prince-charles-pens-ladybird-book-on-climate-change
https://cliscep.com/2019/05/10/cambridge-scientists-set-up-the-worlds-first-climate-repair-centre/
Someone needs to update the Sex Pistols song, "God Save The Queen".... Too bad that I'm not a musician. Any takers?
The following phrase does NOT belong in this diatribe, "the dark history of slavery ... for which royals of the far-distant past are responsible". Please buy and read Black Rednecks and White Liberals by Thomas Sowell (https://archive.org/details/blackredneckswhi0000sowe) to get a good perspective on the subject. The British went far out of their way to reduce the amount of slavery rampant in the world for millenia.
Now if the British forced natives in their colonies to eat too much grain and not enough animal-based foods, then the following phrase is quite damning, "the dark history of ... colonial abuses for which royals of the far-distant past are responsible".
I had a mildly favorable impression of Queen Elizabeth II and have a strong negative impression of Chuck III. Interestingly, my dad was a native in the British and French empires and the remnants of the Ottoman empire, and he found the British least oppressive.
We went out with a friend last night who is of a certain age and is still very much a monarchist. Her standard argument for retaining the monarchy rests on the same old, tired argument that the royal family bring more tourist income to the UK than it costs to keep them. This is provably false and is just one part of my many arguments for republicanism. She’s also very much in denial of the Covid scam. However, I think it’s still worth chipping away at that one as I occasionally see chinks of light getting through! Not so the anti-royal argument. I guess you need to pick your battles ...
Definitely not my King. Ugh.