There was a time when journalists - which Morgan no doubt purports to be - actually checked facts before sharing them. Now they’re just conduits for establishment propaganda.
Hate speech. I don't know how he, and his kind, got away with it. My PM Trudeau, is probably the very worst of these. I still have to pinch myself to believe these people were aiming their comments at me! Me, who as an RN for 40 years, held autonomy, informed consent and medical ethics as sacrosanct. And I'm NOT a bloody anti vaxer!!!!!
100% Bang on Joel! The same information was available to all of us.
Same like The Atlantic saying RDS Florida “Gamble” paid off!
It was NOT a “Gamble”!
It was based on the real Science of airborne respiratory viruses, and the Data, and open transparent discussions with Dr’s and Scientists/Academics from all sides.
Prof Michael Levitt did thé initial analysis on Diamond Princess 🛳️ in Jan 2020. As did @Nick Hudson PANDA as did Ivor Cummins.
Prof Knut Wittkowski NYC 🇺🇸 and several others called all this in great detail in Feb, March, April 2020.
Prof Tom Borody Aussie was already curing obese comorbidities people with Zinc + IVM/HCQ + Doxycycline/Azithromycin.
Ditto Dr Vladimir Zelenko.
It was all available to all to see.
No “Gamble” intentional slant by LibTard Atlantic 👊👊
Piers Morgan and The Atlantic have no where to hide. They knowingly chose one side, when there was lots of information available showing another side, which any genuine investigative journalist or publication with spine and moral values would have looked into!
If this talentless cretin got on his hands and knees and said sorry, and begged for forgiveness I would still spit in his face!!!....the damage he and his ilk have caused society, and my family (and many other relationships) can NEVER be repaired!! F*ck him
Again, it took us some hours of investigation to see that it didn’t work as promised. Fuck their excuse.
PLUS, what if it worked but had all these awful adverse reactions? Still compulsory piers? Even though it could kill you or your kid with zero risk from the virus? Again, fuck these people to death.
You should watch the Maria Zee podcast with Sacha Latypova interview. She’s on Zee media. Com and posts to Telegram. If I had the skills I’d repost it here. It completely proves there was absolutely no science, and why nobody will be held accountable.
Never could quite grasp which part of “take this experimental untested drug multiple times which we have no safety data for and if you don’t we’ll lock you out of society and fire you from your job” was appealing? See to me that just sounded crazy. There was no way hell I’d do that. But the majority did and our public institutions all pushed it hard. Now ... no apology, no reparations. I suffered as did many. The media still pushes it in some quarters. Vaxxing, masking, social distancing is still all the rage here in Australia. They’re getting ready to do it all again with our 4th, 5th wave? These people are surely too stupid to breathe. I don’t know what’s wrong with them. Some kind of social conditioning that robs them of their ability to think and simultaneously their balls. Jab away idiots.
Oh sure, Piers. You're paid such a lot of money, you can afford to change your mind in public and think you can get away with it.
Spare a thought for those whom you vilified and whose cancellation YOU publically supported, so that their livelihoods were cancelled and they're now fighting to survive on a daily basis.
Spare a thought for those who lost their loved ones, isolated in elderly people's homes because of the mainstream media's false narrative.
Spare a thought for those who didn't have the strength to withstand, buckled to pressure and are now permanently disabled, like Alex Mitchell.
Or those who are dead because they thought they would be saving YOU if they got this experimental injection.
Hmmmmh. .... Felt a little rant coming on.
Question to others here: Do you think that the majority of people who resisted the lies are those who had so much time on their hands, because of lockdown and no work?
Because that's our situation. We knew from the start that it was a lie because God told us it was - but we had time to read up about it as well. Several in my family who were some busy in their jobs (incl. in the medical profession) didn't question the narrative for different reasons:
one was obedience to higher authority;
another is, I'm convinced, dependence on Wellcome Trust funding;
a third is, they just didn't have time and thought that everything the government did must have been justified.
His previous statements are straight out of a Red Top Rag leader article designed to pump up and inflate the fear already created in the minds of the gullible who bought the same Rag. They are also the statements of a wholly ignorant person who does not have the humanity to examine the information he uses to make these statements which remind me of similar ignorant comments made by his former GMB colleague (Dr?) Hilary Jones. PM's volte face rumblings are in no way convincing - they appear to me to be very opportunistic, and only made so he can say at some point "well, I did change my mind" - Sorry Herr Morgan, that ain't anywhere near good enough and your culpability for supporting the crime of SARS COV2 scamdemic policies in the first place is never to be erased.
He is a gutless arse who did exactly as ordered and was too chickenshit to stand up and be counted as OFCOM would have had him sacked for not following their notice to Broadcasters dated 23rd March 2020:
What all broadcasters must adhere to or else - the official document to justify the covid narrative censorship:
In the BBC’s Framework Agreement that came into force in 2016 is Section 67, page 44, Defence and Emergency Arrangements.
This is what it says in the first 2 lines:
67. Defence and Emergency Arrangements
(1) Any UK Government Minister-
(a) may request that the BBC broadcast or otherwise distribute any announcement; and
(b) may, if that Minister has requested that the announcement be broadcast or otherwise distributed on television or by means of an online service, request that the BBC accompany that announcement with a visual image (moving or still) of anything mentioned in the announcement.
(2) If it appears to any UK Government Minister that an emergency has arisen, that Minister may request that the BBC broadcast or otherwise distribute any announcement or other programme.
There is a bit more on how they have to comply that then follows.
It was the absolute hatred these people seemed to have for other people who just made different choices. Imagine if that was the case over people who prefer tea to coffee?
I was told several times by relatives that I was wicked and clearly didn't care if other people died. Because I had done my research and they had listened to Piers Morgan, Jeremy Vine, Andrew Neil. Now they either don't talk about their choice to believe it was a plague and to take the obviously untested jab or they say they "just don't know what to believe any more". Still not doing any research themselves though.
"These trials seem designed to prove their vaccines work, even if the measured effects are minimal.
What would a normal vaccine trial look like?
Prevention of infection must be a critical endpoint. Any vaccine trial should include regular antigen testing every three days to test contagiousness to pick up early signs of infection and PCR testing once a week to confirm infection by SARS-CoV-2 test the ability of the vaccines to stave off infection. Prevention of infection is not a criterion for success for any of these vaccines. In fact, their endpoints all require confirmed infections and all those they will include in the analysis for success, the only difference being the severity of symptoms between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Measuring differences amongst only those infected by SARS-CoV-2 underscores the implicit conclusion that the vaccines are not expected to prevent infection, only modify symptoms of those infected."
-------
Forbes article, Sept. 23, 2020!
Explaining that the trials were not even measuring infection/transmission.
All one had to do subsequent to any of this was pull up the NEJM Pfizer study and crunch some numbers and see the relative risk vs. absolute risk lie. And sort out that something was gravely amiss.
There was a time when journalists - which Morgan no doubt purports to be - actually checked facts before sharing them. Now they’re just conduits for establishment propaganda.
Hate speech. I don't know how he, and his kind, got away with it. My PM Trudeau, is probably the very worst of these. I still have to pinch myself to believe these people were aiming their comments at me! Me, who as an RN for 40 years, held autonomy, informed consent and medical ethics as sacrosanct. And I'm NOT a bloody anti vaxer!!!!!
Piers Morgan, he who has the dubious reputation of being a “journalist”, did absolutely no research and refused to listen to those who had.
It exposed him for what he is, an egotistical nasty bit of work.
I will never forget these people and what they said and did, and there are many of them.
INDEPENDENT CRITICAL THINKING...
100% Bang on Joel! The same information was available to all of us.
Same like The Atlantic saying RDS Florida “Gamble” paid off!
It was NOT a “Gamble”!
It was based on the real Science of airborne respiratory viruses, and the Data, and open transparent discussions with Dr’s and Scientists/Academics from all sides.
Prof Michael Levitt did thé initial analysis on Diamond Princess 🛳️ in Jan 2020. As did @Nick Hudson PANDA as did Ivor Cummins.
Prof Knut Wittkowski NYC 🇺🇸 and several others called all this in great detail in Feb, March, April 2020.
Prof Tom Borody Aussie was already curing obese comorbidities people with Zinc + IVM/HCQ + Doxycycline/Azithromycin.
Ditto Dr Vladimir Zelenko.
It was all available to all to see.
No “Gamble” intentional slant by LibTard Atlantic 👊👊
Piers Morgan and The Atlantic have no where to hide. They knowingly chose one side, when there was lots of information available showing another side, which any genuine investigative journalist or publication with spine and moral values would have looked into!
If this talentless cretin got on his hands and knees and said sorry, and begged for forgiveness I would still spit in his face!!!....the damage he and his ilk have caused society, and my family (and many other relationships) can NEVER be repaired!! F*ck him
Again, it took us some hours of investigation to see that it didn’t work as promised. Fuck their excuse.
PLUS, what if it worked but had all these awful adverse reactions? Still compulsory piers? Even though it could kill you or your kid with zero risk from the virus? Again, fuck these people to death.
You should watch the Maria Zee podcast with Sacha Latypova interview. She’s on Zee media. Com and posts to Telegram. If I had the skills I’d repost it here. It completely proves there was absolutely no science, and why nobody will be held accountable.
Never could quite grasp which part of “take this experimental untested drug multiple times which we have no safety data for and if you don’t we’ll lock you out of society and fire you from your job” was appealing? See to me that just sounded crazy. There was no way hell I’d do that. But the majority did and our public institutions all pushed it hard. Now ... no apology, no reparations. I suffered as did many. The media still pushes it in some quarters. Vaxxing, masking, social distancing is still all the rage here in Australia. They’re getting ready to do it all again with our 4th, 5th wave? These people are surely too stupid to breathe. I don’t know what’s wrong with them. Some kind of social conditioning that robs them of their ability to think and simultaneously their balls. Jab away idiots.
Oh sure, Piers. You're paid such a lot of money, you can afford to change your mind in public and think you can get away with it.
Spare a thought for those whom you vilified and whose cancellation YOU publically supported, so that their livelihoods were cancelled and they're now fighting to survive on a daily basis.
Spare a thought for those who lost their loved ones, isolated in elderly people's homes because of the mainstream media's false narrative.
Spare a thought for those who didn't have the strength to withstand, buckled to pressure and are now permanently disabled, like Alex Mitchell.
Or those who are dead because they thought they would be saving YOU if they got this experimental injection.
Hmmmmh. .... Felt a little rant coming on.
Question to others here: Do you think that the majority of people who resisted the lies are those who had so much time on their hands, because of lockdown and no work?
Because that's our situation. We knew from the start that it was a lie because God told us it was - but we had time to read up about it as well. Several in my family who were some busy in their jobs (incl. in the medical profession) didn't question the narrative for different reasons:
one was obedience to higher authority;
another is, I'm convinced, dependence on Wellcome Trust funding;
a third is, they just didn't have time and thought that everything the government did must have been justified.
His previous statements are straight out of a Red Top Rag leader article designed to pump up and inflate the fear already created in the minds of the gullible who bought the same Rag. They are also the statements of a wholly ignorant person who does not have the humanity to examine the information he uses to make these statements which remind me of similar ignorant comments made by his former GMB colleague (Dr?) Hilary Jones. PM's volte face rumblings are in no way convincing - they appear to me to be very opportunistic, and only made so he can say at some point "well, I did change my mind" - Sorry Herr Morgan, that ain't anywhere near good enough and your culpability for supporting the crime of SARS COV2 scamdemic policies in the first place is never to be erased.
Why does anyone listen to him? Morgan is a buffoon.
He is a gutless arse who did exactly as ordered and was too chickenshit to stand up and be counted as OFCOM would have had him sacked for not following their notice to Broadcasters dated 23rd March 2020:
What all broadcasters must adhere to or else - the official document to justify the covid narrative censorship:
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0025/193075/Note-to-broadcasters-Coronavirus.pdf
https://www.ofcom.org.uk/tv-radio-and-on-demand/information-for-industry/guidance/broadcast-standards-and-coronavirus
They used it against this channel and Eammon Holmes:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/ofcom-sanctioned-this-tv-channel
The BBC is also hamstrung by this in addition to OFCOM - their 2016 framework agreement.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/584329/57965_Cm_9366_Print__1_.pdf
This is from the BBC's framework agreement, officially sanctioned "broadcast what we want or else" clause:
https://awkwardgit.substack.com/p/bbc-framework-agreement-section-67
In the BBC’s Framework Agreement that came into force in 2016 is Section 67, page 44, Defence and Emergency Arrangements.
This is what it says in the first 2 lines:
67. Defence and Emergency Arrangements
(1) Any UK Government Minister-
(a) may request that the BBC broadcast or otherwise distribute any announcement; and
(b) may, if that Minister has requested that the announcement be broadcast or otherwise distributed on television or by means of an online service, request that the BBC accompany that announcement with a visual image (moving or still) of anything mentioned in the announcement.
(2) If it appears to any UK Government Minister that an emergency has arisen, that Minister may request that the BBC broadcast or otherwise distribute any announcement or other programme.
There is a bit more on how they have to comply that then follows.
I will never ever forget!
Was Morgan and all his fellow vax pushers paid
for their efforts in persuading people to get the
clot shot and attacking those who refused?
It was the absolute hatred these people seemed to have for other people who just made different choices. Imagine if that was the case over people who prefer tea to coffee?
I was told several times by relatives that I was wicked and clearly didn't care if other people died. Because I had done my research and they had listened to Piers Morgan, Jeremy Vine, Andrew Neil. Now they either don't talk about their choice to believe it was a plague and to take the obviously untested jab or they say they "just don't know what to believe any more". Still not doing any research themselves though.
"These trials seem designed to prove their vaccines work, even if the measured effects are minimal.
What would a normal vaccine trial look like?
Prevention of infection must be a critical endpoint. Any vaccine trial should include regular antigen testing every three days to test contagiousness to pick up early signs of infection and PCR testing once a week to confirm infection by SARS-CoV-2 test the ability of the vaccines to stave off infection. Prevention of infection is not a criterion for success for any of these vaccines. In fact, their endpoints all require confirmed infections and all those they will include in the analysis for success, the only difference being the severity of symptoms between the vaccinated and unvaccinated. Measuring differences amongst only those infected by SARS-CoV-2 underscores the implicit conclusion that the vaccines are not expected to prevent infection, only modify symptoms of those infected."
-------
Forbes article, Sept. 23, 2020!
Explaining that the trials were not even measuring infection/transmission.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/09/23/covid-19-vaccine-protocols-reveal-that-trials-are-designed-to-succeed/?sh=5a62ca595247
-----
All one had to do subsequent to any of this was pull up the NEJM Pfizer study and crunch some numbers and see the relative risk vs. absolute risk lie. And sort out that something was gravely amiss.
Or dunno...watch a Geert Video.