The Big COVID Lie - Debunked
Destruction of the big COVID lie using evidence from 3,135 US counties.
lie premise of COVID is that a deadly virus was going to indiscriminately kill and the only solution was to suppress it using novel (aka never been done before because in theory they wouldn’t work) interventions like social distancing, school and business closures, lockdowns and universal mask-wearing, until a novel (aka never been done before because it didn’t work) gene therapy became available to protect everyone (but only if everyone took it, not just the ones who were ever at risk of the virus, which actually was only those who were already sick with something else).
The virus was so novel and virulent that it respected none of the centuries of intelligence on other viruses, like natural herd immunity, seasonality, and inconsequential asymptomatic spread.
If the virus was as universally deadly as reported and the “cure” was as safe and effective™ as they made out then the death tally after introduction of the gene therapy should be significantly lower than before.
Any talk of confounding should be dismissed. We are talking about the deadliest plague since the Spanish Flu and a treatment that is up to 100% effective in reducing death, in addition to reducing transmission and the only way to achieve herd immunity.
No-one is safe until everyone is safe.
Examination of COVID deaths per 100k population before and after mass injection campaigns for 3,135 US counties, covering all states.
The rate of COVID mortality is determined by the slope of the mortality curve so as to remove the impact of time that would contribute to the overall death tally.
The “success” of the injection campaign is determined by the sum of all doses per 100 population.
The distribution of the change in slope after mass injections should indicate the degree of how effective the injection is at reducing COVID mortality. We should expect the majority of counties to have shallower slopes, i.e. lower death rates. Thus, the majority of values should be negative.
Comparison of the most “successful” counties in terms of injections and their resultant change in COVID death rate. We should expect a strong relationship between injection success and mortality rate reduction.
More than 80% of the counties had a higher rate of COVID deaths after mass injection campaigns. The average change was an increase in the rate of 0.2 deaths per 100k per day.
There is no apparent relationship between the counties that injected the most and subsequent better outcomes in terms of lower COVID death rates.
The highest injected counties in California, Colorado, New Mexico, Maine, and Massachusetts do not have the greatest reductions in COVID death rates.
Even within states like Maine where the south coast is more heavily injected than the rest of the state, there is no difference in the change in COVID death rate across counties. The same is true of the west coast of California.
In fact, the counties with the best overall changes in COVID death rate were simply the ones that were hardest hit prior to mass injection campaigns, like Gove (Kansas), Jerauld, Buffalo, and Gregory (South Dakota), Dickey (North Dakota) and Hancock (Georgia).
You can easily see the high COVID deaths pre-vax, the dark red belt running north to south through the middle of the country, the southeast states, and parts of Arizona, mirrored in the light red and green areas in the deaths post-vax.
Of course, this comes as no surprise since, as I have logically stated many times, depletion of the vulnerable population should naturally lead to lower COVID deaths in the future.
The premise that COVID was an indiscriminately deadly virus that could only be stopped by an experimental gene therapy is a big lie.
If you got injected, you didn’t protect yourself or anyone else. You just opened yourself up to a life of potential adverse events and a willingness to put your health decisions into the hands of people who don’t give a damn about you, just making a buck out of you.
Conversely, the premise that the experiment has yielded worse outcomes than if it had not been conducted is substantially more plausible.
Given that the expectation is for lower COVID deaths regardless of the injections, the fact that the majority of counties have higher COVID death rates indicates that the injections are exacerbating the situation before even considering the plethora of adverse events.
If you want a different perspective on this, consider this explanation from Rounding the Earth that any COVID vaccine efficacy is simply a function of demographics, specifically median household income and education level.
I am grateful to Mathew Crawford for kindly sharing the data compiled from various sources, including the New York Times and the CDC.
The “NHS” sent a letter for my 12 year old grandson to get injected with a COVID19 vaxx. I just finished a scathing complaint to the “nhs” advising the “nhs” the covid vaxx is unsafe and ineffective and the letter they sent out was full of misinformation. I also mentioned that both the “nhs” and the person administering these unsafe and ineffective vaccinations would be held accountable if a child suffers a severe adverse event or death. It took me a few minutes to find the correct place to submit my complaint, but I did it. Parents, grandparents the time is NOW. Protect your children/ grandchildren. Make it crystal clear to the “nhs” that what they are doing is extremely dangerous and putting young lives at risk. Let them know today.💕💕
Thank you. Excellent use of graphics to illustrate the data. I'm passing your post on the several people, including my doctor.