Dynamite. I am so very grateful for your brilliant work. As an Australian living in this dystopian nightmare, I have a very sharp recollection of the 'died-of-Covid' numbers which were so low, they even fell below the annual road death toll numbers from the previous year. And then they rolled out the vaccines. We were in verbal combat with the Covidian cultists, arming ourselves with every fact we could find before our governments censored all the information. We will never forgive, never forget.
In the first year of living with the most virulent strain of covid and without a vaccine Australia suffered 1010 deaths. In the 18 months since the vaccine rollout Australia has recorded in excess of 16,000 deaths. They have no use for a control group. Covid vaccine deaths dwarf even flu vaccine deaths. The unvaccinated have a negative social credit score. It’s only a matter of time.
Great work! Work that should have been done by people employed by Government using taxes paid to so such work. By my reckoning you and the team have put more work into this study than three years of Australian (and all other countries Governments) - which means you have produced equivalent value to around a million hours of work at 100 bucks an hour (salary, benefits and pensions rate for civil servants).
A suggestion - expressing the injection fatality rate as a percentage of the population kind of dulls the severity of the injections amongst the elderly, poor, aboriginal and infirm that were prioritized. Is there any way you can "get granular" and express the injection fatality rate as a percentage of those priortised to get the injections?
In my head, I have a "nibbling" of the male/female elderly by the injection fatality rate. Not many are talking about the gender split - I see adverse events are 2/3 to 1/3 against females, deaths are the same?
of course, it's a can of worms. what has happened to birth rates? life expectancy is down around 3 years over the last two years in the US - probably the same thing will happen in Oz.
Would love to see evidence rather than have to continually do "back of the envelope" approximations. Overall population VIFR for the US looks to be about 650,000 dead for 664 million doses of ALL mRNA doses = an overall VIFR of around 0.1% PER DOSE (I find it tricky to get my head round VIFR per person (2 or 3 doses) or per dose!
Prof Fenton's work showed how the stats are incredibly distorted because those that die within 14 (or 21 or 28 in Oz?) days in the UK were treated as unvaccinated when they were prioritized. Hopefully the Oz TGA just takes reports and does not adjust them in this way. For me, there is no clear evidence that prioritizing anyone to paly Russian Roulette with injections of toxins of dubious manufacturing quality is a great idea, let alone the elderly and infirm. Bass ackwards! Keep them away from it!
Oz adverse events reporting are a fraction of those in the US
Around one tenth the 665 million US doses - 64 million doses administered in Oz here:
Number of cases with a single suspected medicine: 133773
Number of cases where death was a reported outcome: 955
Roughly speaking, 955 Oz vaxx deaths for 64 million doses would scale up to 9,550 for the US - VAERS shows 16,155 US only deaths, so more than 50% more US deaths. Combine that with the fact that Oz used a lot of Astra Zeneca shots that had 4-5 times the number of deaths as other injections reported to EUDRA. Hopefully the URF for Oz is a lot lower than that in the US and EU, but i suspect that it is still around 30 and can be correlated with excess mortality as the Rancourt et al (wtf is Al? haha) study has done.
I may have misunderstood you, but in case you were genuinely wondering, 'et al' stands for 'et alia', meaning 'and others' in Latin. I expect you knew that really. :)
Peter, that’s interesting. I was just thinking along the same lines today looking at the latest report from ABS with regards to Australian Indigenous population, male vs female etc. I noticed this discrepancy and was planning on breaking out the data similar to what you suggest also comparing NSW data to ABS, I’ve been reading the notes on their charts in detail, interesting what they leave out and include in each graph or table.
I think the Australian authorities have been expending lots of man hours making sure the data is believable but still opaque enough that no definitive conclusions can come from what’s released. This balance must take lots of man hours to pull off. I think they’re tired and need a well deserved rest, that’s why they’re sort of skipping the full January release, needs more time in the oven to bake properly.
“The Provisional Mortality report in its usual format will not be released in late January. Instead, a short article will be published, including only summary content …”
Jan 2, 2023·edited Jan 2, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley
I suggest people look at the vax catastrophe currently ongoing in Japan by plotting vax administered vs 'COVID' deaths and excess deaths and tell me after 'safe and effective.' Oh Japan has 95+% masking indoors and outdoors so masks work too right ?
Jan 2, 2023·edited Jan 2, 2023Liked by Joel Smalley
Indeed, Japan basically had no excess deaths before the jabs, despite lots and lots of cases, then it really took off. And the masks? Absolutely useless at best.
Thank you for posting this!! It confirms my suspicion that we were forced to breathe in both micro plastics and fibers, and show that I wasn’t it aware of how much worse masks are for your health. The number of chemicals used in their production is astounding and no doubt another ticking time bong, especially for those that STILL walk around masked all the time.
and subsequent research from the Belgian gov health institute had siilar alarming results on the harms of masking . It's completely legitimate to say regular long term masking has the real potential to increase cancer risk.
They missed out on statins that postpone death on average by 3-4 days???
Sir out-Whitting nobody...
"The median postponement of death for primary and secondary prevention trials were 3.2 and 4.1 days, respectively.
Conclusions Statin treatment results in a surprisingly small average gain in overall survival within the trials’ running time. For patients whose life expectancy is limited or who have adverse effects of treatment, withholding statin therapy should be considered.
Australian death batches correlate with what looks like contamination with other mRNAs shown in TGA FOI released documents. If this isn’t not causality, there is definitely no cause to inject anyone. The causative link between “vaccine” and covid death prevention is much weaker. https://mobile.twitter.com/jikkyleaks/status/1607609182743834625
Terry, do you or anyone else have any good NZ data/articles?
I’m very interested in NZ and Western Australia (WA) they would be excellent case studies basically no covid for nearly 2 years but high vaccine uptake and no real lockdowns as far as I know. Can’t find any good WA data haven’t looked at NZ.
I don’t fully agree with Rancourt, he leaves out the lockdown and border restrictions, he’s probably right but leaving this out makes it less convincing.
My colleague, Grant Dixon , has created a couple of videos using official Nz date. Another Colleague, Guy Hatchard , has a string of articles analyzing data.
vIFR is problematic, since some are more susceptible than others.
For example in Israel 0.2 percent were officially declared dead before 2nd dose. Later MOH demented that figure and provided figure 0.005 without percent which didn’t make any sense when taking into account overall mortality at the time in Israel.
Roughly one in five deaths seem to be due to jabs. But without investigative autopsy we are just left with grosse illegality, immoral behaviour, lack of ethics in medicine and government combined with high mortality, which historically make the deaths attributed to decision makers.
I think it would be most interesting to see excess deaths in WA 2021- March 2022. We were under state arrest at the time with no cases and life in the prison went on quite ‘normally’ apart from restriction of movement in and out. Covid and lack of access to med professionals, lockdown measures - none of that could be blamed on any excess deaths if they occurred.
Cynically looking at the "rollout priorities"--- elderly, disabled,and aborigines---one could infer that those are the groups the ruling class wants decimated first.
As a result of a report that Singapore was counting Covid deaths only if they came with a pneumonia diagnosis, at some point in early-to-mid 2021, I started using Worldometer to keep an eye on their published stats & knocking up my own, basic deaths-to-cases rate reports. I took the first screenshot around March 2021 & it shows that at this time Singapore was reporting just over 60 000 cases with only 30 dead. I extrapolated using an online percentage calculator that this equates to a 0.05% deaths-to-cases rate. At the time, the UK was reporting 4.35+ million cases with 126 700+ deaths that resulted in a 2.96% deaths-to-cases rate. I was aghast to report that this is almost sixty times higher than Singapore's. The UK however was not counting only those covid deaths with a pneumonia diagnosis but in fact ANY death for ANY reason within 28 days of a positive test. For me, this was blatant evidence that the death rate was being ramped up in the UK through deeply flawed methodology.
I continued to watch the stats being produced by Singapore as reported on Worldometer as they began their vaccine rollout around April/May/June & as it picked up in July 2021 &, well, wouldn't you know it, their excellent deaths-to-cases rate began to falter. By December 2021 when I took my last screenshot, Singapore was reporting almost 280 000 cases & 779 fatalities, which takes their deaths-to-cases rate in just over six months from 0.05% before rollout to 0.286%, almost six times higher.
So Singapore's Worldometer deaths-to-cases rate rose almost six times between April 2021 when they rolled out their vaccines & December 2021 which is the last time I looked.
This was strong evidence, in my eyes, that the vaccines were not helping & even appeared to be making things worse.
I was just poking through my memes, as you do, when I came across two graphs on the same image, one from 2020, one from 2021, showing summer cases in the UK.
In 2020, before any vaccine rollout, UK had around 500 daily new cases in July. Summer being, as we all know, a slow time for colds & flu.
In July 2021, well into the vaccine rollout that began in the UK late 2020, media outlets reported that July's daily peak of new cases was 50 000.
So that's UK July cases rising from 500 daily in 2020 before any vaccine rollout, to 50 000 in one day in July 2021, post rollout. That's a 100 times increase in cases after the vaccine rollout out in the UK compared to the summer before.
Interesting you should mention batch numbers. I was looking at something tangentially related today, I’d be interested to know if all batch numbers are recorded in the Australian Immunization Register by the Immunization provider, even though the patient can’t see them, but I would love to here from someone in the know if this information is required via an SOP to be filled in by the provider. If they haven’t been filled in it’s just more proof of the rushed , half assed shortcuts taken on the part of the medical establishment moving at the speed of science.
“You will not be able to access specific details of the vaccine product (such as the vaccine batch number) that was administered to you. In the event that you require specific details of the vaccine product your vaccination provider can assist you.“
Well, Ivo at least it's not proportional spacing. When I gave my secretary an IBM Executive typewriter back in the day, she had to have a chart on her desk to work out the space-backs for correction. She did brilliant work (ex legal sec)...and then memory typewriters arrived, we had a party.
Great days, full of optimism and pretty much free from PsyOp, fond memories indeed!
I was thinking along similar lines, but couldn’t remember the typewriter model. The typewriters were getting phased out about the same time as I started Uni. I remember having to make a decision as a student, buy the latest greatest memory typewriter (word processor) or buy a computer + printer. I chose the computer and never looked back.
Right decision Ivo! I was with Xerox in the 1970s - WPs at $10,000 - size of an average desk. It's lovely to look back and see all the tech road blocks. I remember one presentation when Xerox launched Ethernet (1979 I think) and claimed paper in offices would be obsolete in 5 years!
My one prediction for 2023 is that all the other predictions will be wrong!
This is not the study I was looking for. This study may not support my case (haven’t read it in full) but in the interests of full transparency it may help you make your final desision 😀
Ouch! Artistic license? While they consider your request, you might cut and paste the article into a Word.doc if you have it and change the font (type face) and size to suit your preference, Hope this hekps.
Dynamite. I am so very grateful for your brilliant work. As an Australian living in this dystopian nightmare, I have a very sharp recollection of the 'died-of-Covid' numbers which were so low, they even fell below the annual road death toll numbers from the previous year. And then they rolled out the vaccines. We were in verbal combat with the Covidian cultists, arming ourselves with every fact we could find before our governments censored all the information. We will never forgive, never forget.
In the first year of living with the most virulent strain of covid and without a vaccine Australia suffered 1010 deaths. In the 18 months since the vaccine rollout Australia has recorded in excess of 16,000 deaths. They have no use for a control group. Covid vaccine deaths dwarf even flu vaccine deaths. The unvaccinated have a negative social credit score. It’s only a matter of time.
Great work! Work that should have been done by people employed by Government using taxes paid to so such work. By my reckoning you and the team have put more work into this study than three years of Australian (and all other countries Governments) - which means you have produced equivalent value to around a million hours of work at 100 bucks an hour (salary, benefits and pensions rate for civil servants).
A suggestion - expressing the injection fatality rate as a percentage of the population kind of dulls the severity of the injections amongst the elderly, poor, aboriginal and infirm that were prioritized. Is there any way you can "get granular" and express the injection fatality rate as a percentage of those priortised to get the injections?
Aboriginals are 3% - elderly aboriginals are what, 0.5% of the 26 million Australians, the elderly can be worked out via the % chart (fourth one down) here https://www.populationof.net/australia/ of the 26 million people here https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/people/population/life-tables/2019-2021
In my head, I have a "nibbling" of the male/female elderly by the injection fatality rate. Not many are talking about the gender split - I see adverse events are 2/3 to 1/3 against females, deaths are the same?
of course, it's a can of worms. what has happened to birth rates? life expectancy is down around 3 years over the last two years in the US - probably the same thing will happen in Oz.
Anyway, fantastic work and a big h/t!
Not me or my team but to your point, the vIFR for the "priority" groups seems to be IRO 1%?
Would love to see evidence rather than have to continually do "back of the envelope" approximations. Overall population VIFR for the US looks to be about 650,000 dead for 664 million doses of ALL mRNA doses = an overall VIFR of around 0.1% PER DOSE (I find it tricky to get my head round VIFR per person (2 or 3 doses) or per dose!
Prof Fenton's work showed how the stats are incredibly distorted because those that die within 14 (or 21 or 28 in Oz?) days in the UK were treated as unvaccinated when they were prioritized. Hopefully the Oz TGA just takes reports and does not adjust them in this way. For me, there is no clear evidence that prioritizing anyone to paly Russian Roulette with injections of toxins of dubious manufacturing quality is a great idea, let alone the elderly and infirm. Bass ackwards! Keep them away from it!
Oz adverse events reporting are a fraction of those in the US
Around one tenth the 665 million US doses - 64 million doses administered in Oz here:
https://www.health.gov.au/our-work/covid-19-vaccines/vaccination-numbers-and-statistics
Adverse events here (you have to input covid19 as the treatment then overtype all the date fields with drop down selections)
https://apps.tga.gov.au/Prod/daen/daen-entry.aspx
Number of reports (cases): 137049
Number of cases with a single suspected medicine: 133773
Number of cases where death was a reported outcome: 955
Roughly speaking, 955 Oz vaxx deaths for 64 million doses would scale up to 9,550 for the US - VAERS shows 16,155 US only deaths, so more than 50% more US deaths. Combine that with the fact that Oz used a lot of Astra Zeneca shots that had 4-5 times the number of deaths as other injections reported to EUDRA. Hopefully the URF for Oz is a lot lower than that in the US and EU, but i suspect that it is still around 30 and can be correlated with excess mortality as the Rancourt et al (wtf is Al? haha) study has done.
I may have misunderstood you, but in case you were genuinely wondering, 'et al' stands for 'et alia', meaning 'and others' in Latin. I expect you knew that really. :)
haha...yes i know.. i also know the meaning of the words "ducle et decroum est" that could be applied to those taking the injections.
Peter, that’s interesting. I was just thinking along the same lines today looking at the latest report from ABS with regards to Australian Indigenous population, male vs female etc. I noticed this discrepancy and was planning on breaking out the data similar to what you suggest also comparing NSW data to ABS, I’ve been reading the notes on their charts in detail, interesting what they leave out and include in each graph or table.
https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/covid-19-mortality-australia-deaths-registered-until-30-november-2022
I think the Australian authorities have been expending lots of man hours making sure the data is believable but still opaque enough that no definitive conclusions can come from what’s released. This balance must take lots of man hours to pull off. I think they’re tired and need a well deserved rest, that’s why they’re sort of skipping the full January release, needs more time in the oven to bake properly.
“The Provisional Mortality report in its usual format will not be released in late January. Instead, a short article will be published, including only summary content …”
https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/causes-death/provisional-mortality-statistics/jan-sep-2022
Men just die, therefore they less able to report.
I suggest people look at the vax catastrophe currently ongoing in Japan by plotting vax administered vs 'COVID' deaths and excess deaths and tell me after 'safe and effective.' Oh Japan has 95+% masking indoors and outdoors so masks work too right ?
Also - https://twitter.com/Newsfilter2/status/1609650637494419456
Great work Joel ! 3 weeks to flatten the curve ! lol
Indeed, Japan basically had no excess deaths before the jabs, despite lots and lots of cases, then it really took off. And the masks? Absolutely useless at best.
Masks = useless vs any health benefit....useFUL vs health harms and gov control.
https://www.ecotextile.com/2021040127603/dyes-chemicals-news/exclusive-chemical-cocktail-found-in-face-masks.html
BINGO
Thank you for posting this!! It confirms my suspicion that we were forced to breathe in both micro plastics and fibers, and show that I wasn’t it aware of how much worse masks are for your health. The number of chemicals used in their production is astounding and no doubt another ticking time bong, especially for those that STILL walk around masked all the time.
and subsequent research from the Belgian gov health institute had siilar alarming results on the harms of masking . It's completely legitimate to say regular long term masking has the real potential to increase cancer risk.
PEER REVIEWED. https://www.ecotextile.com/2022022829014/dyes-chemicals-news/unsafe-levels-of-carcinogen-found-in-masks.html
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-06605-w
Oh this is Science. Not Science™️.
But the UK CMO says it’s because we missed out on our statins during lockdown
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11587211/Chris-Whitty-warns-thousands-middle-aged-people-dying-heart-conditions-went-untreated.html
Trust The Experts™ !
out-Whitty is going down but I hope people realize what can happen if governments worldwide are going to try to bury these crimes?
They missed out on statins that postpone death on average by 3-4 days???
Sir out-Whitting nobody...
"The median postponement of death for primary and secondary prevention trials were 3.2 and 4.1 days, respectively.
Conclusions Statin treatment results in a surprisingly small average gain in overall survival within the trials’ running time. For patients whose life expectancy is limited or who have adverse effects of treatment, withholding statin therapy should be considered.
"https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/5/9/e007118
Australian death batches correlate with what looks like contamination with other mRNAs shown in TGA FOI released documents. If this isn’t not causality, there is definitely no cause to inject anyone. The causative link between “vaccine” and covid death prevention is much weaker. https://mobile.twitter.com/jikkyleaks/status/1607609182743834625
More brilliant work from Dr. Rancourt! Bravo 🙌
I was doing the same analysis in NZ, with the same result. Coincidence? I think not.
Terry, do you or anyone else have any good NZ data/articles?
I’m very interested in NZ and Western Australia (WA) they would be excellent case studies basically no covid for nearly 2 years but high vaccine uptake and no real lockdowns as far as I know. Can’t find any good WA data haven’t looked at NZ.
I don’t fully agree with Rancourt, he leaves out the lockdown and border restrictions, he’s probably right but leaving this out makes it less convincing.
My colleague, Grant Dixon , has created a couple of videos using official Nz date. Another Colleague, Guy Hatchard , has a string of articles analyzing data.
https://click.mlsend.com/link/c/YT0yMTE3MDU0Nzk5MTI2OTkzMDAyJmM9bzl4NyZlPTAmYj0xMDU5NTUzNTk1JmQ9dzNnM24wdw==.6nvtHPgdjCNz0YWplf46BslHJBpEyRFD7k266EvEVFQ
https://www.bitchute.com/video/vvNDMZN3ub3Z
Thanks.
the vaccines are definitely killing people https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/excess-mortality-what-does-it-show but I have a few caveats!
Jo
Isn’t that the same paper that Joel highlighted?
Yes, I was using it to try and show the difference between excess mortality and the death rate as it leads to confusion.
Not sure if I made it any clearer or not!
Jo
And a big shout out to Gerrard Rennick who stands in the Senate and keeps reminding everyone of what a disaster this whole scamdemic has been.
vIFR is problematic, since some are more susceptible than others.
For example in Israel 0.2 percent were officially declared dead before 2nd dose. Later MOH demented that figure and provided figure 0.005 without percent which didn’t make any sense when taking into account overall mortality at the time in Israel.
Roughly one in five deaths seem to be due to jabs. But without investigative autopsy we are just left with grosse illegality, immoral behaviour, lack of ethics in medicine and government combined with high mortality, which historically make the deaths attributed to decision makers.
I think it would be most interesting to see excess deaths in WA 2021- March 2022. We were under state arrest at the time with no cases and life in the prison went on quite ‘normally’ apart from restriction of movement in and out. Covid and lack of access to med professionals, lockdown measures - none of that could be blamed on any excess deaths if they occurred.
Cynically looking at the "rollout priorities"--- elderly, disabled,and aborigines---one could infer that those are the groups the ruling class wants decimated first.
Indeed. They were "protected" to death.
I'd really prefer if I didn't agree with you but... Agreed.
As a result of a report that Singapore was counting Covid deaths only if they came with a pneumonia diagnosis, at some point in early-to-mid 2021, I started using Worldometer to keep an eye on their published stats & knocking up my own, basic deaths-to-cases rate reports. I took the first screenshot around March 2021 & it shows that at this time Singapore was reporting just over 60 000 cases with only 30 dead. I extrapolated using an online percentage calculator that this equates to a 0.05% deaths-to-cases rate. At the time, the UK was reporting 4.35+ million cases with 126 700+ deaths that resulted in a 2.96% deaths-to-cases rate. I was aghast to report that this is almost sixty times higher than Singapore's. The UK however was not counting only those covid deaths with a pneumonia diagnosis but in fact ANY death for ANY reason within 28 days of a positive test. For me, this was blatant evidence that the death rate was being ramped up in the UK through deeply flawed methodology.
I continued to watch the stats being produced by Singapore as reported on Worldometer as they began their vaccine rollout around April/May/June & as it picked up in July 2021 &, well, wouldn't you know it, their excellent deaths-to-cases rate began to falter. By December 2021 when I took my last screenshot, Singapore was reporting almost 280 000 cases & 779 fatalities, which takes their deaths-to-cases rate in just over six months from 0.05% before rollout to 0.286%, almost six times higher.
So Singapore's Worldometer deaths-to-cases rate rose almost six times between April 2021 when they rolled out their vaccines & December 2021 which is the last time I looked.
This was strong evidence, in my eyes, that the vaccines were not helping & even appeared to be making things worse.
I was just poking through my memes, as you do, when I came across two graphs on the same image, one from 2020, one from 2021, showing summer cases in the UK.
In 2020, before any vaccine rollout, UK had around 500 daily new cases in July. Summer being, as we all know, a slow time for colds & flu.
In July 2021, well into the vaccine rollout that began in the UK late 2020, media outlets reported that July's daily peak of new cases was 50 000.
So that's UK July cases rising from 500 daily in 2020 before any vaccine rollout, to 50 000 in one day in July 2021, post rollout. That's a 100 times increase in cases after the vaccine rollout out in the UK compared to the summer before.
So much for summer being a slow time for viruses.
It's possible Chris Martenson may have an explanation for the Australian excess mortality:
https://peakprosperity.com/australian-covid-documents-released/
The faulty batch issues appear common in other countries.
Dr Robert Malone is a man who discovered that the hard way.
Interesting you should mention batch numbers. I was looking at something tangentially related today, I’d be interested to know if all batch numbers are recorded in the Australian Immunization Register by the Immunization provider, even though the patient can’t see them, but I would love to here from someone in the know if this information is required via an SOP to be filled in by the provider. If they haven’t been filled in it’s just more proof of the rushed , half assed shortcuts taken on the part of the medical establishment moving at the speed of science.
“You will not be able to access specific details of the vaccine product (such as the vaccine batch number) that was administered to you. In the event that you require specific details of the vaccine product your vaccination provider can assist you.“
https://www.health.gov.au/using-our-websites/website-privacy-policy/privacy-policy-for-the-australian-immunisation-register#can-i-opt-out-from-my-vaccination-information-being-included-in-the-register
I note in the video there are a lot of missing batch numbers.
Please change this type face. Very hard to read.
No! Don’t do it Joel. It’s perfect. Reminds me of the Epson FX series dot matrix printers back in the day. Fond memories.
Well, Ivo at least it's not proportional spacing. When I gave my secretary an IBM Executive typewriter back in the day, she had to have a chart on her desk to work out the space-backs for correction. She did brilliant work (ex legal sec)...and then memory typewriters arrived, we had a party.
Great days, full of optimism and pretty much free from PsyOp, fond memories indeed!
😀😀😀
I was thinking along similar lines, but couldn’t remember the typewriter model. The typewriters were getting phased out about the same time as I started Uni. I remember having to make a decision as a student, buy the latest greatest memory typewriter (word processor) or buy a computer + printer. I chose the computer and never looked back.
Right decision Ivo! I was with Xerox in the 1970s - WPs at $10,000 - size of an average desk. It's lovely to look back and see all the tech road blocks. I remember one presentation when Xerox launched Ethernet (1979 I think) and claimed paper in offices would be obsolete in 5 years!
My one prediction for 2023 is that all the other predictions will be wrong!
https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/new-year-edition-2022-redux-caf-report?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=762792&post_id=93895365&isFreemail=false&utm_medium=email
Excellent article, I just skimmed it just now, saved it to read latter when I’ve got some time to appreciate in full.
Better?
NO! Sacrilege. Bring back the old font. It was perfect. Unreadable, this is a misinformation, I think I’ve got a study from back in the day.
You need to stand firm and “debunk the font”. 😀
This is not the study I was looking for. This study may not support my case (haven’t read it in full) but in the interests of full transparency it may help you make your final desision 😀
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4612630/
Looks like you can find a quality peer reviewed study on anything quickly these days. Except for all cause mortality.
Ouch! Artistic license? While they consider your request, you might cut and paste the article into a Word.doc if you have it and change the font (type face) and size to suit your preference, Hope this hekps.
What device do You use?
Smart phone. This type reproduces like crap in PDFs as well. TY
In the phone, the Substack app is much better. You can even listen to the article.