Not that I'm aware of. I used to speak daily with a Korean in 2020 but not heard from him since. "Imissthesmiles", if you're out there, give me s a shout!
I don't think it was just about the money I think it's far more sinister than that, I read an interesting comment that the 🇬🇧 govern/ment bought a pile of anti coagulant drugs before the plandemic started . They new the harms and carried on regardless, everyone was lied too.There was a massive drive to get everyone injected and it's still going on, there are trials for infants and they still recommend expecting mothers to get the shots.The only thing that currently makes any sense to me is population reduction and getting us all tracked🤝What most people don't realise I that we are the enemy and our govern/ ments are at war with us.Ive said this before ,they blew up the Georgia guide stones as it was a little obvious having it in print for people to read.
Agreed. They can always print more FIAT shekels as needed, but getting a tri-masked, quad jabbed, once free man to beg to enter a grocery store, that is priceless to the evil entities running the Globe.
Aye. I followed the early Codus Alimentarus globalist shit show in the early 2000's pretty closely, thanks to Mercola sounding the alarm. They had us at CheckMate long ago. Only thing left is for them to crush the few of us who notice, and every word we type, in lieu of actions, helps them.
Excellent read, great info. I believe the scam was both profiteering and depopulation (or subjugation, many of these folks will be highly reliant upon government medical care in the decades to come).
On the subject of reproduction, I think it is much more complex than just looking at South Korea's interesting numbers. The various jabs had highly variable effects based upon batch, age and health of recipients, and ACE2 receptors (racial differences). In Israel, for example, despite being highly compliant, Ashkenazim have seen increased birth rates the past 3 years, but Sephardi reduced. A number of widely accepted studies have shown that Caucasians and Blacks have had the most deleterious effects and birthing issues, while East Asians are lower, and at the bottom of the effects ladder are the aforementioned Ashkenazim, and a few smaller subject groups like the Amish.
Would be interested to get your perspective on the racial targeting of Convid, perhaps cross-correlated with the low compliance we found on the African continent, and even in the US, among the black populations.
Is it exists (I haven't investigated), I would think it now likely to be by chance than design. At most, it might be the subject of experimentation but they couldn't have predicted and therefore engineered this on advance with any degree of certainty. Just speculation on my part.
Joel, I think many of us have now reached the pinnacle of healthy cynicism, and easily attribute the worst of intent when foul, three letter world bodies like the WHO, WEF et al are concerned. I know I have seen some reports on racial disparity of outcome, will seek out and report back this evening.
Peter Daszak was the lead researcher and Project Lead at NIH in 2017, when studying "The Risk of Bat coronavirus Emergence." According to the NIH links, they were very acutely trying to determine ACE2 re-uptake.
Here is the original text of the account that posted all this info on Telegram, in cas you arew unable to access:
"We had a lab in Wuhan that was making chimeric corona viruses to study what is known as spillover to see how they could jump from animal populations and they were doing a lot of work looking at how they bind to human ACE2 receptors. A lot of this research was funded by Fauci's NIAID to boot. A lab, doing research on corona viruses that bind to ACE2 receptors is in the center of a city where an outbreak of a coronavirus with a polybasic furin cleavage site, making it look like a chimeric virus, that binds to human ACE2 receptors extremely well, and I'm not supposed to get suspicious? Really?"
Still looking for charts, but many sites allude to the vax in general, having a 56% chance of serious side effects over xx/days, in whites, 35% in blacks, 20% in East Asians, and getting lower in other groups until dropping to near zero in Ashkenazim. Could it be inaccurate propaganda? Sure, but what isn't? :-)
If you're referring to the paper that RFK linked on his Substack which said that Ashkenazis and Amishes had the lowest number of deleterious ACE2 alleles which occured at least once in the population, that's largely because Ashkenazis and Amishes have a small population size at gnomAD v3: https://output.jsbin.com/dekonow#Paper_about_ACE2_and_TMPRSS2_linked_by_RFK. For example if you look at the frequency of the K26R allele of ACE2 at gnomAD v3, the total number of samples that have been typed for the allele is 53,215 for the population labeled "European (non-Finnish)" but only 2,650 for Ashkenazis and 684 for Amishes: https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/X-15600835-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r3.
In another paper about ACE2 alleles, the K26R allele was modeled as beneficial and Ashkenazis were shown to have the highest frequency of the allele. However the frequency of the allele was only about 1.2% in Ashkenazis, so it doesn't make much difference if the allele only gives an advantage to 1.2% of Ashkenazis, and in two other papers the K26R allele was actually modeled as detrimental: https://output.jsbin.com/dekonow#Paper_about_ACE2_by_Ali_et_al.
Danke! Yes, this was where I first heard of the selective uptake. However, there is also some accepted research with actual numbers. All seem to show whites and blacks, most susceptible, and higher in post jab complications.
I think there trying out different formulas of the death shots plus they never had the quality control in place to really know what was in the shots (Hedley Reece has been covering this in detail) it all so makes it difficult to track what is really happening due to the endless list of variables.The only consistency is there evil intent.👍🤝Where there fortunate is most seem happy with the situation🥳
Well said Steve. I too marvel at the duplicity, intentional chaos,. lack of precision, and most of all...the lack of an anger response in billions who have been GMO'd and violated in the most horrific of fashions. Our species is being culled, and it will soon be us against the eugenicists.
Aye, and their delivery mechanisms will become more nefarious, and porous as they perfect their true goal, auto-spreading mRNA vaccines. Neighbor sneezes on you, BOOM, off you go, along with the spike protein of choice.
A significant portion of the alleged excess Covid deaths post injection rollout must also be considered part of the incident to the injections, given the very high uptake.
it's pretty difficult to ignore the depopulation agenda, considering how public the Malthusians have been about, proclaiming their desire to lower the population on record.
he discussions section describes the hodgepodge of results different studies have gotten. Could just be an artifact. I suppose one could hypothesize covid infection has benefits. But the missing item is obviously vaccination status. Perhaps one could argue vaccines prevented covid, but also made some outcomes worse. But at any rate, other studies find differently.
Some believe there is a percentage of each countries population that has to die, or the leaders will be replaced. That explains the lock-step coordination. The global elite are evil & cruel, probably none were held enough as babies. I digress. Power is a huge motivator here. The “Great Reset” is also the elites form of Disneyland. ( they were never taken to) Actually, I hate to promote that place now, ugh.
This is spiritual warfare for sure. It’s about money, power, & gaining lost souls. ( or getting rid of souls all together) That’s the nano-technology, 5G promoting, and all that. It’s a messy web. Time to pick sides & by not choosing, you are choosing. The fence is electric now so can’t sit on that to contemplate. I’m going with my Big GOD. The activity, or place that government deemed as
“ non-essential”, during the fake pandemic. Good thing Wa. kept the pot shops open, Phew! Do you know why they didn’t want large gatherings or church services? It had nothing to do with virus transfer. It was about information transfer & normality, family support, and better health that comes from friendships & love. They KNOW the power of prayer. And God has a history of kicking Satan’s arse. He’s not cowering & either am I. It won’t be easy, the next few years, but it’ll be worth the effort. And WE need to bring the effort & not sit back & expect a miracle. Those are guaranteed along the way, but we have to do the heavy lifting along the way. We took our eyes off God, pushed HIM out of our schools, & selfishly steered our lives right into this mess. We trusted the gov. & forgot to think critically about everything. We need a serious revival. And a few more jails to hold people when the prosecuting starts. Oh, & it will start with Fauci. 👍 And God will be the final judge & jury, either way. He works everything for our good.
Choose carefully, if you need a good book read “ Mere Christianity” by C.S. Lewis. It answers some hard questions and isn’t preachy or judgmental.( IMO, it’s brilliant) 😇
Speaking of depopulation, why in all these graph do we see a steady linear increase in deaths, even for many years before covid? Seems that something was already killing us off..
Taiwan officials claims as of mid 2023 only 33% of deaths are of 77% of boosted population, ignoring ever vaxed numbers
Other Official Numbers showing 21,000 covid deaths, they had 38,000 excess when comparing 2021+2022 with 2020, worse if compared with 2019, so at least 17,000 non covid deaths, at the current rate applied to 2023, it could be 31,000 non covid excess and 21,000 covid for 2021-mid-2023
Brain will be picking at the pregnancy stats for a while.
That almost has to be forged data, doesn't it? In what universe does a population of pregnant mums with an infection fare better than a population of pregnant mums without that infection? Did they test everybody, or did they just count everybody who hadn't been tested as "without covid"?
Indeed, full of confounders. And yet, still the opposite of what you'd systematically expect in the context of a deadly disease adversely affecting pregnancy outcomes? Of course, they speculate myriad, contorted reasons.... I wouldn't dare.
.... since these are insurance stats, let's lay out a hypothetical-- what if all these women were tested for covid as a routine thing, perhaps regularly whenever they encountered a medical setting (such as regular prenatal appt.), and testing positive meant that medical professionals, consciously or unconsciously, took a more hands-off approach with those women, so as to minimize contact/exposure of healthcare workers? Is it possible that *because* of testing positive, this group received lest testing and medical intervention overall, and benefitted from it?
We did see, in some datasets stateside involving pregnant women and infants, some gains during the lockdowns. Fewer premature babies. Less illness and death in new babies. Logically, it'd be easy to attribute some, or all, of that to lockdowns, directly. Lockdowns mean pregnant mums aren't on their feet all day at their jobs, maybe not stressing so much about deadlines. Taking more naps. Means new moms are home with their babies, and not back at work with baby in daycare. Means older siblings aren't bringing home all the germs from school.
What about Korea? Did pregnant ladies in Korea just take the lockdowns way more seriously if they tested positive for covid... and did this result in their being less stressed, better rested, better looked-after, and less exposed to other pathogens? Did the contact-tracing quarantine their families at home with them, minimizing outside exposures? Like, what if the quarantine/lockdown thing, in this one case, worked better for preventing *other* pathogens getting in, than preventing covid from getting out?
Indeed. Just... what was their selection process? They've certainly picked out a small group that had better outcomes than the larger group, so what's the real difference between these groups? Was there some important difference between who got tested for covid and who didn't? Were there other categories not listed on the chart? Was anybody excluded?
There's just no way that virus+/virus- could be the only determinant here, unless only very healthy women test positive for the virus, somehow. Which forces you to ask what the testing criteria were. Was testing voluntary? Did people pay for testing? Did only rich people get tested? Was everyone in this chart actually tested? Let's say everyone in this chart was symptomatic for *something* and was given a COVID test: might this mean that people who tested positive for a fairly insignificant virus just fared better than people who were actively sick with *something more serious*? Would that be enough to get this kind of result? Like, what is this population? Is it every pregnant woman who came to the hospital? Is it just pregnant women who sought medical care because they were sick? Are the stats from all pregnant women receiving prenatal care? At what stage of pregnancy were they tested? 1st trimester? During labor? I have so many questions...
The comparison (n=657,705 without COVID; n=705 with COVID) demands an analysis of statistical power(?) while the heterogeneity of pathologies seen within each group (irrespective of "COVID") demands very careful matching?
Wow. The jabs clearly led to more deaths, and at best had no benefit for pregnant women and their babies (and likely caused very serious harm). As for birthrates, they were already quite low and falling in South Korea before Covid and before the jabs, so they probably just couldn't fall any further (last I checked the TFR was a rock-bottom 0.78 births per woman, less than HALF of the replacement rate of 2.1). They make even Japan look prolific by comparison! As for lockdowns, they probably did give a modest short-term boost to birthrates (just think of mating in captivity, lol), but South Korea didn't actually quite do a full lockdown that I can recall, just partial rolling shutdowns, "test, trace, and quarantine", mask mandates, and antisocial distancing.
Regarding your 2nd point in your conclusion: "in much the same way as it was not necessary for the majority of people who were not at risk of serious illness or death from COVID".
So do you still, at this point, believe that the vaccine somehow protected "the vulnerable" from some form of transmissible respiratory disease?
In this post you seem to imply that the excess deaths were caused by the vaccines. Earlier when I asked you why spikes in PCR positivity rate coincided with spikes in excess mortality in various countries, you answered that it was because people died because of the treatment they received after a positive PCR test. However in South Korea there was low excess mortality and a low PCR positivity rate until March 2022, when according to OWID's data the PCR positivity rate suddenly increased to about 65% and the excess mortality increased to about 70%: https://i.ibb.co/9bLJJcS/south-korea-taiwan-hong-kong-australia-owid.png (R code: https://pastebin.com/raw/Q3vMFmGd). So how can you know that the excess deaths were not caused by COVID or the treatment protocols?
In Hong Kong, there was a massive spike in excess mortality in March 2022 around the same time as in South Korea. In Hong Kong the PCR positivity rate remained below 1% until it increased to 4% in February 2022 and to 23% in March 2022, but similarly the excess mortality increased from -1% in January 2022 to 33% in February and to 169% in March.
And similarly Taiwan had a low PCR positivity rate and low excess mortality until May-June 2022 when there was a sudden increase in both statistics, but it was long after most people had been vaccinated.
It's all public health induced iatrogenesis. Without better data, we can't say what was poor treatment and what was drug experimentation. Just because it happens when the virus is prevalent doesn't change that. And, isn't it rather strange that the virus becomes more prevalent around jab campaigns?
Not that I'm aware of. I used to speak daily with a Korean in 2020 but not heard from him since. "Imissthesmiles", if you're out there, give me s a shout!
I don't think it was just about the money I think it's far more sinister than that, I read an interesting comment that the 🇬🇧 govern/ment bought a pile of anti coagulant drugs before the plandemic started . They new the harms and carried on regardless, everyone was lied too.There was a massive drive to get everyone injected and it's still going on, there are trials for infants and they still recommend expecting mothers to get the shots.The only thing that currently makes any sense to me is population reduction and getting us all tracked🤝What most people don't realise I that we are the enemy and our govern/ ments are at war with us.Ive said this before ,they blew up the Georgia guide stones as it was a little obvious having it in print for people to read.
Agreed. They can always print more FIAT shekels as needed, but getting a tri-masked, quad jabbed, once free man to beg to enter a grocery store, that is priceless to the evil entities running the Globe.
I want Armageddon. It is better than jew world.
Aye. I followed the early Codus Alimentarus globalist shit show in the early 2000's pretty closely, thanks to Mercola sounding the alarm. They had us at CheckMate long ago. Only thing left is for them to crush the few of us who notice, and every word we type, in lieu of actions, helps them.
Sad, but true.
Great charts. They really cut through all the BS. Is anyone in South Korea taking notice? Trying to do anything about it?
Excellent read, great info. I believe the scam was both profiteering and depopulation (or subjugation, many of these folks will be highly reliant upon government medical care in the decades to come).
On the subject of reproduction, I think it is much more complex than just looking at South Korea's interesting numbers. The various jabs had highly variable effects based upon batch, age and health of recipients, and ACE2 receptors (racial differences). In Israel, for example, despite being highly compliant, Ashkenazim have seen increased birth rates the past 3 years, but Sephardi reduced. A number of widely accepted studies have shown that Caucasians and Blacks have had the most deleterious effects and birthing issues, while East Asians are lower, and at the bottom of the effects ladder are the aforementioned Ashkenazim, and a few smaller subject groups like the Amish.
Would be interested to get your perspective on the racial targeting of Convid, perhaps cross-correlated with the low compliance we found on the African continent, and even in the US, among the black populations.
Is it exists (I haven't investigated), I would think it now likely to be by chance than design. At most, it might be the subject of experimentation but they couldn't have predicted and therefore engineered this on advance with any degree of certainty. Just speculation on my part.
Joel, I think many of us have now reached the pinnacle of healthy cynicism, and easily attribute the worst of intent when foul, three letter world bodies like the WHO, WEF et al are concerned. I know I have seen some reports on racial disparity of outcome, will seek out and report back this evening.
https://t.me/ElVaquero2/105
Peter Daszak was the lead researcher and Project Lead at NIH in 2017, when studying "The Risk of Bat coronavirus Emergence." According to the NIH links, they were very acutely trying to determine ACE2 re-uptake.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5708621/
https://reporter.nih.gov/project-details/9819304
Here is the original text of the account that posted all this info on Telegram, in cas you arew unable to access:
"We had a lab in Wuhan that was making chimeric corona viruses to study what is known as spillover to see how they could jump from animal populations and they were doing a lot of work looking at how they bind to human ACE2 receptors. A lot of this research was funded by Fauci's NIAID to boot. A lab, doing research on corona viruses that bind to ACE2 receptors is in the center of a city where an outbreak of a coronavirus with a polybasic furin cleavage site, making it look like a chimeric virus, that binds to human ACE2 receptors extremely well, and I'm not supposed to get suspicious? Really?"
Still looking for charts, but many sites allude to the vax in general, having a 56% chance of serious side effects over xx/days, in whites, 35% in blacks, 20% in East Asians, and getting lower in other groups until dropping to near zero in Ashkenazim. Could it be inaccurate propaganda? Sure, but what isn't? :-)
If you're referring to the paper that RFK linked on his Substack which said that Ashkenazis and Amishes had the lowest number of deleterious ACE2 alleles which occured at least once in the population, that's largely because Ashkenazis and Amishes have a small population size at gnomAD v3: https://output.jsbin.com/dekonow#Paper_about_ACE2_and_TMPRSS2_linked_by_RFK. For example if you look at the frequency of the K26R allele of ACE2 at gnomAD v3, the total number of samples that have been typed for the allele is 53,215 for the population labeled "European (non-Finnish)" but only 2,650 for Ashkenazis and 684 for Amishes: https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/X-15600835-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r3.
In another paper about ACE2 alleles, the K26R allele was modeled as beneficial and Ashkenazis were shown to have the highest frequency of the allele. However the frequency of the allele was only about 1.2% in Ashkenazis, so it doesn't make much difference if the allele only gives an advantage to 1.2% of Ashkenazis, and in two other papers the K26R allele was actually modeled as detrimental: https://output.jsbin.com/dekonow#Paper_about_ACE2_by_Ali_et_al.
Danke! Yes, this was where I first heard of the selective uptake. However, there is also some accepted research with actual numbers. All seem to show whites and blacks, most susceptible, and higher in post jab complications.
I think there trying out different formulas of the death shots plus they never had the quality control in place to really know what was in the shots (Hedley Reece has been covering this in detail) it all so makes it difficult to track what is really happening due to the endless list of variables.The only consistency is there evil intent.👍🤝Where there fortunate is most seem happy with the situation🥳
Well said Steve. I too marvel at the duplicity, intentional chaos,. lack of precision, and most of all...the lack of an anger response in billions who have been GMO'd and violated in the most horrific of fashions. Our species is being culled, and it will soon be us against the eugenicists.
There needs to be feed back loop and if we passively sit back then that's the green light for them to carry on🚀
Aye, and their delivery mechanisms will become more nefarious, and porous as they perfect their true goal, auto-spreading mRNA vaccines. Neighbor sneezes on you, BOOM, off you go, along with the spike protein of choice.
Oh, how they lied. At least the sterility issue appears to fade with time.
A significant portion of the alleged excess Covid deaths post injection rollout must also be considered part of the incident to the injections, given the very high uptake.
it's pretty difficult to ignore the depopulation agenda, considering how public the Malthusians have been about, proclaiming their desire to lower the population on record.
he discussions section describes the hodgepodge of results different studies have gotten. Could just be an artifact. I suppose one could hypothesize covid infection has benefits. But the missing item is obviously vaccination status. Perhaps one could argue vaccines prevented covid, but also made some outcomes worse. But at any rate, other studies find differently.
Even more sinister:
'Everyone that got the vaccine is immune suppressed' Geert Vanden Bossche
1:03:30
https://thehighwire.com/watch/
Hmmm... now why would they do something like this? Could it be because now they intend to introduce a new pathogen ... that kills all these folks?
Some believe there is a percentage of each countries population that has to die, or the leaders will be replaced. That explains the lock-step coordination. The global elite are evil & cruel, probably none were held enough as babies. I digress. Power is a huge motivator here. The “Great Reset” is also the elites form of Disneyland. ( they were never taken to) Actually, I hate to promote that place now, ugh.
This is spiritual warfare for sure. It’s about money, power, & gaining lost souls. ( or getting rid of souls all together) That’s the nano-technology, 5G promoting, and all that. It’s a messy web. Time to pick sides & by not choosing, you are choosing. The fence is electric now so can’t sit on that to contemplate. I’m going with my Big GOD. The activity, or place that government deemed as
“ non-essential”, during the fake pandemic. Good thing Wa. kept the pot shops open, Phew! Do you know why they didn’t want large gatherings or church services? It had nothing to do with virus transfer. It was about information transfer & normality, family support, and better health that comes from friendships & love. They KNOW the power of prayer. And God has a history of kicking Satan’s arse. He’s not cowering & either am I. It won’t be easy, the next few years, but it’ll be worth the effort. And WE need to bring the effort & not sit back & expect a miracle. Those are guaranteed along the way, but we have to do the heavy lifting along the way. We took our eyes off God, pushed HIM out of our schools, & selfishly steered our lives right into this mess. We trusted the gov. & forgot to think critically about everything. We need a serious revival. And a few more jails to hold people when the prosecuting starts. Oh, & it will start with Fauci. 👍 And God will be the final judge & jury, either way. He works everything for our good.
Choose carefully, if you need a good book read “ Mere Christianity” by C.S. Lewis. It answers some hard questions and isn’t preachy or judgmental.( IMO, it’s brilliant) 😇
Speaking of depopulation, why in all these graph do we see a steady linear increase in deaths, even for many years before covid? Seems that something was already killing us off..
Aging populations.
Who are expensive to take care of. Hence the culling.
Fair point
Taiwan officials claims as of mid 2023 only 33% of deaths are of 77% of boosted population, ignoring ever vaxed numbers
Other Official Numbers showing 21,000 covid deaths, they had 38,000 excess when comparing 2021+2022 with 2020, worse if compared with 2019, so at least 17,000 non covid deaths, at the current rate applied to 2023, it could be 31,000 non covid excess and 21,000 covid for 2021-mid-2023
https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/4389983?fbclid=IwAR2VnJ7x6S1cD1tGFdZcvIscufE90-sXGWOoP_10B60Ue089n9qmUhKKl6Q
Brain will be picking at the pregnancy stats for a while.
That almost has to be forged data, doesn't it? In what universe does a population of pregnant mums with an infection fare better than a population of pregnant mums without that infection? Did they test everybody, or did they just count everybody who hadn't been tested as "without covid"?
Indeed, full of confounders. And yet, still the opposite of what you'd systematically expect in the context of a deadly disease adversely affecting pregnancy outcomes? Of course, they speculate myriad, contorted reasons.... I wouldn't dare.
.... since these are insurance stats, let's lay out a hypothetical-- what if all these women were tested for covid as a routine thing, perhaps regularly whenever they encountered a medical setting (such as regular prenatal appt.), and testing positive meant that medical professionals, consciously or unconsciously, took a more hands-off approach with those women, so as to minimize contact/exposure of healthcare workers? Is it possible that *because* of testing positive, this group received lest testing and medical intervention overall, and benefitted from it?
We did see, in some datasets stateside involving pregnant women and infants, some gains during the lockdowns. Fewer premature babies. Less illness and death in new babies. Logically, it'd be easy to attribute some, or all, of that to lockdowns, directly. Lockdowns mean pregnant mums aren't on their feet all day at their jobs, maybe not stressing so much about deadlines. Taking more naps. Means new moms are home with their babies, and not back at work with baby in daycare. Means older siblings aren't bringing home all the germs from school.
What about Korea? Did pregnant ladies in Korea just take the lockdowns way more seriously if they tested positive for covid... and did this result in their being less stressed, better rested, better looked-after, and less exposed to other pathogens? Did the contact-tracing quarantine their families at home with them, minimizing outside exposures? Like, what if the quarantine/lockdown thing, in this one case, worked better for preventing *other* pathogens getting in, than preventing covid from getting out?
(soooooo curious)
Indeed. Just... what was their selection process? They've certainly picked out a small group that had better outcomes than the larger group, so what's the real difference between these groups? Was there some important difference between who got tested for covid and who didn't? Were there other categories not listed on the chart? Was anybody excluded?
There's just no way that virus+/virus- could be the only determinant here, unless only very healthy women test positive for the virus, somehow. Which forces you to ask what the testing criteria were. Was testing voluntary? Did people pay for testing? Did only rich people get tested? Was everyone in this chart actually tested? Let's say everyone in this chart was symptomatic for *something* and was given a COVID test: might this mean that people who tested positive for a fairly insignificant virus just fared better than people who were actively sick with *something more serious*? Would that be enough to get this kind of result? Like, what is this population? Is it every pregnant woman who came to the hospital? Is it just pregnant women who sought medical care because they were sick? Are the stats from all pregnant women receiving prenatal care? At what stage of pregnancy were they tested? 1st trimester? During labor? I have so many questions...
The comparison (n=657,705 without COVID; n=705 with COVID) demands an analysis of statistical power(?) while the heterogeneity of pathologies seen within each group (irrespective of "COVID") demands very careful matching?
Wow. The jabs clearly led to more deaths, and at best had no benefit for pregnant women and their babies (and likely caused very serious harm). As for birthrates, they were already quite low and falling in South Korea before Covid and before the jabs, so they probably just couldn't fall any further (last I checked the TFR was a rock-bottom 0.78 births per woman, less than HALF of the replacement rate of 2.1). They make even Japan look prolific by comparison! As for lockdowns, they probably did give a modest short-term boost to birthrates (just think of mating in captivity, lol), but South Korea didn't actually quite do a full lockdown that I can recall, just partial rolling shutdowns, "test, trace, and quarantine", mask mandates, and antisocial distancing.
Yes, I considered that too but prefer to acknowledge it in the comments section so as to keep speculation out as much as possible.
Regarding your 2nd point in your conclusion: "in much the same way as it was not necessary for the majority of people who were not at risk of serious illness or death from COVID".
So do you still, at this point, believe that the vaccine somehow protected "the vulnerable" from some form of transmissible respiratory disease?
LOL sorry. Please disregard this comment. I should have read your 3rd point before posting :D
In this post you seem to imply that the excess deaths were caused by the vaccines. Earlier when I asked you why spikes in PCR positivity rate coincided with spikes in excess mortality in various countries, you answered that it was because people died because of the treatment they received after a positive PCR test. However in South Korea there was low excess mortality and a low PCR positivity rate until March 2022, when according to OWID's data the PCR positivity rate suddenly increased to about 65% and the excess mortality increased to about 70%: https://i.ibb.co/9bLJJcS/south-korea-taiwan-hong-kong-australia-owid.png (R code: https://pastebin.com/raw/Q3vMFmGd). So how can you know that the excess deaths were not caused by COVID or the treatment protocols?
In Hong Kong, there was a massive spike in excess mortality in March 2022 around the same time as in South Korea. In Hong Kong the PCR positivity rate remained below 1% until it increased to 4% in February 2022 and to 23% in March 2022, but similarly the excess mortality increased from -1% in January 2022 to 33% in February and to 169% in March.
And similarly Taiwan had a low PCR positivity rate and low excess mortality until May-June 2022 when there was a sudden increase in both statistics, but it was long after most people had been vaccinated.
It's all public health induced iatrogenesis. Without better data, we can't say what was poor treatment and what was drug experimentation. Just because it happens when the virus is prevalent doesn't change that. And, isn't it rather strange that the virus becomes more prevalent around jab campaigns?