This is a great idea you got going. A template is forming. These posts need to be pushed everywhere. Time and energy permitting I hope you do the Blue states as well.
I think what you are doing is spot on. I think we need to get these posts out.. state by state. That said I think most of those people could be reluctant to share info especially if it was their idea.
Crazy idea. We contact Liability Lawyers in each state and give them the info. I bet a few scumbags see the potential money in it and could prove to be helpful in a back door kind of way.
Emperor Abbott doesn't care. He still has his tyrannical emergency orders in place from 2-years ago, with no end in sight. The only reason he opened the state back up is because he received 0% of the vote at 2021's CPAC. He's just another RINO.
"You have protected Texans from non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID that have been proven to be harmful and ineffective"
What state do you live in? I'm in Texas. Greg Abbott almost single handedly enforced 10 months of forced masking, forced job loss, the destruction of entire industries, and arbitrary business capacity limitations. He closed interstate traffic and churches for a time. He passed a fake vaccine mandate ban, that he knew was toothless. After his vaxx mandate "ban", my entire family faced workplace vaxx mandates. He then refused to call a special session to address the issue, stating that he had already dealt with it.
He ended masking, he stated, because he had taught Texans how to mask now going forward, so the mandate wasn't needed.
The guy is a serial liar that did everything on COVID wrong, that literally renewed Texas's 27+ month COVID "emergency" last week! Last week! 10 months of abject lawlessness and much more = "protected Texans"? ..... Give me a break.....
The problem with Abbott is, that like his predecessor, he gets plenty of money for his political ambitions from the pharmaceutical companies. Granted, I don't think anyone gets as much from them as Perry did, and Perry repaid them well, especially Merck, by adding Guardasil to the childhood vaccines needed to attend public schools.
Abbott is head and shoulders above Perry and most other governors. He's not as good at protecting the citizens of his state as DeSantis, but he's in the top 3-4. But Abbott refused to sign the pledge that he would fight to prevent Texas having the mandate. Two of his primary challengers signed the pledge. None of those running in the Democrat primary signed the pledge. So, even if faced with these facts, I'd bet $100 that he won't stop the madness.
As a lifelong Texas resident, I will send the info to his office, even though it will likely be staff that reads it and does nothing about it.
Yes, we know that politics and money always get in the way of fortitude and integrity so these open letters serve a purpose to put them on public notice that we are making them aware of the facts at least. An opportunity to avoid the consequences of continuing to condone the use of a known fatal, experimental intervention, if nothing else?
Gardasil is not a required vaccine for school in Texas. I currently have a 17,16,15 & 13 year old kids and NONE have gotten a Gardasil vaccine. Perry did attempt to make it mandatory, but too many people protested.
Thank you for clarifying that. I stand corrected. I understood he got it on the schedule of childhood vaccines for girls. (There was talk about trying to get it for boys too, but that didn't happen.) He tried to repay Merck, and I am glad to hear that he didn't get it on the vaccine schedule for girls, or boys.
To make sure that I understand completely, no HPV vaccine is required? Thanks bunches!
I don't see it as a compromise. From all I know (which is quite a bit), the reason people took the shots is because they were given false information. It's "safe and effective." Also, there was massive pressure. If the information becomes accurate, and before getting a shot or booster, people have to read or see a video about the injuries and deaths, the rise in cancer and heart problems, etc, I believe there would be very few people (except the ultra brainwashed) who would get near a shot. I see it would be mission accomplished.
Many missions left to go: To undo as many of the harmful effects as possible. To hold those accountable who have been part of disseminating false information. Etc.
It is all German but worth to translate. Swedish Health officials published the figures of C19 death in the following groups "partial vaccinated" (I guess people who refused to take second jab) and people with one jab but before second jab (21 days). In official calculation these death had been counted in the group as unvaccinated. Amazing are the numbers In total 919 vacinated with at least one dose died from C19 in these groups. That are more than 30% of the official unvaccinated C19 death!
I have seen that Clare publisged a study about similar stuff in UK data.
He found in the raw data of the study from Israel something interessting:
Bar-On, Y. M., et al. (2022). "Protection by a Fourth Dose of BNT162b2 against Omicron in Israel." New England Journal of Medicine 386(18): 1712-1720.
They investigated the protection of the forth jab by comparing it with the third jab. The findinig is not metioned in the study but shown in Table 1.
In the study is a "Internal Control Group" which according to Florian consits of people with four jabs but without the 8 delay before they count officialy as "people with 4 jabs".
In table 1 are the ratios for infection per 100.000 and severe case per 100.000. The data looks like this:
1) Sever cases
In the control group it is 4.2 for the people with three shots it is 3.9. For the official four times jabbed with 8 day delay it is only 1.5.
Infection rate same order:
388; 361; 177
For me it is not clear how the control group is excatly defined. If it is only within this 8 day category or the full time like the official 4-jab roup plus the 8 day intervall.
Please check for your self and forward it to Claire and/or maybe Igor. He is very good in finding nuggets in the apendix of studies.
Indeed. Take your pick - lockdowns, business closures, masks. All proven to have massively deleterious impact and absolutely no benefit. They never did the cost/benefit analysis (no surprise) but we have (as usual).
Go Joel!!
You are a hero of these evil years. Thank you for continuing to fight.
This is a great idea you got going. A template is forming. These posts need to be pushed everywhere. Time and energy permitting I hope you do the Blue states as well.
I'm open to suggestions. It takes me about 20 minutes per state to compile.
I think what you are doing is spot on. I think we need to get these posts out.. state by state. That said I think most of those people could be reluctant to share info especially if it was their idea.
Crazy idea. We contact Liability Lawyers in each state and give them the info. I bet a few scumbags see the potential money in it and could prove to be helpful in a back door kind of way.
Emperor Abbott doesn't care. He still has his tyrannical emergency orders in place from 2-years ago, with no end in sight. The only reason he opened the state back up is because he received 0% of the vote at 2021's CPAC. He's just another RINO.
"You have protected Texans from non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID that have been proven to be harmful and ineffective"
What state do you live in? I'm in Texas. Greg Abbott almost single handedly enforced 10 months of forced masking, forced job loss, the destruction of entire industries, and arbitrary business capacity limitations. He closed interstate traffic and churches for a time. He passed a fake vaccine mandate ban, that he knew was toothless. After his vaxx mandate "ban", my entire family faced workplace vaxx mandates. He then refused to call a special session to address the issue, stating that he had already dealt with it.
He ended masking, he stated, because he had taught Texans how to mask now going forward, so the mandate wasn't needed.
The guy is a serial liar that did everything on COVID wrong, that literally renewed Texas's 27+ month COVID "emergency" last week! Last week! 10 months of abject lawlessness and much more = "protected Texans"? ..... Give me a break.....
Trying to be diplomatic!!
Yep. Just another gutless, lying politician.
The problem with Abbott is, that like his predecessor, he gets plenty of money for his political ambitions from the pharmaceutical companies. Granted, I don't think anyone gets as much from them as Perry did, and Perry repaid them well, especially Merck, by adding Guardasil to the childhood vaccines needed to attend public schools.
Abbott is head and shoulders above Perry and most other governors. He's not as good at protecting the citizens of his state as DeSantis, but he's in the top 3-4. But Abbott refused to sign the pledge that he would fight to prevent Texas having the mandate. Two of his primary challengers signed the pledge. None of those running in the Democrat primary signed the pledge. So, even if faced with these facts, I'd bet $100 that he won't stop the madness.
As a lifelong Texas resident, I will send the info to his office, even though it will likely be staff that reads it and does nothing about it.
Yes, we know that politics and money always get in the way of fortitude and integrity so these open letters serve a purpose to put them on public notice that we are making them aware of the facts at least. An opportunity to avoid the consequences of continuing to condone the use of a known fatal, experimental intervention, if nothing else?
Gardasil is not a required vaccine for school in Texas. I currently have a 17,16,15 & 13 year old kids and NONE have gotten a Gardasil vaccine. Perry did attempt to make it mandatory, but too many people protested.
Thank you for clarifying that. I stand corrected. I understood he got it on the schedule of childhood vaccines for girls. (There was talk about trying to get it for boys too, but that didn't happen.) He tried to repay Merck, and I am glad to hear that he didn't get it on the vaccine schedule for girls, or boys.
To make sure that I understand completely, no HPV vaccine is required? Thanks bunches!
Correct. No HPV is required for either boys or girls. I have 3 teenage boys and 1 teenage girl and none have been required to have HPV vaccination.
Once again, thanks ever so much!
Great. I still hold that one needs to still permit choice, but to insist on people being utterly informed - like of all the risks and dangers.
If that's the compromise, it's not the worst outcome?
I don't see it as a compromise. From all I know (which is quite a bit), the reason people took the shots is because they were given false information. It's "safe and effective." Also, there was massive pressure. If the information becomes accurate, and before getting a shot or booster, people have to read or see a video about the injuries and deaths, the rise in cancer and heart problems, etc, I believe there would be very few people (except the ultra brainwashed) who would get near a shot. I see it would be mission accomplished.
Many missions left to go: To undo as many of the harmful effects as possible. To hold those accountable who have been part of disseminating false information. Etc.
Thank you Joel for getting the facts out on what's really going on with these genen therapies.
I've been sending the Canadian stats to MPs and MLAs!
Note this article on All Cause Mortality supporting your conclusions:
https://www.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/42/77
Great work Joel. Well done!!
Well said.
CDC excess mortality data begs to differ.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm
It says "As some deaths due to COVID-19 may be assigned to other causes of deaths..."
That means vaccines, also the primary driver of "virus."
Dear Joel,
this is completly off Topic. I have seen that you published together with Clare Craig. Could you forward her this link.
https://blog.bastian-barucker.de/schweden-sterblichkeit-impfstatus/
It is all German but worth to translate. Swedish Health officials published the figures of C19 death in the following groups "partial vaccinated" (I guess people who refused to take second jab) and people with one jab but before second jab (21 days). In official calculation these death had been counted in the group as unvaccinated. Amazing are the numbers In total 919 vacinated with at least one dose died from C19 in these groups. That are more than 30% of the official unvaccinated C19 death!
I have seen that Clare publisged a study about similar stuff in UK data.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358979921_Official_mortality_data_for_England_reveal_systematic_undercounting_of_deaths_occurring_within_first_two_weeks_of_Covid-19_vaccination?channel=doi&linkId=6220b299c4c4fa27cd25201a&showFulltext=true
Maybe she can make use of that information.
I also have just seen that you had been part of the team of this study.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357778435_Official_mortality_data_for_England_suggest_systematic_miscategorisation_of_vaccine_status_and_uncertain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination
Congrats. Great study. A shame that nobody dares to publish it. Phafia is preventing it.
Thanks for your work! Please keep going!
Regards
Jens
Done
I have another finding that points in the same direction. Credit for that findig does not go to me but Florian Schilling who runs a small blog here:
https://www.florianschillingscience.org/
He found in the raw data of the study from Israel something interessting:
Bar-On, Y. M., et al. (2022). "Protection by a Fourth Dose of BNT162b2 against Omicron in Israel." New England Journal of Medicine 386(18): 1712-1720.
They investigated the protection of the forth jab by comparing it with the third jab. The findinig is not metioned in the study but shown in Table 1.
In the study is a "Internal Control Group" which according to Florian consits of people with four jabs but without the 8 delay before they count officialy as "people with 4 jabs".
In table 1 are the ratios for infection per 100.000 and severe case per 100.000. The data looks like this:
1) Sever cases
In the control group it is 4.2 for the people with three shots it is 3.9. For the official four times jabbed with 8 day delay it is only 1.5.
Infection rate same order:
388; 361; 177
For me it is not clear how the control group is excatly defined. If it is only within this 8 day category or the full time like the official 4-jab roup plus the 8 day intervall.
Please check for your self and forward it to Claire and/or maybe Igor. He is very good in finding nuggets in the apendix of studies.
Best regards
Jens
Thank you for your work!
Could you also do these short analyses for countries in Europe?
I live in Texas and do what I can!!
What do you mean non pharmaceutical interventions proven to be harmful and ineffective?
I think he is talking about lockdowns etc.
Indeed. Take your pick - lockdowns, business closures, masks. All proven to have massively deleterious impact and absolutely no benefit. They never did the cost/benefit analysis (no surprise) but we have (as usual).